On 30/01/2019 17:51, Guido Günther wrote:
> Hi,
> On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 05:23:04PM +0100, Andrej Shadura wrote:
>> On Wed, 30 Jan 2019 14:20:29 +0100 Guido Günther wrote:
>>> tags 920898 + wontfix
>>> thanks
>>
>> Any explanation why?
>
> As I wrote initially: We have a filer for that.
Well,
Hi,
On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 05:23:04PM +0100, Andrej Shadura wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Jan 2019 14:20:29 +0100 Guido Günther wrote:
> > tags 920898 + wontfix
> > thanks
>
> Any explanation why?
As I wrote initially: We have a filer for that.
-- Guido
On Wed, 30 Jan 2019 14:20:29 +0100 Guido Günther wrote:
> tags 920898 + wontfix
> thanks
Any explanation why?
--
Cheers,
Andrej
On 30/01/2019 14:04, Andrej Shadura wrote:
> On 30/01/2019 13:54, Guido Günther wrote:
>>> I have noticed gbp-dch started putting Signed-off-by fields into the
>>> generated changelog. I don’t remember it doing so some time ago.
>>> This happens at least from 0.9.10 onwards.
>>
>> It always did
Control: reopen -1
On 30/01/2019 13:54, Guido Günther wrote:
>> I have noticed gbp-dch started putting Signed-off-by fields into the
>> generated changelog. I don’t remember it doing so some time ago.
>> This happens at least from 0.9.10 onwards.
>
> It always did that if you don't set s.th.
Package: git-buildpackage
Version: 0.9.13
Severity: normal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Dear Maintainer,
I have noticed gbp-dch started putting Signed-off-by fields into the
generated changelog. I don’t remember it doing so some time ago.
This happens at least from 0.9.10
6 matches
Mail list logo