Hi,
On Mo 10 Mai 2021 01:03:47 CEST, Russell Stuart wrote:
On 9/5/21 6:08 am, Mike Gabriel wrote:
Furthermore, I agree with Nik, that AGPL for a non-web project (as
that's where AGPL really makes sense) is disputable and you don't
loose anything if you switch over to GPL-3+ instead of AGPL
On 9/5/21 6:08 am, Mike Gabriel wrote:
That is not the point. E.g., if we spot a security issue with a
package, maybe you as the maintainer / upstream developer (afaik, you
are upstream and downstream for pam-python, Russel, right?) but also
maybe someone in the security team (or any other third
Hi Russel,
On Do 06 Mai 2021 12:21:28 CEST, Russell Stuart wrote:
On 6/5/21 12:55 am, Dominik George wrote:
@Mike, @Petter: Did you realise that pam-python is AGPL? It means
that we cannot provide terminal servers or netbooting in Debian Edu
without placing a prominent link to pam-python's
Hi Nik, hi all,
On Mi 05 Mai 2021 16:55:06 CEST, Dominik George wrote:
@Mike, @Petter: Did you realise that pam-python is AGPL? It means that
we cannot provide terminal servers or netbooting in Debian Edu without
placing a prominent link to pam-python's sources on the desktop…
I think that t
On 6/5/21 12:55 am, Dominik George wrote:
@Mike, @Petter: Did you realise that pam-python is AGPL? It means
that we cannot provide terminal servers or netbooting in Debian Edu
without placing a prominent link to pam-python's sources on the
desktop…
Err, no. The requirement is [0]:
Notwith
[ Holger Levsen, 2021-05-05 ]
> The pam-python website (http://pam-python.sourceforge.net/) also
> grants an additional permission "The copyright holders grant you an
> additional permission under Section 7 of the GNU Affero General Public
> License, version 3, exempting you from the requirement
On Wed, May 05, 2021 at 04:55:06PM +0200, Dominik George wrote:
> @Mike, @Petter: Did you realise that pam-python is AGPL? It means that
> we cannot provide terminal servers or netbooting in Debian Edu without
> placing a prominent link to pam-python's sources on the desktop…
The pam-python websi
[Dominik George]
> @Mike, @Petter: Did you realise that pam-python is AGPL?
According to https://bugs.debian.org/578650 > it was Eclipse
Public License v1.0 when it was initially registered. I was not aware
of any relicencing, but see the d/copyright file now say AGPL. No idea
when the change ha
Hi,
> I wonder what the state of this issue is.
>
> I looked at the code and somehow it has a few hints on (at least
> partial?) Python 3 compatibility.
>
> Russell, can you give me a short update on how far this got? Can we
> somehow get to the goal of making this fully work with Python 3? Mayb
Hi,
I wonder what the state of this issue is.
I looked at the code and somehow it has a few hints on (at least
partial?) Python 3 compatibility.
Russell, can you give me a short update on how far this got? Can we
somehow get to the goal of making this fully work with Python 3? Maybe
even for bul
10 matches
Mail list logo