Hi Daniel,
Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Axel Beckert wrote on Mon, 17 Sep 2018 23:17 +0200:
> > Daniel: If you have the patch already in git for your test build, feel
> > free to push it to the debian branch on Salsa.
>
> Actually I just did 'apt-get source zsh/sid' earlier, but I ported that
> to git
Axel Beckert wrote on Mon, 17 Sep 2018 23:17 +0200:
> Daniel: If you have the patch already in git for your test build, feel
> free to push it to the debian branch on Salsa.
Actually I just did 'apt-get source zsh/sid' earlier, but I ported that
to git and pushed. The commit2quilt script
Control: tags -1 fixed-upstream
TS wrote on Mon, 17 Sep 2018 21:54 +0200:
> Just to be sure i again tried stock debian zsh 5.6.2 which still fails for me.
> The version you uploaded fixes it for me.
Thanks for testing both versions!
Daniel
Daniel Shahaf schrieb/wrote:
-- --
> For the time being I did a quick build with that commit backported and
> uploaded it to https://home.apache.org/~danielsh/zsh/debian/ .
Hello,
Just to be sure i again tried stock debian zsh 5.6.2 which still fails for me.
The version you uploaded fixes it
Axel Beckert wrote on Mon, 17 Sep 2018 20:25 +0200:
> $ dpkg-buildpackage -b
>
Thilo may need to pass --no-sign here.
> Then install those resulting packages you already have installed as
> root. If you want to install all build packages, you can do that with
> "dpkg -i …/zsh*_5.6.2-2_*.deb" or
Hello,
Daniel Shahaf schrieb/wrote:
> Upstream has committed 551ff842721d6ca83727dbe6cd40178f46cc8201 (43464:
> Another attachtty() fix). I haven't been able to reproduce the issue so
> I can't confirm that commit fixes it.
Thank your for your support. Really i mean this.
But
There are FAQs
Upstream has committed 551ff842721d6ca83727dbe6cd40178f46cc8201 (43464:
Another attachtty() fix). I haven't been able to reproduce the issue so
I can't confirm that commit fixes it.
-- --
> Could you please send a bug report upstream (zsh-work...@zsh.org)?
> Ideally, the bug report would include a reproduction script that sets up
> a new temporary directory, creates a minimal zshrc in it, and runs
> 'ZDOTDIR=/path/to/dir zsh -d' and provokes the bug.
>
> Thanks!
>
>
-- --
> I can't reproduce the bug with a zshrc that contains nothing but an
> (unconditional) zmodload zsh/zprof. I'm using a self-compiled
> static build from upstream git, not a package build.
>
> Could you please send a bug report upstream (zsh-work...@zsh.org)?
> Ideally, the bug report
TS wrote on Sat, 15 Sep 2018 11:39 +0200:
> > up to 5.5.1-1 seem fine, problem starts with 5.6
>
> for the record what zprofile does...
>
> zprofile() {
> ZSH_PROFILE_RC=1 zsh "$@"
> }
>
> ...is it activates this code snipped in my .zshrc:
>
> #
> # zprofile
> #
> (( ${+ZSH_PROFILE_RC}
-- --
> up to 5.5.1-1 seem fine, problem starts with 5.6
for the record what zprofile does...
zprofile() {
ZSH_PROFILE_RC=1 zsh "$@"
}
...is it activates this code snipped in my .zshrc:
#
# zprofile
#
(( ${+ZSH_PROFILE_RC} )) && builtin zmodload zsh/zprof
in case you want test
-- --
> After downgrading Zsh to 5.4.2-3...
-- --
Tested with 5.5.1-1
% asi zsh
izsh | 5.5.1-1 | 5.6.2-1
izsh-common | 5.5.1-1 | 5.6.2-1
izsh-doc | 5.5.1-1 | 5.6.2-1
>
>
> ...i am not able to reproduce the "[7] + 10408 suspended (tty output)" thing.
TS schrieb/wrote:
> Hello Axel,
>
> thanks for uploading 5.6.2, but no luck.
>
> I still get reliable:
>
> % zprofile
> [7] + 10408 suspended (tty output)
>
> % pZSH_VERSION
> scalar-readonly ZSH_VERSION='5.6.2'
After downgrading Zsh to 5.4.2-3...
% asi zsh
izsh | 5.4.2-3 |
Hello Axel,
thanks for uploading 5.6.2, but no luck.
I still get reliable:
% zprofile
[7] + 10408 suspended (tty output)
% pZSH_VERSION
scalar-readonly ZSH_VERSION='5.6.2'
Debian Bug Tracking System schrieb/wrote:
> This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report
> which was
14 matches
Mail list logo
