Bug#1064882: Wrong order of changelog entries

2024-09-03 Thread Jochen Sprickerhof
Hi Jonathan, * Jonathan Kamens [2024-08-31 19:17]: This is an edge case I don't know how to handle. We sort version numbers in changelog entries in reverse order according to apt_pkg.version_compare, which indeed considers 2:2.7.0-1+exp a newer version number than 2:2.7.0-1. I checke

Bug#1064882: Wrong order of changelog entries

2024-08-31 Thread Jonathan Kamens
Thanks for the bug report. This is an edge case I don't know how to handle. We sort version numbers in changelog entries in reverse order according to apt_pkg.version_compare, which indeed considers 2:2.7.0-1+exp a newer version number than 2:2.7.0-1. I checked the Debian Policy Manual a

Bug#1064782: bind9-doc: please output tags in the documentation in deterministic order.

2024-08-23 Thread James Addison
Package: bind9-doc Followup-For: Bug #1064782 Control: tags -1 = upstream fixed-upstream

Bug#1064782: bind9-doc: please output tags in the documentation in deterministic order.

2024-08-22 Thread James Addison
Package: bind9-doc Followup-For: Bug #1064782 Control: forwarded -1 https://gitlab.isc.org/isc-projects/bind9/-/issues/4886

Bug#1072627: /usr/bin/qterminal: Wrong order of RTL text when escape sequences present

2024-06-05 Thread Ruud Harmsen
Package: qterminal Version: 1.4.0-0ubuntu5 Severity: normal File: /usr/bin/qterminal Dear Maintainer, When there are escape sequences, for example the ones that grep sends to highlight found text in a different color, the display order of right-to-left scripts like Hebrew and Arabic is

Bug#1072371: apt.conf(5) does not say how directive order matters

2024-06-01 Thread Karl O. Pinc
Package: apt Version: 2.6.1 Severity: normal apt.conf(5) talks about the ordering of the loading of config files, but does not say why the order matters. At least not in the section on ordering. (Behavor is implied where "clear" is explained.) The present text (sid) is: W

Bug#1055415: Wrong order for the `resolve' option in nsswitch.conf

2024-05-27 Thread Gioele Barabucci
On 26/05/24 16:11, Luca Boccassi wrote: See https://salsa.debian.org/systemd-team/systemd/-/merge_requests/162 I don't think anybody else here has the required knowledge to provide any more info than we already have. Gioele could you please make a recommendation and update the MR so that we can

Bug#1055415: Wrong order for the `resolve' option in nsswitch.conf

2024-05-26 Thread Luca Boccassi
s/162 > > > > > > > > This is indeed related. Yet the changes (as of today) do not seem to fix > > the order for `resolve'. This merge request seems to be waiting for a > > consensus before it can make progress. > > Indeed, we don't have a con

Bug#826012: /lib/lsb/init-functions.d/40-systemd: Support for compound target units as first-order services

2024-05-26 Thread Luca Boccassi
Control: tags -1 wontfix Control: close -1 On Mon, 10 Dec 2018 14:21:33 +0100 Michael Biebl wrote: > Am 10.12.18 um 14:12 schrieb Michael Biebl: > > Say you have test.service and test.target. > > I'm not sure if there is a reliable way to detect whether the user > > wanted test.service or test.ta

Bug#1071458: wireplumber-doc: "in order of priority" statements are unclear

2024-05-19 Thread Michael Gold
Package: wireplumber-doc Version: 0.5.2-3 Dear Maintainer, The "Locations of WirePlumber’s files" page is unclear about priority in two places. The page starts with this statement: WirePlumber’s default locations of its configuration files are the following, in order o

Bug#1071434: lists.debian.org: On archive pages, please sort the list of monthly archives in newest-first order

2024-05-19 Thread Nis Martensen
Package: lists.debian.org Severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-Cc: nis.marten...@web.de Dear listmaster, The web archives like https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/ would be nicer to use if the latest months were listed first, because right now it is always necessary to scroll down to reach the latest a

Bug#1071291: Please add a neovim-dbg package in order to ease to find issues

2024-05-17 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
Control: tags -1 moreinfo Hi Patrick On 2024-05-17 21:31:06 +0200, Patrick Winnertz wrote: > Package: neovim > Version: 0.9.5-7 > Severity: wishlist > > Hey, > > please add a neovim-dbg package so that it's easier to debug issues with > neovim without the need to rebuild it locally. Are you lo

Bug#1071291: Please add a neovim-dbg package in order to ease to find issues

2024-05-17 Thread Patrick Winnertz
Package: neovim Version: 0.9.5-7 Severity: wishlist Hey, please add a neovim-dbg package so that it's easier to debug issues with neovim without the need to rebuild it locally. For that please compile with -g and without stripping :-) (See: http://neovim.io/doc/user/debug.html) Greetings Pat

Bug#1071248: crowdsec-firewall-bouncer: blocks wrong IPv4 and IPv6 addresses on LE systems (reversed byte order)

