Hi everybody,
i just see, that the debian package version of f-prot expects all signature
files at:
/var/lib/f-prot
However, my patch puts them into the working dir of f-prot (where F-Prot
places them usually..but Debian does it - of course - different)
/usr/lib/f-prot/
Which is obviously W
Package: shadow
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch l10n
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Find attached the updated Tagalog debconf translation file
- -- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500,
Hello Davide,
first of all thank you for your bug report!
I have no option to release a corrected package, as I have found no
"sponsor" (what they call it here at debian..). I am sure Johannes Rohr, who
is still in control of this package, will release an updated version soon.
Until this happen
On Sat, Oct 22, 2005 at 12:41:32AM +0200, Marco Amadori wrote:
>
> > The situation right now is that a user cannot chose initramfs-tools, which
> is
> > not what i had planed, expecting initramfs-tools to follow the proposal
> > shortly, which is partly a good thing since jonas proposed an even c
clone 335154 -1 -2
reassign -1 yaird
reassign -2 initramfs-tools
thanks
On Sat, Oct 22, 2005 at 05:09:07AM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> Package: linux-2.6
> Version: 2.6.13+2.6.14-rc4-0experimental.1
>
> Hello,
>
> This is related to #333003, but I'm filing a separate bug report as
> request
Package: aterm
Version: 0.4.2-11
Severity: wishlist
aterm 1.0.0 is out since July '05, and adds a number of new features and
bugfixes, including the long-requested UTF-8 support (bug #216302).
Available from: ftp://ftp.afterstep.org/apps/aterm/
Thanks,
Mark
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMA
Subject: gdm: Please update the package
Package: gdm
Version: 2.6.0.8-1
Severity: important
*** Please type your report below this line ***
I request to have the package updated because there is a new upstream
release which fixes a problem. It is the following: If two users are
logged in already
reopen 333231
severity 333231 wishlist
thanks
Hi,
> But the generated code is not correct according to C89. In C89, the
> behavior is undefined if a macro defined with one argument is called
> with zero arguments. Please see the official interpretation for
> Defect Report #003, question 3, in
>
severity 304932 important
retitle 304932 lilypond: FTBFS on amd64: Error making documentation.
thanks
Contrary to what Goswin von Brederlow said, this bug does not happen
on all archs; the bug that happens on all archs is #334877.
An examination of the failures shows that they are entirely disti
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Ronan Paixao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: gphpedit: Problem rendering the text
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.17
Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2005 17:50:33 -0300
Pac
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Ricardo Kirkner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: testoob
Version : 0.7
Upstream Author : Ori Peleg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://testoob.sourceforge.net
* License : Apache License, Version 2.0
Description :
On 10/21/05, s. keeling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: foomatic-db-engine
> Version: 3.0.2-20050720-1
> Followup-For: Bug #261662
>
> I did a dist-upgrade the other day and ever since printing has been
> broken. Running foomatic-configure to recover, I see:
>
> foomatic-configure -n lp -N
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.13+2.6.14-rc4-0experimental.1
Hello,
This is related to #333003, but I'm filing a separate bug report as
requested on irc.
2.6.13-1 had CONFIG_FB_VESA=n, while 2.6.14-rc4 has CONFIG_FB_VESA=y.
Still, the obtained behavior is the same (blank screen), becaus
Hi,
Ambrose Li wrote:
> Package: openoffice.org
> Version: 1.1.4-7
> Severity: important
Why important?
> I am using OpenOffice to print to our "Toshiba e-Studio 3511" device. In
> the PPD, There is an option to select the "Quality" of the printouts, which,
> among other things, tags the job as
Package: procps
Version: 1:3.2.3-1
Severity: normal
File: /usr/bin/slabtop
$ slabtop
unrecognizable slabinfo version
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.13.2toughbook
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)
Versions of packages procp
Good day all,
I have too a problem with DomParser of unstable tree. I develop a little
software and it segfault with unstable but not with testing tree.
The segfault seems to be on libxml++2.6 so I compile and execute the
example program on examples/dom_parser. This program segfault on the
same p
tags 308169 + patch
thanks
Lex Spoon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> debootstrap fails with the following error:
>
> I: Installing core packages...
