Source: php-zmq
Version: 1.1.3-11
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20201119 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> gcc version 10.2.0 (Debian 10.
Source: dogecoin
Version: 1.14.2-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20201119 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> g++ -std=c++11 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H
Source: perftest
Version: 4.4+0.29-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20201119 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -Wd
Source: psi
Version: 1.3-6
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20201119 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> g++ -c -pipe -g -O2 -fdebug-prefix-
Source: dpuser
Version: 4.0+dfsg-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20201119 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> g++ -c -pipe -g -O2 -fdebug-pre
Hi Sven,
On Wed, Nov 18, 2020 at 08:29:58PM +0100, Sven Geuer wrote:
> Package: tomb
> Version: 2.7+dfsg2-2
> Severity: important
> Tags: security,upstream
> Forwarded: https://github.com/dyne/Tomb/issues/392
> X-Debbugs-Cc: car...@debian.org, Debian Security Team <
> t...@security.debian.org>
>
Source: phoenix-firmware
Version: 4.7.4+repack1-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20201119 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> /usr/lib/gcc/
Hi @jonas,
can you update node-eslint-scope and node-eslint to add their
typescripts types ? Webpack needs:
* @types/eslint-scope
* @types/eslint (also dependency of @types/eslint-scope)
* @types/json-schema (dependency of @types/eslint)
This files are needed to update webpack. I'd like to
Source: rust-js-sys
Version: 0.3.35-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20201119 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules build
> dh
Source: xeus
Version: 0.24.2-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20201119 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering direct
Source: libkgapi
Version: 20.08.2-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20201119 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[2]: Entering direct
Source: rmlint
Version: 2.9.0-2.1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20201119 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering direct
Source: cif2cell
Version: 2.0.0a1+dfsg-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20201119 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering direct
Source: librdf-closure-perl
Version: 0.001-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20201119 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Enter
Source: puppetlabs-ring-middleware-clojure
Version: 1.0.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20201119 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: pushpin
Version: 1.31.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20201119 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering direct
Source: gap-polycyclic
Version: 2.15.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20201119 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules build
>
Source: jss
Version: 4.8.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20201119 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering directory '/<&
Source: gap-alnuth
Version: 3.1.2-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20201119 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules build
> mk
Source: comidi-clojure
Version: 0.3.2-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20201119 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering direct
Source: veusz
Version: 3.2.1-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20201119 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering directory '/<&
Source: libxrd-parser-perl
Version: 0.201-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20201119 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Enter
Source: golang-gopkg-olivere-elastic.v5
Version: 5.0.83-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20201119 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> deb
Source: elkcode
Version: 6.3.2-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20201119 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[3]: Entering directory '/<
Source: zurl
Version: 1.11.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20201119 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering direct
Source: trapperkeeper-scheduler-clojure
Version: 0.1.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20201119 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: librdf-kml-exporter-perl
Version: 0.003-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20201119 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Enter
Source: shadowsocks-v2ray-plugin
Version: 1.3.1-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20201119 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> dpkg-buildpack
Source: libowl-directsemantics-perl
Version: 0.001-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20201119 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
s: bullseye sid ftbfs
> Usertags: ftbfs-20201119 ftbfs-bullseye
>
> Hi,
>
> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
> on amd64.
>
> Relevant part (hopefully):
> > /usr/bin/ld: /tmp/ffconf.NjlLgBYF/test.o: in function `main':
> >
On Thu, 19 Nov 2020 09:08:57 +0100 Tom Jampen wrote:
> Package: webext-dav4tbsync
> Version: 1.23-1
>
Which branch do you use (buster or sid)
Which version of webext-tbsync and webext-eas4tbsync do you have installed?
Regards
--
Mechtilde Stehmann
## Debian Developer
## PGP encryption welcome
to fix. In case you have further questions, please let me know.