2024-05-17 Thread Cyril Brulebois
a broken AddSet() function, which results in IPv4 and IPv6 addresses to be in reverse byte order at the nftables level on LE systems (i.e. all release architectures but s930x). This issue was confirmed to go away on LE systems once the bouncer gets rebuilt against a fixed golang-github-google

Bug#1069863: ITP: python-opt-einsum -- Optimized Einsum is a tensor contraction order optimizer

2024-04-25 Thread Yogeswaran Umasankar
: Expat Programming Lang: Python Description : Optimized Einsum is a tensor contraction order optimizer Optimized einsum can significantly reduce the overall execution time of einsum-like expressions by optimizing the expression's contraction order and dispatching many operatio

Bug#1069583: ITP: python-pytest-randomly -- Pytest plugin to randomly order tests and control random seed

2024-04-20 Thread Yogeswaran Umasankar
* License : Expat Programming Lang: Python Description : Pytest plugin to randomly order tests and control random seed Randomness in testing can be quite powerful to discover hidden flaws in the tests themselves, as well as giving a little more coverage to your system. By resetting

Bug#987227: php-defaults: Consider changing php sapi dependency order

2024-03-27 Thread Joe Cooper
(security, performance, and memory usage). Installing mod_php also prevents configuring http2 in Apache, because it depends on mpm_prefork. Upstream recommends FPM and strongly discourages mod_php, so the package should prefer FPM. Merely changing the order of dependencies to put fpm first, wou

Bug#1064882: Wrong order of changelog entries

2024-02-27 Thread Jochen Sprickerhof
Package: apt-listchanges Version: 4.4 Severity: normal Hi Jonathan, I just found that the changelog entries for cryptsetup are in the wrong order: $ mmdebstrap --include=cryptsetup-bin,apt-listchanges \ --chrooted-customize-hook="sed -i 's/testing/experimental/' \ /etc/apt/so

Bug#1064782: bind9-doc: please output tags in the documentation in deterministic order.

2024-02-25 Thread James Addison
that the de-duplication is performed using a non-order-preserving Python set[4] object, meaning that the resulting output documentation package can vary at build-time. Please find attached a patch that implements order-preserving de-duplication of these tags. I've confirmed that the package

Bug#1055024: cryptsetup-initramfs changes crypttab entries order when generating initramfs

2023-12-22 Thread Marc Haber
t, since two users came even to the same solution. After taking a step back I also find the solution quite elegant: It preserves the order of the crypt devices as given by the local admin, it just adds the devices that the local admin didn't specify while the system knows a device is needed.

Bug#1059193: imagemagick-6-doc: missing Breaks+Replaces against the dropped imagemagick-doc package, in order to force its removal

2023-12-20 Thread Vincent Lefevre
Package: imagemagick-6-doc Version: 8:6.9.12.98+dfsg1-4 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 7.6.2 On my new laptop, I can't upgrade the imagemagick packages automatically from 8:6.9.11.60+dfsg-1.6 to 8:6.9.12.98+dfsg1-4 with aptitude (I need to enter the dependency resolution so that imagemagi

Bug#1055415: Wrong order for the `resolve' option in nsswitch.conf

2023-11-07 Thread Michael Biebl
On Sun, 5 Nov 2023 20:41:44 +0100 Sylvain Garrigues wrote: Le dimanche 5 novembre 2023, Michael Biebl a écrit : > > See https://salsa.debian.org/systemd-team/systemd/-/merge_requests/162 > > This is indeed related. Yet the changes (as of today) do not seem to fix the order for `re

Bug#1055415: Wrong order for the `resolve' option in nsswitch.conf

2023-11-05 Thread Sylvain Garrigues
Le dimanche 5 novembre 2023, Michael Biebl a écrit : > > See https://salsa.debian.org/systemd-team/systemd/-/merge_requests/162 > > This is indeed related. Yet the changes (as of today) do not seem to fix the order for `resolve'. This merge request seems to be waiting for a co

Bug#1055415: Wrong order for the `resolve' option in nsswitch.conf

2023-11-05 Thread Michael Biebl
Am 05.11.23 um 16:12 schrieb Sylvain Garrigues: Package: libnss-resolve Version: 252.17-1~deb12u1 X-Debbugs-CC: pkg-systemd-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org The debian postinstall script for libnss-resolve inserts `resolve' in the `hosts:' line of /etc/nsswitch.conf before `dns', therefore af

Bug#1055415: Wrong order for the `resolve' option in nsswitch.conf

2023-11-05 Thread Sylvain Garrigues
Package: libnss-resolve Version: 252.17-1~deb12u1 X-Debbugs-CC: pkg-systemd-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org The debian postinstall script for libnss-resolve inserts `resolve' in the `hosts:' line of /etc/nsswitch.conf before `dns', therefore after `files'. This does not seem optimal, as per `m

Bug#1055024: cryptsetup-initramfs changes crypttab entries order when generating initramfs