> dpkg: can't mmap package info file `/var/lib/dpkg/available': Invalid argument
> W: Failure trying to run: chroot /root/woody-chroot dpkg --force-de
Package: syslinux
Version: 2.11-0.1
Tags: d-i
Severity: normal
syslinux doesn't care if it fails to write to a full disk and will
return zero anyway:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/src/d-i/installer/build/dest/floppy>syslinux boot.img
No free cluster 0 2848
write in copy: No space left on device
[EMAIL PRO
I forgot one diff:
--- usr/share/freeradius-dialupadmin/lib/sql/find.php3 2004-04-18
16:28:14.0 +0200
+++ /usr/share/freeradius-dialupadmin/lib/sql/find.php3 2005-10-22
02:43:28.160757976 +0200
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
$link = @da_sql_pconnect($config);
if ($link){
$search = da_sql_esca
Package: xdebconfigurator
Version: 1.18
Severity: important
when run on a system with xserver-xorg installed, xdebconfigurator
populates the debconf database with values for xserver-xfree86.
most notable is the question:
xserver-xfree86/config/device/driver
dexconf (from xserver-common 6.8.2.df
* Philippe COVAL ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Package: mozilla-firefox
> Version: 1.0.7-1
> Followup-For: Bug #305355
>
> I am also affected by this "CPU raise" bug (305355).
> But the page link you gave went correctly on mine.
>
> But the really weird stuff, is :
> When FF goes out of control, i
Package: freeradius-dialupadmin
Version: 1.0.2-4
Severity: normal
This is because is_int [1] is used on a post input instead of is_numeric [2].
Pagesize actually works in user_stats.php3, but this is a spell error
on the variable $pagesize.
[1] http://www.php.net/manual/en/function.is-int.php
Package: xbsql
Severity: wishlist
Hello,
As I pointed out in
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2005/07/msg01579.html, I will be
asking for the removal of automake1.6 from Debian in two weeks. Your
package has a strict build-dependency on automake1.6. Once automake1.6
is removed, the severity o
Hmm, I see, so we have an ifconfig stuck in the early 90's...
Package: tapiir
Severity: wishlist
Hello,
As I pointed out in
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2005/07/msg01579.html, I will be
asking for the removal of automake1.6 from Debian in two weeks. Your
package has a strict build-dependency on automake1.6. Once automake1.6
is removed, the severity
Package: swscanner
Severity: wishlist
Hello,
As I pointed out in
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2005/07/msg01579.html, I will be
asking for the removal of automake1.6 from Debian in two weeks. Your
package has a strict build-dependency on automake1.6. Once automake1.6
is removed, the severi
Package: sppc
Severity: wishlist
Hello,
As I pointed out in
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2005/07/msg01579.html, I will be
asking for the removal of automake1.6 from Debian in two weeks. Your
package has a strict build-dependency on automake1.6. Once automake1.6
is removed, the severity of
Package: splint
Severity: wishlist
Hello,
As I pointed out in
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2005/07/msg01579.html, I will be
asking for the removal of automake1.6 from Debian in two weeks. Your
package has a strict build-dependency on automake1.6. Once automake1.6
is removed, the severity
Package: snort
Severity: wishlist
Hello,
As I pointed out in
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2005/07/msg01579.html, I will be
asking for the removal of automake1.6 from Debian in two weeks. Your
package has a strict build-dependency on automake1.6. Once automake1.6
is removed, the severity o
Package: pdsh
Severity: wishlist
Hello,
As I pointed out in
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2005/07/msg01579.html, I will be
asking for the removal of automake1.6 from Debian in two weeks. Your
package has a strict build-dependency on automake1.6. Once automake1.6
is removed, the severity of
Package: multisync
Severity: wishlist
Hello,
As I pointed out in
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2005/07/msg01579.html, I will be
asking for the removal of automake1.6 from Debian in two weeks. Your
package has a strict build-dependency on automake1.6. Once automake1.6
is removed, the severi
Package: lineak-xosdplugin
Severity: wishlist
Hello,
As I pointed out in
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2005/07/msg01579.html, I will be
asking for the removal of automake1.6 from Debian in two weeks. Your
package has a strict build-dependency on automake1.6. Once automake1.6
is removed, th
Package: lineak-kdeplugins
Severity: wishlist
Hello,
As I pointed out in
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2005/07/msg01579.html, I will be
asking for the removal of automake1.6 from Debian in two weeks. Your
package has a strict build-dependency on automake1.6. Once automake1.6
is removed, th
Package: lineak-defaultplugin
Severity: wishlist
Hello,
As I pointed out in
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2005/07/msg01579.html, I will be
asking for the removal of automake1.6 from Debian in two weeks. Your
package has a strict build-dependency on automake1.6. Once automake1.6
