On Sun, 28 Jul 2019 12:23:22 + hty81z+5ruj6wk24x...@guerrillamail.com wrote:
> https://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2004/05/msg00595.html
A URL without any comment is a bit laconic.
What do you mean?
That I should add an OpenSSL linking exception to the GPLv2-or-later
license of apt-listbug
https://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2004/05/msg00595.html
Sent using Guerrillamail.com
Block or report abuse:
https://www.guerrillamail.com//abuse/?a=GBInV1hSY7YAjx369HsdexXJA8WC1Q%3D%3D
https://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2004/05/msg00595.html
Sent using Guerrillamail.com
Block or report abuse:
https://www.guerrillamail.com//abuse/?a=GBInV1hSY7YAjx369HsdexXJA8WC1Q%3D%3D
Control: notfound -1 1:2.5.1
Control: forcemerge 792639 -1
On Sun, 28 Jul 2019 07:21:29 +
htxo8e+1eqk0555yr...@guerrillamail.com wrote:
> Package: apt-listbugs
> Version: 1:2.5.1
This is not a version of apt-listbugs: I am dropping it from the
"found" list...
> Severity: important
>
> apt
Package: apt-listbugs
Version: 1:2.5.1
Severity: important
apt-listbugs uses insecure http port 80 by default. It can easily be moved to
https via port 443, although additional hardening against tampering should be
verified later to prevent mitm attacks.
lib/aptlistbugs/logic.rb appears to vali
5 matches
Mail list logo
