Hi josch,
On Wed, Dec 29, 2021 at 12:15 AM Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues
wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Dec 2021 23:56:00 -0700 "Anthony Fok" wrote:
>
> > Babylogger is a Go HTTP logger middleware, for babies.
>
> I read this description and I read upstream's README but I cannot figure out
> in
>
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Anthony Fok
* Package name: golang-goji
Version : 2.0.2-1
Upstream Author : Goji
* URL : https://github.com/goji/goji (goji.io)
* License : Expat
Programming Lang: Go
Description : minimalistic and flexible HTTP
Hi,
On Tue, 28 Dec 2021 23:56:00 -0700 "Anthony Fok" wrote:
> Babylogger is a Go HTTP logger middleware, for babies.
> .
> It has been used with Goji (http://goji.io) and the Go standard library,
> but it should work with any multiplexer worth its salt,
> i.e. any multiplexer compatible
Source: openssh
Version: 1:8.7p1-3
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi,
upgrade fails with version 1:8.7p1-3:
Setting up openssh-client (1:8.7p1-3) ...
update-alternatives: and can't be the same
Use 'update-alternatives --help' for program usage information.
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Anthony Fok
* Package name: golang-github-meowgorithm-babylogger
Version : 1.2.0-1
Upstream Author : Christian Rocha
* URL : https://github.com/meowgorithm/babylogger
* License : Expat
Programming Lang: Go
Hi Colin,
thank you for addressing this. I appreciate that.
On Tue, Dec 28, 2021 at 10:47:54PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 25, 2021 at 08:18:11AM +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
> > I would also mention that there might be cases of logins no longer
> > possible regarding library updates
On Tue, 09 Nov 2021 22:28:19 +0100 Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Source: atmel-firmware
> Version: 1.3-4.1
> Severity: important
> Justification: Debian Policy section 4.9
> Tags: bookworm sid
> User: debian...@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: missing-build-arch-indep
>
> Dear maintainer,
>
> Your
On 12/29/21 05:41, Felix Lechner wrote:
Will that work for backports, too?
all the alternatives are in place, unchanged (apart from the lzd
alternative removal), since jessie and newer; so.. that's perfectly fine
to use for backports back up to jessie.
the niche-case where someone would
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Anthony Fok
* Package name: golang-github-calmh-randomart
Version : 1.1.0-1
Upstream Author : Jakob Borg
* URL : https://github.com/calmh/randomart
* License : Expat
Programming Lang: Go
Description : generates
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Anthony Fok
* Package name: golang-github-muesli-toktok
Version : 0.0~git20210519.2b0817e-1
Upstream Author : Christian Muehlhaeuser
* URL : https://github.com/muesli/toktok
* License : TODO
Programming Lang: Go
Package: reportbug
Version: 7.10.3+deb11u1
Severity: important
X-Debbugs-Cc: jeffredbea...@gmail.com
1) I prepared a USB flash drive with the newest net installation image (dd
if=/image.iso of=/dev/drive)
2) I restarted the physical (non-virtualized) computer and installed the
system. I noticed,
The parts of the rust gtk stack used by resvg are now installable again after
having been broken for some time,
so I decided to take a look and see if I could get
The first thing I did was change the dependency on pico-args to 0.4 so that I
could attempt a build.
I then discovered that the
Hi Daniel,
On Tue, Dec 28, 2021 at 7:09 PM Daniel Baumann
wrote:
>
> you can now safely depend on ... "plzip | lzip-decompressor"
Great, thanks! Will that work for backports, too?
