Bug#658462: Patch for the l10n upload of tin

2012-04-20 Thread Christian PERRIER

Dear maintainer of tin,

On Wednesday, April 11, 2012 I sent you a notice announcing my intent to upload 
an
NMU of your package to fix its pending l10n issues, after an initial
notice sent on Wednesday, April 11, 2012.

We finally agreed that you would do the update yourself at the end of
the l10n update round.

That time has come.

To help you out, here's the patch which I would have used for an NMU.
Please feel free to use all of it...or only the l10n part of it.

(all PO files are changed because I ran debconf-updatepo that calls
standard gettext utilities, that themselves addsome information in PO
files headersand also reformats all PO files to 78-columns wrapping)

The corresponding changelog is:


Source: tin
Version: 1:2.1.0-1.1
Distribution: UNRELEASED
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Christian Perrier bubu...@debian.org
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 07:45:33 +0200
Closes: 658462 668447
Changes: 
 tin (1:2.1.0-1.1) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
 .
   * Non-maintainer upload.
   * Fix pending l10n issues. Debconf translations:
   * Dutch; (Jeroen Schot).  Closes: #658462
   * Polish (Michał Kułach).  Closes: #668447

-- 


diff -Nru tin-2.1.0.old/debian/changelog tin-2.1.0/debian/changelog
--- tin-2.1.0.old/debian/changelog	2012-04-09 21:19:20.076632895 +0200
+++ tin-2.1.0/debian/changelog	2012-04-12 08:20:36.131112897 +0200
@@ -1,3 +1,12 @@
+tin (1:2.1.0-1.1) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
+
+  * Non-maintainer upload.
+  * Fix pending l10n issues. Debconf translations:
+  * Dutch; (Jeroen Schot).  Closes: #658462
+  * Polish (Michał Kułach).  Closes: #668447
+
+ -- Christian Perrier bubu...@debian.org  Wed, 11 Apr 2012 07:45:33 +0200
+
 tin (1:2.1.0-1) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * New upstream release.
diff -Nru tin-2.1.0.old/debian/po/cs.po tin-2.1.0/debian/po/cs.po
--- tin-2.1.0.old/debian/po/cs.po	2012-04-09 21:19:20.076632895 +0200
+++ tin-2.1.0/debian/po/cs.po	2012-04-11 13:22:28.958651296 +0200
@@ -14,24 +14,25 @@
 msgid 
 msgstr 
 Project-Id-Version: tin 1:1.7.8\n
-Report-Msgid-Bugs-To: \n
-POT-Creation-Date: 2005-03-20 19:01+0100\n
+Report-Msgid-Bugs-To: t...@packages.debian.org\n
+POT-Creation-Date: 2012-04-11 13:22+0200\n
 PO-Revision-Date: 2005-12-29 10:26+0100\n
 Last-Translator: Martin Sin martin@seznam.cz\n
 Language-Team: Czech debian-l10n-cz...@lists.debian.org\n
+Language: cs\n
 MIME-Version: 1.0\n
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8\n
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\n
 
 #. Type: string
 #. Description
-#: ../tin.templates:3
+#: ../tin.templates:1001
 msgid Enter the fully qualified domain name of your news server
 msgstr Zadejte plně kvalifikované doménové jméno vašeho serveru news
 
 #. Type: string
 #. Description
-#: ../tin.templates:3
+#: ../tin.templates:1001
 msgid 
 What news server (NNTP server) should be used for reading and posting news?
 msgstr 
diff -Nru tin-2.1.0.old/debian/po/da.po tin-2.1.0/debian/po/da.po
--- tin-2.1.0.old/debian/po/da.po	2012-04-09 21:19:20.076632895 +0200
+++ tin-2.1.0/debian/po/da.po	2012-04-11 13:22:28.962651401 +0200
@@ -6,11 +6,12 @@
 msgid 
 msgstr 
 Project-Id-Version: tin\n
-Report-Msgid-Bugs-To: \n
-POT-Creation-Date: 2010-06-02 10:50+0200\n
+Report-Msgid-Bugs-To: t...@packages.debian.org\n
+POT-Creation-Date: 2012-04-11 13:22+0200\n
 PO-Revision-Date: 2010-11-11 12:42+\n
 Last-Translator: Joe Hansen joedalt...@yahoo.dk\n
 Language-Team: Danish da...@dansk-gruppen.dk\n
+Language: da\n
 MIME-Version: 1.0\n
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8\n
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\n
@@ -28,4 +29,3 @@
 What news server (NNTP server) should be used for reading and posting news?
 msgstr 
 Hvilken nyhedsserver (NNTP-server) skal bruges til at læse og sende nyheder?
-
diff -Nru tin-2.1.0.old/debian/po/de.po tin-2.1.0/debian/po/de.po
--- tin-2.1.0.old/debian/po/de.po	2012-04-09 21:19:20.076632895 +0200
+++ tin-2.1.0/debian/po/de.po	2012-04-11 13:22:28.970651618 +0200
@@ -14,11 +14,12 @@
 msgid 
 msgstr 
 Project-Id-Version: PACKAGE VERSION\n
-Report-Msgid-Bugs-To: \n
-POT-Creation-Date: 2006-10-26 04:40+0200\n
+Report-Msgid-Bugs-To: t...@packages.debian.org\n
+POT-Creation-Date: 2012-04-11 13:22+0200\n
 PO-Revision-Date: 2006-10-29 14:16+0100\n
 Last-Translator: Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de\n
 Language-Team: de debian-l10n-ger...@lists.debian.org\n
+Language: \n
 MIME-Version: 1.0\n
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15\n
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\n
@@ -27,7 +28,8 @@
 #. Description
 #: ../tin.templates:1001
 msgid Enter the fully qualified domain name of your news server
-msgstr Bitte geben Sie den vollständigen Domainnamen (FQDN) Ihres Servers ein.
+msgstr 
+Bitte geben Sie den vollständigen Domainnamen (FQDN) Ihres Servers ein.
 
 #. Type: string
 #. Description
@@ -39,4 +41,5 @@
 werden?
 
 #~ msgid What news server should be used for reading and posting news?
-#~ msgstr Welcher Newsserver soll zum Lesen und Posten von News genutzt werden?
+#~ msgstr 
+#~ Welcher Newsserver soll zum Lesen und Posten von News 

Bug#669498: github-backup: FTBFS: build-dependency not installable: libghc-github-dev

2012-04-20 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 19/04/12 at 16:47 -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
 Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
sbuild-build-depends-github-backup-dummy : Depends: libghc-github-dev 
   but it is not going to be installed
   E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages.
 
 I have no idea what this means. How can it possibly be a bug in
 github-backup?

sbuild generates a dummy package with dependencies on the build-deps,
then installs it.

# apt-get build-dep github-backup
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree   
Reading state information... Done
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
 libghc-github-dev : Depends: libghc-aeson-dev-0.6.0.0-e285f but it is not 
installable
E: Build-dependencies for github-backup could not be satisfied.

Lucas



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#655801: tarantool: FTBFS: make[4]: lua: Command not found

2012-04-20 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 20/04/12 at 00:32 +0400, Dmitry E. Oboukhov wrote:
  On 19/01/12 at 03:07 +0400, Dmitry E. Oboukhov wrote:
  severity 655801 important
  thanks
  
  I can't reproduce the bug. So I reduce severity level.
 
  I can. Please post a build log including dependencies installation, so
  we can see why lua is there for you but not for me.
 
 I think that Your filesystem is a cause for Your trouble.

Can you elaborate ?

 buildlog for i386:
 
 https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=tarantoolarch=i386ver=1.4.4%2B20120127-1stamp=1327746838

In your log:

make[4]: Entering directory
`/build/buildd-tarantool_1.4.4+20120127-1-i386-v48zmd/tarantool-1.4.4+20120127/build-area/third_party/luajit/src'
HOSTCCbuildvm.o
gcc  -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -Wall  -c -o buildvm.o buildvm.c
HOSTCCbuildvm_asm.o
gcc  -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -Wall  -c -o buildvm_asm.o
buildvm_asm.c
[...]

In my log:
make[4]: Entering directory
`/«BUILDDIR»/tarantool-1.4.4+20120127/build-area/third_party/luajit/src'
DYNASMbuildvm_ppcspe.h
lua ../dynasm/dynasm.lua  -D SPE -o buildvm_ppcspe.h buildvm_ppc.dasc
make[4]: lua: Command not found
make[4]: *** [buildvm_ppcspe.h] Error 127

Can you explain that difference?

- Lucas



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#666357: yubiserver: FTBFS: make[1]: *** No targets specified and no makefile found. Stop.

2012-04-20 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 18/04/12 at 16:15 +0300, Nanakos V. Chrysostomos wrote:
 Dear Lucas,
 I am trying to resolve this problem but with no luck. I cannot reproduce
 it with
 the latest pbuilder or dpkg-buildpackage.
 I have one question though, why this happens only in amd64 and not on
 other archs also?
 The rules script seems to be ok and pbuilder/dpkg-buildpackage runs
 smoothly without complaints.
 Can you help resolve this problem please?

Did you build with dpkg-buildpackage -B ?

Lucas



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#655801: tarantool: FTBFS: make[4]: lua: Command not found

2012-04-20 Thread Dmitry E. Oboukhov
 severity 655801 important
 thanks
 
 I can't reproduce the bug. So I reduce severity level.
 
 I can. Please post a build log including dependencies installation, so
 we can see why lua is there for you but not for me.
 
 I think that Your filesystem is a cause for Your trouble.

 Can you elaborate ?

 buildlog for i386:
 
 https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=tarantoolarch=i386ver=1.4.4%2B20120127-1stamp=1327746838

 In your log:

 make[4]: Entering directory
 `/build/buildd-tarantool_1.4.4+20120127-1-i386-v48zmd/tarantool-1.4.4+20120127/build-area/third_party/luajit/src'
 HOSTCCbuildvm.o
 gcc  -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -Wall  -c -o buildvm.o buildvm.c
 HOSTCCbuildvm_asm.o
 gcc  -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -Wall  -c -o buildvm_asm.o
 buildvm_asm.c
 [...]

 In my log:
 make[4]: Entering directory
 `/«BUILDDIR»/tarantool-1.4.4+20120127/build-area/third_party/luajit/src'
 DYNASMbuildvm_ppcspe.h
 lua ../dynasm/dynasm.lua  -D SPE -o buildvm_ppcspe.h buildvm_ppc.dasc
 make[4]: lua: Command not found
 make[4]: *** [buildvm_ppcspe.h] Error 127

 Can you explain that difference?

I think that Your tar unpacked buildvm_ppcspe.h after buildvm_ppc.dasc
and set wrong date for the file.

The project contains some parts that are prebuilt by hand, for example
some ragel c-objects and the case. But they aren't compiled if You
unpack tarball correctly.

I can reproduce Your problem only If I change datetime some files by
hand.
-- 

. ''`.   Dmitry E. Oboukhov
: :’  :   email: un...@debian.org jabber://un...@uvw.ru
`. `~’  GPGKey: 1024D / F8E26537 2006-11-21
  `- 1B23 D4F8 8EC0 D902 0555  E438 AB8C 00CF F8E2 6537


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#669558: wine-gecko-unstable: fix for the FTBFS

2012-04-20 Thread Stephen Kitt
tags 669558 + patch
tags 669558 + pending
thanks

Dear maintainer,

The attached patch allows wine-gecko-unstable to build again.

Regards,

Stephen
diff -Nru wine-gecko-unstable-1.0.0+dfsg/debian/changelog wine-gecko-unstable-1.0.0+dfsg/debian/changelog
--- wine-gecko-unstable-1.0.0+dfsg/debian/changelog	2011-08-04 23:41:55.0 +0200
+++ wine-gecko-unstable-1.0.0+dfsg/debian/changelog	2012-04-20 07:54:17.0 +0200
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+wine-gecko-unstable (1.0.0+dfsg-1.1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+  * Non-maintainer upload.
+  * Correct build-dependencies following gcc-mingw-w64 package split.
+
+ -- Stephen Kitt st...@sk2.org  Fri, 20 Apr 2012 07:53:39 +0200
+
 wine-gecko-unstable (1.0.0+dfsg-1) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * Initial release (Closes: #479861)
diff -Nru wine-gecko-unstable-1.0.0+dfsg/debian/control wine-gecko-unstable-1.0.0+dfsg/debian/control
--- wine-gecko-unstable-1.0.0+dfsg/debian/control	2011-05-30 20:28:27.0 +0200
+++ wine-gecko-unstable-1.0.0+dfsg/debian/control	2012-04-20 07:51:59.0 +0200
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
 Maintainer: Debian Wine Party pkg-wine-pa...@lists.alioth.debian.org
 Uploaders: Ove Kaaven o...@arcticnet.no
 Build-Depends: debhelper (= 7), autoconf2.13, libidl-dev, libx11-dev,
- gcc-mingw-w64, libstdc++6-4.5-dev, python, zip, unzip, lcab
+ g++-mingw-w64-i686, python, zip, unzip, lcab
 Build-Conflicts: binfmt-support
 Standards-Version: 3.9.1
 Homepage: http://www.winehq.org/


Bug#635382: [tex-live] new release of latex-unicode

2012-04-20 Thread Wolfgang Jeltsch
Am Freitag, den 20.04.2012, 00:09 +0200 schrieb Reinhard Kotucha:
 On 2012-04-19 at 23:17:50 +0300, Wolfgang Jeltsch wrote:
  At least, the following minimal example works as expected:
  
   \documentclass{article}
  
   \usepackage[utf8x]{inputenc}
   \usepackage[vietnam]{babel}
  
   \begin{document}
  
   Ơ, ơ, Ư, ư
  
   \end{document}

 […]

   I wasn’t able to derive an analog minimal example, which uses the
   vietnam package. Maybe, I just have no proper understanding of how to
   use the vietnam package. I got complaints about missing babel
   definitions for vietnam and such.
 
 Could you send me your .tex and .log files?

I think Iʼve found the problem. After having tested the above minimal
example, I replaced the lines

\usepackage[utf8x]{inputenc}
\usepackage[vietnam]{babel}

by

\usepackage[utf8x]{vietnam}

and reran pdflatex. This gave me the following:

! Package babel Error: You haven't defined the language vietnam yet.

The problem was that there was a line

\select@language{vietnam}

in the aux file from the previous pdflatex run. When running pdflatex
again, everything worked fine.

Best wishes,
Wolfgang




--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#669584: python-rbtools: New upstream version 0.4.1 is available

2012-04-20 Thread Dmitry Nezhevenko
Package: python-rbtools
Version: 0.3.4-1
Severity: wishlist

Hi,

I'm packaging ReviewBoard itself (#653113) and almost done with it. I've
filled #669570 ITP for rbtools package, but guys at debian-devel noticed
me that it's already packaged.

So could you please update your package to latest upstream version
(0.4.1).

If you don't have time to do it, I can provide some help with it.

Regards

-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 3.3.1+ (SMP w/2 CPU cores; PREEMPT)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL 
set to en_US.UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages python-rbtools depends on:
ii  python2.7.2-10
ii  python-pkg-resources  0.6.24-1
ii  python2.6 2.6.7-4
ii  python2.7 2.7.3~rc2-2

python-rbtools recommends no packages.

python-rbtools suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information

-- 
WBR, Dmitry



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#669153: redmine: Missing syntax highlighting

2012-04-20 Thread Youhei SASAKI
Hi, J$(D+1(Br$(D+1(Bmy

At Fri, 20 Apr 2012 00:30:19 +0200,
J$(D+1(Br$(D+1(Bmy Lal kapo...@melix.org wrote:
 
- snip -
 
 I just tested with coderay 1.0.5 packages that sits in pkg-ruby's git
 repository and it works quite well.
 Either i backport redmine to coderay 0.9.x or someone uploads the work
 of Youhei ?

New upstream coderay ver.1.0.5 does not upload yet.

Best Wishes,
---
Youhei SASAKI uwab...@gfd-dennou.org
  uwab...@debian.or.jp
GPG fingerprint:
  4096/RSA: 66A4 EA70 4FE2 4055 8D6A C2E6 9394 F354 891D 7E07



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#654783: race condition in libpthread causes hangs in python2.7 testsuite

2012-04-20 Thread Petr Salinger

That's really nice.  Petr, could you give some explanation on that
one-line patch you provided?  Is it supposed to be the correct fix or
is more work necessary?  I'm not familiar with the whole picture but
if you give some pointers I may be able to help.


In the original (plain linuxthreads) code, with thread implemented as 
freebsd process, the wakeup signal is sent to thread manager from kernel, 
after exit of thread.


In current variant, with thread implemented as freebsd kernel thread,
the wakeup signal is sent to thread manager from userspace, a few moments 
before exit. It is an expected race condition. It is also the reason, 
why || main_thread_exiting have been added. I expected, that loss of a
wakeup does not matter, the child thread will be eaten only slightly 
later, when another thread exits and sends wake up. The only problem 
should be, when there is no another thread, it should be solved by

|| main_thread_exiting. But it does not suffice.

The try eat dead child everytime is just workaround.
The better way might be to add atomic counter
[using gcc's __sync_fetch_and_add()] to track 
the number of expected dead or soon to be dead child

and try to eat dead child when the number is above zero.

And (of course) in long term, do not use manager thread anymore.

