Version: 0.11.3-1
On Mon, 19 Feb 2018 at 09:53:14 +, Simon McVittie wrote:
> flatpak 0.11.0 has the upstream fix that you described, so this is
> certainly fixed in experimental.
Just to make sure, I built the version I'm about to upload against glibc
2.27 and it seems fine. I'll do the same
Control: tags -1 + confirmed moreinfo
On Sat, 17 Feb 2018 at 23:57:48 +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> flatpak 0.10.3-1 (and version 0.10.4-1 currently in sid) fails to build
> with glibc 2.27 (2.27-0experimental0 from experimental)
Did you test 0.10.4-1 unsuccessfully, or is that based on extrapol
Control: tags -1 + fixed-upstream
On Sat, 17 Feb 2018 at 23:57:48 +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> flatpak 0.10.3-1 (and version 0.10.4-1 currently in sid) fails to build
> with glibc 2.27 (2.27-0experimental0 from experimental)
...
> The issue has already been fixed upstream in commit 3e16d4ef with
Package: flatpak
Version: 0.10.3-1
Severity: important
Tags: upstream
User: debian-gl...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: 2.27
flatpak 0.10.3-1 (and version 0.10.4-1 currently in sid) fails to build
with glibc 2.27 (2.27-0experimental0 from experimental):
| libtool: compile: gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -D
4 matches
Mail list logo