Kind regards
Felix Lechner
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Anthony Fok
* Package name: golang-github-muesli-sasquatch
Version : 0.0~git20210519.30aff9d-1
Upstream Author : Christian Muehlhaeuser
* URL : https://github.com/muesli/sasquatch
* License : BSD-3-clause
Programming
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Anthony Fok
* Package name: golang-github-charmbracelet-wish
Version : 0.1.1-1
Upstream Author : Charm
* URL : https://github.com/charmbracelet/wish
* License : Expat
Programming Lang: Go
Description : Make SSH
Package: openssh
Version: 1:8.7p1-3
Severity: serious
Tag: patch
Hi,
I think there's a typo here (running openssh-client postinst with set -x):
--snip--
+ update-alternatives --install /usr/bin/rcp rcp /usr/bin/scp 20 --slave
/usr/share/man/man1/rcp.1.gz rcp.1.gz /usr/share/man/man1/rcp.1.gz
Hi Felix,
> Looking at your documentation [1] does that mean Lintian can only
> offer the alternatives except lzd?
yes; to make that easier.. given that lzd is the only one that doesn't
support '--test', I've dropped it from the alternatives handling and
updated README.Debian accordingly:
Hi,
debhelper 13.1 introduced dh_installalternatives (wonderful, thanks a
lot!). it would be nice if debhelper could support divertions in the
same way, via debian/foo.divert or so.
Given that dh_installalternatives is there already, this seems like an
easy way to "copy" this to a
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Joao Eriberto Mota Filho
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, Exeldro
* Package name: obs-scene-notes-dock
Version : 0.0.1
Upstream Author : Exeldro
* URL :
Package: dh-runit
Version: 2.10.3
Severity: wishlist
debhelper 11.4 added a new bit of syntactic sugar:
* dh: Support implicitly loading addons via "dh-sequence-${name}"
relations in Build-Depends (which would imply "dh ... --with ${name}").
Only simple relations in Build-Depends are
Package: debhelper
Version: 13.6
Severity: wishlist
Thanks for dh_installalternatives! I've wanted this for literally
decades, and discovered it this evening; it's allowed me to convert a
few more maintainer scripts to being managed entirely by debhelper.
In a couple of cases, I've found that I
Version: 0.27-4
On Mon, 27 Dec 2021 17:24:40 +0100, gregor herrmann wrote:
> - With this patch the testsuite passes for me locally both during
> build and autopkgtests, so I went ahead and uploaded -4 with this
> change.
> - I'll monitor the build logs and autopkgtest logs to see how the
>
* Lucas Nussbaum:
>> The following packages have unmet dependencies:
>> libguestfs-tools : Depends: guestfs-tools but it is not installable
>> E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages.
>> apt-get failed.
Sure, we'll just need to wait for the guestfs-tools package (#1002577)
Package: live-tools
Version: 1:20190831
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Debian Live Team,
# apt install live-tools
# live-persistence
E: live-boot not installed
# apt install live-boot
# live-persistence activate VOLUME
/usr/bin/live-persistence: 240: /sbin/cryptsetup: not found
...
# apt install
Package: initramfs-tools
Version: 0.140
Severity: normal
Tags: security
Hi.
AFAIU, the UMASK option is there for cases like e.g. when dm-crypt keys
are included in the initramfs.
I played a bit with it, and found that it already doesn't just affect the
final initramfs image, but also parts
Package: live-boot
Version: 1:20210208
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Debian Live Team,
The following live-boot components define functions which use cryptsetup:
* /lib/live/boot/9990-cmdline-old
* /lib/live/boot/9990-misc-helpers.sh
Therefore, I think live-boot should change from:
Package: mailman3-web
Version: 0+20180916-8
Hello pkg-mailman-hack...@lists.alioth.debian.org,
In debian/control is `recommends: libapache2-mod-proxy-uwsgi | nginx`,
but package `libapache2-mod-proxy-uwsgi` is empty. It became
a _transitional package_.
(
Package: r-cran-rsgcc
Severity: normal
rsgcc has been off CRAN for a while:
https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/rsgcc/index.html
It would be nice if you could retire the package so that we can
also retire 'r-cran-gwidgetsrgtk2' which was also remove from CRAN
hello
I have see the same test error here:
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/geary/-/issues/776
Michael Gratton @mjog · 1 year ago
Maintainer
Hi, thanks for the report. A couple of the unit tests do some checking
of collation
On Sat, Dec 25, 2021 at 08:18:11AM +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 24, 2021 at 11:04:20PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> > diff --git a/debian/README.Debian b/debian/README.Debian
> > index dbe6c2958..0851e38e3 100644
> > --- a/debian/README.Debian
> > +++ b/debian/README.Debian
> > @@ -193,9
control: tags 853915 + patch
> > Somehow, when the code is run on the BTS server, the MIME::Parser seems
> > to fail and the `parse` function code is falling back to the legacy
> > pre-MIME code. Why?