Petr



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#649404: ITP: bibtexconv/0.8.14-1 -- BibTeX Converter

2012-04-20 Thread Thomas Dreibholz
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist

* Package name: bibtexconv
   Version : 0.8.14-1
   Upstream Author : Thomas Dreibholz dre...@iem.uni-due.de
 * URL : http://www.iem.uni-due.de/~dreibh/bibtexconv/index.html
 * License : GPL, version 3
   Section : tex

BibTeXConv is still looking for a Deban sponsor. See 
http://mentors.debian.net/package/bibtexconv .

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Bug#669585: RFS: bibtexconv/0.8.14-1 -- Looking for a Debian sponsor

2012-04-20 Thread Thomas Dreibholz
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package bibtexconv. BibTeXConv is a BibTeX 
file converter which allows one to export BibTeX entries to other formats, 
including customly defined text output. Furthermore, it provides the 
possibility to check URLs (including MD5, size and MIME type computations)
 and to verify ISBN and ISSN numbers. Examples are provided on the BibTeXConv 
website at http://www.iem.uni-due.de/~dreibh/bibtexconv/index.html .

 * Package name: bibtexconv
   Version : 0.8.14-1
   Upstream Author : Thomas Dreibholz dre...@iem.uni-due.de
 * URL : http://www.iem.uni-due.de/~dreibh/bibtexconv/index.html
 * License : GPL, version 3
   Section : tex

It builds those binary packages:

  bibtexconv - BibTeX Converter

To access further information about this package, please visit the following 
URL:

  http://mentors.debian.net/package/bibtexconv


Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

dget -x 
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/b/bibtexconv/bibtexconv_0.8.14-1.dsc

More information about bibtexconv can be obtained from http://www.iem.uni-
due.de/~dreibh/bibtexconv/.


Best regards,
   Thomas Dreibholz


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Bug#655801: tarantool: FTBFS: make[4]: lua: Command not found

2012-04-20 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 20/04/12 at 10:24 +0400, Dmitry E. Oboukhov wrote:
  severity 655801 important
  thanks
  
  I can't reproduce the bug. So I reduce severity level.
  
  I can. Please post a build log including dependencies installation, so
  we can see why lua is there for you but not for me.
  
  I think that Your filesystem is a cause for Your trouble.
 
  Can you elaborate ?
 
  buildlog for i386:
  
  https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=tarantoolarch=i386ver=1.4.4%2B20120127-1stamp=1327746838
 
  In your log:
 
  make[4]: Entering directory
  `/build/buildd-tarantool_1.4.4+20120127-1-i386-v48zmd/tarantool-1.4.4+20120127/build-area/third_party/luajit/src'
  HOSTCCbuildvm.o
  gcc  -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -Wall  -c -o buildvm.o buildvm.c
  HOSTCCbuildvm_asm.o
  gcc  -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -Wall  -c -o buildvm_asm.o
  buildvm_asm.c
  [...]
 
  In my log:
  make[4]: Entering directory
  `/«BUILDDIR»/tarantool-1.4.4+20120127/build-area/third_party/luajit/src'
  DYNASMbuildvm_ppcspe.h
  lua ../dynasm/dynasm.lua  -D SPE -o buildvm_ppcspe.h buildvm_ppc.dasc
  make[4]: lua: Command not found
  make[4]: *** [buildvm_ppcspe.h] Error 127
 
  Can you explain that difference?
 
 I think that Your tar unpacked buildvm_ppcspe.h after buildvm_ppc.dasc
 and set wrong date for the file.
 
 The project contains some parts that are prebuilt by hand, for example
 some ragel c-objects and the case. But they aren't compiled if You
 unpack tarball correctly.
 
 I can reproduce Your problem only If I change datetime some files by
 hand.

Are you using ext3 or ext4?

Lucas



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#661297: html roundtrip example on man page

2012-04-20 Thread Alexander Holupirek

On 20.04.2012, at 04:04, jida...@jidanni.org wrote:

   o  Parse non well-formed HTML (needs libtagsoup-java installed):
 Say good HTML is fine too.
 
  $ cat bad.html
  html
ul
  liA
  liB
/ul
  /html
 
  $ basex -c 'set parser html; create db html bad.html'
 
 Did you have to use the exact db name 'html'? So confusing.
 
  $ basex -q doc('html')
  html xmlns=http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml;
 
 Say there how to get rid of that xmlns=... or else one cannot do an exact 
 roundtrip.

Thanks for your suggestions. BaseX 7.2.1 will be released next week
by upstream, when packaging it, i'll add the man page updates.

Thanks,
Alex


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#669586: git-svn cannot convert some repositories

2012-04-20 Thread Ian Zimmerman
Package: git-svn
Version: 1:1.7.9.5-1
Severity: normal

[104+0]~$ git svn clone http://mlton.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/mlton mlton.bug

[... much normal output snipped ... ]

RA layer request failed: REPORT of '/svnroot/mlton/!svn/vcc/default':
Could not read response body: Connection reset by peer
(http://mlton.svn.sourceforge.net) at /usr/lib/git-core/git-svn line
5653

Since this happens at exactly the same point in the history every time,
I think it is neither a general network problem nor a cosmic ray.

It also looks similar to #512710, but since this repository can be
successfully cloned with svn clone, it is hard to call it corrupted.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-2-686-pae (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages git-svn depends on:
ii  git   1:1.7.9.5-1
ii  libsvn-perl   1.6.17dfsg-3
ii  libterm-readkey-perl  2.30-4+b2
ii  libwww-perl   6.04-1

git-svn recommends no packages.

Versions of packages git-svn suggests:
ii  git-doc 1:1.7.9.5-1
ii  subversion  1.6.17dfsg-3

-- no debconf information



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#669380: acl2-infix: unowned file /usr/local/share/texmf/ls-R after purge (policy 6.8, 9.1.2)

2012-04-20 Thread Andreas Beckmann
Followup-For: Bug #669380

Looks like the template got truncated at the beginning ... here is the
full one:

Hi,

during a test with piuparts I noticed your package left unowned files on
the system after purge, which is a violation of policy 6.8:
http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-maintainerscripts.html#s-removedetails

As putting files into /usr/local is also a violation of
http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-opersys.html#s9.1.2
I'm setting the severity to serious.

From the attached log (scroll to the bottom...):

0m53.8s ERROR: FAIL: Package purging left files on system:
  /usr/local/share/texmf/not owned
  /usr/local/share/texmf/ls-Rnot owned


This problem is usually caused by running mktexlsr (or texhash) without
path arguments from a maintainer script.

The recommende solution is to switch to use dh_installtex and have this
generate most (or perhaps even all) of the maintainer scripts content.

Otherwise run mktexlsr with the tree as argument where the package
installs its files, which is usually
  mktexlsr /usr/share/texmf

There has been some further discussion about these bugs in this thread:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-tex-maint/2012/04/msg00306.html

Please have a look at the Debian-TeX-Policy (in the tex-common package)
for the current practice of handling TeX packages. For further TeX
packaging related questions contact debian-tex-ma...@lists.debian.org


cheers,

Andreas



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#669403: iceweasel: Build-Dependency on libffi-dev needs a higher version

2012-04-20 Thread Mike Hommey
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 05:23:10PM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
 Package: iceweasel
 Version: 10.0.3esr-3
 Severity: wishlist
 
 Hi!
 
 It appears the build-dependency on libffi-dev should require some version
 later than 3.0.9-3 (squeeze).  Current testing has 3.0.10-3 which is good
 enough.  I guess it'd be a waste of time to research which particular
 version in between is required, so blindly setting it to = 3.0.10~ or
 = 3.0.10-3~ should be ok.
 
 Thus, could you please bump the dependency's version?

Why? The configure script checks for = 3.0.9, and bumping the build
dependency makes for harder backports.

Mike



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#669570: ITP: reviewboard-rbtools -- Command-line tool to create/update ReviewBoard requests

2012-04-20 Thread Dmitry Nezhevenko
tags #669570 + wontfix
thanks

On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 11:27:59PM -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
 On Friday, April 20, 2012 04:12:56 AM Dmitry Nezhevenko wrote:
  Package: wnpp
  Severity: wishlist
  Owner: Dmitry Nezhevenko d...@inhex.net
  
  * Package name: reviewboard-rbtools
Version : 0.4.1
Upstream Author : Christian Hammond, David Trowbridge
  * URL : http://www.reviewboard.org/
  * License : MIT
Programming Lang: Python
Description : Command-line tool to create/update ReviewBoard requests
  
  ReviewBoard is a web application to handle code reviews.
  This package provides post-review command-line utility that simplifies
  both creating and updating review requests. It can look at your source
  directory, generate a diff, and upload it to a new or existing review
  request on an associated Review Board server.
  
  Upstream releases it as separate source package, so we've separate debian
  source pkg too.
 
 Isn't this the same as the existing python-rbtools package:
 
 http://packages.debian.org/sid/python-rbtools
 

Oops. Yeah. It's outdated, but this is different issue. I'll fill
different request for this

-- 
WBR, Dmitry


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#669587: latex-xcolor: unowned file /usr/local/share/texmf/ls-R after purge (policy 6.8, 9.1.2)

2012-04-20 Thread Andreas Beckmann
Package: latex-xcolor
Version: 2.11-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts

Hi,

during a test with piuparts I noticed your package left unowned files on
the system after purge, which is a violation of policy 6.8:
http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-maintainerscripts.html#s-removedetails

As putting files into /usr/local is also a violation of
http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-opersys.html#s9.1.2
I'm setting the severity to serious.

From the attached log (scroll to the bottom...):

0m53.8s ERROR: FAIL: Package purging left files on system:
  /usr/local/share/texmf/not owned
  /usr/local/share/texmf/ls-Rnot owned


This problem is usually caused by running mktexlsr (or texhash) without
path arguments from a maintainer script.

The recommende solution is to switch to use dh_installtex and have this
generate most (or perhaps even all) of the maintainer scripts content.

Otherwise run mktexlsr with the tree as argument where the package
installs its files, which is usually
  mktexlsr /usr/share/texmf

There has been some further discussion about these bugs in this thread:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-tex-maint/2012/04/msg00306.html

Please have a look at the Debian-TeX-Policy (in the tex-common package)
for the current practice of handling TeX packages. For further TeX
packaging related questions contact debian-tex-ma...@lists.debian.org


cheers,

Andreas


latex-xcolor_2.11-1.log.gz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data


Bug#669588: [guake] wrong Homepage info in package

2012-04-20 Thread Matthias Cramer
Package: guake
Version: 0.4.2-8
Severity: minor

--- Please enter the report below this line. ---

In the package is the wrong project url. The correct one is: http://guake.org

Regards

  Matthias

--- System information. ---
Architecture: amd64
Kernel:   Linux 3.2.0-2-amd64

Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  500 unstablewww.debian-multimedia.org
  500 unstablemirror.switch.ch
  500 stable  dl.google.com
  500 mavericklinux.dropbox.com

--- Package information. ---
Depends (Version) | Installed
=-+-==
libatk1.0-0   (= 1.12.4) | 2.4.0-2
libc6(= 2.4) | 2.13-30
libcairo2  (= 1.2.4) | 1.12.0-2
libfontconfig1 (= 2.8.0) | 2.8.0-3.1
libfreetype6   (= 2.2.1) | 2.4.9-1
libgdk-pixbuf2.0-0(= 2.22.0) | 2.26.1-1
libglib2.0-0  (= 2.12.0) | 2.32.0-4
libgtk2.0-0   (= 2.24.0) | 2.24.10-1
libpango1.0-0 (= 1.14.0) | 1.30.0-1
libpython2.7 (= 2.7) | 2.7.3~rc2-2
libx11-6  | 2:1.4.99.901-1
notification-daemon   | 0.7.4-1
python-notify | 0.1.1-3
python  (= 2.6.6-7~) | 2.7.2-10
gconf2| 3.2.3-4
python-vte| 1:0.28.2-4
python-dbus   | 0.84.0-3
python-glade2 | 2.24.0-3
python-gconf  | 2.28.1+dfsg-1
python2.7 | 2.7.3~rc2-2


Package's Recommends field is empty.

Package's Suggests field is empty.
-- 
Matthias Cramer / mc322-ripe   Senior Network  Security Engineer
iway AGPhone +41 43 500 
Badenerstrasse 569 Fax   +41 44 271 3535
CH-8048 Zürich http://www.iway.ch/
GnuPG 1024D/2D208250 = DBC6 65B6 7083 1029 781E  3959 B62F DF1C 2D20 8250



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Bug#666098:

2012-04-20 Thread Mathieu Malaterre
Looks like OP did not read CMake wiki:

http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_Cross_Compiling#The_toolchain_file

I believe you forgot to setup the variable: 'CMAKE_FIND_ROOT_PATH'

2cts



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#669586: git-svn cannot convert some repositories

2012-04-20 Thread Jonathan Nieder
Ian Zimmerman wrote:

 It also looks similar to #512710, but since this repository can be
 successfully cloned with svn clone, it is hard to call it corrupted.

I have never heard of the svn clone command.  svn checkout reads
the latest revision and does not look at earlier history.  I tried
using the subversion equivalent to git svn clone, which is svnrdump
dump from Subversion 1.7:

$ svnrdump dump \
http://mlton.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/mlton /tmp/mlton.dump
* Dumped revision 0.
* Dumped revision 1.
* Dumped revision 2.
[...]
* Dumped revision 538.
svnrdump: E175002: REPORT of 
'http://mlton.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/mlton': Could not read response body: 
Connection reset by peer (http://mlton.svn.sourceforge.net)

The revision where it stops varies from one run to another.

The above suggests a flakey Subversion server.

I'd recommend finishing the import using git svn fetch.

Hope that helps,
Jonathan



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#635382: [tex-live] new release of latex-unicode

2012-04-20 Thread Wolfgang Jeltsch
Am Mittwoch, den 18.04.2012, 17:47 +0300 schrieb Wolfgang Jeltsch:
 Furthermore, I have a problem with building the documentation. I’ve
 added a changelog, but it isn’t included in the PDF that LaTeX produces.
 I’ve tried with an additional \RecordChanges, but with no success.

I’ve re-added \RecordChanges now, since it is obviously needed, and
changed a few other details. However, the changelog is still not show.
If you can help me at this point, *please* do. I want the ucs release to
be finally done, and the changelog issue is the main stopping point.
Thanks in advance.

Best wishes,
Wolfgang




--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#669590: libusb-1.0: version 1.0.9 is now available

2012-04-20 Thread Ludovic Rousseau
Package: libusb-1.0
Severity: normal

Hello,

The official version 1.0.9 of libusb is now available [1]. After 2
years without an official release. Yeah!

Also note that a fork of libusb called libusbx [2] was announced just
the day before the libusb 1.0.9 release. Any relation? :-)
libusbx is supposed to be a drop-in replacement of libusb. If libusb
only has a new release every 2 years it may be a good idea to package
libusbx instead/in addition.

If you want I can co-maintain libusb.

I also plan to package libusbx if the situation of libusb do not
change. Maybe I will wait after the freeze/release of Wheezy planned
for this summer.
Do you want to co-maintain libusbx?

Regards,

[1] http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=29155533
[2] http://libusbx.org/

-- 
 Dr. Ludovic Rousseau



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#669591: apt: 'apt-get remove g++' is intrepreted as an install command (iprobably any package with a + at the end)

2012-04-20 Thread Andreas Beckmann
Package: apt
Version: 0.9.1
Severity: serious

Hi,

this is a regression from 0.8.x:

# apt-get --version
apt 0.9.1 for amd64 compiled on Apr 17 2012 09:51:18
...
# apt-get remove g++
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
g++ is already the newest version.
0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.

# apt-get --version
apt 0.8.15.10 for amd64 compiled on Mar  6 2012 14:33:57
...
# apt-get remove g++
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
The following packages were automatically installed and are no longer required:
  libgmp10 libmpfr4 g++-4.6 libgomp1 gcc-4.6 libquadmath0 cpp gcc 
libstdc++6-4.6-dev libc6-dev cpp-4.6 linux-libc-dev libc-dev-bin binutils 
libmpc2
Use 'apt-get autoremove' to remove them.
The following packages will be REMOVED:
  g++
0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 1 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
After this operation, 34.8 kB disk space will be freed.
(Reading database ... 8959 files and directories currently installed.)
Removing g++ ...

remove g++ can be interpreted as
  remove g++ ({g++}-)
  install g+ ({g+}+)

iThe introduction of packages called 'g+' or 'g++-' could cause real ambiguity.


Andreas



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#669583: OSError: [Errno 1] Operation not permitted

2012-04-20 Thread Michael Vogt
B1;3100;0cOn Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 08:48:49AM +0300, Teodor wrote:
 Package: unattended-upgrades
 Version: 0.76.1
 Severity: grave
 Justification: renders package unusable
 
 Hi,
 
 The os.setsid() changes makes u-a abort on every invocation:
 | root@r2:~# unattended-upgrade
 | Traceback (most recent call last):
 |   File /usr/bin/unattended-upgrade, line 913, in module
 | os.setsid()
 | OSError: [Errno 1] Operation not permitted
 | 
 | root@r2:~# unattended-upgrade --debug
 | Traceback (most recent call last):
 |   File /usr/bin/unattended-upgrade, line 913, in module
 | os.setsid()
 | OSError: [Errno 1] Operation not permitted
 
 Thanks

Thanks for your bugreport. I fixed that now. I guess in your case it
was already the session-leader for some reason (maybe because of
systemd?).

