Bug#1013309: Confirmed: happens on Debian

: Processing triggers for hicolor-icon-theme (0.17-2) ... Processing triggers for doc-base (0.11.1) ... Processing 2 changed doc-base files, 2 added doc-base files... Processing triggers for mate-menus (1.26.0-3) ... Processing triggers for libc-bin (2.33-7) ... Processing triggers for man-db

Bug#1013732: hostapd: Build options: 802.11ax should be enabled. 802.11ax has been standardised.

Package: hostapd Version: 2:2.10-9+b1 Severity: normal Tags: patch X-Debbugs-Cc: mvanderko...@gmail.com Dear Maintainer, 802.11ax has been standardised; we can just enable the CONFIG_IEEE80211AX option. The patch for this follows: --- config/hostapd/linux.orig 2022-06-25 14:04:02.262732937

Bug#1013731: linux-image-5.10.0-13-amd64: 5.10.0-13-amd64 RTL8153 power management kernel hang

Package: src:linux Version: 5.10.106-1 Severity: important Tags: upstream X-Debbugs-Cc: vec...@vectro.org Dear Maintainer, On this kernel (linux-image-5.10.0-13-amd64 and previous) I experience occasional kworker kernel hangs with numerous other associated uninterruptable processes. I think

Bug#675804: patch

tags -1 patch thanks

Bug#926262: patch

tags -1 patch thanks

Bug#1013730: FTBFS: S/MIME test fails with OpenSSL 3.0

Package: request-tracker4 Version: 4.4.5+dfsg-1 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs upstream Justification: fails to build from source To preempt other people reporting this. The unit test t/mail/smime/realmail.t fails with OpenSSL 3.0.x due to DES being deprecated and the sample emails used by the

Bug#834724: trace-cannong-RP1A.200720.011-2022-06-25-08-21-14.perfetto-trace

Redmi/cannong_eea/cannong:11/RP1A.200720.011/V12.5.10.0.RJEEUVF:user/release-keys

Bug#1013678: installation-reports: honeycomb lx2: partial success, network and issues with raid/lvm/grub

On Fri, Jun 24, 2022 at 02:10:44PM -0700, Vagrant Cascadian wrote: > Package: installation-reports > Severity: normal > X-Debbugs-Cc: vagr...@debian.org > > Boot method: network > Image version: > https://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/arm64/20220624-02:19/netboot/netboot.tar.

Bug#1013437: cups: Nothing prints from driverless IPP queues unless added via lpadmin

On Fri 24 Jun 2022, at 23:08, Brian Potkin wrote: [...] > Everywhere works. driverless doesn't work and neither does s-c-p. > s-c-p uses driverless. > > Please reprt upstream: > > https://github.com/OpenPrinting/cups-filters/issues > > Cheers, > > Brian. Reported here

Bug#1013729: rust-zbus: Please upgrade to version 2.2.0

Package: librust-zbus-dev Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: Reinhard Tartler Please upgrade the rust-zbus package to version 2.2.0 This is a required dependency for packaging netavark, cf. #1009713 -rt -- System Information: Debian Release: bookworm/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (500,

Bug#1013728: mount: exfat filesystem mtime's are wrong

Package: src:linux Version: 5.10.113-1 Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: dpchr...@holgerdanske.com Dear Maintainer, Please see: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1001306 David -- Package-specific info: ** Version: Linux version 5.10.0-14-amd64 (debian-ker...@lists.debian.org)

Bug#1013726: python-astor: FTBFS: pytest7 regression, deprecated pytest feature: -k-

On Fri, 24 Jun 2022 at 15:57, Louis-Philippe Véronneau wrote: > I had a closer look at the error log and identified the regression as: > 'deprecated pytest feature: -k-'. Hopefully, that's helpful! Thanks! I've updated Git with a fix now (`-k 'not ...'`), but I'm not sure when I'll have a

Bug#1011875: golang-github-opencontainers-runtime-tools: FTBFS unreproducible

Hi there. Just a side note: The test fails on my test builds (with the same error as in the original report. Because it relies on having a working network connection. Which it shouldn't do. (my test builds are on a connection that only allows access to a Debian mirror). Cheers, Sven

Bug#1013727: openlp: FTBFS: pytest7 regression, deprecated pytest feature: -k-

Source: openlp Version: 2.9.4-2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org Usertags: pytest7 Hi, During a selected rebuild of python packages in sid, your package failed to build with pytest version 7.1.2-1. The full build log is

Bug#1013726: python-astor: FTBFS: pytest7 regression, deprecated pytest feature: -k-

Source: python-astor Version: 0.8.1-2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org Usertags: pytest7 Hi, During a selected rebuild of python packages in sid, your package failed to build with pytest version 7.1.2-1. The full build log is

Bug#1013724: python-b2sdk: FTBFS: pytest7 regression, deprecated pytest feature: -k-