2023-10-29 Thread Nicolas Melot
that seems to have been left as is. I am now hitting the same issue on Debian Bookworm. update-initramfs does not generate entries of initrd's /cryptroot/crypttab in the same order as system's /etc/crypttab, when entries tagged as "initramfs" are placed before entries that

Bug#1053582: mtr: --order option is not supported

2023-10-06 Thread Witold Baryluk
Package: mtr Version: 0.95-1 Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: witold.bary...@gmail.com user@debian:~$ mtr ‐-order "LSB" ::1 mtr: Failed to resolve host: ‐-order: Name or service not known user@debian:~$ mtr ‐o "LSB" ::1 mtr: Failed to resolve host: ‐o: Name or service n

Bug#1052062: plasma-desktop: Tab order of Application tab within an application's .desktop file is incorrect

2023-09-26 Thread JT Hundley
. Click the Application tab at the top. > > 3. Press tab to cycle through the available LineEdit fields. > > 4. Observe that the order is Application tab, Name, Description, > > Comment, Environment Variables, Program, Browse button, Work path, > > browse work path button,

Bug#1052062: plasma-desktop: Tab order of Application tab within an application's .desktop file is incorrect

2023-09-26 Thread Patrick Franz
ick the Application tab at the top. > 3. Press tab to cycle through the available LineEdit fields. > 4. Observe that the order is Application tab, Name, Description, > Comment, Environment Variables, Program, Browse button, Work path, > browse work path button, Arguments. > > The o

Bug#1052062: plasma-desktop: Tab order of Application tab within an application's .desktop file is incorrect

2023-09-16 Thread JT Hundley
the order is Application tab, Name, Description, Comment, Environment Variables, Program, Browse button, Work path, browse work path button, Arguments. The order is from top to bottom with the exception of Arguments being skipped and then added last. The order should be completely top to bottom. The

Bug#1050979: debian-installer-12-netboot-amd64 Drive Order scrambled

2023-09-15 Thread Pascal Hambourg
or disk ID. I agree. That is why I used UUID for the fstab entries. But this drive ordering issue is specific to the installer. The preseed is expecting a /dev/sd* type of entry in order for partman to partition the correct drive...or in my case (using software RAID1) drives. If I understand

Bug#1050979: debian-installer-12-netboot-amd64 Drive Order scrambled

2023-09-15 Thread Todd Morgan
hat is why I used UUID for the fstab entries. But this drive ordering issue is specific to the installer. The preseed is expecting a /dev/sd* type of entry in order for partman to partition the correct drive...or in my case (using software RAID1) drives. > I advise to not hardcode /dev/sd* a

Bug#1051322: libarchive: Use native order of the files in ISO images

2023-09-06 Thread Roland Clobus
]. At [1] I've provided a minimal example to generate 2 ISO files with a small difference. With 'bsdtar -tf filename' it can be seen that the linked files are not processed in the native order in the ISO file. For comparison, 'isoinfo' outputs the files in the native order.

Bug#1050979: debian-installer-12-netboot-amd64 Drive Order scrambled

2023-09-01 Thread Pascal Hambourg
On 01/09/2023 at 01:17, Todd Morgan wrote: When using the same method to install Debian 12, I am noticing that the installer is detecting the drives out of order. It does not match what the server BIOS or HPE ILO5 displays. With each PXE installation attempt the ordering can vary. Looking in

Bug#1050979: debian-installer-12-netboot-amd64 Drive Order scrambled

2023-08-31 Thread Todd Morgan
PXE and a preseed file for a touchless installation. This has been our standard method for Debian installs for years, starting with "buster." It has worked VERY reliably for us. When using the same method to install Debian 12, I am noticing that the installer is detecting the drives ou

Bug#1050418: Conntrackd in Bookworm reverts byte order in src address sent by conntrackd in Bullseye

2023-08-24 Thread Jeremy Sowden
y.49.137 dst=x.y.48.169 > > sport=35570 dport=636 src=153.0.170.10 dst=x.y.49.137 > > sport=636 dport=35570 [ASSURED] mark=0 use=1 > > .. > > > > Notice order of the 'src' address bytes. > > When failover occures all TCP connections via

Bug#1050418: Conntrackd in Bookworm reverts byte order in src address sent by conntrackd in Bullseye

2023-08-24 Thread Jeremy Sowden
570 > dport=636 src=153.0.170.10 dst=x.y.49.137 sport=636 dport=35570 [ASSURED] > mark=0 use=1 > .. > > Notice order of the 'src' address bytes. > When failover occures all TCP connections via secondary balancer are > broken as packets source addresses don't match

Bug#1050418: Conntrackd in Bookworm reverts byte order in src address sent by conntrackd in Bullseye

2023-08-24 Thread Pavel Matěja
rk=0 use=1 .. bookworm:~$ sudo conntrack -L .. tcp 6 431388 ESTABLISHED src=x.y.49.137 dst=x.y.48.169 sport=35570 dport=636 src=153.0.170.10 dst=x.y.49.137 sport=636 dport=35570 [ASSURED] mark=0 use=1 .. Notice order of the 'src' address bytes. When failover occures all TCP connections via se