Cheers,
 Michael

 
 -- System Information:
 Debian Release: wheezy/sid
   APT prefers unstable
   APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing')
 Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
 
 Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
 Locale: LANG=ro_RO.utf8, LC_CTYPE=ro_RO.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
 Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
 
 Versions of packages unattended-upgrades depends on:
 ii  apt0.9.1
 ii  apt-utils  0.9.1
 ii  debconf [debconf-2.0]  1.5.42
 ii  lsb-release4.1+Debian1
 ii  python 2.7.2-10
 ii  python-apt 0.8.4
 ii  ucf3.0025+nmu3
 
 unattended-upgrades recommends no packages.
 
 Versions of packages unattended-upgrades suggests:
 pn  bsd-mailx  none
 
 -- Configuration Files:
 /etc/apt/apt.conf.d/50unattended-upgrades changed:
 // Automatically upgrade packages from these origin patterns
 Unattended-Upgrade::Origins-Pattern {
 // Codename based matching:
 // This will follow the migration of a release through different
 // archives (e.g. from testing to stable and later oldstable).
 //  o=Debian,n=squeeze;
 //  o=Debian,n=squeeze-updates;
 //  o=Debian,n=squeeze-proposed-updates;
 //  o=Debian,n=squeeze,l=Debian-Security;
 // Archive or Suite based matching:
 // Note that this will silently match a different release after
 // migration to the specified archive (e.g. testing becomes the
 // new stable).
 o=Debian,a=unstable;
 //  o=Debian,a=stable;
 //  o=Debian,a=stable-updates;
 //  o=Debian,a=proposed-updates;
 origin=Debian,archive=stable,label=Debian-Security;
 };
 // List of packages to not update
 Unattended-Upgrade::Package-Blacklist {
 //vim;
 //libc6;
 //libc6-dev;
 //libc6-i686;
 };
 // This option allows you to control if on a unclean dpkg exit
 // unattended-upgrades will automatically run 
 //   dpkg --force-confold --configure -a
 // The default is true, to ensure updates keep getting installed
 //Unattended-Upgrade::AutoFixInterruptedDpkg false;
 // Split the upgrade into the smallest possible chunks so that
 // they can be interrupted with SIGUSR1. This makes the upgrade
 // a bit slower but it has the benefit that shutdown while a upgrade
 // is running is possible (with a small delay)
 //Unattended-Upgrade::MinimalSteps true;
 // Install all unattended-upgrades when the machine is shuting down
 // instead of doing it in the background while the machine is running
 // This will (obviously) make shutdown slower
 //Unattended-Upgrade::InstallOnShutdown true;
 // Send email to this address for problems or packages upgrades
 // If empty or unset then no email is sent, make sure that you
 // have a working mail setup on your system. A package that provides
 // 'mailx' must be installed.
 Unattended-Upgrade::Mail root;
 // Set this value to true to get emails only on errors. Default
 // is to always send a mail if Unattended-Upgrade::Mail is set
 Unattended-Upgrade::MailOnlyOnError true;
 // Do automatic removal of new unused dependencies after the upgrade
 // (equivalent to apt-get autoremove)
 Unattended-Upgrade::Remove-Unused-Dependencies true;
 // Automatically reboot *WITHOUT CONFIRMATION* if a 
 // the file /var/run/reboot-required is found after the upgrade 
 //Unattended-Upgrade::Automatic-Reboot false;
 // Use apt bandwidth limit feature, this example limits the download
 // speed to 70kb/sec
 //Acquire::http::Dl-Limit 70;
 
 
 -- debconf information:
 * unattended-upgrades/enable_auto_updates: true
 
 



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#655801: tarantool: FTBFS: make[4]: lua: Command not found

2012-04-20 Thread Dmitry E. Oboukhov
 I can reproduce Your problem only If I change datetime some files by
 hand.

 Are you using ext3 or ext4?

Yes, I'm using ext4 and ext3 and pbuilder and can't reproduce Your
problem :)
-- 

. ''`.   Dmitry E. Oboukhov
: :’  :   email: un...@debian.org jabber://un...@uvw.ru
`. `~’  GPGKey: 1024D / F8E26537 2006-11-21
  `- 1B23 D4F8 8EC0 D902 0555  E438 AB8C 00CF F8E2 6537


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#635382: [tex-live] new release of latex-unicode

2012-04-20 Thread Norbert Preining
Hi Wolfgang,


On Fr, 20 Apr 2012, Wolfgang Jeltsch wrote:
 I’ve re-added \RecordChanges now, since it is obviously needed, and
 changed a few other details. However, the changelog is still not show.

I never used docstrip etc before, but google helped, and an example
document, too ;-)

http://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/14181/keep-track-of-changes-in-latex-document

Did you add
\PrintChanges
somewhere and run
makeindex -s gglo.ist -o name.gls name.glo
?

That is the key point I guess.

Best wishes

Norbert

Norbert Preiningpreining@{jaist.ac.jp, logic.at, debian.org}
JAIST, Japan TeX Live  Debian Developer
DSA: 0x09C5B094   fp: 14DF 2E6C 0307 BE6D AD76  A9C0 D2BF 4AA3 09C5 B094

Trillian did a little research in the ship's copy of
THHGTTG. It had some advice to offer on drunkenness.
and good luck.'
It was cross-referenced to the entry concerning the size of
the Universe and ways of coping with that.
 --- One of the more preferable pieces of advice contained in
 --- the Guide.
 --- Douglas Adams, The Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#660547: Please re-enable C++ libraries

2012-04-20 Thread Tolga Dalman
Package: libhdf5-serial-dev
Version: 1.8.8-9
Followup-For: Bug #660547


To remove a package feature, just because it's not used by any other Debian
package appears rather strange to me.
I'm developing an application that uses the HDF5 C++ API, thus your
change just broke my development machine.
Please revert and add C++ support back to the Debian HDF5 packages.

Thanks!


-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.utf-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.utf-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

Versions of packages libhdf5-serial-dev depends on:
ii  libhdf5-dev  1.8.8-9

libhdf5-serial-dev recommends no packages.

libhdf5-serial-dev suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information




Forschungszentrum Juelich GmbH
52425 Juelich
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Juelich
Eingetragen im Handelsregister des Amtsgerichts Dueren Nr. HR B 3498
Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: MinDir Dr. Karl Eugen Huthmacher
Geschaeftsfuehrung: Prof. Dr. Achim Bachem (Vorsitzender),
Karsten Beneke (stellv. Vorsitzender), Prof. Dr.-Ing. Harald Bolt,
Prof. Dr. Sebastian M. Schmidt



Kennen Sie schon unsere app? http://www.fz-juelich.de/app



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#659519: Status of this Bug?

2012-04-20 Thread David Baron
I am seeing more and more posts on linux-audio and debian-user which seem to 
relate to this problem. Some relating to new versions of alsa libraries 
installed over 2.6.33 kernels, not just 3.2.4!



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#616109: confirming bug in kernel for raq2

2012-04-20 Thread Tom Duijf
Hi all,

I'd like to confirm this bug, also experiencing this.
It's not related to ntpd specific, all ntp updates on kernel will eventually 
crash the system.

When; while using time update methods, like
- ntpdate (cron)
- ntpd (daemon)
- openbsd ntpd (daemon)

Versions:
Experienced this with multiple debian versions (4-6) all kernels + updates so 
far.
Current:
- Debian 6.0.4
- Kernel: 2.6.32-5-r5k-cobalt
- Arch: mips

Symptoms:
No kernel messages or errors found (incl remote syslog).
Remote syslog server saves the timestamp sent by the system. Looking at the 
logs before crash; time on the system stops! Starting at some point, all logs 
have exactly the same timestamp until the system does not respond anymore.

Hope this helps.

Regards,
Tom Duijf




--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#669403: iceweasel: Build-Dependency on libffi-dev needs a higher version

2012-04-20 Thread Adam Borowski
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 09:19:35AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
 On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 05:23:10PM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
  It appears the build-dependency on libffi-dev should require some version
  later than 3.0.9-3 (squeeze).  Current testing has 3.0.10-3 which is good
  enough.  I guess it'd be a waste of time to research which particular
  version in between is required, so blindly setting it to = 3.0.10~ or
  = 3.0.10-3~ should be ok.
  
  Thus, could you please bump the dependency's version?
 
 Why? The configure script checks for = 3.0.9, and bumping the build
 dependency makes for harder backports.

Except it doesn't build against 3.0.9.  I deleted the build already so
quoting from memory: a #include fails on some/path/ffi.h, and works
correctly against 3.0.10.

And yeah, it was during backporting, obviously :)

-- 
// If you believe in so-called intellectual property, please immediately
// cease using counterfeit alphabets.  Instead, contact the nearest temple
// of Amon, whose priests will provide you with scribal services for all
// your writing needs, for Reasonable and Non-Discriminatory prices.



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#669569: Workaround apt-get changelog

2012-04-20 Thread Adrian Lang
Same here. apt-get changelog works for me, though.


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Bug#660547: Please re-enable C++ libraries

2012-04-20 Thread Sylvestre Ledru

On 20/04/2012 10:02, Tolga Dalman wrote:

Package: libhdf5-serial-dev
Version: 1.8.8-9
Followup-For: Bug #660547


To remove a package feature, just because it's not used by any other Debian
package appears rather strange to me.
The main reason was that it was a pain to manage symbol files with a C++ 
library.

I will see to bring them back.

Sylvestre



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#669592: GNUS assumes sendmail fails if sendmail prints on stderr but returns with 0

2012-04-20 Thread Christoph Egger
Package: emacs23
Version: 23.4+1-2
Severity: normal

Hi!

  If sendmail outputs to stderr (like Gnome Keyring *Warnings* in
msmtp) gnus assumes sending the mail failed although sendmail returned
with exitcode 0

Regards

Christoph

-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: kfreebsd-amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: kFreeBSD 8.3-1-amd64
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages emacs23 depends on:
ii  emacs23-bin-common  23.4+1-2
ii  gconf-service   3.2.3-4
ii  libatk1.0-0 2.2.0-2
ii  libc0.1 2.13-27
ii  libcairo2   1.10.2-7
ii  libdbus-1-3 1.5.12-1
ii  libfontconfig1  2.8.0-3.1
ii  libfreetype62.4.9-1
ii  libgconf-2-43.2.3-4
ii  libgdk-pixbuf2.0-0  2.24.1-1
ii  libgif4 4.1.6-9
ii  libglib2.0-02.30.2-6
ii  libgtk2.0-0 2.24.10-1
ii  libice6 2:1.0.7-2
ii  libjpeg88d-1
ii  libm17n-0   1.6.3-1
ii  libncurses5 5.9-4
ii  libotf0 0.9.12-1
ii  libpango1.0-0   1.29.4-3+b1
ii  libpng12-0  1.2.49-1
ii  librsvg2-2  2.36.0-5
ii  libsm6  2:1.2.0-2
ii  libtiff43.9.6-2
ii  libtinfo5   5.9-4
ii  libx11-62:1.4.4-4
ii  libxft2 2.2.0-3
ii  libxpm4 1:3.5.9-4
ii  libxrender1 1:0.9.6-2
ii  zlib1g  1:1.2.6.dfsg-2

emacs23 recommends no packages.

Versions of packages emacs23 suggests:
pn  emacs23-common-non-dfsg  none

-- no debconf information



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#589103: lsof on Debian FreeBSD

2012-04-20 Thread Nicholas Bamber

Steven,
	Thanks for your quick response and efforts. Crucially when I poke 
around in /proc/self on asdfasdf.debian.net (or the Hurd 
exodar.debian.net for that matter) I can find no /proc/sef/fd directory. 
From what I understand that is crucial to a /proc-basd lsof.


	Please feel free to check in your experiments into the collab-maint 
repository but please could you do it on a kfreebsd branch. We could 
release it to the experiemntal distribution.



On 20/04/12 03:23, Steven Chamberlain wrote:

Hi!

On 20/04/12 00:45, Nicholas Bamber wrote:

8.6Why can't Configure create lsof_owner.h for FreeBSD 6 and above?



 ...  Lsof needs to access elements of that
 lockf_owner structure to determine if a lock belongs to the
 process that has a file open.


The goal really is to keep userland tools out of kernel internals to
produce better software;  that's one of many good things I hope will
come as a side effect out of the GNU/kFreeBSD effort.


Since the 'freebsd' dialect of lsof has been relying on kernel internals
for some time, I expect that code will be in pretty bad shape.  You
could try to get what you need from the kfreebsd source but I think it
would be a bad idea.  (A kernel with an incompatible definition might be
booted at any time, and no dpkg dependency can help with that).

However, if the 'linux' dialect does not depend on kernel source code I
think that would make a better starting point.


I tried just now with the freebsd/machine.h and Makefile, but replaced
the symlinks to use dialect/linux code instead, except for node1/2 and
zfs.  That way I even managed to build something, which almost looks
like it works:


steven@kfreebsd-i386:~/lsof-4.81.dfsg.1+wtf$ ./lsof -c lsof
COMMAND   PID   USER   FD   TYPEDEVICE   SIZE   NODE NAME
lsof99812 steven  cwdDIR 92,2340356138 72  15497 
/home/steven/lsof-4.81.dfsg.1+wtf
lsof99812 steven  rtdDIR  0,71512  2 /
lsof99812 steven  txtREG 92,2340356138 145071  15837 
/home/steven/lsof-4.81.dfsg.1+wtf/lsof
lsof99812 steven  memREG   0,0 15837 
/home/steven/lsof-4.81.dfsg.1+wtf/lsof (path dev=92,-1954611158)
lsof99812 steven  memREG   0,0117963 
/lib/i386-kfreebsd-gnu/ld-2.13.so (path dev=0,71)
lsof99812 steven  memREG   0,0213682 /etc/ld.so.cache 
(path dev=0,71)
lsof99812 steven  memREG   0,0117953 /lib/libkvm.so.0 
(path dev=0,71)
lsof99812 steven  memREG   0,0117809 
/lib/i386-kfreebsd-gnu/i686/cmov/libc-2.13.so (path dev=0,71)
lsof99812 steven  memREG   0,0117827 
/lib/i386-kfreebsd-gnu/libbsd.so.0.3.0 (path dev=0,71)
lsof99812 steven  memREG   0,0108648 
/usr/lib/locale/locale-archive (path dev=164,284950746)
lsof99812 steven  memREG   0,0117898 
/lib/i386-kfreebsd-gnu/i686/cmov/libnss_compat-2.13.so (path dev=0,71)
lsof99812 steven  memREG   0,0117829 
/lib/i386-kfreebsd-gnu/i686/cmov/libnsl-2.13.so (path dev=0,71)
lsof99812 steven  memREG   0,0117834 
/lib/i386-kfreebsd-gnu/i686/cmov/libnss_nis-2.13.so (path dev=0,71)
lsof99812 steven  memREG   0,0117838 
/lib/i386-kfreebsd-gnu/i686/cmov/libnss_files-2.13.so (path dev=0,71)
lsof99812 steven NOFD/proc/99812/fd 
(opendir: No such file or directory)
lsof99813 steven  cwdDIR 92,2340356138 72  15497 
/home/steven/lsof-4.81.dfsg.1+wtf
lsof99813 steven  rtdDIR  0,71512  2 /
lsof99813 steven  txtREG 92,2340356138 145071  15837 
/home/steven/lsof-4.81.dfsg.1+wtf/lsof
lsof99813 steven  memREG   0,0 15837 
/home/steven/lsof-4.81.dfsg.1+wtf/lsof (path dev=92,-1954611158)
lsof99813 steven  memREG   0,0117963 
/lib/i386-kfreebsd-gnu/ld-2.13.so (path dev=0,71)
lsof99813 steven  memREG   0,0213682 /etc/ld.so.cache 
(path dev=0,71)
lsof99813 steven  memREG   0,0117953 /lib/libkvm.so.0 
(path dev=0,71)
lsof99813 steven  memREG   0,0117809 
/lib/i386-kfreebsd-gnu/i686/cmov/libc-2.13.so (path dev=0,71)
lsof99813 steven  memREG   0,0117827 
/lib/i386-kfreebsd-gnu/libbsd.so.0.3.0 (path dev=0,71)
lsof99813 steven  memREG   0,0108648 
/usr/lib/locale/locale-archive (path dev=164,284950746)
lsof99813 steven NOFD/proc/99813/fd 
(opendir: No such file or directory)


Sadly though we're missing /proc/*/fd in linprocfs as you can see. :(
No pipes, network or unix-style sockets can be listed either.  So it's
not very functional yet, but being able to build something is a start.

To build this I had to change declarations in machine.h to turn off each
bit of code that touches the structs usually guarded by #ifdef 

Bug#647581: gnome-session-bin: gnome-session-properties does not have any menu link

2012-04-20 Thread Kees de Jong
Package: gnome-session
Version: 3.2.1-1
Followup-For: Bug #647581

I agree, I also experience this problem. It can be fixed by adding it manually
with the application 'Main Menu', but this is not ideal.
This is indeed an important application which should be visible in the shell
menu by default, I guess it's just a matter of adding a small tweak to the
shell.
I hope this will be packaged in the next release of gnome-shell, thank you!



