Bug#989632: dash: remove unnecessary diversion of /bin/sh

2023-06-12 Thread Luca Boccassi
On Wed, 9 Jun 2021 08:02:15 +0200 Helmut Grohne wrote: > Package: dash > Version: 0.5.11+git20210120+802ebd4-1 > Tags: patch Hi Andrej, Now that bookworm is out, could we get the version in experimental moved to unstable please? Thanks! -- Kind regards, Luca Boccassi signature.asc

Bug#989632: dash: remove unnecessary diversion of /bin/sh

2023-05-01 Thread Luca Boccassi
On Mon, 1 May 2023 at 08:55, Helmut Grohne wrote: > > Hi, > > On Mon, May 01, 2023 at 12:07:52AM +0100, Luca Boccassi wrote: > > On Sat, 29 Apr 2023 16:32:23 +0100 Luca Boccassi > > wrote: > > > > > > MR: https://salsa.debian.org/debian/dash/-/merge_requests/19 > > > > > > I think we should ship

Bug#989632: dash: remove unnecessary diversion of /bin/sh

2023-05-01 Thread Helmut Grohne
Hi, On Mon, May 01, 2023 at 12:07:52AM +0100, Luca Boccassi wrote: > On Sat, 29 Apr 2023 16:32:23 +0100 Luca Boccassi > wrote: > > > > MR: https://salsa.debian.org/debian/dash/-/merge_requests/19 > > > > I think we should ship these changes in bookworm. Why? > > > > - we get diversion-less

Bug#989632: dash: remove unnecessary diversion of /bin/sh

2023-04-30 Thread Luca Boccassi
On Sat, 29 Apr 2023 16:32:23 +0100 Luca Boccassi wrote: > > MR: https://salsa.debian.org/debian/dash/-/merge_requests/19 > > I think we should ship these changes in bookworm. Why? > > - we get diversion-less essential package set already in bookworm > - we get diversion-less uber-essential

Bug#989632: dash: remove unnecessary diversion of /bin/sh

2023-04-29 Thread Luca Boccassi
On Wed, 9 Jun 2021 12:18:58 +0200 Helmut Grohne wrote: > > Upshot: the proposal below doesn't bring us closer to that ideal, > but > > it doesn't bring us further away either. And I like the idea of > > making the default configuration simpler. > > \o/ > > > Summary: I like what this patch aims

Bug#989632: dash: remove unnecessary diversion of /bin/sh

2023-04-28 Thread Gioele Barabucci
On Wed, 9 Jun 2021 12:18:58 +0200 Helmut Grohne wrote: > 1c. include the /bin/sh symlink in a separate "sh-is-dash" > package Likely base-files would depend on sh-is-dash | sh-is-bash | sh-is-... I suppose that this approach would just work. It feels a bit excessive in terms of

Bug#989632: dash: remove unnecessary diversion of /bin/sh

2022-05-15 Thread Harald Dunkel
I think you missed another case: A third package might install a diversion for /bin/sh. Regards Harri

Bug#989632: dash: remove unnecessary diversion of /bin/sh

2021-06-09 Thread Helmut Grohne
Hi Jonathan, it's rare for me to receive such detailed and quick feedback on a patch. Thank you very much! On Wed, Jun 09, 2021 at 12:40:58AM -0700, Jonathan Nieder wrote: > My ideal would be to go even further and not include /bin/sh in any > shell's package (in other words, to treat the

Bug#989632: dash: remove unnecessary diversion of /bin/sh

2021-06-09 Thread Jonathan Nieder
Hi Helmut, Helmut Grohne wrote: > At present, /bin/sh is always diverted. The diversion takes one of three > forms: > > A. diverted by package dash, pointing to dash > B. diverted by package bash (but performed by dash.postinst), pointing > to bash > C. local diversion > > The local

Bug#989632: dash: remove unnecessary diversion of /bin/sh

2021-06-09 Thread Helmut Grohne
Package: dash Version: 0.5.11+git20210120+802ebd4-1 Tags: patch At present, /bin/sh is always diverted. The diversion takes one of three forms: A. diverted by package dash, pointing to dash B. diverted by package bash (but performed by dash.postinst), pointing to bash C. local diversion