Bug#1049010: pytest-order: Fails to build source after successful build

2023-08-13 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
Source: pytest-order Version: 1.0.1-1 Severity: minor Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-sab-20230813 ftbfs-source-after-build User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-doublebuild Hi, This package fails to build a source package after a successful build (dpkg

Bug#1043142: git-buildpackage: import-dscs importing upstream branches out-of-order

2023-08-06 Thread Joao Eriberto Mota Filho
-order. See the following command after an import (important lines only): $ git log commit 17d263cee50d3f4b8ba881ca7216194672e7fdfb (HEAD -> debian/master, tag: debian/1.9.4-2) Author: Thiago Marques Siqueira Date: Sun Jul 9 17:11:06 2023 +0100 [...] commit 8b622b80fb70e9cbdbd071f1d7f714f3f9629

Bug#1028155: I know what the problem is - incorrect order in After of /lib/systemd/system/nginx.service

2023-08-04 Thread Perlover
Hello, I know what the problem is. The problem is that nginx starts before all network interfaces are upped up. I looked through all nginx unit files (nginx-common debian package) and found that all versions, including Ubuntu 22.04, have incorrect After & Wants. All versions from the packag

Bug#1043018: mate-desktop: panel fails to properly size or move to some displays / displays cannot be arranged in proper order

2023-08-04 Thread Mike Lieberman
I am seeing upon the install following all upgrades and dist-upgrades. (1) the monitors were out of order comared to how they were under MATE / bullseye. Using system/preferences/hardware/displays did not allow me to move the displays in the proper order. (I had to shut the workstation down and

Bug#1040424: python-pytest-random-order: implicitly depends on python3-py

2023-07-05 Thread Timo Röhling
Source: python-pytest-random-order Version: 1.1.0-1 Severity: serious -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Dear maintainer, your package implicitly depends on python3-py for its autopkgtest, which used to be provided by python3-pytest. However, pytest has dropped that dependency

Bug#1039257: eja: Please repack in order to avoid lua

2023-06-25 Thread Bastien Roucariès
Source: src:eja Severity: important Dear Maintainer, Could you repack in order to avoid to ship lua. It will avoid false positive for shipping lua and avoid to accidentally compile local lua instead of packaged lua Thanks Rouca -- System Information: Debian Release: trixie/sid APT prefers

Bug#1039118: blobby: Please repack in order to avoid to ship source copy of lua

2023-06-25 Thread Bastien Roucariès
Source: blobby Severity: important Dear Maintainer, Could you consider to repack in order to avoid to ship a non compiled lua ? It is alway better to repack in this case, it avoid accidental compilation of this embded library. Rouca -- System Information: Debian Release: trixie/sid APT

Bug#1039117: bam: Please repack in order to avoid lua

2023-06-25 Thread Bastien Roucariès
Source: bam Severity: important Dear Maintainer, Could you consider to repack in order to avoid third party library like lua. Even if they are not compiled, it could be accidentally compiled and thus is not best pratice Thanks Rouca -- System Information: Debian Release: trixie/sid APT

Bug#1036637: RFP: plio - "Pleasant Image Order", image viewer with many sort options

2023-05-23 Thread Oliver Bandel
es reflect the order that was established by the sorting (integer index value prepended to basename). In case of sort-by-modification-time, the epoch with subseconds instead of the index number is prepended. (Using Index number is also possible - with two keystrokes.) Arbitrarily reorder

Bug#1033958: binutils: reproducible builds: files in source tarball in arbitrary order

2023-05-19 Thread Vagrant Cascadian
On 2023-04-04, Vagrant Cascadian wrote: > The files in the binutils tarball appear to be in arbitrary order, > possibly affected by locale or filesystem differences: > > > https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/bookworm/armhf/diffoscope-results/binutils.html > >

Bug#1036091: release-notes: What's new: OpenJDK and OpenLDAP rows out of alphabetical order

2023-05-15 Thread Daniel Lewart
Package: release-notes Severity: minor Tags: patch Release Notes Maintainers, In Chapter 2. What's new in Debian 12, the OpenJDK and OpenLDAP rows are out of alphabetical order. Patch (for the English version only) is below, with the following fixes: 1) s/gnupg/gnupg2/ 2) s/llvm-tool

Bug#1033958: binutils: reproducible builds: build paths/tarball sort order

2023-05-14 Thread Vagrant Cascadian
Control: found 1033959 2.40-2 Control: found 1033958 2.40-2 Marking issues with versions in which it is still present. live well, vagrant

Bug#1035922: postgis: Axis order regression since 3.1.1+dfsg-1+deb11u1

2023-05-11 Thread Bas Couwenberg
Some digging in the upstream stable-3.1 branch reveals two additional commits required to resolve this regression: https://trac.osgeo.org/postgis/changeset/11efb9f0cdc71cf2bdc4850491218495a07b18ba/git https://trac.osgeo.org/postgis/changeset/8baf0b07b26df12d246c82bdae8ecd77371f3d24/git With the