is removed,
Package: libwmf
Severity: wishlist
Hello,
As I pointed out in
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2005/07/msg01579.html, I will be
asking for the removal of automake1.6 from Debian in two weeks. Your
package has a strict build-dependency on automake1.6. Once automake1.6
is removed, the severity
Package: libtheora
Severity: wishlist
Hello,
As I pointed out in
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2005/07/msg01579.html, I will be
asking for the removal of automake1.6 from Debian in two weeks. Your
package has a strict build-dependency on automake1.6. Once automake1.6
is removed, the severi
Package: libotf
Severity: wishlist
Hello,
As I pointed out in
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2005/07/msg01579.html, I will be
asking for the removal of automake1.6 from Debian in two weeks. Your
package has a strict build-dependency on automake1.6. Once automake1.6
is removed, the severity
Package: libosip2
Severity: wishlist
Hello,
As I pointed out in
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2005/07/msg01579.html, I will be
asking for the removal of automake1.6 from Debian in two weeks. Your
package has a strict build-dependency on automake1.6. Once automake1.6
is removed, the severit
Package: libnss-ldap
Severity: wishlist
Hello,
As I pointed out in
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2005/07/msg01579.html, I will be
asking for the removal of automake1.6 from Debian in two weeks. Your
package has a strict build-dependency on automake1.6. Once automake1.6
is removed, the seve
Package: lesstif1-1
Severity: wishlist
Hello,
As I pointed out in
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2005/07/msg01579.html, I will be
asking for the removal of automake1.6 from Debian in two weeks. Your
package has a strict build-dependency on automake1.6. Once automake1.6
is removed, the sever
Package: ksociograma
Severity: wishlist
Hello,
As I pointed out in
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2005/07/msg01579.html, I will be
asking for the removal of automake1.6 from Debian in two weeks. Your
package has a strict build-dependency on automake1.6. Once automake1.6
is removed, the seve
Package: ksimus-floatingpoint
Severity: wishlist
Hello,
As I pointed out in
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2005/07/msg01579.html, I will be
asking for the removal of automake1.6 from Debian in two weeks. Your
package has a strict build-dependency on automake1.6. Once automake1.6
is removed,
Package: ksimus-datarecorder
Severity: wishlist
Hello,
As I pointed out in
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2005/07/msg01579.html, I will be
asking for the removal of automake1.6 from Debian in two weeks. Your
package has a strict build-dependency on automake1.6. Once automake1.6
is removed,
Package: ksimus-boolean
Severity: wishlist
Hello,
As I pointed out in
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2005/07/msg01579.html, I will be
asking for the removal of automake1.6 from Debian in two weeks. Your
package has a strict build-dependency on automake1.6. Once automake1.6
is removed, the s
Package: konserve
Severity: wishlist
Hello,
As I pointed out in
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2005/07/msg01579.html, I will be
asking for the removal of automake1.6 from Debian in two weeks. Your
package has a strict build-dependency on automake1.6. Once automake1.6
is removed, the severit
Package: kompose
Severity: wishlist
Hello,
As I pointed out in
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2005/07/msg01579.html, I will be
asking for the removal of automake1.6 from Debian in two weeks. Your
package has a strict build-dependency on automake1.6. Once automake1.6
is removed, the severity
Package: k3d
Severity: wishlist
Hello,
As I pointed out in
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2005/07/msg01579.html, I will be
asking for the removal of automake1.6 from Debian in two weeks. Your
package has a strict build-dependency on automake1.6. Once automake1.6
is removed, the severity of
Package: isdnutils
Severity: wishlist
Hello,
As I pointed out in
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2005/07/msg01579.html, I will be
asking for the removal of automake1.6 from Debian in two weeks. Your
package has a strict build-dependency on automake1.6. Once automake1.6
is removed, the severi
Package: gsmlib
Severity: wishlist
Hello,
As I pointed out in
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2005/07/msg01579.html, I will be
asking for the removal of automake1.6 from Debian in two weeks. Your
package has a strict build-dependency on automake1.6. Once automake1.6
is removed, the severity
Package: freqtweak
Severity: wishlist
Hello,
As I pointed out in
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2005/07/msg01579.html, I will be
asking for the removal of automake1.6 from Debian in two weeks. Your
package has a strict build-dependency on automake1.6. Once automake1.6
is removed, the severi
Package: facturalux
Severity: normal
Hello,
As I pointed out in
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2005/07/msg01579.html, I will be