>
> The reason is that the perl code on the BTS server is executed in taint
> mode, and
On 12/28/21 8:32 PM, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
> Source: ceph
> Version: 16.2.6+ds-8
> Severity: critical
>
> Hi,
>
> from https://docs.ceph.com/en/latest/releases/pacific/
>
>
> V16.2.6 PACIFIC
> Danger
>
> DATE: 01 NOV 2021.
>
> DO NOT UPGRADE TO CEPH PACIFIC FROM AN OLDER VERSION.
>
> A
Control: tag -1 confirmed
Hi Lucas,
Reply follows inline.
Lucas Nussbaum writes:
> Source: vorta
> Version: 0.7.8-1
> Severity: serious
> Justification: FTBFS
> Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
> User: lu...@debian.org
> Usertags: ftbfs-20211220 ftbfs-bookworm
>
> Hi,
>
> During a rebuild of all
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Anton Gladky
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
* Package name: luma.lcd
Version : 2.9.0
Upstream Author : Richard Hull and contributors
* URL :
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Anton Gladky
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
* Package name: luma.oled
Version : 3.8.1
Upstream Author : Richard Hull and contributors
* URL :
On Tue, Dec 28, 2021 at 12:58:32AM +, Amr Ibrahim wrote:
> Package: fonts-ibm-plex
Hi!
> For my case, I need only the Latin and Arabic fonts, but I have to
> install everything to get only those.
>
> So please, if possible, break the big package into smaller packages
> according to the
Hello,
Thank you for the report. I will have a look at whether or not I can reproduce
this,
and will fix accordingly.
Kind regards,
Shayan
--
Shayan Doust - 201427418
Fingerprint: 0401 A810 A6F2 4303 1EA3 9759 6D7D 4419 19D0 2395
Note: all emails sent by me are signed with my PGP key.
Source: python-pycdlib
Version: 1.12.0+ds1-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211228 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: statsmodels
Version: 0.13.1+dfsg-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211228 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: gnudatalanguage
Version: 1.0.1-3
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
The upload of proj (8.2.1~rc1-1~exp1) to experimental resulted in an
autopkgtest regression on amd64:
https://release.debian.org/britney/pseudo-excuses-experimental.html#proj
The logs shows a couple of errors:
Source: babel-minify
Version: 0.5.1+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211228 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: golang-github-biogo-graph
Version: 0.0~git20150317.057c198-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211228 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part
Source: ros-perception-pcl
Version: 1.7.3-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211228 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> /usr/
Source: firefox-esr
Version: 91.4.0esr-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211228 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: pd-mediasettings
Version: 0.1.1-5
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211228 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> cc -DPD
Source: libconfig-model-backend-augeas-perl
Version: 0.125-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211228 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part
Source: org-roam
Version: 2.1.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211228 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules bin
Source: rust-sniffglue
Version: 0.14.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211228 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: cdbs
Version: 0.4.163
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211228 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Enter
Source: python-aioamqp
Version: 0.14.0-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211228 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: magic-wormhole
Version: 0.12.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211228 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/ru
Source: python-django-channels
Version: 3.0.4-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211228 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: lua-cliargs
Version: 3.0-2-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211228 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/ru
Source: nbdkit
Version: 1.28.3-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211228 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: nfs-ganesha
Version: 3.4-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211228 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> cd /<>
Source: rust-zip
Version: 0.5.13-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211228 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: lua-say
Version: 1.3-1-6
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211228 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules bin
Source: python-daphne
Version: 3.0.2-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211228 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: lua-system