Bug#1033958: binutils: reproducible builds: files in source tarball in arbitrary order

2023-04-04 Thread Vagrant Cascadian
Source: binutils Severity: normal Tags: patch User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: randomness X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-b...@lists.alioth.debian.org The files in the binutils tarball appear to be in arbitrary order, possibly affected by locale or filesystem differences

Bug#1033651: ifupdown: "ifdown -a" brings the interfaces down in the reverse order while the man page claims the opposite

2023-03-29 Thread Martin Tonusoo
Package: ifupdown Version: 0.8.35 Severity: normal The man page of ifup(8) under "--all" option claims that "Interfaces are brought down in the order in which they are currently listed in the state file". However, the "for" loop seen below in read_all_state() fu

Bug#619265: mdadm: mdadm.8.in -- Order items alphabetically in manual page

2023-02-25 Thread Daniel Baumann
close 619265 thanks Hi, thank you for your report, however: * the patches do not apply to the current upstream version anymore. * even if they would, they are way to much of a burden to maintain downstream/keep them debian specific and therefore rebase for every new version, so they

Bug#1031392: postgis: Polar stereographic axis order wrong when transforming coordinates

2023-02-16 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
On 2/16/23 15:05, Paul Cochrane wrote: On Thu, Feb 16, 2023 at 02:44:36PM +0100, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: I'm not sure if it's worth the effort to fix this issue in bullseye with a stable update. Since you've already done the work to patch package in bullseye, can you prepare the stable upda

Bug#1031392: postgis: Polar stereographic axis order wrong when transforming coordinates

2023-02-16 Thread Paul Cochrane
-- SRID=4326;POINT(-18.43494882292201 -89.27021258118658) (1 row) ``` As one can see, the first element of the coordinate pair is completely wrong. We managed to isolate the problem to the issue [Polar Stereographic Axis order wrong](https://trac.osgeo.org/pos

Bug#1031175: strace: bogus (on the order of 2^54) tv_nsec readings for clock_nanosleep_time64() on armel

2023-02-12 Thread наб
Package: strace Version: 5.10-1 Version: 6.1-0.1 Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, When running this test program under strace, built with cc qwe.c -g -target arm-linux-gnueabi -o qwe -fuse-ld=lld (binary attached): -- >8 -- #include #include #include #in

Bug#1030148: [Pkg-tcltk-devel] Bug#1030148: tk8.6: Please switch the order of Recommends, making xterm the fallback for x-terminal-emulator

2023-02-01 Thread Lukas Märdian
Hi Sergei, thank you, that works for me, too! Cheers, Lukas Am 01.02.23 um 10:06 schrieb Sergei Golovan: Hi Lucas, On Tue, Jan 31, 2023 at 7:27 PM Lukas Märdian wrote: Dear Sergei, please switch the order of tk8.6's Recommends so that xterm is only the fallback option if nothing

Bug#1030148: [Pkg-tcltk-devel] Bug#1030148: tk8.6: Please switch the order of Recommends, making xterm the fallback for x-terminal-emulator

2023-02-01 Thread Sergei Golovan
Hi Lucas, On Tue, Jan 31, 2023 at 7:27 PM Lukas Märdian wrote: > > Dear Sergei, > > please switch the order of tk8.6's Recommends so that xterm is only the > fallback option if nothing else provides x-terminal-emulator. I won't switch the dependencies, but I'll dro

Bug#1030148: tk8.6: Please switch the order of Recommends, making xterm the fallback for x-terminal-emulator

2023-01-31 Thread Lukas Märdian
Package: tk8.6 Version: 8.6.13-1 Severity: minor Tags: patch User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com Usertags: origin-ubuntu lunar ubuntu-patch X-Debbugs-Cc: sl...@ubuntu.com Dear Sergei, please switch the order of tk8.6's Recommends so that xterm is only the fallback option if nothing else pro

Bug#1029435: linux-image-6.1.0-1-amd64: internal battery and removable battery have a switched priority order

2023-01-22 Thread Jan
Package: src:linux Version: 6.1.4-1 Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: yan...@web.de Dear Maintainer, after upgrading from linx-5.19.x to linux-6.0.x the priority order of the internal battery (nonremovable) and the removable battery have switched. The internal battery is considered nr. 0 by `acpi

Bug#1027723: RM: haskell-byte-order [armel armhf i386 mipsel] -- ROM; Depends on haskell-wide-word which FTBFS on 32 bit

2023-01-02 Thread Ilias Tsitsimpis
Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal User: ftp.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: remove X-Debbugs-Cc: haskell-byte-or...@packages.debian.org Control: affects -1 + src:haskell-byte-order Dear ftp team, Please remove haskell-byte-order from 32 bit architectures, since it depends on

Bug#1025575: python3-h5py: h5py does not provide dh-python usable meta data in order to compute dependencies