-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (990, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages gnome-session depends on:
ii  gnome-session-bin  3.2.1-1
ii  gnome-session-common   3.2.1-1
ii  gnome-settings-daemon  3.2.2-3
ii  gnome-shell3.2.2.1-2

Versions of packages gnome-session recommends:
ii  gnome-power-manager 3.2.1-2
ii  gnome-session-fallback  3.2.1-1

Versions of packages gnome-session suggests:
ii  desktop-base  6.0.7
ii  gnome-keyring 3.2.2-2
ii  gnome-user-guide  3.4.0-1

-- no debconf information



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#669389: texlive-latex-extra: typos in package description

2012-04-20 Thread Hilmar Preuße
On 19.04.12 helix84 (heli...@centrum.sk) wrote:

Hi Norbert,

 Package: texlive-latex-extra
 Severity: minor
 Tags: patch
 Version: 2011.20120322-1
 
 I found these typos in package description:
 
 visting-cards - visiting-cards
 reimplimentation - reimplementation
 
I guess that bug is in upstream. Will you fix it there?

H.
-- 
sigmentation fault


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#660897: Fixed upstream in syslog-ng 3.3.5

2012-04-20 Thread Gergely Nagy
tags 660897 = upstream fixed-upstream
thanks

Fixed upstream in syslog-ng 3.3.5, the patch sent earlier does fix it
too, but a better approach was chosen upstream.

-- 
|8]




-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#669571: Dependency changes causing other packages to fail to build

2012-04-20 Thread Felix Geyer
On 20.04.2012 03:20, Andrew Caudwell wrote:
 Changes made to the dependencies of this package seem to have had some
 downstream effects:

 A lot of packages assume libsdl-image1.2-dev/libsdl-image1.2 depend on
 libpng, libjpeg and/or zlib indirectly and now fail to build:

Relying on transitive depenencies when using these libraries directly
is a bug and those packages need to be fixed.

 Some examples:

 bomberclone : http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=669542
 supertux: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=669496
 logstalgia  : http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=669453

 The subject of some of these bugs is wrong, but the build log shows a
 failure testing for the existence of the above libraries.

 I could change the dependencies of my packages (logstalgia, gource),
 but it might be optimal if you could add these dependencies back.

Yes, please do that.
If this affects too many packages we could revert the dependency
changes temporarily until most of them have been fixed.

Felix




-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#669593: megaglest: After exit megaglest the desktop plays crazy, flashes and flickers.

2012-04-20 Thread Alberto
Package: megaglest
Version: 3.6.0.3
Severity: normal

Dear Maintainer,
*** Please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***

   * What led up to the situation?
   * What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
 ineffective)?
   * What was the outcome of this action?
   * What outcome did you expect instead?

*** End of the template - remove these lines ***



-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=es_ES.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=es_ES.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#635382: [tex-live] Bug#635382: new release of latex-unicode

2012-04-20 Thread Wolfgang Jeltsch
Am Donnerstag, den 19.04.2012, 22:46 +0100 schrieb Robin Fairbairns:
 Wolfgang Jeltsch wolfg...@cs.ioc.ee wrote:
 
  By the way, the package is already called “ucs” in TeXLive. However, it
  is called “unicode” in MiKTeX. And it is called “unicode” on CTAN, and
  its directory on CTAN is also called “unicode”.
 
 i wonder what you consider is naming what, here?  if you're assuming the
 catalogue entry name is the source, you're wrong.  the catalogue only
 really emerged about 10 years after ctan, and its first population was
 named from the directory that the catalogue entry described.

I mean these URLs and the appearances of “unicode” on the web pages they
represent:

http://ctan.org/pkg/unicode

http://ctan.org/tex-archive/macros/latex/contrib/unicode

  How can I change the package and directory name on CTAN? Is there a
  dedicated process for doing so? Should I upload the package under the
  name “ucs”? Should the “unicode” entry be changed to just contain some
  README that tells that the package name has changed? Should the
  “unicode” entry be removed entirely?
 
 upload a package called ucs and note that it replaces unicode ;-)

I’ll probably do so within the next days.

By the way, I’ve changed a few things to accommodate for the upcoming
name change:

• The name “ucs” is now consistently used in the package’s
  documentation.

• The distribution file that is produced by the makefile is now
  called “ucs.tar.gz” instead of “unicode.tar.gz”.

• The FAQ entry that used to explain the naming inconsistency now
  mentions the name change and explains the rationale behind it.

• The URL of the source code repository is now

  http://darcs.wolfgang.jeltsch.info/tex/ucs/  .

• The URL of the package’s homepage is now

  http://wolfgang.jeltsch.info/software/tex/ucs  .

  A redirect from the old URL is in place.

Best wishes,
Wolfgang




--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#669299: rubber: URL of home page is outdated

2012-04-20 Thread Emmanuel Beffara
Hi,

De Hilmar Preuße le 19/04/2012 à 22:22:
 On 19.04.12 Baruch Even (bar...@ev-en.org) wrote:
  The maintainer was Emanuel Befarra who is also the upstream author.
  I was co-maintainer to help him get it into Debian but in fact he
  did most of the packaging work as well.
  
 Fine. Do you know if the package is actively still developed? On
 https://launchpad.net/rubber/ I read that the most recent version is
 the 1.1 for about 6 years now.

Indeed, I have not been active on this recently, for lack of time (an
also because it still just works for me). There have been some
bugfixes committed since the 1.1 release, and there are also some
proposed patches, which should get integrated to make a new release.

 Should instead the snapshot be used?

Definitely, and various distributions do that already, AFAIK.

Actually what should be done is really making a proper new release,
which, apart from integrating patches, would involve some packaging
work.

  As I have no time to maintain my packages properly if there are
  volunteers to take over I'd be happy to give ownership over the
  package.

I too would be happy to hand over maintenance to someone actually
willing to do it, and in fact that is why the code and home page have
been migrated to launchpad. Sadly there has not been much improvement
since then...

 Well, I could do it. Unfortunately I don't speak python and I never
 packaged a python based software. Not sure if this qualifies my to do
 the job.

Certainly it would be most efficient if it was done by someone fluent in
Python, but the real problem is to find someone willing to actually do
the work until a new release is produced. I you feel like contributing
to this task, please do!

-- 
Emmanuel



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#665312: What a coincidence!

2012-04-20 Thread Tomasz Buchert

Hi,
I was working on #669311 and I've run into the same thing!
Also, I wrote exactly the same patch (well, this one is obvious, isn't it?)
before I found your bug.

Dear maintainer - please merge it, so that other people won't hit this wall.

Cheers,
Tomasz



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#554387: /usr/bin/apt-get: segmentation fault when trying to update

2012-04-20 Thread Simon McVittie
retitle 554387 rred segfaults during apt-get update if pkgcache.bin is corrupted
found 554387 0.9.1
thanks

On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 at 09:04:49 +0100, Salvo Tomaselli wrote:
 E: Method rred has died unexpectedly!
 E: Il sottoprocesso rred ha ricevuto un segmentation fault.
 
 rred[15924]: segfault at bf498fe4 ip b7c5c8af sp bf498fe8 error 6 in 
 libc-2.10.1.so[b7bf5000+141000]

I saw a similar crash recently:

Apr 20 09:51:53 reptile kernel: [309153.324154] rred[2731]: segfault at 1d71148 
ip 7ffae2176799 sp 795ec270 error 4 in 
libc-2.13.so[7ffae20fc000+17d000]

On Tue, 19 Jul 2011 at 12:53:43 +0200, Michal Suchanek wrote:
 This happens when the pkgcache is corrupted (eg due to update with too
 low disk space).

Removing /var/cache/apt/*.bin* seems to have resolved it. I have 26G free
on my root filesystem (which also contains /var), so it must have been corrupt
for some other reason?

(Sorry, I deleted the corrupt versions before I realised they'd probably
have been useful to the apt developers...)

This is on my development laptop (running unstable, frequently upgraded since
lenny), so it's had basically every version of apt that was available and is
currently on 0.9.1.

It would be useful if apt could recover from this sort of thing without
sysadmin intervention - if the cache is indeed just a cache, it should be
safe to get rid of it and go back to the source files whenever something
is not right?

S



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#669317: reconf-inetd does not handle comments correctly

2012-04-20 Thread Serafeim Zanikolas
retitle 669317 verbose mode should list invalid fragments
severity 669317 minor
thanks

Hi again,

The files you install under /usr/share/reconf-inetd are not valid
xinetd.conf(5) fragments (instead they are in the inetd.conf format).

For an example fragment, see lines 35-45 at
http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=collab-maint/reconf-inetd.git;a=blob;f=tests.py;h=d455e565c860ca9c743525e1e2d281755e222ae5;hb=4e9335e379c085fc9fb0858360bb7a37949da5b8

The fields that are required by reconf-inetd are listed at
http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep9/#index6h1

Cheers,
sez

-- 
Every great idea is worthless without someone to do the work. --Neil Williams



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#669571: Dependency changes causing other packages to fail to build

2012-04-20 Thread Dominique Dumont
On Friday 20 April 2012 10:47:47 Felix Geyer wrote:
  I could change the dependencies of my packages (logstalgia, gource),
  but it might be optimal if you could add these dependencies back.
 
 Yes, please do that.
 If this affects too many packages we could revert the dependency
 changes temporarily until most of them have been fixed.

I wonder if the problem is not a tad more complex. Here's a snippet from 
bomberclone's build log:

 configure: error: 
 *** Unable to find SDL_image libary with PNG support
 (http://www.libsdl.org/projects/SDL_image/)
 
 checking for IMG_LoadPNG_RW in -lSDL_image... no
 make: *** [debian/stamp-autotools] Error 1

What puzzle me is that IMG_LoadPNG_RW symbol is provided by SDL_image library. 
It's not just an issue with a missing header file.

Hope this helps

-- 
https://github.com/dod38fr/config-model/ -o- http://search.cpan.org/~ddumont/
http://ddumont.wordpress.com/-o-   irc: dod at irc.debian.org



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#669403: iceweasel: Build-Dependency on libffi-dev needs a higher version

2012-04-20 Thread Mike Hommey
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 10:16:20AM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
 On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 09:19:35AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
  On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 05:23:10PM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
   It appears the build-dependency on libffi-dev should require some version
   later than 3.0.9-3 (squeeze).  Current testing has 3.0.10-3 which is good
   enough.  I guess it'd be a waste of time to research which particular
   version in between is required, so blindly setting it to = 3.0.10~ or
   = 3.0.10-3~ should be ok.
   
   Thus, could you please bump the dependency's version?
  
  Why? The configure script checks for = 3.0.9, and bumping the build
  dependency makes for harder backports.
 
 Except it doesn't build against 3.0.9.  I deleted the build already so
 quoting from memory: a #include fails on some/path/ffi.h, and works
 correctly against 3.0.10.
 
 And yeah, it was during backporting, obviously :)

I've been building backports against 3.0.9 for a long time and haven't
had any problem.

Mike



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#669527: [Pkg-telepathy-maintainers] Bug#669527: telepathy-glib: FTBFS: tests failed

2012-04-20 Thread Simon McVittie
 /stream-tube/offer/race/room/unix/localhost: OK
 Alarm clock
 /stream-tube/offer/race/room/unix/credentials: FAIL: test-stream-tube

This test timed out; either the buildd was too slow/busy, the test has a
race condition, or the library has a race condition.

How fast are your buildds, how many cores do they have, and how much
else is the same machine doing at the same time?

In the debian-experimental git branch I've turned off the timeout (to be
nice to sh4 and Ubuntu), so the only timeout will be the buildds' usual
n minutes with no stdout/stderr; so if it's that, it'll be fixed soon.

If it's a race condition, telepathy-glib 0.18 (currently in
experimental, but should probably hit unstable soon) might improve matters.

It might be https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45173 (which
was a race condition in that test), but that bug was a response to
139a0f63b6d (fdo#44825, 0.17.4) which isn't in 0.16 either. (It's
possible that the test was always broken and we just didn't catch it
until then, though.)

S




-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#669594: cups-client: lpstat outputs blank lines

2012-04-20 Thread Lionel Vaux
Package: cups-client
Version: 1.5.2-5
Severity: important

Hi,

On my installation, the output of lpstat only consists of blank lines
for most options. For instance, lpstat -d outputs a blank line, and
lpstat -a outputs several blank lines (as many as there are printers
detected on the system). Curiously lpstat -H does produce a correct
output.

I thought this might be TERM related but neither changing TERM or piping
the output solved the issue:
# lpstat -a | wc 
  9   0   9

I run a freshly installed wheezy.

Please let me know if I can provide additionnal information.

L.


-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages cups-client depends on:
ii  adduser3.113+nmu1
ii  cups-common1.5.2-5
ii  libc6  2.13-27
ii  libcups2   1.5.2-5
ii  libcupsimage2  1.5.2-5

Versions of packages cups-client recommends:
ii  smbclient  2:3.6.4-1

Versions of packages cups-client suggests:
pn  cups  1.5.2-5
pn  cups-bsd  1.5.2-5
pn  xpp   none

-- no debconf information



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#635382: [tex-live] Bug#635382: new release of latex-unicode

2012-04-20 Thread Norbert Preining
On Fr, 20 Apr 2012, Wolfgang Jeltsch wrote:
 I mean these URLs and the appearances of “unicode” on the web pages they
 represent:
 
 http://ctan.org/pkg/unicode
 
 http://ctan.org/tex-archive/macros/latex/contrib/unicode

Yes, if you upload ucs as an replacement for unicode also the 
above will change.

Great, thanks.

Best wishes

Norbert

Norbert Preiningpreining@{jaist.ac.jp, logic.at, debian.org}
JAIST, Japan TeX Live  Debian Developer
DSA: 0x09C5B094   fp: 14DF 2E6C 0307 BE6D AD76  A9C0 D2BF 4AA3 09C5 B094

DREBLEY (n.)
Name for a shop which is supposed to be witty but is in fact
wearisome, e.g. 'The Frock Exchange', 'Hair Apparent', etc.
--- Douglas Adams, The Meaning of Liff



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#669571: Dependency changes causing other packages to fail to build

2012-04-20 Thread Felix Geyer
On 20.04.2012 11:08, Dominique Dumont wrote:
 I wonder if the problem is not a tad more complex. Here's a snippet from
 bomberclone's build log:

  configure: error:
  *** Unable to find SDL_image libary with PNG support
  (http://www.libsdl.org/projects/SDL_image/)
 
  checking for IMG_LoadPNG_RW in -lSDL_image... no
  make: *** [debian/stamp-autotools] Error 1

 What puzzle me is that IMG_LoadPNG_RW symbol is provided by SDL_image library.
 It's not just an issue with a missing header file.

 Hope this helps

That's just the build system being a bit silly.
It links against libpng and libjpeg even though it never actually uses these 
libraries.

That can be easily fixed by removing this line from configure.in:
SDL_LIBS=$SDL_LIBS -lpng -ljpeg

Felix




-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#661069: The problem is kernel-pae

2012-04-20 Thread Daniele Antonucci
I have realized the problem is a kernel PAE presents in testing's
installation.
In fact i have installed a minimal squeeze with kernel 2.6 and the laptop
has working well; than i have upgraded to wheezy and the debian installer
installed the kernel 3.2...PAE.
When I had rebooted Debian at end of upgrade, i had selected the new kernel
and then the boot crashed.
I have rebooted the laptop and i selected the old kernel, then i removed
kernel PAE and i installed another kernel, the linux-image-3.2.0-2-4.
With this kernel the laptop works correctly.

Best regards,
Daniele


Bug#669389: texlive-latex-extra: typos in package description

2012-04-20 Thread Norbert Preining
On Fr, 20 Apr 2012, Hilmar Preuße wrote:
  visting-cards - visiting-cards
  reimplimentation - reimplementation
  
 I guess that bug is in upstream. Will you fix it there?

I fixed it in the TeX Catalogue, where there is the proper place.
But these changes will not find their way into the tlnet distribution
unless the packages are updated ... well maybe - I honstely forgot
how all this is done, although I wrote it ;-)

We will see ...

Best wishes

Norbert

Norbert Preiningpreining@{jaist.ac.jp, logic.at, debian.org}
JAIST, Japan TeX Live  Debian Developer
DSA: 0x09C5B094   fp: 14DF 2E6C 0307 BE6D AD76  A9C0 D2BF 4AA3 09C5 B094

NAAS (n.)
The winemaking region of Albania where most of the wine that people
take to bottle-parties comes from.
--- Douglas Adams, The Meaning of Liff



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#668854: nvidia-glx: Upgrade from 295.33 to 295.40 causes serious performance regression

2012-04-20 Thread Sthu
Package: nvidia-kernel-source
Version: 295.40-1
Followup-For: Bug #668854

Dear Maintainer,


After the upgrade of 

linux-image-3.2.0-2-amd64
nvidia-alternative:amd64 295.33-1 - 295.40-1
nvidia-glx:amd64 295.33-1 - 295.40-1
nvidia-kernel-dkms:amd64 295.33-1 - 295.40-1
nvidia-kernel-source:amd64 295.33-1 - 295.40-1
nvidia-vdpau-driver:amd64 295.33-1 - 295.40-1
xserver-xorg-video-nvidia:amd64 295.33-1 - 295.40-1

among others, 3D acceleration failed.

I did as usualy in such case:

module-assistant clean nvidia-kernel  m-a auto-install 
nvidia-kernel${VERSION}-source

that did successfully install the module against my kernel

though I think now it was extra meaure - as the kernel version was the same
and only Debian inner version changed.

Please fix it if You may.

Thank You for Your work!


