Control: tag -1 +pending
On Sat, Sep 10, 2016 at 07:54:02AM +0200, Hannes von Haugwitz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> when moving tagged messages (by typing ; followed by s) the messages are
> correctly marked as Deleted in the current folder but saved twice in the
> target folder.
Hi Hannes,
thanks for your
Source: r-cran-treescape
Version: 1.9.17-1
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160910 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: erlang-cherly
Version: 0.12.8+dfsg-5
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160910 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: xemacs21
Version: 21.4.24-2
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160910 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: rebar
Version: 2.6.2-2
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160910 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: r-bioc-deseq2
Version: 1.12.3-2
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160910 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: neotoma
Version: 1.7.3+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160910 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: zeroinstall-injector
Version: 2.10-2
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160910 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: r-cran-rglwidget
Version: 0.1.1434-1
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160910 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: erlang-cowlib
Version: 1.3.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160910 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> deb
Source: ruby-cheffish
Version: 2.0.4-1
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160910 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> /
Source: rt-extension-calendar
Version: 1.00-1
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160910 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: chef
Version: 12.10.24-1
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160910 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> /usr/
Source: python-xklavier
Version: 0.4-4
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160910 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> deb
Source: elixir-lang
Version: 1.2.6-1
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160910 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
Control: block 832206 by -1
Dear FTP masters,
Please change the override entry for elasticsearch-curator; as the
package contains an end-user utility for administering elasticsearch
instances and not a Python library, the `admin' section is more
On 10/09/16 at 10:33 +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi Lucas,
>
> before you keep on filing bug reports against lots of R packages are you sure
> that your build environment is correct. r-cran-knitr is available as far as
> I can see.
Available, yes. Installable, no:
It seems that r-cran-yaml
ok - all looks ok so I've pushed the revised package and am waiting for
either my mentor or another reviewer to look at this upload request:
- https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=837196
On 9 September 2016 at 00:02, Jeremy Bicha wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at
This transition is complicated by being intertwined with the openmpi
transition.
The getfem++ & petsc build dependencies cannot be installed until
scalapack is rebuilt with openmpi 2.0, unfortunately scalapack FTBFS due
to test failures (#837062) which need to be resolved first.
And the slepc
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
[CC += team@security]
On Mon, 2016-09-05 at 20:50 +, Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
> I'd like to update Samba in jessie to 4.2.14+dfsg. Debdiff is attached.
This didn't make it to debian-release, most likely due to the size of
the debdiff.
> The 4 Samba releases since
Hi Adam,
On Sat, Sep 10, 2016 at 11:16:00AM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
>
> [CC += team@security]
>
> On Mon, 2016-09-05 at 20:50 +, Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
> > I'd like to update Samba in jessie to 4.2.14+dfsg. Debdiff is attached.
>
> This didn't make it to
Hey!
There is still a problem, if only gpg2 and no gpg1 is installed.
With gpg2 only there is no binary 'gpg'. So Gajim does not recognize,
that a gpg version is installed. A symlink from gpg to gpg2 helps.
Gajim should try gpg2 if gpg was not found. I also reported this
upstream.
Regards
Thomas
Source: liblockfile
Version: 1.09-6
Tags: patch
User: helm...@debian.org
Usertags: rebootstrap
liblockfile cross builds supposedly successfully, but the resulting
packages contain build architecture ELF executables. Switching to host
architecture triplet prefixed tools fixes that. Please consider
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
librime FTBFS on armel (which is armv5) due to usage of std::future
which requires atomics that are not available in armv5.
See #727621 for details.
Andreas
Package: libc6
Version: 2.24-2
Followup-For: Bug #748215
Something important has changed w.r.t. that matter:
export LANG=C.UTF-8
echo "ça va が" | iconv -f UTF-8 -t 'ascii//translit'
in Jessie, it returns expectedly
> ca va iconv: illegal input sequence at position 7
in Stretch, it returns
>
On Fri, Sep 02, 2016 at 11:48:25PM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> control: tags -1 patch
>
> On 2016-06-26 12:24:37 [+0200], Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > OpenSSL 1.1.0 is about to released. During a rebuild of all packages using
> > OpenSSL this package fail to build. A log of that build
Source: node-iconv
Version: 2.1.11-1
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160910 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: pagekite
Version: 0.5.8e-1
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160910 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: libdbi-drivers
Version: 0.9.0-4
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160910 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: erlang-cuttlefish
Version: 2.0.7+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160910 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
HI Craig,
Thanks for looking into it. Some comments, and adding the security
team alias.