2022-12-06 Thread picca
Package: python3-h5py Version: 3.7.0-3 Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, I am packaging pymca and when I build it I get this error message D: dh_python3 pydist:173: trying to find dependency for h5py (python=None) D: dh_python3 pydist:277: invoking dpkg -S *python3/*/[Hh]5[Pp][Yy]-?*.*-info

Bug#888059: libtool: the generated run path order is incorrect, yielding failures with "make check"

2022-11-18 Thread Vincent Lefevre
Control: found -1 2.4.7-4 Control: retitle -1 libtool: the generated run path order is incorrect, yielding failures with "make check", e.g. for Solaris Updated the title to mention Solaris, so that this bug report can be found more easily (I currently have this issue only with Solaris

Bug#1010957: status update? Re: Bug#1010957: man-db: unreproducible index.db: contents depend on directory read order

2022-10-03 Thread Holger Levsen
On Sun, Oct 02, 2022 at 04:00:58PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote: > Control: tag -1 fixed-upstream > Success! > https://gitlab.com/cjwatson/man-db/-/compare/5d2594d0a0...866c3571d3 awesome! On Sun, Oct 02, 2022 at 05:56:19PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote: > I thought I'd set SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH, but I'd

Bug#1010957: status update? Re: Bug#1010957: man-db: unreproducible index.db: contents depend on directory read order

2022-10-02 Thread Colin Watson
On Sun, Oct 02, 2022 at 05:50:07PM +0200, Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues wrote: > Quoting Colin Watson (2022-10-02 17:00:58) > > As well as more localized testing, I built a .deb with this and used > > josch's instructions from the start of this bug to build mmdebstrap > > tarballs via disorderf

Bug#1010957: status update? Re: Bug#1010957: man-db: unreproducible index.db: contents depend on directory read order

2022-10-02 Thread Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues
Quoting Colin Watson (2022-10-02 17:00:58) > Success! > > https://gitlab.com/cjwatson/man-db/-/compare/5d2594d0a0...866c3571d3 Thank you!! :D > > As well as more localized testing, I built a .deb with this and used > josch's instructions from the start of this bug to build mmdebstrap > tarbal

Bug#1010957: status update? Re: Bug#1010957: man-db: unreproducible index.db: contents depend on directory read order

2022-10-02 Thread Colin Watson
Control: tag -1 fixed-upstream Success! https://gitlab.com/cjwatson/man-db/-/compare/5d2594d0a0...866c3571d3 As well as more localized testing, I built a .deb with this and used josch's instructions from the start of this bug to build mmdebstrap tarballs via disorderfs, using "--hook-dir=/usr/

Bug#1020899: haskell-byte-order: BD-Uninstallable on armel, armhf, i386, mipsel

2022-09-28 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
Source: haskell-byte-order Version: 0.1.3.0-1 Severity: serious Tags: sid bookworm X-Debbugs-Cc: sramac...@debian.org haskell-byte-order is BD-Uninstallable on 32 bit architectures: ∙ ∙ haskell-byte-order unsatisfiable Build-Depends(-Arch) on armel: libghc-wide-word-dev (>= 0.1.1) ∙ ∙ hask

Bug#1010957: status update? Re: Bug#1010957: man-db: unreproducible index.db: contents depend on directory read order

2022-09-26 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi Colin, On Sun, Sep 25, 2022 at 11:18:19PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote: > This weekend's work has been: > https://gitlab.com/cjwatson/man-db/-/compare/bb0f7086ba...5d2594d0a0 wow, impressive! (and thank you for taking care of man-db for so many years now! :) [...] > I'll need a bit more conce

Bug#1010957: status update? Re: Bug#1010957: man-db: unreproducible index.db: contents depend on directory read order

2022-09-25 Thread Colin Watson
This weekend's work has been: https://gitlab.com/cjwatson/man-db/-/compare/bb0f7086ba...5d2594d0a0 A lot of this was code rearrangement that I needed to do before I could make progress on the real issues, but if you look at the NEWS.md diff you'll see a number of changes that relate to this bug

Bug#1010957: status update? Re: Bug#1010957: man-db: unreproducible index.db: contents depend on directory read order

2022-09-22 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi Colin, On Thu, Sep 22, 2022 at 08:53:07PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote: > Yeah, this has taken me a bit longer than expected, but I have in fact > been making some progress. josch's patch has been very useful in that > it provides an easy way to see differences between unsorted and sorted > trave

Bug#1010957: status update? Re: Bug#1010957: man-db: unreproducible index.db: contents depend on directory read order

2022-09-22 Thread Colin Watson
ich other entries, so that the end result doesn't change depending on the scan order. With that, I'm down to on the order of 150 lines of diff of accessdb output against the result of josch's patch, and I think there are only about one or two problems left. A lot of the remaining diff

Bug#1020424: krb5: Versioned dependencies are needed in order to avoid version skew

2022-09-22 Thread Sam Hartman
> "Sam" == Sam Morris writes: Sam> When using a container image that has an older version of some Sam> of the binary packages from krb5 in it, installing krb5-user Sam> results in binary packages being installed that are a mix of Sam> the newer and older version. Thanks for f

