Bug#894462: closed by Drew Parsons (reply to dpars...@debian.org) (Re: Bug#894462 paraview: edges are blotted [regression])

2024-07-10 Thread Francesco Poli
On Mon, 08 Jul 2024 09:24:05 + Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > There is no "Endpoint Search Iterations" option in the Render View > settings for paraview 5.12.1. > Perhaps the issue has already been considered upstream. As I have previously said, you can access the FXAA parameters by cli

Bug#894462: paraview: edges are blotted [regression]

2024-02-24 Thread Drew Parsons
On 2024-02-24 12:40, Francesco Poli wrote: On Thu, 04 Jan 2024 12:18:21 +0100 Drew Parsons Can you confirm paraview 5.11 is meeting your image quality expectations? Only if I disable FXAA (which, by the way, is enabled by default, but can luckily be disabled in the settings!). ... Could yo

Bug#894462: paraview: edges are blotted [regression]

2024-01-04 Thread Drew Parsons
Package: paraview Followup-For: Bug #894462 The png generated by the procedure in this bug looks fine to me, using current paraview (5.11). It's slightly blurry but no more than you'd expect for a png file (it's raster image format, not a vector image format, you can't expect to main high resolut

Bug#894462: paraview: edges are blotted [regression]

2018-04-04 Thread Anton Gladky
Hi Francesco, 2018-04-02 17:31 GMT+02:00 Francesco Poli : ... > I noticed that you removed yourself from the uploader list, but I was > hoping someone else from the Debian Science Team was going to step in > soon... Is this not the case? :-( ... Well, I hope also. >> I am not using it any more

Bug#894462: paraview: edges are blotted [regression]

2018-04-02 Thread Francesco Poli
On Sun, 1 Apr 2018 19:51:36 +0200 Anton Gladky wrote: > Hi Francesco, Hello Anton! :-) > > thanks for bugreport. You are welcome. Thanks for your prompt reply! > The problem with paraview now is that it does > not actually have any active maintainer [...] I noticed that you removed yoursel

Bug#894462: paraview: edges are blotted [regression]

2018-04-02 Thread Francesco Poli
Control: severity -1 important On Sun, 01 Apr 2018 20:39:56 +0200 Gert Wollny wrote: [...] > These two upstream bugs might also be related: > > https://gitlab.kitware.com/paraview/paraview/issues/17202 > https://gitlab.kitware.com/paraview/paraview/issues/16882 I think the latter (issue 16882

Bug#894462: paraview: edges are blotted [regression]

2018-04-01 Thread Anton Gladky
Hi Francesco, thanks for bugreport. The problem with paraview now is that it does not actually have any active maintainer [1]. I am not using it any more and the Gert (thanks to him!) is doing some technical uploads. If you really want it to be fixed (as well as export to AVI), feel free to join

Bug#894462: paraview: edges are blotted [regression]

2018-04-01 Thread Gert Wollny
Am Freitag, den 30.03.2018, 18:01 +0200 schrieb Francesco Poli (wintermute): > Package: paraview > Version: 5.4.1+dfsg4-2 > Severity: grave > Justification: renders package unusable > > Hello paraview Debian package maintainers, > thanks for uploading a Debian revision that uses Qt5 rather than Qt

Bug#894462: paraview: edges are blotted [regression]

2018-03-30 Thread Francesco Poli (wintermute)
Package: paraview Version: 5.4.1+dfsg4-2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Hello paraview Debian package maintainers, thanks for uploading a Debian revision that uses Qt5 rather than Qt4! I've just upgraded to it on my Debian testing box, but I found a bad regression that re