Re: https://bugs.debian.org/913723:
i've always thought that sections were effectively impossible to have a
clear "correct" answer for some packages. hyphenation and spellcheck
dictionaries are quite clearly packages for localization (they are
meaningful in the context of, and necessary for,
Hi Guillem,
Quoting Guillem Jover (2018-12-22 18:58:04)
> On Sun, 2018-12-02 at 15:48:53 +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > Quoting Guillem Jover (2018-12-02 15:17:02)
> > > On Sun, 2018-11-18 at 05:44:42 -0500, Chris Lamb wrote:
> > > > Could you propose a patch that would fix this to your
> >
Hi!
On Sun, 2018-12-02 at 15:48:53 +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> Quoting Guillem Jover (2018-12-02 15:17:02)
> > On Sun, 2018-11-18 at 05:44:42 -0500, Chris Lamb wrote:
> > > Could you propose a patch that would fix this to your satisfaction?
> > > I'm having a little difficulty sorting this
Quoting Chris Lamb (2018-12-03 09:01:56)
> > But your notion (in an earlier post) that this is not for mere
> > mortals but (yet another) ftpmaster matter, defused my enthusiasm
> > completely.
> >
> > :-(
>
> Aw, that seems a little premature to go that far at this stage.
>
> I read
Dear Jonas,
> But your notion (in an earlier post) that this is not for mere mortals
> but (yet another) ftpmaster matter, defused my enthusiasm completely.
>
> :-(
Aw, that seems a little premature to go that far at this stage.
I read Guillem's reference to the ftp-masters as merely a "well,
Quoting Guillem Jover (2018-12-02 15:17:02)
> On Sun, 2018-11-18 at 05:44:42 -0500, Chris Lamb wrote:
> > Could you propose a patch that would fix this to your satisfaction?
> > I'm having a little difficulty sorting this out in my head now
> > after applying, reverting, etc. etc. :)
>
> If you
On Sun, 2018-11-18 at 05:44:42 -0500, Chris Lamb wrote:
> > > Oh dear, we appear to have generated a lot of philosophical
> > > conversation here for what was almost-certainly just a slight typo
> > > or misstep on the behalf of the aforementioned bug submitter.
> >
> > See my other reply. This
tags 913723 - pending
thanks
Dear Guillem,
> > Oh dear, we appear to have generated a lot of philosophical
> > conversation here for what was almost-certainly just a slight typo
> > or misstep on the behalf of the aforementioned bug submitter.
>
> See my other reply. This was certainly neither
On Fri, 2018-11-16 at 04:18:02 -0500, Chris Lamb wrote:
> > #874121 contains the patch that implemented this lintian tag,
> > but unfortunately it contains no justification for it.
>
> Oh dear, we appear to have generated a lot of philosophical
> conversation here for what was almost-certainly
tags 913723 + pending
thanks
> #874121 contains the patch that implemented this lintian tag,
> but unfortunately it contains no justification for it.
Oh dear, we appear to have generated a lot of philosophical
conversation here for what was almost-certainly just a slight typo
or misstep on the
[ Sorry for the dupe! Resending to the correct bug number, the debbugs
mboxes do not track cloned bugs. :/ ]
Hi!
On Wed, 2018-11-14 at 11:12:04 +0100, Sébastien Villemot wrote:
> Le mardi 13 novembre 2018 à 17:33 +0100, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit :
> > Quoting Sébastien Villemot (2018-11-13
11 matches
Mail list logo