Source: python-b2sdk Version: 1.3.0-2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org Usertags: pytest7 Hi, During a selected rebuild of python packages in sid, your package failed to build with pytest version 7.1.2-1. The full build log is

Bug#1013725: python-aws-xray-sdk: FTBFS: pytest7 regression, deprecated pytest feature: -k-

Source: python-aws-xray-sdk Version: 0.95-2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org Usertags: pytest7 Hi, During a selected rebuild of python packages in sid, your package failed to build with pytest version 7.1.2-1. The full build

Bug#1013723: python-easydev: FTBFS: pytest7 regression, deprecated pytest feature: -k-

Source: python-easydev Version: 0.12.0+dfsg-2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org Usertags: pytest7 Hi, During a selected rebuild of python packages in sid, your package failed to build with pytest version 7.1.2-1. The full build

Bug#1013722: python-h11: FTBFS: pytest7 regression, deprecated pytest feature: -k-

Source: python-h11 Version: 0.13.0-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org Usertags: pytest7 Hi, During a selected rebuild of python packages in sid, your package failed to build with pytest version 7.1.2-1. The full build log is

Bug#1013721: python-jose: FTBFS: pytest7 regression, deprecated pytest feature: -k-

Source: python-jose Version: 3.3.0+dfsg-2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org Usertags: pytest7 Hi, During a selected rebuild of python packages in sid, your package failed to build with pytest version 7.1.2-1. The full build log

Bug#1013720: python-matrix-nio: FTBFS: pytest7 regression, deprecated pytest feature: -k-

Source: python-matrix-nio Version: 0.19.0-2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org Usertags: pytest7 Hi, During a selected rebuild of python packages in sid, your package failed to build with pytest version 7.1.2-1. The full build

Bug#1013719: python-twitter: FTBFS: pytest7 regression, deprecated pytest feature: -k-

Source: python-twitter Version: 3.3-3 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org Usertags: pytest7 Hi, During a selected rebuild of python packages in sid, your package failed to build with pytest version 7.1.2-1. The full build log is

Bug#1013718: sphinx-gallery: FTBFS: pytest7 regression, deprecated pytest feature: -k-

Source: sphinx-gallery Version: 0.10.1-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org Usertags: pytest7 Hi, During a selected rebuild of python packages in sid, your package failed to build with pytest version 7.1.2-1. The full build log

Bug#1013717: spyne: FTBFS: pytest7 regression, deprecated pytest feature: -k-

Source: spyne Version: 2.14.0-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org Usertags: pytest7 Hi, During a selected rebuild of python packages in sid, your package failed to build with pytest version 7.1.2-1. The full build log is

Bug#1013716: flask: FTBFS: pytest7 regression, deprecated pytest feature: pytest.warnsNone

Source: flask Version: 2.0.1-2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org Usertags: pytest7 Hi, During a selected rebuild of python packages in sid, your package failed to build with pytest version 7.1.2-1. The full build log is

Bug#1013715: photutils: FTBFS: pytest7 regression, deprecated pytest feature: pytest.warnsNone

Source: photutils Version: 1.4.0-3 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org Usertags: pytest7 Hi, During a selected rebuild of python packages in sid, your package failed to build with pytest version 7.1.2-1. The full build log is

Bug#1013714: python-ase: FTBFS: pytest7 regression, deprecated pytest feature: pytest.warnsNone

Source: python-ase Version: 3.22.1-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org Usertags: pytest7 Hi, During a selected rebuild of python packages in sid, your package failed to build with pytest version 7.1.2-1. The full build log is

Bug#1013713: python-biom-format: FTBFS: pytest7 regression, not sure what the problem is

Source: python-biom-format Version: 2.1.10-4 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org Usertags: pytest7 Hi, During a selected rebuild of python packages in sid, your package failed to build with pytest version 7.1.2-1. The full build

Bug#1013712: python-httplib2: FTBFS: pytest7 regression, not sure what the problem is

Source: python-httplib2 Version: 0.20.2-3 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org Usertags: pytest7 Hi, During a selected rebuild of python packages in sid, your package failed to build with pytest version 7.1.2-1. The full build log

Bug#1013711: python-pytest-subtests: FTBFS: pytest7 regression, not sure what the problem is

Source: python-pytest-subtests Version: 0.6.0-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org Usertags: pytest7 Hi, During a selected rebuild of python packages in sid, your package failed to build with pytest version 7.1.2-1. The full

Bug#1013710: python-can: FTBFS: pytest7 regression, AttributeError: pytest.approx is not supported in a boolean context

Source: python-can Version: 3.3.2.final~github-3 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org Usertags: pytest7 Hi, During a selected rebuild of python packages in sid, your package failed to build with pytest version 7.1.2-1. The full

Bug#1013709: python-protobix: FTBFS: pytest7 regression, plugin distutils failed with: exit code=5

Source: python-protobix Version: 1.0.2-11 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org Usertags: pytest7 Hi, During a selected rebuild of python packages in sid, your package failed to build with pytest version 7.1.2-1. The full build log

