On Sun, 13 Sep 2020 15:27:24 +0200 Tobias Frost wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 13, 2020 at 02:50:43PM +0200, Tobias Frost wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 13, 2020 at 01:23:41PM +0200, Alec Leamas wrote:
> More stuff. Lintian this time.
>
> - Lintian overrides
> Lintian overrides should only be used if Lintian is
On Sun, Sep 13, 2020 at 11:19:33PM +0200, Alec Leamas wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, 13 Sep 2020 15:27:24 +0200 Tobias Frost wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 13, 2020 at 02:50:43PM +0200, Tobias Frost wrote:
> > > On Sun, Sep 13, 2020 at 01:23:41PM +0200, Alec Leamas wrote:
> >
> > > So far for now…
> >
> >
Hi,
On Sun, 13 Sep 2020 15:27:24 +0200 Tobias Frost wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 13, 2020 at 02:50:43PM +0200, Tobias Frost wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 13, 2020 at 01:23:41PM +0200, Alec Leamas wrote:
>
> > So far for now…
>
> More stuff. Lintian this time.
>
> - Lintian overrides
> Lintian overrides
Hi,
On Sun, 13 Sep 2020 15:27:24 +0200 Tobias Frost wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 13, 2020 at 02:50:43PM +0200, Tobias Frost wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 13, 2020 at 01:23:41PM +0200, Alec Leamas wrote:
>
> Ah, regarding my remark for NSIS.template.in:
> After thinking about it: This is probably an upstream
On 13/09/2020 14:50, Tobias Frost wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 13, 2020 at 01:23:41PM +0200, Alec Leamas wrote:
>
> (snipping stuff that is done or settled … Its getting a long mail)
>
> (regarding the transitinal package and Replace/Breaks versioning)
>> OK, will do (unless not done in a MR)>
> MR
On Sun, Sep 13, 2020 at 02:50:43PM +0200, Tobias Frost wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 13, 2020 at 01:23:41PM +0200, Alec Leamas wrote:
>
> (snipping stuff that is done or settled … Its getting a long mail)
>
> (regarding the transitinal package and Replace/Breaks versioning)
> > OK, will do (unless not
On Sun, Sep 13, 2020 at 01:23:41PM +0200, Alec Leamas wrote:
(snipping stuff that is done or settled … Its getting a long mail)
(regarding the transitinal package and Replace/Breaks versioning)
> OK, will do (unless not done in a MR)
MR sent.
On Sun, Sep 13, 2020 at 11:00:17AM +0200, Alec Leamas wrote:
>
> Hi Tobias,
>
> Here we go:
>
> On 12/09/2020 16:28, Tobias Frost wrote:
> > Control: owner -1 !
> >
>
> > Two remarks:
> > - d/changelog You could bumpt the timestamp on the changelog from time to
> > time, though
> > ;-): dch
Hi Tobias,
Here we go:
On 12/09/2020 16:28, Tobias Frost wrote:
> Control: owner -1 !
>
> Two remarks:
> - d/changelog You could bumpt the timestamp on the changelog from time to
> time, though
> ;-): dch -r "" is a nice trick ;-)
Indeed, thanks! Tried now, will need to to it again.
> -
Control: owner -1 !
Ok, finally found time \o/, but did not have enough to complete the review :-(
(The review is based on the package from mentors uploaded 2020-09-10 19:38.)
Not yetreviewed:
dep3-headers on patches, d/changelog and d/copyright as Alec is actively
working on those (as per
On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 12:12:29PM +0200, Alec Leamas wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Sep 2020 05:12:34 -0400 The Wanderer
> wrote:
> > On 2020-09-10 at 01:45, Tobias Frost wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, Sep 09, 2020 at 10:53:37PM +0200, Alec Leamas wrote:
> > >
>
> > > Well, actually, all those lines probably
On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 05:12:34AM -0400, The Wanderer wrote:
> > https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-source.html#debian-changelog-debian-changelog
> > for some better/more accurate wording in the Policy)
>
> I'm not sure I read that section as meaning that. Could you point more
>
On Thu, 10 Sep 2020 05:12:34 -0400 The Wanderer
wrote:
> On 2020-09-10 at 01:45, Tobias Frost wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Sep 09, 2020 at 10:53:37PM +0200, Alec Leamas wrote:
> >
> > Well, actually, all those lines probably should be removed:
> > debian/changelog is intended to record changes to the
On 2020-09-10 at 01:45, Tobias Frost wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 09, 2020 at 10:53:37PM +0200, Alec Leamas wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> A new version is uploaded to mentors. Time to reset the history. Changes
>> since last round:
>>
>> - New warning dialog for downloading binary plugin content (patch).
