Hi all,
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh dixit:
>On Thu, Oct 1, 2020, at 21:05, Michael Stone wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 01, 2020 at 11:20:44PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
>> >Michael Stone dixit:
>> >
>> >> you can fix it right now!
>> >
>> >So, what do you mean? Take over the rng-tools package?
>So,
Hi,
>Yes, I have made it clear in the past that I am happy with any
>transition plan at all, so I was not under the impression that I had to
>write anything...
ah okay, and I missed *that*. Great that we talked about it,
thanks Michael for pointing us out.
>So, feel free to even become the new
Hello...
On Thu, Oct 1, 2020, at 21:05, Michael Stone wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 01, 2020 at 11:20:44PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> >Michael Stone dixit:
> >
> >> you can fix it right now!
> >
> >So, what do you mean? Take over the rng-tools package?
> >
> >If so, it has a maintainer, you know. hmh
retitle 919893 rng-tools-debian: please take over rng-tools with a proper
transition
thanks
Michael Stone dixit:
> On Thu, Oct 01, 2020 at 11:20:44PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
>> Michael Stone dixit:
>>
>>> you can fix it right now!
>>
>> So, what do you mean? Take over the rng-tools
On Thu, Oct 01, 2020 at 11:20:44PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
Michael Stone dixit:
you can fix it right now!
So, what do you mean? Take over the rng-tools package?
If so, it has a maintainer, you know. hmh has been quiet so far.
he's been clear that he's happy for someone to take it
Michael Stone dixit:
> you can fix it right now!
So, what do you mean? Take over the rng-tools package?
If so, it has a maintainer, you know. hmh has been quiet so far.
> you keep talking about launchpad, but this is a conversation in debian
> channels
> about a debian package. what ubuntu
On Thu, Oct 01, 2020 at 09:32:47PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
Michael Stone dixit:
So your position is that rng-tools 2-unofficial-mt.14-1+b2 and rng-tools-debian
2-unofficial-mt.14-3 both in buster are completely different codebases?
No, no, no, of course not. I’m talking about sid (and
Michael Stone dixit:
> So your position is that rng-tools 2-unofficial-mt.14-1+b2 and
> rng-tools-debian
> 2-unofficial-mt.14-3 both in buster are completely different codebases?
No, no, no, of course not. I’m talking about sid (and therefore testing).
Even before the release of buster,
On Thu, Oct 01, 2020 at 05:28:12PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
Michael Stone dixit:
So you could have added whatever you needed to rng-tools and skipped the
unnecessary package...
No, rng-tools is a completely different software.
So your position is that rng-tools 2-unofficial-mt.14-1+b2
Michael Stone dixit:
> No, there were also user confusion, duplication of functionality, and
> increased difficulty in future migration.
So, the name, and that we have two packages.
Oh well, it has happened now.
> So you could have added whatever you needed to rng-tools and skipped the
>
On Thu, Oct 01, 2020 at 04:51:54PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
Michael Stone dixit:
So the package that shouldn't have existed made it into buster, there's a
ridiculous situation with 3 packages providing essentially the same
functionality with minor differences and no practical way for a
Michael Stone dixit:
> So the package that shouldn't have existed made it into buster, there's a
> ridiculous situation with 3 packages providing essentially the same
> functionality with minor differences and no practical way for a user to figure
> out which to install, and no movement on fixing
12 matches
Mail list logo