El jue, 19 de nov. de 2020 a la(s) 04:42, Lucas Nussbaum (lu...@debian.org)
escribió:
> Source: tupi
> Version: 0.2+git08-3
> Severity: serious
> Justification: FTBFS on amd64
> Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
> Userta
Control: severity -1 important
On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 10:47:32AM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Source: pulseview
> Version: 0.4.2-1
> Severity: serious
> Justification: FTBFS on amd64
> Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
> Usertags: ftbfs-20201119 ftbfs-bullseye
>
> Hi,
>
Source: rsyslog
Version: 8.2010.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20201119 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> checking for rdkafka >=
Source: rust-openssl
Version: 0.10.29-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20201119 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: rust-native-tls
Version: 0.2.4-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20201119 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Control: tags -1 upstream fixed-upstream
On 2020-11-17 23:33:03 +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> I've updated my patch to avoid this issue. But now the spurious
> empty lines before the beginning of the file are avoided only
> when going to the beginning of the file, more precisely to the
>
[I don't need a CC, thanks]
Hi,
I know it was mentioned back in the day, but trying to re-ask it now:
Wouldn't it be possible to ship init scripts for compatibility purposes
from a sysvinit (or maybe a sysvinit-support) package? This would be the
inverse of what happened back when systemd was
Source: kdiagram
Version: 2.7.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20201119 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering direct
Source: rust-libmount
Version: 0.1.15-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20201119 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: rust-crypto-hash
Version: 0.3.4-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20201119 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: ruby-in-parallel
Version: 0.1.17-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20201119 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> Failure/Error: exp
Source: kreport
Version: 3.2.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20201119 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering direct
Source: mitmproxy
Version: 5.1.1-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20201119 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> [1moriginal = geta
Source: rust-libsystemd
Version: 0.1.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20201119 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: rust-publicsuffix
Version: 1.5.2-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20201119 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Hi Paul,
On Wed, Nov 18, 2020 at 10:07:01PM +0100, Paul Gevers wrote:
> I just hinted this package into testing because it's a new build
> dependency of a key package that's not migrating, but please fix the
> autopkgtest.
Could you please be more verbose?
Source: fdb
Version: 5.7.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20201119 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering direct
Source: glob2
Version: 0.9.4.4-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20201119 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering direct
Source: pikepdf
Version: 1.17.3+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20201119 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[2]: Entering direct
Source: petsc
Version: 3.14.1+dfsg1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20201119 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering direct
Upstream fix: https://www.hostedredmine.com/issues/868060, upstream
2.6.2.1 release with the fix included coming soon (likely 28.11)
- ML
Package: tmate
Version: 2.2.1-1+b1
Severity: minor
Dear Maintainer,
the manpage of tmate states that "tmate is a modified version of tmate"
(sic), which doesn't make a lot of sense.
I first suspected the culprit to be a search & replace gone wrong, but
after looking around, the issue is
On Thu, 19 Nov 2020 at 11:50, Marko Lindqvist wrote:
>
> Upstream fix: https://www.hostedredmine.com/issues/868060, upstream
> 2.6.2.1 release with the fix included coming soon (likely 28.11)
In case you decide not to wait for official upstream release but to
backport the fix to debian, you
Package: python3-dbussy
Version: 1.2.1-1
Severity: serious
X-Debbugs-Cc: roderich.sch...@gmail.com
dbussy doesn't work if /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libdbus-1.so.3
(from libdbus-1-3) isn't installed:
$ sudo mv /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libdbus-1.so.3{,-off}
$ python3
Python 3.8.6 (default, Sep
On Thu, 19 Nov 2020 10:54:14 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Without looking deeper, it looks like all 4 packages fail with the
same error:
> Source: libowl-directsemantics-perl
> Version: 0.001-2
> > # Tried to use 'OWL::DirectSemantics'.
> > # Error: Undefined subroutine
Source: rust-syntect
Version: 3.3.0-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20201119 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: ruby-kubeclient
Version: 4.6.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20201119 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> /usr/bin/ruby2.7 /usr/
Source: rust-hyper-tls
Version: 0.3.2-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20201119 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: git
Version: 1:2.29.2-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20201119 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> *** t3100-ls-tree-restrict
Source: librtr
Version: 0.6.3-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20201119 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering direct
On Sun, Mar 15, 2020 at 7:01 PM Shlomi Fish wrote:
>
> Hi Gergely !