Bug#1010957: status update? Re: Bug#1010957: man-db: unreproducible index.db: contents depend on directory read order

2022-09-22 Thread Holger Levsen
hi! Colin, what's the status of this bug? You said you were working on improving josch' patch in May 2022...?! :) Also, the bug is currently tagged 'patch', I guess it's appropriate to remove that tag? josch: btw you said you you submitted other patches missing freeing of memory, have you update

Bug#1020424: krb5: Versioned dependencies are needed in order to avoid version skew

2022-09-21 Thread Sam Morris
Source: krb5 Version: 1.20-1 Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: s...@robots.org.uk When using a container image that has an older version of some of the binary packages from krb5 in it, installing krb5-user results in binary packages being installed that are a mix of the newer and older version. The

Bug#1017639: ITP: elpa-orderless -- Emacs completion style that matches multiple regexps in any order

2022-08-18 Thread Aymeric Agon-Rambosson
: Emacs completion style that matches multiple regexps in any order This Emacs package offers a completion style, that is an completion matching engine, capable of matching multiple regexps, each following different regexp syntax, in any order. Aymeric Agon-Rambosson

Bug#1017533: dh-cargo: Order of cargo:X-Cargo-Built-Using subtitution varies depending on the locale env vars that are set

2022-08-17 Thread Rob Shearman
Package: dh-cargo Version: 24 Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: r...@graphiant.com The order of the cargo:X-Cargo-Built-Using substitution generated by dh-cargo- built-using for binary Rust packages can vary if LC_ALL is set when building. This means that the contents of the binary package can vary

Bug#1015759: ovmf: OVMF_CODE_4M.ms.fd puts EFI shell first in boot order

2022-07-21 Thread dann frazier
ng the resulting > image with QEMU with Secure Boot enforced. Unfortunately, the > OVMF_VARS*.ms.fd seems to define a boot order where the EFI shell is > placed before the disk. Hm.. that must be a side effect of enrolling the keys, but I'm not sure why that would be. Certainly we cou

Bug#1015808: linux-image-5.18.0-2-amd64: Please enable mt7921u module in order to support usb wireless card using this chipset

2022-07-21 Thread Yaacov Akiba Slama
Package: src:linux Version: 5.18.5-1 Severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-Cc: yaslama+bugs.debian@gmail.com Thanks!

Bug#990247: vlc: reproducible builds: Fix passing sort order to tar when generating default.vlt

2022-07-16 Thread Vagrant Cascadian
riable to tar. >> >> It does not appear to affect the sort order on >> tests.reproducible-builds.org, but it does appear to cause issues when >> testing with reprotest, and so may occur in other situations in the >> wild. >> >> >> The attached p

Bug#1014921: ITP: coq-iris -- high-order concurrent separation logic framework for Coq

2022-07-14 Thread Julien Puydt
: BSD-3-clause and CC-BY-4.0 Programming Lang: Coq Description : high-order concurrent separation logic framework for Coq This package provides a high-order concurrent separation logic framework for Coq, which means it is useful to reason about safety of concurrent programs. . Coq is a

Bug#1014647: ITP: abpoa -- adaptive banded Partial Order Alignment

2022-07-11 Thread Bastian Germann
parsnp 1.7.4 does no longer need this because it comes with https://github.com/marbl/parsnp/pull/117

Bug#891037: dmcrypt_write: page allocation stalls for 10008ms, order:0, mode:0x2400000(GFP_NOIO)

2022-05-31 Thread Diederik de Haas
Control: tag -1 moreinfo On Tue, 20 Feb 2018 04:30:54 +0100 Thilo Molitor wrote: > Package: src:linux > Version: 4.9.65-3+deb9u2 Can you still reproduce this with a recent kernel like 5.10 from current Debian Stable? signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Bug#1010957: man-db: unreproducible index.db: contents depend on directory read order

2022-05-18 Thread Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues
FILE > > > > /* strlen(newdir->d_name) could be replaced by newdir->d_reclen */ > > > > - while ((newdir = readdir (dir)) != NULL) { > > - if (*newdir->d_name == '.' && > > - strlen (newdir->d_na

Bug#1010957: man-db: unreproducible index.db: contents depend on directory read order

2022-05-18 Thread Colin Watson
rlen (newdir->d_name) < (size_t) 3) > + while (n--) { I guess this might have been borrowed from the example in the scandir(3) manual page, because it goes in reverse order; I don't think there's a good reason to do that. > + free(namelist); This leaks memory. We ne

Bug#1010957: man-db: unreproducible index.db: contents depend on directory read order

2022-05-18 Thread Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues
Hi Colin, Quoting Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues (2022-05-15 00:20:57) > I now have a patch (attached). do you have an approximate ETA for when you think you'll be able to upload a version of man-db that fixes this issue? I'm trying to decide whether I should make a new mmdebstrap release that

Bug#990247: vlc: reproducible builds: Fix passing sort order to tar when generating default.vlt