On Fri, Sep 09, 2016 at 09:13:46PM +, Craig Small wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 3:39 AM Salvatore Bonaccorso
> wrote:
>
> > the following vulnerabilities were published for
Hi,
On 09-09-16 23:15, Kristian Nielsen wrote:
> Otto Kekäläinen writes:
>
>> 2016-09-09 23:04 GMT+03:00 Kristian Nielsen :
>>> ci.debian.net, maybe the docs have something, I can try looking. How is this
>>> configured, is everything in the debian
Source: rt-extension-smsnotify
Version: 1.04-1
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160910 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: libimage-info-perl
Version: 1.28-1.2
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160910 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: python-tackerclient
Version: 0.4.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160910 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
looking at .xsession-errors i get lots of messages like:
(marco:21606): Gtk-WARNING **: MetaFrames 0x55723837d180 is drawn
without a current allocation. This should not happen.
(marco:21606): Gtk-WARNING **: MetaFrames 0x55723837d180 is drawn
without a current allocation. This should not happen.
Hi Guilhem,
Quoting Guilhem Moulin (2016-09-10 01:53:56)
> Fair enough, I shouldn't have rushed this due to the train arriving at
> destination, sorry :-P The actual bug I was trying to fix was #834898, but
> you released 0.71.0-1 meanwhile. Since your fix is a lot more complicated
> than
Package: gnome-shell
Version: 3.14.4-1~deb8u1
Severity: important
On one particular system, I've observed there is always a delay of about
20 seconds to unlock the screen. The logs don't contain any warning or
explanation.
The delay occurs after typing the password and pressing enter.
Two
Control: forwarded 835887 https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=694472
On Sat, 10 Sep 2016 at 05:57:58 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Aug 2016 01:52:07 +0100 Simon McVittie wrote:
> > I'll open an upstream bug after doing this MBF.
>
> Have you filed such a
On Sat, Sep 10, 2016 at 10:33:33AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> before you keep on filing bug reports against lots of R packages are you sure
> that your build environment is correct. r-cran-knitr is available as far as
> I can see.
Hello Lucas and Andreas.
The bug seems to be correct in the
The problem is, that when using a qcow2 image, the OS reports the disk
size to be like 192k, not 10G. This also happens on Debian jessie and
using different partitioning tools like parted, cfdisk or looking at
/proc/partitions. Therefore it's not the fault of setup-storage or
parted.
It can be
Package: postgresql-9.5-postgis-2.3-scripts
Version: 2.3.0~beta1+dfsg-1~exp1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from
'sid' to 'experimental'.
It installed fine in 'sid', then the upgrade to
Control: tags -1 pending
> dpkg: error processing archive
> /tmp/apt-dpkg-install-gbqKla/1-postgresql-9.5-postgis-2.3-scripts_2.3.0~beta1+dfsg-1~exp1_all.deb
> (--unpack):
>trying to overwrite
> '/usr/share/postgresql/9.5/extension/address_standardizer.control', which is
> also in
Hi Gianfranco,
the debug packages and symbols are not currently being created since I am
using the pre v9 packaging mechanism.
I'm sure you remember - budgie-desktop is just very weird under debian &
ubuntu and the standard debhelper - all packages seem to be generated but
the desktop never
Control: tags -1 pending fixed-upstream
I have already a patch, but I prefer to fix this with a new upstream
version (just commited to my upstream repository)
Upstream fix is at:
https://github.com/coldtobi/liblightify/commit/35355c128a844dec98b414c5
f8f31b871c05fc15
--
tobi
Package: firefox
Version: 48.0-1~bpo80+1
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
I hope it is ok to report this issue here, my firefox is from
http://mozilla.debian.net/. I cannot tell if this is related to a recent
firefox update
or if the rootcause is different.
When I run firefox that I get on
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
The package ‘inform6-compiler’ is now in Debian, and installs the
free-software Inform 6 compiler.
On 14-Nov-2015, James Cowgill wrote:
> The build logs on 64-bit arches report warnings similar to these:
>
> > In file included from asm.c:9:0:
> > asm.c: In function
Package: gnuplot-nox
Version: 5.0.4+dfsg1-3
Severity: minor
Hi there,
I believe the patch 05_default_gd_font.diff that is applied to the
Debian gnuplot package is not necessary (anymore?). In turn, I believe
it is even quite counter-productive.
Let's have a look at the code that the patch
On Wed, 7 Sep 2016 18:31:12 +0200 Michal Schmidt
wrote:
> systemd-fsckd's event loop terminates if nothing happens for 30 seconds
> (IDLE_TIME_SECONDS). Usually fsck writes progress updates more frequently
> than that, but the interval is not guaranteed. So systemd-fsckd may
Package: opus
Version: 1.1.2-1
Severity: wishlist
please upgrade to libopus 1.1.3 https://www.opus-codec.org/downloads/
Control: tags -1 + unreproducible moreinfo
Hello Đặng Duy Sơn.
