Bug#947960: gdal: Doesn't build on ports without java

2020-04-12 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
On 4/12/20 2:23 PM, Laurent Bigonville wrote: > Le 12/04/20 à 12:40, Sebastiaan Couwenberg a écrit : >> I'll consider dropping the java package entirely when the package is >> updated for GDAL 3.1.0. > > An idea when this will be released? May probably: https://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/gdal-de

Bug#947960: gdal: Doesn't build on ports without java

2020-04-12 Thread Laurent Bigonville
Le 12/04/20 à 12:40, Sebastiaan Couwenberg a écrit : On 4/12/20 10:52 AM, Laurent Bigonville wrote: On Fri, 3 Jan 2020 11:03:56 +0100 Samuel Thibault wrote: Sebastiaan Couwenberg, le ven. 03 janv. 2020 07:34:42 +0100, a ecrit: opencv is not on your list however. Ah, indeed. I wonder why, tha

Bug#947960: gdal: Doesn't build on ports without java

2020-04-12 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
On 4/12/20 10:52 AM, Laurent Bigonville wrote: > On Fri, 3 Jan 2020 11:03:56 +0100 Samuel Thibault > wrote: >> Sebastiaan Couwenberg, le ven. 03 janv. 2020 07:34:42 +0100, a ecrit: >> > opencv is not on your list however. >> >> Ah, indeed. I wonder why, that was indeed in the list in my memory. An

Bug#947960: gdal: Doesn't build on ports without java

2020-04-12 Thread Laurent Bigonville
On Fri, 3 Jan 2020 11:03:56 +0100 Samuel Thibault wrote: > Sebastiaan Couwenberg, le ven. 03 janv. 2020 07:34:42 +0100, a ecrit: > > opencv is not on your list however. > > Ah, indeed. I wonder why, that was indeed in the list in my memory. And > yes, that adds a lot of packages. What are we do

Bug#947960: gdal: Doesn't build on ports without java

2020-01-03 Thread Samuel Thibault
Sebastiaan Couwenberg, le ven. 03 janv. 2020 07:34:42 +0100, a ecrit: > opencv is not on your list however. Ah, indeed. I wonder why, that was indeed in the list in my memory. And yes, that adds a lot of packages. Samuel

Bug#947960: gdal: Doesn't build on ports without java

2020-01-02 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
On 1/2/20 9:07 PM, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Sebastiaan Couwenberg, le jeu. 02 janv. 2020 20:51:43 +0100, a ecrit: >> Is there a particular reason you want to build gdal on hppa, hurd & >> kfreebsd? Is it blocking any important packages? > > It is directly blocking various packages (see attached li

Bug#947960: gdal: Doesn't build on ports without java

2020-01-02 Thread Samuel Thibault
Hello, Sebastiaan Couwenberg, le jeu. 02 janv. 2020 20:51:43 +0100, a ecrit: > as long as the Architecture field doesn't > support excludes like Build-Depends I'm not willing to apply it. I agree that the arch list maintenance burden is problematic. Does anybody know if some effort has been start

Bug#947960: gdal: Doesn't build on ports without java

2020-01-02 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
Control: tags -1 wontfix moreinfo Hi Samuel, Thanks for the patch, but as long as the Architecture field doesn't support excludes like Build-Depends I'm not willing to apply it. Experience with mapnik has shown that maintaining the list of architectures manually is a PITA. I'd rather not have gd

Bug#947960: gdal: Doesn't build on ports without java

2020-01-02 Thread Samuel Thibault
Source: gdal Version: 2.4.3+dfsg-1 Severity: important Tags: patch User: debian-h...@lists.debian.org Usertags: hurd Hello, gdal currently doesn't build on ports without java support. The attached patch fix that: they disable the defaul-jdk-headless and ant build-deps on non-java ports, they enab