2022-05-17 Thread Rémi Denis-Courmont
ppear to affect the sort order on > tests.reproducible-builds.org, but it does appear to cause issues when > testing with reprotest, and so may occur in other situations in the > wild. > > > The attached patch fixes this by passing it as a make variable rather > than a quoted

Bug#1010957: man-db: unreproducible index.db: contents depend on directory read order

2022-05-14 Thread Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues
ttached the contents of /var/cache/man/index.db so that you can see > that it is indeed the order that differs between individual runs. I now have a patch (attached). Thanks! cheers, josch--- a/src/check_mandirs.c +++ b/src/check_mandirs.c @@ -342,8 +342,8 @@ static void add_dir_entries (MYDBM_

Bug#998308: /usr/bin/drill: drill does not respect the /etc/resolv.conf nameserver order

2022-04-26 Thread Michael Tokarev
. Quoting from resolv.conf(5) ... However, drill seems to use all entries in a random(?) order. Or at least in an order which changes from one run to another, causing failures which come and go depending on whether the nameserver works on the primary link or not. Hi Bjørn! Drill is a dns

Bug#1006783: tcpreplay: Please consider compiling with libdumbnet in order to enable the fragroute feature

2022-04-25 Thread Christoph Biedl
Control: tag 1006783 confirmed Florian Ernst wrote... (...) > Please consider whether it's worthwhile to include libdumbnet support > into tcpreplay, thanks. Hello, and sorry for taking so long to respond. Still, you suggestion seems sensible to include, I'll re-visit when it comes to another u

Bug#1009793: linux-source 5.10.106-1 changes block device order

2022-04-17 Thread Elliott Mitchell
A few utilities are still sensitive to block device order and this causes issues for those. Nothing on the hardware explains this. The controller thinks the device has a lower number, the device should respond much faster. The lowest level is the cciss driver. -- (\___(\___(\__ -

Bug#1008759: apt: autopkgtest needs update for new version of dpkg: Testcase test-apt-tagfile-fields-order failed

2022-03-31 Thread Paul Gevers
https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=dpkg https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/amd64/a/apt/20465752/log.gz (68/287) Testcase test-apt-tagfile-fields-order: -Class -Conffiles -Config-Version -MSDOS-Filename -Optional -Original-Maintainer -Package-Revision -Package_Revision -Recomm

Bug#1008652: mirrors must support also HTTPS in order to be considered official

2022-03-30 Thread Geert Stappers
Control: retitle -1 mirrors must support also HTTPS in order to be considered official > This is related to: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=992692 Quoting https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=992692#37 This change is more about recognizing HTTPS as

Bug#1008652: mirrors must support HTTPS in order to be considered official

2022-03-30 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
Package: general Severity: wishlist Since the beginning of F-Droid, we have required that official package repos and mirrors use HTTPS. We have encouraged all of them to have HTTPS. I think Debian should do the same. There are already very many Debian mirrors that do support HTTPS, here's

Bug#1006802: cryptdisks_stop should process crtypttab entries in reverse order

2022-03-06 Thread Guilhem Moulin
Control: tag -1 pending On Sat, 05 Mar 2022 at 17:17:07 +0100, Guilhem Moulin wrote: > For do_start() we're reading crypttab(5) sequentially as we don't have > enough information about nesting, however for do_stop() we have that > information in the mapping table, so no need to reverse crypttab(5)

Bug#1006802: cryptdisks_stop should process crtypttab entries in reverse order

2022-03-05 Thread Guilhem Moulin
Control: retitle -1 `/etc/init.d/cryptdisks stop` should safely traverse nested block device stacks Control: tag -1 - moreinfo On Sat, 05 Mar 2022 at 16:54:07 +0100, Guenther Brunthaler wrote: > which is exactly the same as do_start() does. And hence the entries are > processed in the same

Bug#1006802: cryptdisks_stop should process crtypttab entries in reverse order

2022-03-05 Thread Guenther Brunthaler
Am Sat, 5 Mar 2022 13:32:24 +0100 schrieb Guilhem Moulin : > I believe cryptdisks_start(8) and cryptdisks_stop(8) processes > mappings in the order given on the command line, which is > intentional. Are you talking about SysV init scripts? Yes, you are right. The problem actually

Bug#1006802: cryptdisks_stop should process crtypttab entries in reverse order

2022-03-05 Thread Guilhem Moulin
Control: tag -1 moreinfo On Sat, 05 Mar 2022 at 13:13:57 +0100, Guenther Brunthaler wrote: > When creating nested dmcrypt mappings in /etc/crtypttab, > cryptdisks_start processes them from top to bottom. I believe cryptdisks_start(8) and cryptdisks_stop(8) processes mappings in the order

Bug#1006802: cryptdisks_stop should process crtypttab entries in reverse order

2022-03-05 Thread Guenther Brunthaler
this works fine for unlocking the encrypted disks, cryptdisk_stop tries to remove the dmcrypt mappings in the same order which is clearly wrong: It tries to remove the base mapping before any mappings bases on it, which will fail because the base mapping is "busy" at that point.

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >