On 9/26/18 9:33 AM, Antonio Russo wrote:
> My merge request [1] handles this issue by directly including the
> changes [2] which added support for this upstream.
>
> It does so by using upstream's dkms framework, rather than our
> now-outdated version.
>
> [1]
My merge request [1] handles this issue by directly including the
changes [2] which added support for this upstream.
It does so by using upstream's dkms framework, rather than our
now-outdated version.
[1] https://salsa.debian.org/zfsonlinux-team/zfs/merge_requests/9
[2]
On 05/29/2018 04:14 PM, Antonio Russo wrote:
> Control: severity -1 wishlist
>
> I think everyone can agree this is at most a wishlist bug.
>
> I also agree that making Debian packaging easier for others in the greater
> Debian ecosystem would be nice.
>
> However, your point of contact for a
Also, I already pushed a fix to git master that should make this work. Have you
not tried a clean build with that patch?
Control: severity -1 wishlist
I think everyone can agree this is at most a wishlist bug.
I also agree that making Debian packaging easier for others in the greater
Debian ecosystem would be nice.
However, your point of contact for a build issue on another distribution should
be that
lsb_release -is = Devuan
Also installed the sysvinit patch:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=826994
I deployed a Stretch test system from an upgrade from Jessie along with the
sysvinit patch. To my surprise, zfs-dkms compiled fine.
So it seams that on the entire server with
What is the output of
# lsb_release -is
?
7 matches
Mail list logo