asking for the removal of automake1.6 from Debian in two weeks. Your
package has a strict build-dependency on automake1.6. Once automake1.6
is removed, the severit
Package: epplets
Severity: wishlist
Hello,
As I pointed out in
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2005/07/msg01579.html, I will be
asking for the removal of automake1.6 from Debian in two weeks. Your
package has a strict build-dependency on automake1.6. Once automake1.6
is removed, the severity
Package: droidbattles
Severity: wishlist
Hello,
As I pointed out in
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2005/07/msg01579.html, I will be
asking for the removal of automake1.6 from Debian in two weeks. Your
package has a strict build-dependency on automake1.6. Once automake1.6
is removed, the sev
Package: boson-base
Severity: wishlist
Hello,
As I pointed out in
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2005/07/msg01579.html, I will be
asking for the removal of automake1.6 from Debian in two weeks. Your
package has a strict build-dependency on automake1.6. Once automake1.6
is removed, the sever
Package: amaya
Severity: wishlist
Hello,
As I pointed out in
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2005/07/msg01579.html, I will be
asking for the removal of automake1.6 from Debian in two weeks. Your
package has a strict build-dependency on automake1.6. Once automake1.6
is removed, the severity o
On Sat, Oct 22, 2005 at 02:41:18AM +0200, David Madore wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 21, 2005 at 05:25:25PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > The obvious
> > workaround here would be to not list apt sources in your configuration that
> > you don't
On Fri, Oct 21, 2005 at 06:17:15PM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> The correct spelling is "home page". Check Webster.
I know. But that is not the point.
Did you decided by yourself that the correct English spelling words with
colon should be used instead of developer-reference defined pseudo
No a DD, but I've fixed my own wishlist.
deb ftp://ftp.real-time.com/linux/real-time-debpool sid custom main
deb-src ftp://ftp.real-time.com/linux/real-time-debpool sid custom main
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2005 17:50:37 -0500
Source: sqlobject
Binary: python2.3-sqlobject python2.4-sqlobject
Package: foomatic-db-engine
Version: 3.0.2-20050720-1
Followup-For: Bug #261662
I did a dist-upgrade the other day and ever since printing has been
broken. Running foomatic-configure to recover, I see:
foomatic-configure -n lp -N 'Lexmark Z52' -L infidel -c /dev/lp0 -p \
gi
Hi Dan,
losetup already has an undocumented "v" option.
The bug is that it's not in any way documented...
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
On Fri, Oct 21, 2005 at 05:25:25PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
>The obvious
> workaround here would be to not list apt sources in your configuration that
> you don't actually want apt to use...
So I guess my bug report wasn't clean e
This problem is fixed in 3.3.3-1.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: glibc
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
The attached patch adds support for the big-endian arm (armeb)
architecture to glibc. Changes:
1) Add 'armeb' to all the Architecture: lines; and
2) Add arm-float-byteorder.dpatch which:
1) fixes sysdeps/arm/gmp-mparam.h (__ARMEB__ has
IEEE_D
Package: criticalmass
Version: 1:0.9.12-2
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
>From
>http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=kdebindings&ver=4%3A3.4.2-2&arch=alpha&stamp=1129937211&file=log&as=raw
Making all in utilsgl
make[3]: Entering directory `/build/buildd/criticalmass-0.9.12/utilsgl'
g++ -DHAVE_
Package: util-linux
Version: 2.12p-8
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
The attached patch adds support for the big-endian arm (armeb)
architecture.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
Architecture: armeb (armv4b)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.13
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)
Versi
Package: zoo
Version: 2.10-11
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Zoo is able to read and list existing archives, and creates new
archives, but it is unable to add new files to an existing archive. Zoo
on a x86 system can add to the same archive, and a created archive on
x86
severity 335112 important
thanks
On Sat, Oct 22, 2005 at 02:16:39AM +0200, David Madore wrote:
> Package: apt
> Version: 0.6.41
> Severity: serious
> The --allow-unauthenticated option does not revert to the exact
> pre-0.6.27 behavior: even when this flag is passed on the command
> line, apt sti
Package: apt
Version: 0.6.41
Severity: serious
The --allow-unauthenticated option does not revert to the exact
pre-0.6.27 behavior: even when this flag is passed on the command
line, apt still favors an authenticated package on the network to an
unauthenticated package on the local host (say with
Of course a better approach here is to try what devices are found, and
if it fails, sleep, look to see if any more devices have popped up, and
try those. iso-scan already uses a similar technique around other races.
