On 4/12/20 2:23 PM, Laurent Bigonville wrote:
> Le 12/04/20 à 12:40, Sebastiaan Couwenberg a écrit :
>> I'll consider dropping the java package entirely when the package is
>> updated for GDAL 3.1.0.
>
> An idea when this will be released?
May probably:
https://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/gdal-de
Le 12/04/20 à 12:40, Sebastiaan Couwenberg a écrit :
On 4/12/20 10:52 AM, Laurent Bigonville wrote:
On Fri, 3 Jan 2020 11:03:56 +0100 Samuel Thibault
wrote:
Sebastiaan Couwenberg, le ven. 03 janv. 2020 07:34:42 +0100, a ecrit:
opencv is not on your list however.
Ah, indeed. I wonder why, tha
On 4/12/20 10:52 AM, Laurent Bigonville wrote:
> On Fri, 3 Jan 2020 11:03:56 +0100 Samuel Thibault
> wrote:
>> Sebastiaan Couwenberg, le ven. 03 janv. 2020 07:34:42 +0100, a ecrit:
>> > opencv is not on your list however.
>>
>> Ah, indeed. I wonder why, that was indeed in the list in my memory. An
On Fri, 3 Jan 2020 11:03:56 +0100 Samuel Thibault
wrote:
> Sebastiaan Couwenberg, le ven. 03 janv. 2020 07:34:42 +0100, a ecrit:
> > opencv is not on your list however.
>
> Ah, indeed. I wonder why, that was indeed in the list in my memory. And
> yes, that adds a lot of packages.
What are we do
Sebastiaan Couwenberg, le ven. 03 janv. 2020 07:34:42 +0100, a ecrit:
> opencv is not on your list however.
Ah, indeed. I wonder why, that was indeed in the list in my memory. And
yes, that adds a lot of packages.
Samuel
On 1/2/20 9:07 PM, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Sebastiaan Couwenberg, le jeu. 02 janv. 2020 20:51:43 +0100, a ecrit:
>> Is there a particular reason you want to build gdal on hppa, hurd &
>> kfreebsd? Is it blocking any important packages?
>
> It is directly blocking various packages (see attached li
Hello,
Sebastiaan Couwenberg, le jeu. 02 janv. 2020 20:51:43 +0100, a ecrit:
> as long as the Architecture field doesn't
> support excludes like Build-Depends I'm not willing to apply it.
I agree that the arch list maintenance burden is problematic. Does
anybody know if some effort has been start
Control: tags -1 wontfix moreinfo
Hi Samuel,
Thanks for the patch, but as long as the Architecture field doesn't
support excludes like Build-Depends I'm not willing to apply it.
Experience with mapnik has shown that maintaining the list of
architectures manually is a PITA.
I'd rather not have gd
Source: gdal
Version: 2.4.3+dfsg-1
Severity: important
Tags: patch
User: debian-h...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: hurd
Hello,
gdal currently doesn't build on ports without java support. The attached
patch fix that: they disable the defaul-jdk-headless and ant build-deps
on non-java ports, they enab
9 matches
Mail list logo