Version: 0.2.1-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211228 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/ru
Source: rust-html2pango
Version: 0.4.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211228 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: magic-wormhole-mailbox-server
Version: 0.4.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211228 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: rust-dhcp4r
Version: 0.2.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211228 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: hfd-service
Version: 0.1.0-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211228 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/ru
Source: emscripten
Version: 3.0.1~dfsg+~1.39.6-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211228 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: zeek
Version: 3.2.3+ds2-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211228 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> cd /<>/
Source: lua-mediator
Version: 1.1.2-0-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211228 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/ru
Source: rust-condure
Version: 1.1.0-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211228 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: rust-pbr
Version: 1.0.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211228 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: rust-ammonia
Version: 3.1.2-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211228 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: rust-xml5ever
Version: 0.16.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211228 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: node-immutable
Version: 4.0.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211228 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: newsboat
Version: 2.21-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211228 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: python-pcl
Version: 0.3.0~rc1+dfsg-11
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211228 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> x86
Source: rust-markup5ever-rcdom
Version: 0.1.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211228 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: node-js-tokens
Version: 6.0.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211228 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: fcitx5-m17n
Version : 5.0.6-1
Upstream Author : Xuetian Weng
* URL : https://github.com/fcitx/fcitx5-m17n
* License : LGPL-2.1+
Programming Lang: C++
Description : m17n support module for Fcitx5 Input
Source: ceph
Version: 16.2.6+ds-8
Severity: critical
Hi,
from https://docs.ceph.com/en/latest/releases/pacific/
V16.2.6 PACIFIC
Danger
DATE: 01 NOV 2021.
DO NOT UPGRADE TO CEPH PACIFIC FROM AN OLDER VERSION.
A recently-discovered bug (https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/53062) can cause
data
Package: sgt-puzzles
Version: 20191231.79a5378-3+b1
Severity: normal
When using a dark gtk3 theme (eg adwaita-dark), sgt -puzzles keeps the white
foreground for menus but uses a light gray background, making them unreadable.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: bookworm/sid
APT prefers
Package: makeparallel
Version: 1:8.1.0+r23-3ubuntu2
Severity: important
The makeparallel command does not correctly determine the number of jobs
it should use. This is because it determines the the jobserver pipe fds
from the "--jobserver-fds" options [1]. However, this option was renamed
in
package release.debian.org
tags 1002740 = buster pending
thanks
Hi,
The upload referenced by this bug report has been flagged for acceptance into
the proposed-updates queue for Debian buster.
Thanks for your contribution!
Upload details
==
Package: rustc-mozilla
Version:
On 28/12/2021 19:40, Yadd wrote:
On 28/12/2021 08:25, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
On Sun, 21 Nov 2021 17:17:32 + Matthew Vernon wrote:
On 19/11/2021 21:46, Yadd wrote:
> Sadly pcre2 does not provide /usr/bin/pcre-config, I'm unable to do
this
> change
Well, there is pcre2-config, but
Package: thinkfan
Version: 1.2.1-3.1+b2
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: atga...@gmail.com
Dear maintainer,
1.2.1 is afected by a bug that prevents monitoring "optional" sensors,
including the current handling of discrete GPUs with bumblebee/primus, that has
been apparently solved in upstream's
Package: src:linux
Version: 5.15.5-1
Followup-For: Bug #1002310
X-Debbugs-Cc: max...@maxzor.eu
Dear Maintainer,
I do not have tested against 5.15, but just got a complete freeze (no REISUB
avail)
for more than a minute here.
BR, Maxime
-- Package-specific info:
** Version:
Linux version
Hello Camm!
On 12/28/21 19:20, Camm Maguire wrote:
> Correction, that is current autobuilders on 68k and sh4.
That's a known issue, see [1]. I will patch the glibc packages for m68k
and sh4 again to address this issue.