-- Package-specific info:
uname -a:
Linux STNkTen 3.2.0-2-amd64 #1 SMP Sun Apr 15 16:47:38 UTC 2012 x86_64 GNU/Linux

/proc/version:
Linux version 3.2.0-2-amd64 (Debian 3.2.15-1) (debian-ker...@lists.debian.org) 
(gcc version 4.6.3 (Debian 4.6.3-1) ) #1 SMP Sun Apr 15 16:47:38 UTC 2012

/proc/driver/nvidia/version:
NVRM version: NVIDIA UNIX x86_64 Kernel Module  295.40  Thu Apr  5 21:37:00 PDT 
2012
GCC version:  gcc version 4.6.3 (Debian 4.6.3-1) 

lspci 'VGA compatible controller [0300]':
00:0d.0 VGA compatible controller [0300]: NVIDIA Corporation C61 [GeForce 7025 
/ nForce 630a] [10de:03d6] (rev a2) (prog-if 00 [VGA controller])
Subsystem: ASRock Incorporation Device [1849:03d6]
Control: I/O+ Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- 
Stepping- SERR- FastB2B- DisINTx-
Status: Cap+ 66MHz+ UDF- FastB2B+ ParErr- DEVSEL=fast TAbort- TAbort- 
MAbort- SERR- PERR- INTx-
Latency: 0
Interrupt: pin A routed to IRQ 21
Region 0: Memory at fa00 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=16M]
Region 1: Memory at e000 (64-bit, prefetchable) [size=256M]
Region 3: Memory at f900 (64-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=16M]
[virtual] Expansion ROM at fbfc [disabled] [size=128K]
Capabilities: access denied
Kernel driver in use: nvidia

dmesg:
[0.00] No AGP bridge found
[0.00] No AGP bridge found
[0.00] Console: colour VGA+ 80x25
[0.078230] vgaarb: device added: 
PCI::00:0d.0,decodes=io+mem,owns=io+mem,locks=none
[0.078234] vgaarb: loaded
[0.078235] vgaarb: bridge control possible :00:0d.0
[0.39] Linux agpgart interface v0.103
[9.005899] nvidia: module license 'NVIDIA' taints kernel.
[9.656989] nvidia :00:0d.0: PCI INT A - Link[LMC9] - GSI 21 (level, 
low) - IRQ 21
[9.656996] nvidia :00:0d.0: setting latency timer to 64
[9.657000] vgaarb: device changed decodes: 
PCI::00:0d.0,olddecodes=io+mem,decodes=none:owns=io+mem
[9.657133] NVRM: loading NVIDIA UNIX x86_64 Kernel Module  295.40  Thu Apr  
5 21:37:00 PDT 2012

OpenGL and NVIDIA library files installed:
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root   15 Sep 13  2011 /etc/alternatives/glx - 
/usr/lib/nvidia
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root   43 Sep 13  2011 
/etc/alternatives/glx--libGL.so.1-x86_64-linux-gnu - 
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/nvidia/libGL.so.1
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root   43 Sep 13  2011 
/etc/alternatives/glx--libGL.so.1-x86_64-linux-gnu - 
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/nvidia/libGL.so.1
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root   51 Sep 13  2011 
/etc/alternatives/glx--libXvMCNVIDIA.so.1-x86_64-linux-gnu - 
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/nvidia/libXvMCNVIDIA.so.1
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root   59 Sep 13  2011 
/etc/alternatives/glx--libXvMCNVIDIA_dynamic.so.1-x86_64-linux-gnu - 
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/nvidia/libXvMCNVIDIA_dynamic.so.1
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root   51 Sep 13  2011 
/etc/alternatives/glx--libnvidia-cfg.so.1-x86_64-linux-gnu - 
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/nvidia/libnvidia-cfg.so.1
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root   25 Sep 13  2011 
/etc/alternatives/glx--linux-libglx.so - /usr/lib/nvidia/libglx.so
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root   36 Sep 13  2011 
/etc/alternatives/glx--nvidia-bug-report.sh - 
/usr/lib/nvidia/nvidia-bug-report.sh
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root   29 Sep 13  2011 
/etc/alternatives/glx--nvidia_drv.so - /usr/lib/nvidia/nvidia_drv.so
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root   23 Sep 13  2011 /etc/alternatives/nvidia - 
/usr/lib/nvidia/current
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root   51 Sep 13  2011 
/etc/alternatives/nvidia--libGL.so.1-x86_64-linux-gnu - 
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/nvidia/current/libGL.so.1
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root   51 Sep 13  2011 
/etc/alternatives/nvidia--libGL.so.1-x86_64-linux-gnu - 
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/nvidia/current/libGL.so.1
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root   59 Sep 13  2011 
/etc/alternatives/nvidia--libXvMCNVIDIA.so.1-x86_64-linux-gnu - 
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/nvidia/current/libXvMCNVIDIA.so.1
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root   67 Sep 13  2011 
/etc/alternatives/nvidia--libXvMCNVIDIA_dynamic.so.1-x86_64-linux-gnu - 
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/nvidia/current/libXvMCNVIDIA_dynamic.so.1
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root   33 Sep 13  

Bug#669310: verbiste-el: debian-pkg-add-load-path-item

2012-04-20 Thread Tomasz Buchert

I've fixed it in git repository of verbiste and the package should
make it to the unstable soon.

Just a note: this is related to #662163 (actually I used a patch 
provided there).


Cheers,
Tomasz



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#669311: verbiste-el: help mode access to source code

2012-04-20 Thread Tomasz Buchert

Hi,
this is now fixed in the git repository. Package should be uploaded soon.
Note that this bug is related to #665312.

Cheers,
Tomasz



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#669595: [PATCH] tpp: Helping to update to packaging format 3.0

2012-04-20 Thread jari . aalto
Package: tpp
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch

Hi Nico,

I had some free time; see attached patch to migrate to new package
format. Note that all files in debian/patches/* are canocalized to
*.patch.

Let me know if there is anything that needs adjusting.

Thanks,
Jari

[*] The dpatch patch management system has been deprecated for some time. The
Lintian currently flags use of dpatch packages as an error. The new 3.0
packaging format is an improved version which, among other things, contains
patch management built-in. For more information, see:
http://wiki.debian.org/Projects/DebSrc3.0.


From b61e110930321ad0b2ae09890a359d8c531aeb23 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jari Aalto jari.aa...@cante.net
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2012 12:43:25 +0300
Subject: [PATCH] format-3.0
Organization: Private
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Signed-off-by: Jari Aalto jari.aa...@cante.net
---
 debian/changelog  |   11 +++
 debian/compat |2 +-
 debian/control|6 +++---
 debian/copyright  |2 +-
 debian/patches/{make.dpatch = 00-make.patch} |8 ++--
 debian/patches/00list |2 --
 debian/patches/{man.dpatch = 05-man.patch}   |8 ++--
 debian/patches/series |2 ++
 debian/rules  |   15 ++-
 debian/source/format  |1 +
 debian/watch  |2 ++
 11 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
 rename debian/patches/{make.dpatch = 00-make.patch} (69%)
 delete mode 100644 debian/patches/00list
 rename debian/patches/{man.dpatch = 05-man.patch} (90%)
 create mode 100644 debian/patches/series
 create mode 100644 debian/source/format
 create mode 100644 debian/watch

diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog
index f9f7e07..9b78d3d 100644
--- a/debian/changelog
+++ b/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,14 @@
+tpp (1.3.1-3) unstable; urgency=low
+
+  [ Jari Aalto ]
+  * Remove deprecated dpatch and upgrade to packaging format 3.0 quilt.
+  * Update to Standards-Version to 3.9.3 and debhelper to 9.
+  * Add build-arch, build-indep, binary-arch targets; use dh_prep in rules file.
+  * Fix copyright-refers-to-symlink-license (Lintian).
+  * Fix debian-watch-file-is-missing (Lintian).
+
+ -- Jari Aalto jari.aa...@cante.net  Fri, 20 Apr 2012 12:42:08 +0300
+
 tpp (1.3.1-2) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * Make use of the new Homepage control field instead of the tag.
diff --git a/debian/compat b/debian/compat
index 7ed6ff8..ec63514 100644
--- a/debian/compat
+++ b/debian/compat
@@ -1 +1 @@
-5
+9
diff --git a/debian/control b/debian/control
index fc548d1..691770f 100644
--- a/debian/control
+++ b/debian/control
@@ -2,13 +2,13 @@ Source: tpp
 Section: graphics
 Priority: optional
 Maintainer: Nico Golde n...@debian.org
-Build-Depends: debhelper (= 5), dpatch (=1.11)
-Standards-Version: 3.7.3
+Build-Depends: debhelper (= 9)
+Standards-Version: 3.9.3
 Homepage: http://www.ngolde.de/tpp/
 
 Package: tpp
 Architecture: all
-Depends: ruby (=1.8.0-1), libncurses-ruby1.8
+Depends: ${misc:Depends}, ruby (=1.8.0-1), libncurses-ruby1.8
 Suggests: figlet, texpower
 Description: text presentation program
  Tpp stands for text presentation program and is an ncurses-based presentation
diff --git a/debian/copyright b/debian/copyright
index bbaac88..a686932 100644
--- a/debian/copyright
+++ b/debian/copyright
@@ -22,4 +22,4 @@ This software is copyrighted (c) 2004,2005,2007 by Nico Golde and Andreas Krennm
MA 02110-1301, USA.
 
 On Debian GNU/Linux systems, the complete text of the GNU General
-Public License can be found in `/usr/share/common-licenses/GPL'.
+Public License can be found in `/usr/share/common-licenses/GPL-2'.
diff --git a/debian/patches/make.dpatch b/debian/patches/00-make.patch
similarity index 69%
rename from debian/patches/make.dpatch
rename to debian/patches/00-make.patch
index 0e7289e..241cad6 100644
--- a/debian/patches/make.dpatch
+++ b/debian/patches/00-make.patch
@@ -1,10 +1,6 @@
-#! /bin/sh /usr/share/dpatch/dpatch-run
-## make.dpatch by Nico Golde n...@debian.org
-##
-## All lines beginning with `## DP:' are a description of the patch.
-## DP: No description.
+From: Nico Golde n...@debian.org
+Subject: Adjust documention file install
 
-@DPATCH@
 diff -urNad tpp-1.3.1~/Makefile tpp-1.3.1/Makefile
 --- tpp-1.3.1~/Makefile	2005-06-12 13:37:20.0 +0200
 +++ tpp-1.3.1/Makefile	2007-04-23 11:24:33.0 +0200
diff --git a/debian/patches/00list b/debian/patches/00list
deleted file mode 100644
index 15c9426..000
--- a/debian/patches/00list
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,2 +0,0 @@
-make
-man
diff --git a/debian/patches/man.dpatch b/debian/patches/05-man.patch
similarity index 90%
rename from debian/patches/man.dpatch
rename to debian/patches/05-man.patch
index f56593e..0968629 100644
--- 

Bug#660148: auctex: Should depend on emacsen

2012-04-20 Thread Luca Capello
notfixed 660148 auctex/11.86-10
thanks

Hi there!

On Sun, 01 Apr 2012 17:25:32 +0200, Luca Capello wrote:
 Davide, thank you for having re-added emacs-snapshot support.

Actually, now that I *effectively* tried to upgrade, I found out that
emacs-snapshot is still missing from debian/control, so this bug has not
been fixed yet.

Thx, bye,
Gismo / Luca


pgpWP0MNHCpSj.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Bug#667901: iceweasel: FTBFS on s390x: segmentation fault with jemalloc

2012-04-20 Thread Philipp Kern
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 11:06:54AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
 So, it is in fact a jemalloc problem, and I have an actual fix for it.
 As 10.0.4 is due on tuesday, I'll wait for that.

Thanks, Mike!

Kind regards
Philipp Kern
 


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#667901: iceweasel: FTBFS on s390x: segmentation fault with jemalloc

2012-04-20 Thread Mike Hommey
On Sat, Apr 07, 2012 at 03:05:20PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
 On Sat, Apr 07, 2012 at 01:06:45PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
  Source: iceweasel
  Version: 10.0.3esr-3
  Severity: important
  User: debian-s...@lists.debian.org
  Usertags: s390x
  
  iceweasel currently fails to build from source:
  
  |   adding: hyphenation/hyph_is.dic (deflated 50%)
  |   adding: hyphenation/hyph_da.dic (deflated 47%)
  |   adding: hyphenation/hyph_gl.dic (deflated 69%)
  |   adding: hyphenation/hyph_sv.dic (deflated 51%)
  |   adding: hyphenation/hyph_nn.dic (deflated 52%)
  |   adding: hyphenation/hyph_lt.dic (deflated 51%)
  |   adding: hyphenation/hyph_bg.dic (deflated 72%)
  | Segmentation fault
  | make[2]: *** [install] Error 139
  | make[2]: Leaving directory 
  `/build/buildd-iceweasel_10.0.3esr-3-s390x-oh0PPR/iceweasel-10.0.3esr/build-xulrunner/xulrunner/installer'
  | dh_auto_install: make -j1 install 
  DESTDIR=/build/buildd-iceweasel_10.0.3esr-3-s390x-oh0PPR/iceweasel-10.0.3esr/debian/tmp
   AM_UPDATE_INFO_DIR=no MOZ_APP_BASE_VERSION=10.0 
  MOZ_PKG_MANIFEST=/build/buildd-iceweasel_10.0.3esr-3-s390x-oh0PPR/iceweasel-10.0.3esr/build-xulrunner/debian/installer/package-manifest
   MOZ_NONLOCALIZED_PKG_LIST=xpcom xulrunner debian 
  MOZ_LOCALIZED_PKG_LIST=en-US SIGN_NSS= returned exit code 2
  | make[1]: *** [stamps/install-xulrunner] Error 29
  | rm build-browser/debian/installer/Makefile 
  build-xulrunner/debian/installer/Makefile
  | make[1]: Leaving directory 
  `/build/buildd-iceweasel_10.0.3esr-3-s390x-oh0PPR/iceweasel-10.0.3esr'
  | make: *** [binary-arch] Error 2
  
  This failure is reproducible and happens when xpcshell is invoked.  
  Aurélien
  pinned it down to a failure with jemalloc, as the build completes 
  successfully
  with --disable-jemalloc.  zelenka, the s390 porterbox, does have a s390x 
  chroot
  as sid_s390x.  Fedora apparently disabled jemalloc in response to this 
  problem.
  
  Aurélien further found this:
  
  10:25 aurel32 what i know about jemalloc so far:
  10:25 aurel32 - it works with version 7
  10:25 aurel32 - it doesn't with version 8
  10:26 aurel32 - using the jemalloc from version 8 in firefox 7 still works
  10:26 aurel32 - building with --disable-jemalloc make firefox working
  
  Mike, is disabling jemalloc to make it build an option or would you prefer 
  to
  dig into the problem?
 
 I doubt jemalloc is the whole story. I think the js engine is the actual
 problem, and not using jemalloc merely hides it at build time.

So, it is in fact a jemalloc problem, and I have an actual fix for it.
As 10.0.4 is due on tuesday, I'll wait for that.

Mike



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#561737: udisks inhibits me to mount an USB floppy drive

2012-04-20 Thread Andreas Brogle
Packet: udisks Version 1.0.4-5

Hi,

Yet as root I can't manually mount a floppy in an USB drive, as long as udisks 
is installed.

A 'mount /dev/sda /mount/local/usbfloppy' fails.
There is some noise at the drive, but nothing happens.

As a workaround I can do 'udisks --mount /dev/sda'

Entries in 'etc/fstab' are ignored.

Is this a proper solution ?

Regards,
Andreas


Bug#668854: nvidia-glx: Upgrade from 295.33 to 295.40 causes serious performance regression

2012-04-20 Thread Andreas Beckmann
On 2012-04-20 11:34, Sthu wrote:
 Please fix it if You may.
Only NVIDIA can.

In http://www.nvnews.net/vbulletin/showpost.php?p=2547640postcount=10
Plagman (NVIDIA Corporation) wrote at 04-19-12, 02:55 PM:
  We've identified a performance problem with integrated graphics
  chipsets that got included in the 295.40 release, but is independent
  of the security fix. Expect a fix shortly.

So there is hope :-)


Andreas



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#669596: [PATCH] yacpi: Helping to update to packaging format 3.0

2012-04-20 Thread jari . aalto
Package: yacpi
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch

Hi Nico,

I had some free time; see attached patch to migrate to new package
format[*]. Note that all files in debian/patches/* are canocalized to
*.patch.

Let me know if there is anything that needs adjusting.

Thanks,
Jari

[*] The dpatch patch management system has been deprecated for some time.
The Lintian currently flags use of dpatch packages as an error. The new 3.0
packaging format is an improved version which, among other things, contains
patch management built-in. For more information, see:
http://wiki.debian.org/Projects/DebSrc3.0.