>
> There is now an ITP here:
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=953574 .
>
Hi Gergely!
Ping! Can the python-pysol_cards package be sponsored by you?
I'd like to get the new freecell-solver release (
On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 10:39:08AM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Source: wpewebkit
> Version: 2.30.2-1
> Severity: serious
> Justification: FTBFS on amd64
> Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
> Usertags: ftbfs-20201119 ftbfs-bullseye
>
> Hi,
>
> During a rebuild of all
Source: bidi-clojure
Version: 2.1.3-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20201119 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering direct
Source: node-multipipe
Version: 1.0.2-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20201119 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering direct
Source: syncmaildir
Version: 1.3.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20201119 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering direct
Source: junit5
Version: 5.3.2-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20201119 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering direct
Source: libmbassador-java
Version: 1.3.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20201119 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules build
&
Source: xdg-utils
Version: 1.1.3-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20201119 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[3]: Entering direct
Source: golang-pault-go-ykpiv
Version: 1.3.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20201119 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> dpkg-buildpack
Source: node-async
Version: 0.8.0-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20201119 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering direct
Source: trapperkeeper-clojure
Version: 1.5.2-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20201119 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Enter
bug report in upstream is open: https://github.com/haproxy/haproxy/issues/963
On Wednesday, 2020-11-18, 09:31:59 (GMT +0100), Vincent Bernat wrote:
> ❦ 18 novembre 2020 09:11 +01, Katharina Drexel:
>
> >> > local0.*/var/log/haproxy.log
> >> >
> >> Logging all local0 to
On Mon, Nov 09, 2020 at 08:17:37PM +0100, Ivan J. wrote:
> Package: debootstrap
> Version: 1.0.123
>
> Hi. I've submitted patches to debootstrap which reimplement the logic of
> the Devuan targets (ceres, chimaera, beowulf, ascii) into being separate
> from the "sid" target. I believe the patches
Control: clone -1 -2
Control: retitle -2 tasksel --new-install fails
Control: severity -2 normal
Hi,
On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 10:21:29AM +0100, Holger Wansing wrote:
> Swen Joachim wrote:
> > On 2020-11-17 23:00 +0100, nicoo wrote:
> > > Could you confirm that the version Holdger uploaded fixes
Hi,
On 19/11/20 at 11:38 +0100, Xavier wrote:
> Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
>
> Le 19/11/2020 à 10:54, Lucas Nussbaum a écrit :
> > Source: node-async
> > Version: 0.8.0-3
> > Severity: serious
> > Justification: FTBFS on amd64
> > Tags: bullseye sid f
Source: python-pynvim
Version: 0.4.1-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20201119 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> collecting ... collected
Source: python-cement
Version: 2.10.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20201119 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
> Traceback (most
On Thu, 2020-11-19 at 00:00 +0100, Svante Signell wrote:
> Source: zeromq3
> Version: 4.3.3-3
> Severity: important
> Tags: ftbfs, patch
> User: debian-h...@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: hurd
>
> Hello,
>
> zeromq3 fails to build from source due to a PATH_MAX issue in
> tests/testutil.cpp, and a
Source: golang-github-magiconair-properties
Version: 1.8.1+really1.8.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20201119 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: vsmartcard
Version: 3.3+dfsg-1.2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20201119 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[3]: Entering direct
Source: pulseview
Version: 0.4.2-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20201119 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> dpkg-buildpack
Source: micro
Version: 2.0.6-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20201119 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering direct
Source: slic3r-prusa
Version: 2.2.0+dfsg1-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20201119 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[2]: Enter
Source: r-cran-pbdzmq
Version: 0.3.3.1+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20201119 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Enter
Source: cupt
Version: 2.10.4+nmu1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20201119 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[4]: Entering directory '/&
Source: gdb-mingw-w64
Version: 10.9
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20201119 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering direct
Package: mirrors
Severity: wishlist
User: mirr...@packages.debian.org
Usertags: mirror-submission
Submission-Type: new
Site: mirror.it4i.cz
Type: leaf
Archive-architecture: ALL amd64 arm64 armel armhf hurd-i386 i386 kfreebsd-amd64
kfreebsd-i386 mips mips64el mipsel powerpc ppc64el s390x
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
Le 19/11/2020 à 10:54, Lucas Nussbaum a écrit :
> Source: node-async
> Version: 0.8.0-3
> Severity: serious
> Justification: FTBFS on amd64
> Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
> Usertags: ftbfs-20201119 ftbfs-bullseye
>
> Hi,
>
> During a rebuil
tbfs
> Usertags: ftbfs-20201119 ftbfs-bullseye
>
> Hi,
>
> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
> on amd64.