Thanks for your bug report.
On Fri, Sep 09, 2016 at 03:26:21PM +0700, Đặng Duy Sơn wrote:
> Package: gnome-tweak-tool
> Version: 3.21.91-1
> Severity: normal
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> When I open a new gnome-tweak-tool instance,
Source: erlang-getopt
Version: 0.8.2+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160910 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: python-axiom
Version: 0.7.5-1
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160910 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: r-cran-htmlwidgets
Version: 0.6-1
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160910 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: python-llfuse
Version: 1.1.1+dfsg-2
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160910 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: libconfig-record-perl
Version: 1.1.2-1
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160910 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: erlang-folsom
Version: 0.8.2+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160910 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: sugar-toolkit-gtk3
Version: 0.106.1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160910 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: smlnj
Version: 110.79-1
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160910 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: pygtksourceview
Version: 2.10.1-2
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160910 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: r-cran-scatterd3
Version: 0.6.2+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160910 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: arc-theme
Version: 20160605-2
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160910 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> check
Source: libconfig-model-dpkg-perl
Version: 2.083
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160910 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
I've seen #834911 but I'm
Source: rt-authen-externalauth
Version: 0.25-1
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160910 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: sugar-presence-service
Version: 0.90.2-5
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160910 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: erlang-bear
Version: 0.8.2+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160910 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
tags 741360 fixed-upstream
thanks
Hello Zefram,
On 11 March 2014 at 16:48, Zefram wrote:
> Package: manpages
> Version: 3.44-1
> Severity: minor
>
> proc(5) says:
>
>/proc/[pid]/statm
> Provides information about memory usage, measured in pages. The
>
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Simon Quigley
* Package name : qtspeech
Version : 5.8.0~alpha-1
Upstream Author : The Qt Company Ltd.
* URL : https://wiki.qt.io/QtSpeech
* License : LGPL-3, GPL-2+, BSD-3-clause, GFDL-NIV-1.3
Programming Lang: C++
Description :
Package: libvtk6.3
Version: 6.3.0+dfsg1-1+b1
Severity: critical
up to date sid docker
root@97834534b7e0:/# apt-get install libvtk6.3
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
requested an impossible situation
Hi,
Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 10, 2016 at 03:03:42PM +0200, Axel Beckert wrote:
> > cdist-doc depends on "sphinx-common (<< 1.4.5.0~), sphinx-common (>=
> > 1.4.5)". This causes the following issues:
> >
> > * It's uninstallable in unstable
> > * sphinx doesn't migrate to testing[0]
>
Hello Đặng Duy Sơn.
Hi Andreas, thanks for your reply.
(Not interpretting your "segmentation fault" literally as that's pretty
unlikely for being a python application. If it is an actual segmentation
fault and given we're not being flooded in bug reports about anything
written in python
Control: notfixed -1 1.1-3
Control: found -1 1.1-3
There are still two tests that fail intermittently:
FAIL: test/p4est_test_loadsave
FAIL: test/p8est_test_loadsave
I believe upstream are aware of issues with openmpi 2.
Package: inkscape
Version: 0.91-10
Severity: minor
Tags: patch
Please use https for inkscape's homepage:
Resolving www.inkscape.org (www.inkscape.org)... 140.211.15.230
Connecting to www.inkscape.org (www.inkscape.org)|140.211.15.230|:80...
connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response...
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
On Tue, 2016-09-06 at 11:20 +0200, Patrick Matthäi wrote:
> +glusterfs (3.5.2-2+deb8u3) jessie-proposed-updates; urgency=medium
> +
> + * quota: Fix could not start auxiliary mount issue by adding upstream patch
> +
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
On Tue, 2016-08-30 at 21:50 -0400, Jeremy Bicha wrote:
> gnome-sudoku had a bug where it would generate the same sequence of
> puzzles every time the app was run. I'm applying the patch included
> upstream in 3.18.3.
Please go ahead, bearing in mind that the window
reopen 836262
thanks
On Thu, 1 Sep 2016 10:04:37 +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> [ not libnihs maintainer ]
so why did you take it upon yourself to close this bug?
> Welcome in unstable. This is normal in unstable.
>
> No bug here and will sort out itself by rebuilding
Hi,
On Sat, 2016-09-10 at 09:50 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> I'll object until the string is removed.