From 5b5f51df6c031dd31ce3f86a9f484ba5c63f437e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jari Aalto jari.aa...@cante.net
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2012 12:54:45 +0300
Subject: [PATCH] format-3.0
Organization: Private
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Signed-off-by: Jari Aalto jari.aa...@cante.net
---
 debian/NEWS|   12 +++-
 debian/changelog   |   14 ++
 debian/compat  |2 +-
 debian/control |6 +++---
 debian/copyright   |2 +-
 debian/patches/00list  |2 --
 debian/patches/01-makefile.patch   |   18 ++
 debian/patches/01_makefile.dpatch  |   19 ---
 .../{02_fixacstate.dpatch = 02-fixacstate.patch}  |8 ++--
 debian/patches/series  |2 ++
 debian/rules   |9 +
 debian/source/format   |1 +
 debian/watch   |2 ++
 13 files changed, 56 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)
 delete mode 100644 debian/patches/00list
 create mode 100644 debian/patches/01-makefile.patch
 delete mode 100644 debian/patches/01_makefile.dpatch
 rename debian/patches/{02_fixacstate.dpatch = 02-fixacstate.patch} (64%)
 create mode 100644 debian/patches/series
 create mode 100644 debian/source/format
 create mode 100644 debian/watch

diff --git a/debian/NEWS b/debian/NEWS
index c0dbe41..67b87ee 100644
--- a/debian/NEWS
+++ b/debian/NEWS
@@ -1,10 +1,12 @@
 yacpi (3.0-1) unstable; urgency=low
 
-* This release is a complete rewrite of yacpi so watch you setups.
-* -m option removed, not needed anymore.
-* New options to enable or disable features (battery, therm, etc).
+This release is a complete rewrite of yacpi so watch you setups. The
+major changes are:
+
+- Remove option -m; not needed anymore.
+- New options to enable or disable features (battery, therm, etc).
   Have a look at yacpi -h
-* Samples are completely dropped, they are not needed anymore.
-* -t is now -p since -t is used to enable thermal information.
+- Drop examples; not needed anymore.
+- Option -t is now -p since -t is used to enable thermal information.
 
  -- Nico Golde n...@debian.org  Thu, 09 Aug 2007 19:05:00 +0200
diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog
index e6f4d26..e4c92a3 100644
--- a/debian/changelog
+++ b/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,17 @@
+yacpi (3.0-3) unstable; urgency=low
+
+  [ Jari Aalto ]
+  * Remove deprecated dpatch and upgrade to packaging format 3.0 quilt.
+- Note: patch 01 was updated with quilt refresh to make
+  it apply cleanly.
+  * Update to Standards-Version to 3.9.3 and debhelper to 9.
+  * Add build-arch and build-indep targets; use dh_prep in rules file.
+  * Fix copyright-refers-to-symlink-license (Lintian).
+  * Fix debian-news-entry-uses-asterisk (Lintian).
+  * Fix debian-watch-file-is-missing (Lintian).
+
+ -- Jari Aalto jari.aa...@cante.net  Fri, 20 Apr 2012 12:53:07 +0300
+
 yacpi (3.0-2) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * Added 02_fixacstate to add missing call to read_acpi_acstate
diff --git a/debian/compat b/debian/compat
index 7ed6ff8..ec63514 100644
--- a/debian/compat
+++ b/debian/compat
@@ -1 +1 @@
-5
+9
diff --git a/debian/control b/debian/control
index dc73f10..48b2dbe 100644
--- a/debian/control
+++ b/debian/control
@@ -2,13 +2,13 @@ Source: yacpi
 Section: utils
 Priority: optional
 Maintainer: Nico Golde n...@debian.org
-Build-Depends: debhelper (= 5), libncurses5-dev, dpatch, libacpi-dev
+Build-Depends: debhelper (= 9), libncurses5-dev, libacpi-dev
 Homepage: http://www.ngolde.de/yacpi/
-Standards-Version: 3.7.2
+Standards-Version: 3.9.3
 
 Package: yacpi
 Architecture: i386 ia64 amd64
-Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}
+Depends: ${misc:Depends}, ${shlibs:Depends}
 Description: ncurses based acpi monitor for text mode
  yacpi (yet another configuration and power interface) is an ncurses based
  ACPI monitoring program for notebooks. There is also a text-only output
diff --git a/debian/copyright b/debian/copyright
index c30c9dc..cdd6f13 100644
--- a/debian/copyright
+++ b/debian/copyright
@@ -26,4 +26,4 @@ License:

Bug#669597: yacpi: package new upstream release 3.0.1

2012-04-20 Thread Jari Aalto
Package: yacpi
Version: 3.0-2
Severity: wishlist

Consider packaging new release:

http://www.ngolde.de/yacpi.html



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#668457: monotone: FTBFS (multiple test suite failures)

2012-04-20 Thread Francis Russell
I've just had a go at building monotone in an i386 unstable chroot and
had no issues. Perhaps whatever was causing the build failure is now fixed?

Francis



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#669583: OSError: [Errno 1] Operation not permitted

2012-04-20 Thread Teodor MICU
2012/4/20 Michael Vogt m...@debian.org:
 Thanks for your bugreport. I fixed that now. I guess in your case it
 was already the session-leader for some reason (maybe because of
 systemd?).

Yes, I use «systemd» but I don't know what being session-leader means.
Most times u-a is run automatically by Cron, only when I check or
debug some problem its run from a tty/pts console.

Just for my curiosity, can you shortly explain what problem does
os.setsid() fix or avoid?

Thanks



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#669510: giggle: FTBFS: giggle-plugin.c:439: undefined reference to `g_module_close'

2012-04-20 Thread Michael Biebl
tags 669510 + patch fixed-upstream
forwarded 669510 https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=667350
thanks

This issue has been fixed upstream and there is a patch available in the
upstream Git repository [1]. You probably need to pick the patch from
the giggle-0-6 branch [2].

Cheers,
Michael

[1]
http://git.gnome.org/browse/giggle/commit/?id=6a4d71af9920df76a15e427671c90952fddbb411
[2]
http://git.gnome.org/browse/giggle/commit/?h=giggle-0-6id=d7e2dd276396a5d9d7c04de2b7cd3f06c96e020f

-- 
Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the
universe are pointed away from Earth?



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Bug#669598: RFS: python-django-djblets/0.6.17-1 [ITP] -- Collection of useful extensions for Django

2012-04-20 Thread Dmitry Nezhevenko
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package python-django-djblets

 Package name: python-django-djblets
 Version : 0.6.17-1
 Upstream Author : Christian Hammond, David Trowbridge, Micah Dowty
 URL : https://github.com/djblets/djblets
 License : MIT
 Section : python

It builds those binary packages:

  python-django-djblets - Collection of useful extensions for Django

To access further information about this package, please visit the
following URL:

http://mentors.debian.net/package/python-django-djblets

Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this
command:

dget -x
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/python-django-djblets/python-django-djblets_0.6.17-1.dsc

This package is a dependency of ReviewBoard that I'm packaging.
ReviewBoard is a tool for Web-based code reviews. More information about
ReviewBoard is available at http://www.reviewboard.org/

djblets was present in Debian some times ago but was removed together with
ReviewBoard. I'm trying to reintroduce it in Debian.

--
WBR, Dmitry



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#669575: Pending fixes for bugs in the libanyevent-httpd-perl package

2012-04-20 Thread pkg-perl-maintainers
tag 669575 + pending
thanks

Some bugs in the libanyevent-httpd-perl package are closed in
revision 0a27525437178c056984866e1eac296bcd1c14dd in branch 'master'
by gregor herrmann

The full diff can be seen at
http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-perl/packages/libanyevent-httpd-perl.git;a=commitdiff;h=0a27525

Commit message:

Fix Vcs-* fields in debian/control.

Closes: #669575




-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#669599: RFS: python-django-evolution/0.6.7-1 [ITP] -- Schema evolution for the Django web framework

2012-04-20 Thread Dmitry Nezhevenko
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package python-django-evolution

 * Package name: python-django-evolution
   Version : 0.6.7-1
   Upstream Author : Christian Hammond, Russell Keith-Magee, Ben Khoo
 * URL : http://code.google.com/p/django-evolution/
 * License : BSD
   Section : python

It builds those binary packages:

   python-django-evolution - Implementation of schema evolution for the Django 
web framework

To access further information about this package, please visit the following 
URL:

   http://mentors.debian.net/package/python-django-evolution

Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

   dget -x 
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/python-django-evolution/python-django-evolution_0.6.7-1.dsc

Package has one pedantic lintian warning (no-upstream-changelog). It was
overridden since upstream currently doesn't provide any changelog at all.

This package is a dependency of ReviewBoard that I'm packaging.
ReviewBoard is a tool for Web-based code reviews. More information about
ReviewBoard is available at http://www.reviewboard.org/

-- 
WBR, Dmitry



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#669600: coretemp: missing support for newer processors

2012-04-20 Thread Jonathan Nieder
Source: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.32-43
Tags: upstream patch moreinfo
Severity: important
Justification: hardware support

Hi,

Trying to load coretemp with modprobe coretemp, I get

FATAL: Error inserting coretemp 
(/lib/modules/2.6.32-5-amd64/kernel/drivers/hwmon/coretemp.ko): No such device

The kernel log says

coretemp: Unknown CPU model 2f

This is with a newish Intel Xeon processor.  I suspect the attached
patch (applied upstream during the 2.6.35 merge window) will fix it,
though I haven't checked yet.  If you have any questions, feel free to
ask.

(Filing so it's not forgetten.  Once this is tested I'll be happy to
pass it upstream.)

Thanks,
Jonathan
From: Carsten Emde c.e...@osadl.org
Date: Mon, 24 May 2010 14:33:39 -0700
Subject: drivers/hwmon/coretemp.c: detect the thermal sensors by CPUID

commit 5db47b009d17d69a2f8d84357e7b24c3e3c2edec upstream.

The thermal sensors of Intel(R) CPUs can be detected by CPUID instruction,
indicated by CPUID.06H.EAX[0].

Signed-off-by: Huaxu Wan huaxu@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Carsten Emde c.e...@osadl.org
Reviewed-by: Valdis Kletnieks valdis.kletni...@vt.edu
Cc: Jean Delvare kh...@linux-fr.org
Cc: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh h...@hmh.eng.br
Cc: Yong Wang yong.y.w...@linux.intel.com
Cc: Rudolf Marek r.ma...@assembler.cz
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton a...@linux-foundation.org
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds torva...@linux-foundation.org
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder jrnie...@gmail.com
---
 drivers/hwmon/coretemp.c |   32 
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/coretemp.c b/drivers/hwmon/coretemp.c
index 585219167fa7..3ab9a223eb53 100644
--- a/drivers/hwmon/coretemp.c
+++ b/drivers/hwmon/coretemp.c
@@ -479,28 +479,20 @@ static int __init coretemp_init(void)
 
for_each_online_cpu(i) {
struct cpuinfo_x86 *c = cpu_data(i);
+   /*
+* CPUID.06H.EAX[0] indicates whether the CPU has thermal
+* sensors. We check this bit only, all the early CPUs
+* without thermal sensors will be filtered out.
+*/
+   if (c-cpuid_level = 6  (cpuid_eax(0x06)  0x01)) {
+   err = coretemp_device_add(i);
+   if (err)
+   goto exit_devices_unreg;
 
-   /* check if family 6, models 0xe (Pentium M DC),
- 0xf (Core 2 DC 65nm), 0x16 (Core 2 SC 65nm),
- 0x17 (Penryn 45nm), 0x1a (Nehalem), 0x1c (Atom),
- 0x1e (Lynnfield) */
-   if ((c-cpuid_level  0) || (c-x86 != 0x6) ||
-   !((c-x86_model == 0xe) || (c-x86_model == 0xf) ||
-   (c-x86_model == 0x16) || (c-x86_model == 0x17) ||
-   (c-x86_model == 0x1a) || (c-x86_model == 0x1c) ||
-   (c-x86_model == 0x1e))) {
-
-   /* supported CPU not found, but report the unknown
-  family 6 CPU */
-   if ((c-x86 == 0x6)  (c-x86_model  0xf))
-   printk(KERN_WARNING DRVNAME : Unknown CPU 
-   model %x\n, c-x86_model);
-   continue;
+   } else {
+   printk(KERN_INFO DRVNAME : CPU (model=0x%x)
+has no thermal sensor.\n, c-x86_model);
}
-
-   err = coretemp_device_add(i);
-   if (err)
-   goto exit_devices_unreg;
}
if (list_empty(pdev_list)) {
err = -ENODEV;
-- 
1.7.10



Bug#669601: libgnuradio-fcd3.5.3: udev-rule for Funcube Dongle produces error

2012-04-20 Thread denk
Package: libgnuradio-fcd3.5.3
Version: 3.5.3-3
Severity: normal

The udev rule 60-libgnuradio-fcd3.5.3.rules leads to the following error:

unknown key 'BUS' in /lib/udev/rules.d/60-libgnuradio-fcd3.5.3.rules:2

Instead of 'BUS', which is deprecated, 'SUBSYSTEM' should be used, I think.

Regards
denk



-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 3.3-2.slh.5-aptosid-686 (SMP w/2 CPU cores; PREEMPT)
Locale: LANG=de_DE.utf8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages libgnuradio-fcd3.5.3 depends on:
ii  libasound2                        1.0.25-2
ii  libboost-date-time1.49.0          1.49.0-2
ii  libboost-filesystem1.49.0         1.49.0-2
ii  libboost-program-options1.49.0    1.49.0-2
ii  libboost-system1.49.0             1.49.0-2
ii  libboost-thread1.49.0             1.49.0-2
ii  libc6                             2.13-30
ii  libgcc1                           1:4.7.0-3
ii  libgnuradio-audio3.5.3            3.5.3-3
ii  libgnuradio-core3.5.3             3.5.3-3
ii  libgruel3.5.3                     3.5.3-3
ii  libjack-jackd2-0 [libjack-0.116]  1.9.8~dfsg.2-1
ii  libstdc++6                        4.7.0-3
ii  libusb-1.0-0                      2:1.0.9~rc3-4
ii  multiarch-support                 2.13-30

libgnuradio-fcd3.5.3 recommends no packages.

libgnuradio-fcd3.5.3 suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#406935: Upload for LedgerSMB Debian package?

2012-04-20 Thread Robert James Clay
Hi Raphael!

On Thu, 2012-04-19 at 03:22 -0400, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
 On Wed, 18 Apr 2012, Robert James Clay wrote:
But would they accept it?  I do want to get it into Debian unstable 
  then testing before the freeze, but besides that new versions are coming
  out fairly often (currently every couple of weeks or so) there is also
  the matter of that embedded copy of the Scriptaculous Javascript
  Library.  Would they accept a new package with that still in it?
  (That's one reason I've been setting the changelog for experimental
  instead of the unstable distribution.)  

 The package goes through NEW only once, for experimental and for unstable.

  Would that mean that the ITP bug would also be closeable if it were
uploaded to experimental at first instead of unstable?  (Not that I
necessarily think it needs to go that way now...)


 So uploading to experimental doesn't change much.

  While it might be useful for when working on not using that embedded
library, I no longer think the current package itself necessarily needs
to start off by being uploaded to experimental instead of unstable.  The
package configuration using debconf/dbconfig-common isn't working the
way I want it to (initially I just want it to enable setting the
ledgersmb role and password properly) but that's why it's not enabled by
default.  (There's a note about that in Debian/NEWS.)

I currently have several LXC systems (wheezy  now squeeze; I needed
more local testing, including for new installs, so I created several of
them) that I'm using for testing LedgerSMB and once it is configured
(ledgersmb DB role created, Pg contrib_dir setting configured, apache
config updated if necessary) it is usable. Different company databases
can be created, I can log in to those companies, add users, make changes
to the user access... Update installs of the package work from my local
package repository. 


 As long as you document the reason why you have kept the copy, they
 should have no problem with it.

   Well, do you think that not yet tested with the Debian package
versions is sufficient reason?


 You can also blindly replace it and hope for the best.

More testing than what I can do by myself is certainly what I want
to see, but blindly replacing it isn't the way I'd want to go...g  


  Unstable is also here so that people can test :-)

   And that's certainly what the package needs more of.g   What do you
think of the idea of uploading the LedgerSMB package to unstable now?  




Jame
  







-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#603157: ITP: ttf-ubuntu-font-family

2012-04-20 Thread Gürkan Sengün

Hello Jeremy

If you find a sponsor, I will do the updates to the package and provide a new
.dsc file for upload into contrib.

Yours,
Gurkan

On 04/20/12 05:02, Jeremy Bicha wrote:

Just as a follow up, could we get fonts-ubuntu uploaded into contrib?
We could see about what's needed for moving it into main later once
the appropriate requirements are met and the right people are happy.

I believe fonts-ubuntu is the correct name for this package, following
Debian's relatively new http://wiki.debian.org/Fonts/PackagingPolicy

My understanding of what Paul stated a few months ago is that
Canonical/Ubuntu would be just happy to get it into Debian however's
best, but he didn't want to force for its inclusion if Debian didn't
want it.

Thanks,
Jeremy Bicha






--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#610676: My version of php-codecoverage

2012-04-20 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 04/20/2012 04:37 AM, Luis Uribe wrote:
 Hi,
 
 For some strange reason i can't push my changes to alioth, i'm sending a
 patch then.
 
 Cheers,

Thanks. Uploaded with your changes.

Thomas




-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#635382: [tex-live] Bug#635382: new release of latex-unicode

2012-04-20 Thread Wolfgang Jeltsch
Am Freitag, den 20.04.2012, 10:16 +0100 schrieb Robin Fairbairns:
 all we await, now, is the upload.

This is done now. :-) 

Best wishes,
Wolfgang




-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#653113: ITP: reviewboard -- web-based code review tool

2012-04-20 Thread Dmitry Nezhevenko
block 653113 by 669426
block 653113 by 656275
stop

I'm still working on it. Followed dependencies are packaged and are
waiting for sponsor:

- python-django-djblets
- python-django-evolution

ReviewBoard itself is almost ready with some minor issues

-- 
WBR, Dmitry



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#666098:

2012-04-20 Thread Michal Suchanek
Excerpts from Mathieu Malaterre's message of Fri Apr 20 09:39:46 +0200 2012:
 Looks like OP did not read CMake wiki:
 
 http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_Cross_Compiling#The_toolchain_file
 
 I believe you forgot to setup the variable: 'CMAKE_FIND_ROOT_PATH'
 
 2cts

yes, this is problem with the tigervnc build instructions.