Thanks Lucas!
This is the same bug as #975216.
This is caused by the upgrade of pari to 2.13.0.
Cheers,
Bill
function
Message-Id: <20201119201844.e5ef49746727110119c26...@xdump.org>
In-Reply-To: <91f835cb-2be6-1c89-0889-7ea4e9d48...@gaussglocke.de>
X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.7.0 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Am Fr., 13. Nov. 2020 um 01:28 Uhr schrieb Gunnar Hjalmarsson
:
>
> On 2020-11-12 23:20, Matthias Klumpp wrote:
> > You want this patch for AppStream:
> > https://github.com/ximion/appstream/commit/b52858bff55d358f925b8e64bab77b953067f248
>
> But only comments are changed there!?
>
> Still... I
1. Basic principles
Josh Triplett writes:
> I do not believe it falls within the scope of the technical
> committee to override a decision already decided by a project-wide
> GR,
No-one is asking the TC to override the GR. In fact, Matthew is
asking the TC to *implement* the GR.
> or to
Control: clone -1 -2
Control: reassign -1 src:python-msgpack 1.0.0-4
Control: severity -1 normal
Control: retitle -1 Add Breaks python-pynvim << 0.4.2~
Control: reassing -2 src:python-pynvim 0.4.1-2
Control: retitle -2 python-pynvim update for new python-msgpack
Hi,
On Wed, 18 Nov 2020 21:32:41
Package: firmware-misc-nonfree
Version: 20190114-2
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
The file /lib/firmware/nvidia/gv100/acr/ucode_load.bin is missing from
package firmware-misc-nonfree in Debian Buster. I have to use the package
provided in backports.
-- System Information:
Debian Release:
Am Donnerstag, den 19.11.2020, 12:01 +0200 schrieb Marko Lindqvist:
> On Thu, 19 Nov 2020 at 11:50, Marko Lindqvist wrote:
> > Upstream fix: https://www.hostedredmine.com/issues/868060, upstream
> > 2.6.2.1 release with the fix included coming soon (likely 28.11)
>
> In case you decide not to
Package: u-boot-menu
Version: 4.0.2
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
Previously there was call to check with lsb_release what the default
label should be. Currently, it is customizable via the config file, or
fallsback to Debian. It would be nice to read "PRETTY_NAME" from
/etc/os-release
Hi,
as noted above, my use for this fix is quodlibet not segfaulting
anymore as describe in bug 970687. So I got the latest libproxy
source package (0.4.15-15) and built it, and then installed both
the bianry package and the debug symbols.
Quodlibet still dies, even with the new libproxy, and
Control: tags -1 help
Hi, since version 0.7.0 (uploaded by Dylan Aïssi in CC) the autopkgtest
of r-cran-bayestestr fails with the error mentioned in the bug log. It
has slightly changed with the version I pushed to Git. It is now:
> library(bayestestR)
>
> if
On Wed, Nov 18, 2020 at 03:49:06PM +0300, Dmitry Shachnev wrote:
> Hi Nicoo!
Hi Dmitry!
> On Wed, Nov 18, 2020 at 02:38:06AM +0100, nicoo wrote:
> Since 2015, gnome-flashback got even better, and is still actively developed.
That's good to know!
> > However, if we start ordering the list by
201 - 300 of 335 matches
Mail list logo