Please consider that the string you're referring to [0] is only a
placeholder. The element containing it [1] will be discovered at
runtime [2] and it's label value set to the correctly adjusted
Am 10.09.2016 um 10:02 schrieb Daniel Pocock:
> Package: gnome-shell
> Version: 3.14.4-1~deb8u1
> Severity: important
>
> On one particular system, I've observed there is always a delay of about
> 20 seconds to unlock the screen. The logs don't contain any warning or
> explanation.
>
> The
> *sigh* I'd reopened and reassiged it if I were you. Not doing that now
> myself because there is also a sponsorship request for cdist at
> https://bugs.debian.org/837319 which will solve this anyways.
>
> Dmitry: Will have a look at #837319. :-)
Fine.
> > While on it I'd investigate why it
Source: sugar-toolkit
Version: 0.98.1-7
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160910 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: jwchat
Version: 1.0+dfsg-1.3
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160910 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> deb
Source: sugar-base
Version: 0.98.0-5
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160910 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> deb
Source: sugar-base-0.88
Version: 0.88.0-4
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160910 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: r-cran-yaml
Version: 2.1.13-4
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160910 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: sugar-datastore-0.88
Version: 0.88.0-4
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160910 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: libtest-file-perl
Version: 1.44-1
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160910 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: rgl
Version: 0.96.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160910 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: rabbitmq-server
Version: 3.5.7-1
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160910 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> m
Source: obfsproxy
Version: 0.2.13-1
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160910 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> F
Hi!
On Sat, Sep 10, 2016 at 10:26 AM, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
>
> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
> amd64.
>
>> Uncaught error in rebar_core: {'EXIT',
>>{undef,
>>
[Gaetano Guerriero]
> I've uploaded new version to debian mentors:
>
> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/e/eyed3/eyed3_0.7.9-2.dsc
>
> Development of the packaging is here:
>
> https://github.com/gaetano-guerriero/eyeD3-debian
I just noticed this one, but the mentors URL is now
On 09/10/2016 02:11 AM, Kumar Appaiah wrote:
> armadillo has already been uploaded to unstable. While the reverse
> dependencies should build with a binNMU, I have not tested them and
> will test it in the next couple of days.
Because gdal needs to be rebuilt for the armadillo transition to
Hi Andreas,
sadly, the documentation in ADP 0.7 does not expose the meaning of
NEEDRESTART-KSTA values. Since ADP was developed for apt-dater the
meaning of NEEDRESTART-STA can be lookuped in apt-dater's sources[1]:
#define ADP_STATUS_NRK_UNKNOWN 0
#define ADP_STATUS_NRK_NOUPGR
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
On Sun, 2016-08-28 at 16:59 +0200, Joel Rosdahl wrote:
> To fix #829088 ("ccache don't stop immediately on SIGINT and SIGTERM"), I
> propose to upgrade ccache from 3.1.12-1 to 3.1.12-2 in
> stable-proposed-updates.
>
> The change is a simple one-liner: Call _exit(1)
Control: reassign 837215 src:vim 2:7.4.2330-1
Control: reassign 837217 src:vim 2:7.4.2330-1
Control: forcemerge 837130 837215 837217
On Sat, Sep 10, 2016 at 09:23:40AM +0200, Aiko Barz wrote:
> $ apt dist-upgrade
>
>* What was the outcome of this action?
>
> > Remove: vim:amd64
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
Control: clone -1 -2 -3
Control: retitle -2 ibus-rime [armel] -- RoQA; dependency librime FTBFS on armel
Control: retitle -3 brise [armel] -- RoQA; dependency librime FTBFS on armel
With librime requested for removal on armel, the rdepends need to go
away,
Package: kde-cli-tools
Version: 4:5.7.0-1
Severity: important
--- Please enter the report below this line. ---
Any attempt to exec kioclient5 with http or ftp slave gives this:
couldn't create slave: "Unable to create io-slave:\nklauncher said: Error
loading
On 10 September 2016 at 08:46, Lucas Nussbaum <lu...@debian.org> wrote:
> Source: zeroinstall-injector
> Version: 2.10-2
> Severity: serious
> Tags: stretch sid
> User: debian...@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160910 qa-ftbfs
> Justification: FTBFS on amd64
&
Source: protobuf
Version: 3.0.0-7
Severity: important
Hi,
protobuf FTBFS on hurd-i386 and kfreebsd-* with testsuite failures:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=protobuf=hurd-i386=3.0.0-7=1472818436
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
Hi,
cdist-doc depends on "sphinx-common (<< 1.4.5.0~), sphinx-common (>=
1.4.5)". This causes the following issues:
* It's uninstallable in unstable
* sphinx doesn't migrate to testing[0]
1 - 100 of 349 matches
Mail list logo