Thanks

Michal



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#667116: blahtexml: diff for NMU version 0.9-1.1

2012-04-20 Thread gregor herrmann
tags 667116 + pending
thanks

Dear maintainer,

I've prepared an NMU for blahtexml (versioned as 0.9-1.1) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/5. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.

Regards.

-- 
 .''`.  Homepage: http://info.comodo.priv.at/ - OpenPGP key 0xBB3A68018649AA06
 : :' : Debian GNU/Linux user, admin, and developer  -  http://www.debian.org/
 `. `'  Member of VIBE!AT  SPI, fellow of the Free Software Foundation Europe
   `-   NP: Simon and Garfunkel
diff -Nru blahtexml-0.9/debian/changelog blahtexml-0.9/debian/changelog
--- blahtexml-0.9/debian/changelog	2011-09-04 17:53:02.0 +0200
+++ blahtexml-0.9/debian/changelog	2012-04-20 13:00:22.0 +0200
@@ -1,3 +1,12 @@
+blahtexml (0.9-1.1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+  * Non-maintainer upload.
+  * Fix ftbfs with GCC-4.7: add patch fix-ftbfs-with-gcc-4.7 from Cyril
+Brulebois: fix missing unistd.h includes
+(Closes: #667116)
+
+ -- gregor herrmann gre...@debian.org  Fri, 20 Apr 2012 12:59:48 +0200
+
 blahtexml (0.9-1) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * New upstream version.
diff -Nru blahtexml-0.9/debian/patches/fix-ftbfs-with-gcc-4.7 blahtexml-0.9/debian/patches/fix-ftbfs-with-gcc-4.7
--- blahtexml-0.9/debian/patches/fix-ftbfs-with-gcc-4.7	1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 +0100
+++ blahtexml-0.9/debian/patches/fix-ftbfs-with-gcc-4.7	2012-04-20 12:57:57.0 +0200
@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
+Description: Fix FTBFS with gcc 4.7 by fixing missing unistd.h includes.
+Author: Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org
+Bug-Debian: http://bugs.debian.org/667116
+
+--- blahtexml-0.9.orig/Source/main.cpp
 blahtexml-0.9/Source/main.cpp
+@@ -24,6 +24,7 @@ THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIG
+ #include stdlib.h
+ #include sstream
+ #include stdexcept
++#include unistd.h
+ 
+ using namespace std;
+ using namespace blahtex;
+--- blahtexml-0.9.orig/Source/mainPng.cpp
 blahtexml-0.9/Source/mainPng.cpp
+@@ -27,6 +27,7 @@ THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIG
+ #include stdio.h
+ #include stdlib.h
+ #include sstream
++#include unistd.h
+ 
+ 
+ using namespace std;
diff -Nru blahtexml-0.9/debian/patches/series blahtexml-0.9/debian/patches/series
--- blahtexml-0.9/debian/patches/series	1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 +0100
+++ blahtexml-0.9/debian/patches/series	2012-04-20 12:57:57.0 +0200
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+fix-ftbfs-with-gcc-4.7


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#669061: apt: http method dies on sparc

2012-04-20 Thread David Kalnischkies
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 18:07, David Kalnischkies
kalnischkies+deb...@gmail.com wrote:
 It seems to be indeed the way the sha256 and sha512 checksums are
 calculated. To make it a bit obscure: we have a testcase checking them
 and they run successfully producing the correct output.
 (for reference: test/libapt/hashsums_test.cc)

 The bug seems only to be triggered if a checksum is slowly build
 as it is the case in the http transport while downloading.

/me can't see the forest for the trees…

While our testcase as well as other places in the library use well-aligned
buffers which can be casted from byte to word (or double-word) the
http transport is with its circle buffer implementation an exception to
this as it usually reads full words, but writes them to random places
which do not care for word boundaries…

More as a workaround than a completely proper fix i changed the only
place in which the input buffer is directly passed into Transform
(which was somehow not in the path gdb claimed it is used)
to memcpy it instead into a local buffer to ensure that the cast later
will work. The alternative would have been to change the http method,
but given the high debugging cost in case someone uses these
methods on unaligned buffers and that the calculations aren't that
time-critical we can life with that for now.

A more interesting fix would it be to make the Transform
methods work with bytes instead of words, but i guess
we can better think about that without blocking a transition…

(Michael will upload that soon together with a few more fixes.
 As of writing this should make apt new-serious-bug-free… yeah!
 We will see how long this will last… :) )

Best regards

David Kalnischkies


apt-669061-unaligned-http-buffer-sigbus-on-sparc.diff
Description: Binary data


Bug#669147: libvdpau1: latest version of libvdpau1 is missing red

2012-04-20 Thread Andreas Beckmann
On 2012-04-17 21:39, Hans-J. Ullrich wrote:
 Sorry, I was unprecise. 
 
 The troubled version is libvdpau1-0.4.1-5 and the well working version is 
 libvdpau1-0.4.1-2.

Which videoplayer/browser/... did you use? Version?
Was that using the same version of nvidia-glx? Which one?

Can you try the -3 (and -4) releases inbetween? You can find them here:
http://snapshot.debian.org/package/libvdpau/

I don't see any change between -2 and -5 that could cause this.

Andreas



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#669402: [moodle-packaging] Bug#669402: moodle: Package configuration asks for database administrative password

2012-04-20 Thread Alfredo Sola

 Package installer (dbconfig-common) asks for admin password only to create a 
 new user and new database. To confirm that, check /etc/moodle/config.php 
 after you install Moodle.

Yes, I think that is what is wrong. If the user installing Moodle is 
not going to be able to give an administrative user, why not give him the 
option to provide the database, user and password instead?

-- 
Alfredo Sola
ASP5-RIPE
http://www.solucionesdinamicas.net/






--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#669555: coreutils: FTBFS: env: setfacl: No such file or directory

2012-04-20 Thread Jim Meyering
Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
 Source: coreutils
 Version: 8.13-3.1
 Severity: serious
 Tags: wheezy sid
 User: debian...@lists.debian.org
 Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120419 qa-ftbfs
 Justification: FTBFS on amd64

 Hi,

 During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
 amd64.

 Relevant part:

Hi Lucas,

Thanks for the report.
The failure is unrelated to env/setfacl.
In general, you need to search for FAIL: and (within that block) fail=1:

This test is ensuring that sort works even when it requires every single
available file descriptor.  If something about sort or one of the programs
it execs happens to keep just one extra file descriptor open, then this
test will fail.

The following upstream fix to the failing test script,
v8.14-38-g91a5bad may solve this problem:

commit 91a5badc7b8b96916147f28b1d094af98efa5aa7
Author: Paul Eggert egg...@cs.ucla.edu
Date:   Sat Nov 12 00:20:01 2011 -0800

* tests/misc/sort-continue: Port to Fedora 15.

Redirect with the shell command, not in a separate 'exec'.
Without this patch, Fedora 15 x86-64 /bin/sh (i.e., Bash 4.2.10)
complained about running out of file descriptors in the shell.


...
 FAIL: misc/sort-continue (exit: 1)
 ==
...
 + tee -a in
 + echo 31
 + ulimit -n 6
 + exec
 ./misc/sort-continue: redirection error: cannot duplicate fd: Invalid 
 argument
 ./misc/sort-continue: line 33: /dev/null: Invalid argument
 + sort -n -m __test.1 __test.10 __test.11 __test.12 __test.13
 __test.14 __test.15 __test.16 __test.17 __test.18 __test.19 __test.2
 __test.20 __test.21 __test.22 __test.23 __test.24 __test.25 __test.26
 __test.27 __test.28 __test.29 __test.3 __test.30 __test.31 __test.4
 __test.5 __test.6 __test.7 __test.8 __test.9
 sort: open failed: __test.10: Too many open files
 + fail=1
 + echo 'file descriptor exhaustion not handled'
 file descriptor exhaustion not handled
 + tee -a in
 + echo 32
 + ulimit -n 6
 + exec
 ./misc/sort-continue: redirection error: cannot duplicate fd: Invalid 
 argument
 ./misc/sort-continue: line 42: 0: Invalid argument
 + sort -n -m __test.1 __test.10 __test.11 __test.12 __test.13
 __test.14 __test.15 __test.16 __test.17 __test.18 __test.19 __test.2
 __test.20 __test.21 __test.22 __test.23 __test.24 __test.25 __test.26
 __test.27 __test.28 __test.29 __test.3 __test.30 __test.31 __test.4
 __test.5 __test.6 __test.7 __test.8 __test.9 -
 + compare in out
 + diff -u in out
 + Exit 1
 + set +e
 + exit 1
 + exit 1
 + remove_tmp_
 + __st=1
 + cleanup_
 + :
 + cd /«PKGBUILDDIR»/tests
 + chmod -R u+rwx /«PKGBUILDDIR»/tests/gt-sort-continue.HX7W
 + rm -rf /«PKGBUILDDIR»/tests/gt-sort-continue.HX7W
 + exit 1



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#669569: [Aptitude-devel] Bug#669569: aptitude: aptitude changelog: Changelog download failed: Download queue destroyed.

2012-04-20 Thread Axel Beckert
Hi,

Vincent Lefevre wrote:
 $ aptitude changelog gnome-core
 Err Changelog of gnome-core   
   
 E: Changelog download failed: Download queue destroyed.
 E: Couldn't find a changelog for gnome-core
 
 It seems that the same problem occurs for every package.

This is very likely related to being compiled against apt 0.9.x as
this was reported months ago in Ubuntu which shipped apt 0.8.16~exp
already in their last release (11.10, Oneiric)

  https://bugs.launchpad.net/debian/+source/aptitude/+bug/824708

And it doesn't happen in Testing which also has 0.6.6-1, but compiled
against an older apt version (0.8.15.10).

Regards, Axel
-- 
 ,''`.  |  Axel Beckert a...@debian.org, http://people.debian.org/~abe/
: :' :  |  Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin
`. `'   |  1024D: F067 EA27 26B9 C3FC 1486  202E C09E 1D89 9593 0EDE
  `-|  4096R: 2517 B724 C5F6 CA99 5329  6E61 2FF9 CD59 6126 16B5



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#669602: wicd-curses: crash upon start (UnicodeEncodeError)

2012-04-20 Thread Armin Haas
Package: wicd-curses
Version: 1.7.2.2-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable

Dear Maintainer,

wicd-curses crashes upon start:

~$ wicd-curses
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File /usr/share/wicd/curses/wicd-curses.py, line 81, in module
language[i] = language[i].decode('utf8')
  File /usr/lib/python2.7/encodings/utf_8.py, line 16, in decode
return codecs.utf_8_decode(input, errors, True) UnicodeEncodeError: 'ascii' 
codec 
can't encode character u'\xfc' in position 21: ordinal not in range(128)

Cheers

Armin

-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-2-686-pae (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=de_DE.utf8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages wicd-curses depends on:
ii  python2.7.2-10
ii  python-urwid  1.0.1-2
ii  wicd-daemon   1.7.2.2-1

Versions of packages wicd-curses recommends:
ii  sudo  1.8.3p2-1

wicd-curses suggests no packages.

Versions of packages wicd depends on:
ii  wicd-daemon  1.7.2.2-1

Versions of packages wicd-gtk depends on:
ii  python 2.7.2-10
ii  python-glade2  2.24.0-3
ii  python-gtk22.24.0-3
ii  wicd-daemon1.7.2.2-1

Versions of packages wicd-gtk recommends:
pn  gksu   2.0.2-6
pn  python-notify  none

Versions of packages wicd-daemon depends on:
ii  adduser 3.113+nmu1
ii  dbus1.5.12-1
ii  debconf 1.5.42
ii  iproute 20120319-1
ii  iputils-ping3:20101006-1+b1
ii  isc-dhcp-client [dhcp3-client]  4.2.2.dfsg.1-4
ii  lsb-base4.1+Debian1
ii  net-tools   1.60-24.1
ii  psmisc  22.16-1
ii  python  2.7.2-10
ii  python-dbus 0.84.0-3
ii  python-gobject  3.2.0-3
ii  python-wicd 1.7.2.2-1
ii  wireless-tools  30~pre9-8
ii  wpasupplicant   0.7.3-6

wicd-daemon recommends no packages.

Versions of packages wicd-daemon suggests:
ii  pm-utils  1.4.1-9

Versions of packages python-wicd depends on:
ii  python 2.7.2-10
ii  python2.7  2.7.3~rc2-2

-- debconf information:
* wicd/users:



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#669603: chaksem: unowned file /usr/local/share/texmf/ls-R after purge (policy 6.8, 9.1.2)

2012-04-20 Thread Andreas Beckmann
Package: chaksem
Version: 1.7b-5
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts

Hi,

during a test with piuparts I noticed your package left unowned files on
the system after purge, which is a violation of policy 6.8:
http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-maintainerscripts.html#s-removedetails

As putting files into /usr/local is also a violation of
http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-opersys.html#s9.1.2
I'm setting the severity to serious.

From the attached log (scroll to the bottom...):

0m53.8s ERROR: FAIL: Package purging left files on system:
  /usr/local/share/texmf/not owned
  /usr/local/share/texmf/ls-Rnot owned


This problem is usually caused by running mktexlsr (or texhash) without
path arguments from a maintainer script.

The recommende solution is to switch to use dh_installtex and have this
generate most (or perhaps even all) of the maintainer scripts content.

Otherwise run mktexlsr with the tree as argument where the package
installs its files, which is usually
  mktexlsr /usr/share/texmf

There has been some further discussion about these bugs in this thread:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-tex-maint/2012/04/msg00306.html

Please have a look at the Debian-TeX-Policy (in the tex-common package)
for the current practice of handling TeX packages. For further TeX
packaging related questions contact debian-tex-ma...@lists.debian.org


cheers,

Andreas


chaksem_1.7b-5.log.gz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data


Bug#668589: xserver-xorg: xserver crash when starting or after some time of using psi

2012-04-20 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Don, 2012-04-19 at 21:24 +0200, Mariusz Bialonczyk wrote: 
 On 04/16/2012 05:40 PM, Michel Dänzer wrote:
  I am wondering if it is possible because i am using xinerama on top
  of all my screens. See my config below, it's a little exotic.
  
  I'm not sure it's possible, but it's hard to guess what the problem is
  with a) and b) without seeing the corresponding xorg.conf files.
 This time I am attaching log and correlated xorg.conf (and gdb.log if it 
 apply)
 
  Also, it might be easier if you first derive a simpler configuration
  which reproduces the problem, e.g. using only one nvidia device section.
 I did as you suggested and in logs are my four testing:
 1. 1 screen from nvidia GT220 + radeon = segfault
 2. 1 screen from nvidia 6200LE + radeon = segfault
 3. same as in point 2 but i was trying to use vesa for nvidia, result:
(EE) VESA(0): Cannot read V_BIOS (3) Input/output error
 4. same as in point 2 but i used nouveau for nvidia, result:
it doesn't segfault and it was working ok (i was trying for about 3hrs)

The thing is, nouveau uses EXA as well, so it might just work by
accident. To rule that out, you could try disabling acceleration for
nouveau (if it allows that) or radeon (Option NoAccel).


-- 
Earthling Michel Dänzer   |   http://www.amd.com
Libre software enthusiast |  Debian, X and DRI developer



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#667116: blahtexml: diff for NMU version 0.9-1.1

2012-04-20 Thread Abhishek Dasgupta
On Apr 20, 2012 12:28 PM, gregor herrmann gre...@debian.org wrote:

 tags 667116 + pending
 thanks

 Dear maintainer,

 I've prepared an NMU for blahtexml (versioned as 0.9-1.1) and
 uploaded it to DELAYED/5. Please feel free to tell me if I
 should delay it longer.

Hi,
Thanks for the NMU. That is fine by me.
Cheers
Abhishek


Bug#669583: OSError: [Errno 1] Operation not permitted

2012-04-20 Thread Michael Vogt
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 12:57:29PM +0300, Teodor MICU wrote:
 2012/4/20 Michael Vogt m...@debian.org:
  Thanks for your bugreport. I fixed that now. I guess in your case it
  was already the session-leader for some reason (maybe because of
  systemd?).
 
 Yes, I use «systemd» but I don't know what being session-leader means.
 Most times u-a is run automatically by Cron, only when I check or
 debug some problem its run from a tty/pts console.
 
 Just for my curiosity, can you shortly explain what problem does
 os.setsid() fix or avoid?

Sure, the setsid() call makes the process a session leader and removes
the controlling tty. The rational is that if you run
unattended-upgrades in a shell and then shutdown your tty goes away
and unattended-upgrades gets killed even if its in the middle of a
operation (like a upgrade). The unattended-upgrades-shutdown script is
there to avoid that and keep the system running long enough to finish
the upgrade - but for that unattended-upgrades must not be terminated
by the tty going away.

Cheers,
 Michael



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#669317: reconf-inetd does not handle comments correctly

2012-04-20 Thread Jonathan McCrohan
Package: reconf-inetd

Hi Serafeim,

I've changed the format of the reconf-inetd files and it is now working.

I was going to suggest documenting the config file format in the man page, 
(especially given that it is quite easy to misread xinetd.conf as inetd.conf)
but I see this has already been filed as #669515.