>>
Hi Tobias,
On Thu, 10 Sep 2020 08:06:10 +0200 Tobias Frost wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 09, 2020 at 11:08:53PM +0200, Alec Leamas wrote:
> > On Wed, 9 Sep 2020 22:53:37 +0200 Alec Leamas wrote:
> > Dammit. There's still one copyright for src/gshhs.cpp to fix. I'm on it,
> > but holding next upload
On Thu, 10 Sep 2020 07:46:32 +0200 Tobias Frost wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 09, 2020 at 11:08:53PM +0200, Alec Leamas wrote:
> > On Wed, 9 Sep 2020 22:53:37 +0200 Alec Leamas wrote:
> just go ahead and update the package on mentors.
Done.
--alec
On Wed, Sep 09, 2020 at 11:08:53PM +0200, Alec Leamas wrote:
> On Wed, 9 Sep 2020 22:53:37 +0200 Alec Leamas wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > A new version is uploaded to mentors. Time to reset the history. Changes
> > since last round:
>
> ...
>
> Dammit. There's still one copyright for src/gshhs.cpp
On Wed, Sep 09, 2020 at 11:08:53PM +0200, Alec Leamas wrote:
> On Wed, 9 Sep 2020 22:53:37 +0200 Alec Leamas wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > A new version is uploaded to mentors. Time to reset the history. Changes
> > since last round:
>
> ...
>
> Dammit. There's still one copyright for src/gshhs.cpp
On Wed, Sep 09, 2020 at 10:53:37PM +0200, Alec Leamas wrote:
> Hi,
>
> A new version is uploaded to mentors. Time to reset the history. Changes
> since last round:
>
> - New warning dialog for downloading binary plugin content (patch).
> - Spelling error fixed
> - Removed references to
On Wed, 9 Sep 2020 18:44:17 +0200 Tobias Frost wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 09, 2020 at 07:39:38AM +0200, Alec Leamas wrote:
>
> > Now, this should not really change anything. OpenCPN is perfectly usable
> > without any plugins, and builds fine on all Debian core platforms (sic!)
>
> Sounds good ;-)
>
On Wed, 9 Sep 2020 22:53:37 +0200 Alec Leamas wrote:
> Hi,
>
> A new version is uploaded to mentors. Time to reset the history. Changes
> since last round:
...
Dammit. There's still one copyright for src/gshhs.cpp to fix. I'm on it,
but holding next upload until I hear from you.
"Annoyed"
Hi,
A new version is uploaded to mentors. Time to reset the history. Changes
since last round:
- New warning dialog for downloading binary plugin content (patch).
- Spelling error fixed
- Removed references to upstream bugs. I think it's a pity, the
references linked patches in
On Wed, Sep 09, 2020 at 07:39:38AM +0200, Alec Leamas wrote:
> Now, this should not really change anything. OpenCPN is perfectly usable
> without any plugins, and builds fine on all Debian core platforms (sic!)
Sounds good ;-)
(And it can happen that someone is showing up later and packaging
On Tue, 8 Sep 2020 21:01:47 +0200 Tobias Frost wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 08, 2020 at 08:10:48PM +0200, Alec Leamas wrote:
>> On Tue, 8 Sep 2020 19:05:21 +0200 Tobias Frost wrote:
>> All this said: do you think it's motivated to make such a patch?
>
> I guess. (Again being Debianite ;-))
OK, will
On Tue, Sep 08, 2020 at 08:10:48PM +0200, Alec Leamas wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Sep 2020 19:05:21 +0200 Tobias Frost wrote:
>
> > > Not really. Do you think a patch is motivated? If so, for each and every
> > > plugin, or just for the first one?
> >
> > I'm not sure how plugins are installed. If there
On Tue, 8 Sep 2020 19:05:21 +0200 Tobias Frost wrote:
> > Not really. Do you think a patch is motivated? If so, for each and every
> > plugin, or just for the first one?
>
> I'm not sure how plugins are installed. If there is an UI, the warning
> could be presented in that gui.
The basic
On Tue, Sep 08, 2020 at 05:54:42PM +0200, Alec Leamas wrote:
> Hi Tobias,
>
> Thanks for taking some time for this!
>
> On 08/09/2020 16:29, Tobias Frost wrote:
>
> > a short review:
> >
> > * New upstream release including plugin downloader. Closes: 948702
> >
> > It is a privacy violation
Hi Tobias,
Thanks for taking some time for this!
On 08/09/2020 16:29, Tobias Frost wrote:
> a short review:
>
> * New upstream release including plugin downloader. Closes: 948702
>
> It is a privacy violation to download stuff. Do you inform your user about it?
Not really. Do you think a
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi Alec,
a short review:
* New upstream release including plugin downloader. Closes: 948702
It is a privacy violation to download stuff. Do you inform your user about it?
Are the downloads somehow validated that it won't execute malicious / (MITM)
modified code? (It
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: important
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "opencpn"
* Package name: opencpn
Version : 5.2.0+dfsg-1
Upstream Author : Dave S. Register
* URL : https://opencpn.org
* License : GPL-2+
* Vcs
30 matches
Mail list logo
