Bug#905068: ITP: golang-github-canonicalltd-dqlite -- Distributed SQLite for Go applications

2018-09-14 Thread Clément Hermann
Hey, thanks for the quick response! On 9/14/18 2:24 PM, Free Ekanayaka wrote: > Hey there, > > I do have the intention to submit the patches upstream, but since 1) the > work is not fully complete 2) SQLite authors are *extremely* > conservative when it comes to contributions, that won't happen

Bug#905068: ITP: golang-github-canonicalltd-dqlite -- Distributed SQLite for Go applications

2018-09-14 Thread Free Ekanayaka
Hey there, I do have the intention to submit the patches upstream, but since 1) the work is not fully complete 2) SQLite authors are *extremely* conservative when it comes to contributions, that won't happen any time soon. Is there anything that prevents you from going with second option? You can

Bug#905068: ITP: golang-github-canonicalltd-dqlite -- Distributed SQLite for Go applications

2018-09-14 Thread Clément Hermann
Hi! On Tue, 31 Jul 2018 14:00:12 -0400 =?UTF-8?Q?St=C3=A9phane_Graber?= wrote: > On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 10:10 AM Free Ekanayaka wrote: > > > > Hey, > > > > I would think that Stéphane will want to backport these changes to the > > 3.0.x series, as they improve performance considereably. It wo

Bug#905068: ITP: golang-github-canonicalltd-dqlite -- Distributed SQLite for Go applications

2018-07-31 Thread Stéphane Graber
On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 10:10 AM Free Ekanayaka wrote: > > Hey, > > I would think that Stéphane will want to backport these changes to the > 3.0.x series, as they improve performance considereably. It wouldn't be > a big change for the LXD code itself, since this is mostly "backend" > code. Yes,

Bug#905068: ITP: golang-github-canonicalltd-dqlite -- Distributed SQLite for Go applications

2018-07-31 Thread Free Ekanayaka
Hey, I would think that Stéphane will want to backport these changes to the 3.0.x series, as they improve performance considereably. It wouldn't be a big change for the LXD code itself, since this is mostly "backend" code. I'll Stéphane say the last workd tho. Thanks for the initiative, looking

Bug#905068: ITP: golang-github-canonicalltd-dqlite -- Distributed SQLite for Go applications

2018-07-31 Thread Clément Hermann
Hi, On 31/07/2018 17:28, Free Ekanayaka wrote: > Hello Clement, > > dqlite upstream and LXD team member here. > > Please note that dqlite is going through a bit of change, which I > started to merge yesterday. So a few of the ITPs you have filed will no > longer make sense. Thanks a lot for the

Bug#905068: ITP: golang-github-canonicalltd-dqlite -- Distributed SQLite for Go applications

2018-07-31 Thread Free Ekanayaka
Hello Clement, dqlite upstream and LXD team member here. Please note that dqlite is going through a bit of change, which I started to merge yesterday. So a few of the ITPs you have filed will no longer make sense. In a nutshell: 1) https://github.com/CanonicalLtd/dqlite is now a C project 2) ht

Bug#905068: ITP: golang-github-canonicalltd-dqlite -- Distributed SQLite for Go applications

2018-07-30 Thread Clement Hermann
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Clement Hermann * Package name: golang-github-canonicalltd-dqlite Version : 0.0~git20180507.e5bc052-1 Upstream Author : Canonical Ltd * URL : https://github.com/CanonicalLtd/dqlite * License : Apache-2.0 Programming Lan