Thanks,
Jon



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#669604: kbdcontrol can't load any keymap

2012-04-20 Thread Anton Zinoviev
Package: kbdcontrol
Version: 9.0+ds1-1
Severity: grave

I am not sure whether this bug belongs to kbdcontrol or to the kernel.  
I am unable to use kbdcontrol for any keymap.  Even for a simplest test 
one-line keymap it issues the following error message:

# kbdcontrol -l any_file.kbd
kbdcontrol: setting keymap: Inappropriate ioctl for device

I observed this bug on testing(wheezy).  After I upgraded the system to 
unstable(sid) the bug still remains.

Anton Zinoviev

-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: kfreebsd-amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: kFreeBSD 8.2-1-amd64
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages kbdcontrol depends on:
ii  debconf [debconf-2.0]  1.5.42
ii  libbsd00.3.0-2
ii  libc0.12.13-27

kbdcontrol recommends no packages.

kbdcontrol suggests no packages.

-- debconf information:
* kbdcontrol/keymap: us.iso.kbd



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#669605: debootstrap can't install base-files and base-passwd

2012-04-20 Thread Adrian Ban
Package: debootstrap
Version: 1.0.39
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks unrelated software

I'm trying to create a debian system and after I call:

debootstrap --verbose --arch=i386 --include=quagga,linux-
image-686-pae,syslinux,vim,gawk wheezy /media/jffs2 ftp://ftp.lug.ro/debian

I'm getting this error:

I: Extracting liblzma5...
I: Extracting xz-utils...
I: Extracting zlib1g...
I: Installing core packages...
W: Failure trying to run: chroot /media/jffs2 dpkg --force-depends --install
/var/cache/apt/archives/base-files_6.7_i386.deb /var/cache/apt/archives/base-
passwd_3.5.24_i386.deb

I've tried to run the command and the output is:

root@MyDebian:/media# chroot /media/jffs2 dpkg --force-depends --install
/var/cache/apt/archives/base-files_6.7_i386.deb /var/cache/apt/archives/base-
passwd_3.5.24_i386.deb
dpkg: warning: parsing file '/var/lib/dpkg/status' near line 48 package 'dpkg':
 missing description
dpkg: warning: parsing file '/var/lib/dpkg/status' near line 48 package 'dpkg':
 missing architecture
dpkg: regarding .../base-files_6.7_i386.deb containing base-files, pre-
dependency problem:
 base-files pre-depends on awk
  awk is not installed.
dpkg: warning: ignoring pre-dependency problem!
(Reading database ... 109 files and directories currently installed.)
Preparing to replace base-files 6.7 (using .../base-files_6.7_i386.deb) ...
Unpacking replacement base-files ...
Preparing to replace base-passwd 3.5.24 (using .../base-passwd_3.5.24_i386.deb)

Unpacking replacement base-passwd ...
dpkg: base-passwd: dependency problems, but configuring anyway as you
requested:
 base-passwd depends on libc6 (= 2.1); however:
  Package libc6 is not installed.
Setting up base-passwd (3.5.24) ...
dpkg: base-files: dependency problems, but configuring anyway as you requested:
 base-files depends on awk; however:
  Package awk is not installed.
Setting up base-files (6.7) ...
cp: preserving permissions for `/etc/profile': Permission denied
dpkg: error processing base-files (--install):
 subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
Errors were encountered while processing:
 base-files



-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-2-686-pae (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.ISO-8859-1, LC_CTYPE=en_US.ISO-8859-1 (charmap=ISO-8859-1)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages debootstrap depends on:
ii  wget  1.13.4-3

Versions of packages debootstrap recommends:
ii  debian-archive-keyring  2010.08.28
ii  gnupg   1.4.12-4

debootstrap suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#669606: nmu: samba4_4.0.0~alpha19+dfsg1-5

2012-04-20 Thread Andreas Beckmann
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu

nmu samba4_4.0.0~alpha19+dfsg1-5 . amd64 . -m rebuild against libldb1 1:1.1.6


samba4 (4.0.0~alpha19+dfsg1-5) was uploaded about 2.5 hours after
ldb (1:1.1.6-1).
Depending on the timing it was built against 1.1.5 or 1.1.6.
There is a strict versioned dependency of libsamdb0 against the upstream
version of ldb used at build time, making libsamdb0 uninstallable in
unstable (amd64 at least):

  Package: libsamdb0
  Version: 4.0.0~alpha19+dfsg1-5
  Depends: libldb1 ( 1:1.1.6~), libldb1 ( 1:1.1.5~), ...

A rebuild in a clean sid chroot works fine.

I don't know if any other architectures than amd64 (maintainer supplied
binaries, probably built while 1.1.6 was not on the mirrors, yet) are
affected by this and need to be rebuild, too.
How could I check this?


Andreas



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#669607: [PATCH] fdupes: Helping to update to packaging format 3.0

2012-04-20 Thread jari . aalto
Package: fdupes
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch

Hi Sandro,

I had some free time; see attached patch to migrate to new package
format[*]. Note that all files in debian/patches/* are canocalized to
*.patch.

Thanks,
Jari

[*] The dpatch patch management system has been deprecated for some time. The
Lintian currently flags use of dpatch packages as an error. The new 3.0
packaging format is an improved version which, among other things, contains
patch management built-in. For more information, see:
http://wiki.debian.org/Projects/DebSrc3.0

From 28873372543d51bbf27963c0e00f0429bcfef702 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jari Aalto jari.aa...@cante.net
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2012 15:02:51 +0300
Subject: [PATCH] format-3.0
Organization: Private
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Signed-off-by: Jari Aalto jari.aa...@cante.net
---
 debian/README.source   |4 
 debian/changelog   |9 +
 debian/compat  |2 +-
 debian/control |4 ++--
 debian/patches/00list  |   10 --
 ..._code.dpatch = 01-restore-pristine-code.patch} |8 ++--
 ...5_fix_makefile.dpatch = 05-fix-makefile.patch} |7 ++-
 ...{07_fix_manpage.dpatch = 07-fix-manpage.patch} |7 ++-
 ...typo.dpatch = 10-bts353789-manpage-typo.patch} |8 ++--
 ...pport.dpatch = 20-bts447601-lfs-support.patch} |8 ++--
 ...dpatch = 30-bts481809-manpage-summarize.patch} |7 ++-
 dpatch = 40-bts511702-nohidden-support.patch} |7 ++-
 ...e.dpatch = 50-bts284274-hardlinkreplace.patch} |8 ++--
 ...eaks.dpatch = 60-bts544568-fix-memleaks.patch} |8 ++--
 ...tch = 70-bts537138-disambiguate-recurse.patch} |8 ++--
 debian/patches/series  |   10 ++
 debian/rules   |   11 +++
 debian/source/format   |2 +-
 18 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 78 deletions(-)
 delete mode 100644 debian/README.source
 delete mode 100644 debian/patches/00list
 rename debian/patches/{01_restore_pristine_code.dpatch = 01-restore-pristine-code.patch} (87%)
 rename debian/patches/{05_fix_makefile.dpatch = 05-fix-makefile.patch} (76%)
 rename debian/patches/{07_fix_manpage.dpatch = 07-fix-manpage.patch} (70%)
 rename debian/patches/{10_bts353789_manpage_typo.dpatch = 10-bts353789-manpage-typo.patch} (72%)
 rename debian/patches/{20_bts447601_lfs_support.dpatch = 20-bts447601-lfs-support.patch} (86%)
 rename debian/patches/{30_bts481809_manpage_summarize.dpatch = 30-bts481809-manpage-summarize.patch} (65%)
 rename debian/patches/{40_bts511702_nohidden_support.dpatch = 40-bts511702-nohidden-support.patch} (95%)
 rename debian/patches/{50_bts284274_hardlinkreplace.dpatch = 50-bts284274-hardlinkreplace.patch} (96%)
 rename debian/patches/{60_bts544568_fix_memleaks.dpatch = 60-bts544568-fix-memleaks.patch} (72%)
 rename debian/patches/{70_bts537138_disambiguate_recurse.dpatch = 70-bts537138-disambiguate-recurse.patch} (88%)
 create mode 100644 debian/patches/series

diff --git a/debian/README.source b/debian/README.source
deleted file mode 100644
index 0d0aa40..000
--- a/debian/README.source
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,4 +0,0 @@
-This package uses dpatch to handle patches against upstream source code; you
-can find additional information about dpatch at
-
-/usr/share/doc/dpatch/
diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog
index b4c64ae..473051f 100644
--- a/debian/changelog
+++ b/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,12 @@
+fdupes (1.50-PR2-3.1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+  * Non-maintainer upload.
+  * Remove deprecated dpatch and upgrade to packaging format 3.0 quilt.
+  * Update to Standards-Version to 3.9.3 and debhelper to 9.
+  * Add build-arch and build-indep targets; use dh_prep in rules file.
+
+ -- Jari Aalto jari.aa...@cante.net  Fri, 20 Apr 2012 14:59:39 +0300
+
 fdupes (1.50-PR2-3) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * debian/control
diff --git a/debian/compat b/debian/compat
index 7ed6ff8..ec63514 100644
--- a/debian/compat
+++ b/debian/compat
@@ -1 +1 @@
-5
+9
diff --git a/debian/control b/debian/control
index 6e4969e..a73c514 100644
--- a/debian/control
+++ b/debian/control
@@ -2,8 +2,8 @@ Source: fdupes
 Section: utils
 Priority: optional
 Maintainer: Sandro Tosi mo...@debian.org
-Build-Depends: debhelper (= 5), dpatch
-Standards-Version: 3.8.4
+Build-Depends: debhelper (= 9)
+Standards-Version: 3.9.3
 Homepage: http://code.google.com/p/fdupes/
 Vcs-Git: git://git.debian.org/users/morph/fdupes.git
 Vcs-Browser: http://git.debian.org/?p=users/morph/fdupes.git
diff --git a/debian/patches/00list b/debian/patches/00list
deleted file mode 100644
index e000b92..000
--- a/debian/patches/00list
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,10 +0,0 @@
-01_restore_pristine_code
-05_fix_makefile
-07_fix_manpage
-10_bts353789_manpage_typo

Bug#669468: saga: FTBFS: build-dependency not installable: libvigraimpex-dev

2012-04-20 Thread Francesco P. Lovergine
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 09:39:19PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
  The following packages have unmet dependencies:
   sbuild-build-depends-saga-dummy : Depends: libvigraimpex-dev but it is not 
  going to be installed
  E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages.
  apt-get failed.

It seems to me that both libtiff4-dev and libtiff5-dev are requested for 
building which
leads to a failure. I think that a simple or dependency would be enough to
avoid problems.

-- 
Francesco P. Lovergine



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#669609: sponsorship-requests: NMU mod-gnutls/0.5.10-1.1

2012-04-20 Thread Bastiaan Franciscus van den Dikkenberg
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: important

Dear mentors,

  I am looking for a sponsor for my NMU for package mod-gnutls

It builds those binary packages:

libapache2-mod-gnutls - Apache module for SSL and TLS encryption with GnuTLS

  To access further information about this package, please visit the following 
URL:

  http://mentors.debian.net/package/mod-gnutls


  Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

dget -x 
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/m/mod-gnutls/mod-gnutls_0.5.10-1.1.dsc

  More information about hello can be obtained from http://www.example.com.

  Changes since the last upload:

  * Fix default-tls file for apache Added default-tls file
(Closes: #558232)
  * Fix configure: *** memcache library not found.
added build-depensie to libapr-memcache-dev (Closes: #497097)
  * apache2-dev is releplaced by apache2-threaded-dev
  * upgrade to standards-version 3.9.3

-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#666229: ITP: igtf-policy-bundle -- IGTF profiles for Authority Root Certificates

2012-04-20 Thread Christoph Anton Mitterer
Hi.

Was on a dCache workshop and hadn't time to answer before...


On Mon, 2012-04-16 at 16:08 +0200, Dennis van Dok wrote:
  I'm not sure what I prefer:
  a) ship/create symlinks for both formats
 I went with a) at the moment. That is what 'upstream' does and it's
 really handy for legacy software.
Well,.. as said I'm unsure myself...
I think software wise it's not needed for Debian,.. the transition to
ssl1.x is complete, isn't it, so there is no legacy software in Debian.

One argument against shipping both formats is, that openssl always at
least stats all files in the respective dirs...
So this could mean that for every access you get twice as many stats on
files as needed...


  But I guess this is a separate debconf thingy,... configuring what you
  put in /etc/grid-security and not the one from ca-certificates?
 yes
:)

  /etc/grid-security should then _only_ contain symlinks, IMHO.
 Agreed, and that's how it works.
:)


 Rather than start a lot of fuss here...maybe TERENA could be included in
 the ca-certificates package. It takes only a couple of sponsors IIRC.
Would perhaps make sense...


 I haven't given the metapackage a thought yet. I also don't see the need
 as there are just three packages for all the accredited stuff. Better to
 make it a conscious choice.
I personally usually prefer having meta-packages, well at least if they
don't force you to install more than really necessary (e.g. the gnome
metapackages in debian depend one many useless crap, where a recommends
would be enough IMHO).
Anyway,... given that you need to somehwere put the logic for
the /etc/grid-security handling,... a ca-certificates-igtf
(meta-)package could be a good place, IMHO


  No I don't mean older versions...
  IGTF updates quite often... once the packages are in stable (e.g.
  wheezy) we still would need to update it...
  I guess stable-updates is what this is called in the meantime.
 Sure, if upstream brings out a new version, the Debian stable package
 would have to be updated. Isn't this essentially a security fix?
Well not sure... strictly speaking I don't think so...
If a CA was broken, and therefore be removed,.. that would be a security
fix.
If a CA was no longer member of IGTF,.. that could be a security fix,...
but already questionable.
If just adding CAs surely no security fix.


  I thought David Groep is from NIKHEF? And he signed the key that is used
  to sign the eugridpma distripution key...
 Well, sure. And I'll take his word that it's the right bundle ;-) He's
 practically in the next office.
:)


 I can promise that I will diligently check the signatures, but then
 you'll have to trust me that I will do as I say...
Obviously,... but that's the trust relation users have to Debian ;)



Chris.


smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature


Bug#669608: evince: unusable UI and crashes

2012-04-20 Thread Michael Biebl
On 20.04.2012 14:06, Valentin Lorentz wrote:
 Package: evince
 Version: 3.3.90-1
 Severity: important
 Tags: upstream
 
 Dear Maintainer,
 
 Since latest update in Sid, evince has bugs which makes menu or printing
 unusable.

This might be related to the libgtk-3-0 update and you running evince
under KDE with apparently a GTK theme that tries to match the KDE widgets.

Which theme is that?

Could you use the default (Adwaita) theme and test again.

 More over, some actions (such as closing the Print dialog)
 make it crash with:
 
 (evince:12732): Gdk-WARNING **: The program 'evince' received an X
 Window System error. This probably reflects a bug in the program.
 The error was 'BadWindow (invalid Window parameter)'.
   (Details: serial 23509 error_code 3 request_code 152 minor_code 3)
   (Note to programmers: normally, X errors are reported asynchronously;
that is, you will receive the error a while after causing it.
To debug your program, run it with the GDK_SYNCHRONIZE environment
variable to change this behavior. You can then get a meaningful
backtrace from your debugger if you break on the gdk_x_error()
 function.)

Not sure if this is also related to the theme problem.

Do you use other GTK 3 apps? Do they have the same problem.

Michael

-- 
Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the
universe are pointed away from Earth?



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Bug#669610: wicd-curses crashes with italian locale

2012-04-20 Thread Salvo Tomaselli
Package: wicd-curses
Version: 1.7.2.2-1
Severity: grave
Tags: upstream patch
Justification: renders package unusable

Dear Maintainer,
wicd-curses doesn't start. I've fixed it.

80,81d79
 for i in language.keys():
 language[i] = language[i].decode('utf8')


language[i] variables appear to be already of unicode type, hence they don't
need to be decoded.
I hope they won't have different types with different locales, because that
would be very bad, and cause this fix to be harmful.

Ciao :-)


-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 3.3.2a (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=it_IT.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=it_IT.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages wicd-curses depends on:
ii  python2.7.2-10
ii  python-urwid  1.0.1-2
ii  wicd-daemon   1.7.2.2-1

Versions of packages wicd-curses recommends:
ii  sudo  1.8.3p2-1

wicd-curses suggests no packages.

Versions of packages wicd depends on:
ii  wicd-daemon  1.7.2.2-1

Versions of packages wicd-daemon depends on:
ii  adduser 3.113+nmu1
ii  dbus1.5.12-1
ii  debconf 1.5.42
ii  iproute 20120319-1
ii  iputils-ping3:20101006-1+b1
ii  isc-dhcp-client [dhcp3-client]  4.2.2.dfsg.1-4
ii  lsb-base4.1+Debian1
ii  net-tools   1.60-24.1
ii  psmisc  22.16-1
ii  python  2.7.2-10
ii  python-dbus 0.84.0-3
ii  python-gobject  3.2.0-3
ii  python-wicd 1.7.2.2-1
ii  wireless-tools  30~pre9-8
ii  wpasupplicant   0.7.3-6

wicd-daemon recommends no packages.

Versions of packages wicd-daemon suggests:
ii  pm-utils  1.4.1-9

Versions of packages python-wicd depends on:
ii  python 2.7.2-10
ii  python2.6  2.6.7-4
ii  python2.7  2.7.3~rc2-2

-- debconf information excluded



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



  1   2   3   4   >