Adrian
> [1] https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23960
--
Control: tags 997271 + patch
Control: tags 997271 + pending
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for xnnpack (versioned as 0.0~git20201221.e1ffe15-2.1)
and uploaded it to DELAYED/14. Please feel free to tell me if I should
cancel it.
cu
Adrian
diff -Nru
On 28/12/2021 08:25, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
On Sun, 21 Nov 2021 17:17:32 + Matthew Vernon wrote:
On 19/11/2021 21:46, Yadd wrote:
> Sadly pcre2 does not provide /usr/bin/pcre-config, I'm unable to do
this
> change
Well, there is pcre2-config, but that's a little beside the point -
Package: minetest-mod-protector
Version: 20210923-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Something went completely wrong with the latest version of this package.
It doesn't contain the mod "protector" but the mod "mobs_redo".
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 11.2
APT
Correction, that is current autobuilders on 68k and sh4.
Take care,
Camm Maguire writes:
> Package: libc6
> Version: 2.33-1
> Severity: serious
> Justification: Policy 2.2.1
> X-Debbugs-Cc: c...@debian.org
>
> With a file "configure" in the current directory, the following fails
> (only in the
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: important
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "rumur":
* Package name: rumur
Version : 2021.12.27-1
Upstream Author : Matthew Fernandez
* URL : https://github.com/Smattr/rumur
* License :
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Roland Mas
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org
* Package name: threeb
Version : 1.1
Upstream Author : Edward Rosten and Susan Cox
* URL : http://www.coxphysics.com/3b/index.html
* License : GPL-3
Programming
Hello
i cannot reproduce this bug in 3.7.5+debian-4 release.
Bullseye ships 1.7 release of rrdtool so the gap you mention between
1.4 and 1.5 releases of rrdtool is an old stuff, IMHO.
If no further information is provided i'll close this bug.
Greetings,
Marcos
Package: pccts
Version: 1.33MR33-6
Severity: normal
Tags: patch pending
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for pccts (versioned as 1.33MR33-6.1) and uploaded
it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I should delay it
longer.
Regards,
--
Colin Watson
Package: thunar-volmanVersion: 4.16.0-1Severity: importantX-Debbugs-Cc:
dbrazz...@snet.net
Dear Maintainer,
*** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
* What led up to the situation?Start Thunar * What exactly did you do (or
not do) that was effective (or
On Tue, Dec 28, 2021 at 03:16:30PM +0100, Andras Korn wrote:
> If /sbin/runlevel looked like this instead:
>
> #!/bin/sh
> # This only does anything useful if /etc/runit/3 updates /run/runit.runlevel
> before starting stop scripts
> if [ -s /run/runit.runlevel ]; then
> CURLEVEL="$(head
X-Debbugs-CC: Tiago Bortoletto Vaz
On Tue, Dec 28, 2021 at 09:45:04AM -0500, Tiago Bortoletto Vaz wrote:
> gdb log attached. I hope that can be useful :\
That stacktrace looks very similar to the ones from #983597 which
already has 3 entries in the Qt bugtracker[0] one of which has an
Orca-less
Hello,
i believe that it is not appropriate to hide processes that, we
suppose, are legitimate [1].
It is somewhat easy to parse any regular expression, and customize
files/directories names of the rootkit that match it, thus avoiding its
detection.
Please, use etc/chkrootkit/chkrootkit.ignore
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: buster
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
OSRM,
I have prepared a follow-up update of rustc-mozilla for buster (c.f.
#1001043). This update fixes build failures on i386 and
Hi Johannes,
> I therefore suspect the issue being with the write
> restrictions in the default Systemd unit file for redis-server.
It sounds like that to me too. However:
> Dec 28 15:19:05 debian redis-server[521]: >>>
> 'logfile/var/log/redis/redis-server.log'
> Dec 28 15:19:05 debian
On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 05:12:35PM +, Rebecca N. Palmer wrote:
> Package: python3-ulmo
> Version: 0.8.5+dfsg1-1
> Severity: serious
> Tags: patch
>
> The current binary package has a python3-suds dependency, but the result of
> building the current source package in current unstable does not.
1 - 100 of 147 matches
Mail list logo