--
see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hmmm, try instead on
http://alpha03u.c-wss.com/inc/ApplServlet?RQF=MENU&RQS=WWUCA910&LA=1129758525749&SV=WWUCA142&TRF=MAIN
center clicking vs. right clicking on one of the pdfs offered.
Center clicking will open an empty other window whilst right clicking
works. At least here offline with wwwoffle
Package: imagemagick
Version: 6:6.2.4.5-0.1
Severity: minor
File: /usr/share/man/man1/ImageMagick.1.gz
The word mogrify is indented wrong.
identify
describes the format and characteristics of one or more image
files. mogrify
resize an imag
Package: imagemagick
Version: 6:6.2.4.5-0.1
Severity: wishlist
File: /usr/bin/convert
Tags: upstream
All I wanted to do was use convert -strip to remove the
Profile-exif: 35395 bytes
from a digicam image. But one sees that the jpeg itself has been
tampered with too... why not just pass it intact?
Package: jhead
Version: 2.41-1
Severity: wishlist
File: /usr/share/man/man1/jhead.1.gz
Tags: upstream
DESCRIPTION should warn that, except for info requesting commands, the
output is not stdout, not a new file, but modifying original file
itself!
Nor is there an option other than -n to give arbit
I'm not the only one seeing this, so I am relctantly upgrading it to RC.
Which sucks, I needed this version of apt in testing to release the d-i
beta with. :-(
--
see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
reassign 335099 net-tools
merge 145004 186208 180367 122792 87784 335099
tags upstream patch
thanks
On Fri, Oct 21, 2005 at 11:35:04PM +0100, Carlos Rodrigues wrote:
> Let me extend this a bit:
>
> This Debian machine has other interfaces configured statically. These
> interfaces have private net
found 334999 0.23-2
thanks
On Fri, Oct 21, 2005 at 11:48:22AM -0700, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report
> #334999: FTBFS on arm/hppa/m68k: please use g++-3.4,
> which was filed against the monotone package.
[...]
>* Arm, hppa and m68
Package: wavemon
Version: 0.4.0b-8
Followup-For: Bug #328442
Same happens here with ipw2200 card:
fatal error: could not get range information
strace says:
ioctl(2, SNDCTL_TMR_STOP or TCSETSW, {B38400 opost isig icanon echo ...}) = 0
ioctl(2, SNDCTL_TMR_TIMEBASE or TCGETS, {B38400 opost isig ic
Package: evince
Version: 0.4.0-1
Severity: normal
In changelog evince claims to have fixed bug #294512 in 0.1.5-1, and
to depend on gs. However in 0.4.0-1 evince doesn't depend on gs at all.
I am filing a new bug instead of reopening since #294512 is already
archived.
Thanks,
Ming
2005.10.21
-
Package: konqueror
Version: 4:3.4.2-3
Severity: normal
*** Please type your report below this line ***
omit that bug I filed about smb:// files not
copyNpaste, there was an inclusion that I missed..
sorry about this 3%## ;/
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers un
Daniel Burrows a écrit :
On Sat, Oct 22, 2005 at 12:35:25AM +0200, Aurelien Jarno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
was heard to say:
Well I don't see what will change if lm-sensors recommends
lm-sensors-2.4.27-2-386 as default, except some confusion to the users.
They will install it, and nothing will wor
On Sat, Oct 22, 2005 at 12:35:25AM +0200, Aurelien Jarno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
was heard to say:
> Well I don't see what will change if lm-sensors recommends
> lm-sensors-2.4.27-2-386 as default, except some confusion to the users.
> They will install it, and nothing will work.
>
> Currently, here
Norbert Tretkowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * Jari Aalto wrote:
>
| > Current description reads (for "apt-cache search"):
| >
| > Description: Light-weight text mode menu- and window-driven audio
| > player
| >
| > This may give the misleading impression that the utility is useful
| > for g
Package: konqueror
Version: 4:3.3.2-1sarge1
Severity: important
*** Please type your report below this line ***
cannot copy and paste to smb://<~
destination>/subFolder_foobar
With konqueror open, and using two tabs, one local,
the other smb://,
even though the remote target is a subfolder with a
I just saw there's even a newer version 2.06:
http://search.cpan.org/dist/HTML-TableExtract/
Florian Ragwitz wrote:
> OK - I'll get onto it ASAP.
If by ASAP you mean a month, you may want to orphan the package.
Prueba el Nuevo Correo Terra; Seguro, Rápido, Fiable.
On Friday 21 October 2005 05:19 pm, you wrote:
> New upstream release is available.
>
> http://cheeseshop.python.org/packages/2.4/s/setuptools/setuptools-0.6a5-py2
>.4.egg
>
> OR
>
> http://cheeseshop.python.org/packages/source/s/setuptools/setuptools-0.6a5.
>zip
Not a DD, so, I put the file up on
Let me extend this a bit:
This Debian machine has other interfaces configured statically. These
interfaces have private network addresses which also get wrong
broadcast address guesses:
10.1.92.0/22 - ifupdown chooses 10.255.255.255 instead of 10.1.95.255
10.1.96.0/22 - ifupdown chooses 10.255.25
Package: python2.4-psycopg
Version: 1.1.19-1
Followup-For: Bug #319509
i solved the problem today for me: the file
debian/python2.4-psycopg.dirs
is missing, it must contain the line
usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT
Hi,
Daniel Burrows a écrit :
Package: lm-sensors
Version: 1:2.9.2-4
Severity: normal
lm-sensors Recommends lm-sensors-mod-2.9.2 | kernel-image-2.6;
as a result, users who install this package will get a random Provider of
lm-sensors-mod-2.9.2 along with it (if this recommendation isn't alread
> The situation right now is that a user cannot chose initramfs-tools, which
is
> not what i had planed, expecting initramfs-tools to follow the proposal
> shortly, which is partly a good thing since jonas proposed an even cleverer
> method that should satisfy everyone, but it would have still be
Package: perl
Version: 5.8.7-7
Severity: serious
According to
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?pkg=perl&arch=mips&ver=5.8.7-7&stamp=1129566720&file=log
perl fails for the t/op/fork test on mips.
I tried to reproduce it and found that the test succeeds with a
probability of ~50% for a locally bu
Package: harden-doc
Version: 3.4
Severity: minor
The Social Contract is quoted in section 2.3 as follows:
| We Won't Hide Problems
|
| We will keep our entire bug-report database open for public view
| at all times. Reports that users file on-line will immediately
| become visible to others.
Th
Package: apt
Version: 0.6.42
Severity: important
Tags: d-i
apt-cache search seems to segfault on alpha (i386 and sparc
are ok). 0.6.41 was ok. Unfortunatly this prevents d-i from working
since it uses apt-cache search to work out what kernel packages are
available for install.
I built apt and go
Package: apt
Version: 0.6.42
Severity: important
apt-cache search segfaults. Other apt-cache commands seem to be ok.
0.6.41 doesn't exhibit this problem.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/space/debian/apt-0.6.42$ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/lib/debug gdb
./build/bin/apt-cache core
GNU gdb 6.3-debian
Copyright 2004
Laurent Bonnaud a écrit :
Hi,
I am now using kernel 2.6.13 from the standard Debian linux-image
package. Unfortunately hddtemp still does not work:
# hddtemp /dev/sda
/dev/sda: ATA ST3120026AS: drive supported, but it doesn't have a temperature
sensor.
Well hddtemp *works*, but your kernel
Package: python2.4-setuptools
Version: 0.6a2-0.1
Severity: wishlist
New upstream release is available.
http://cheeseshop.python.org/packages/2.4/s/setuptools/setuptools-0.6a5-py2.4.egg
OR
http://cheeseshop.python.org/packages/source/s/setuptools/setuptools-0.6a5.zip
-- System Information:
De
On Fri, Oct 21, 2005 at 09:23:36AM +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 21, 2005 at 08:36:10AM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
> > (Marc pinged me on IRC about this bug report in adduser)
>
> Thanks for your help!
>
> > First of all, I think that adduser should probably make better use of
> > t
This is SAITO Fuyuki.
> > Without acpid package, my acpitool cannot show Battery and other
> > status. As far as I tested, the options -f, -F and -s of acpitools
> > can be used, so anyway it works for some cases.
> > I think that acpitool should suggest (or recommend) acpid package for
> > its f
Here's a fun thing: it doesn't crash if I remove the explicit list of files
in which changes should be committed.
Daniel
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
As my harddisk is for testing purposes only, I tried to install Ubuntu
Linux 5.10 (which uses a 2.6.12 kernel too) to verify, whether the error
comes on other debian based distributions. Indeed after installing the
base packages the system doesn't boot anymore, showing the same error
messages a
Package: freeradius
Version: 1.0.5-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi,
I got the following error while upgrading from 1.0.5-1 (actually, the
report below is from a "aptitude remove freeradius; userdel freerad;
aptitude install freeradius" which I did after the upgrade fai
1 - 100 of 418 matches
Mail list logo