Bug#1011712: olm: FTBFS: unsatisfiable build-dependency: binaryen (< 105+) but 106-1 is to be installed

Hi, On Thu, 23 Jun 2022 13:33:55 +0200 Markus Koschany wrote: > Hi, > > I didn't know that there was some coordination required between binaryen and > emscripten. Nobody talked about that in the past. Sorry to ditch your request > but I don't plan to maintain emscripten.  Thanks for your reply

Bug#1013708: python-pykka: FTBFS: pytest7 regression, AttributeError: module pytest has no attribute collect

Source: python-pykka Version: 2.0.3-2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org Usertags: pytest7 Hi, During a selected rebuild of python packages in sid, your package failed to build with pytest version 7.1.2-1. The full build log is

Bug#1013707: python-ratelimiter: FTBFS: pytest7 regression, AttributeError: module pytest has no attribute collect

Source: python-ratelimiter Version: 1.2.0.post0-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org Usertags: pytest7 Hi, During a selected rebuild of python packages in sid, your package failed to build with pytest version 7.1.2-1. The full

Bug#1013706: python-pytest-xprocess: FTBFS: pytest7 regression, pytest.PytestUnraisableExceptionWarning: Exception ignored

Source: python-pytest-xprocess Version: 0.18.1-3 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org Usertags: pytest7 Hi, During a selected rebuild of python packages in sid, your package failed to build with pytest version 7.1.2-1. The full

Bug#1013705: humanfriendly: FTBFS: pytest7 regression, upstream doesn't actually use pytest?

Source: humanfriendly Version: 10.0-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org Usertags: pytest7 Hi, During a selected rebuild of python packages in sid, your package failed to build with pytest version 7.1.2-1. The full build log is

Bug#1013704: pyglet: FTBFS: pytest7 regression, py3.9 OK; py3.10 fails

Source: pyglet Version: 1.5.14-2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org Usertags: pytest7 Hi, During a selected rebuild of python packages in sid, your package failed to build with pytest version 7.1.2-1. The full build log is

Bug#1013703: pyranges: FTBFS: pytest7 regression, py3.9 OK; py3.10 fails with Fatal Python error: Bus error

Source: pyranges Version: 0.0.111+ds-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org Usertags: pytest7 Hi, During a selected rebuild of python packages in sid, your package failed to build with pytest version 7.1.2-1. The full build log is

Bug#1013702: pytest-pylint: FTBFS: pytest7 regression, AssertionError

Source: pytest-pylint Version: 0.18.0-3 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org Usertags: pytest7 Hi, During a selected rebuild of python packages in sid, your package failed to build with pytest version 7.1.2-1. The full build log is

Bug#1013701: junitparser: FTBFS: pytest7 regression, deprecated pytest feature: -k-

Source: junitparser Version: 2.5.0-2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org Usertags: pytest7 Hi, During a selected rebuild of python packages in sid, your package failed to build with pytest version 7.1.2-1. The full build log is

Bug#1013700: python-qtpy: FTBFS: pytest7 regression, TypeError: the 'package' argument is required to perform a relative import

Source: python-qtpy Version: 2.1.0-2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org Usertags: pytest7 Hi, During a selected rebuild of python packages in sid, your package failed to build with pytest version 7.1.2-1. The full build log is

Bug#1013699: asyncpg: FTBFS: pytest7 regression, deprecated pytest feature: -k-

Source: asyncpg Version: 0.25.0-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org Usertags: pytest7 Hi, During a selected rebuild of python packages in sid, your package failed to build with pytest version 7.1.2-1. The full build log is

Bug#540373: Report can be declared as solved (old age)

This bug report is to old to be kept. -- Bjarni I. Gislason

Bug#1013437: cups: Nothing prints from driverless IPP queues unless added via lpadmin

On Fri 24 Jun 2022, at 18:55, Brian Potkin wrote: > tags 1013437 moreinfo > thanks > > > > On Thu 23 Jun 2022 at 17:00:31 +0100, Gareth Evans wrote: > >> Package: cups >> Version: 2.3.3op2-3+deb11u2 >> Severity: normal >> X-Debbugs-Cc: donots...@fastmail.fm >> >> Dear Maintainer, >> >> ***

Bug#1013679: nmu: xq_0.0.7-1

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu Hi, please rebuild xq on amd64 after it was accepted from NEW; it is a simple tool, so rebuilding it only on amd64 is enough. nmu xq_0.0.7-1 . amd64 . unstable . -m "rebuild on buildd"

Bug#1004899: ITP: numberstation -- TOTP Authenticator application

Hello! I noticed this has been here for about four months. Was there anything needed to finish this? -- Respectfully, Chris Talbot On Thu, 03 Feb 2022 10:05:34 +0100 Thomas Goirand wrote: > Package: wnpp > Severity: wishlist > Owner: Thomas Goirand > X-Debbugs-Cc:

Bug#1013678: installation-reports: honeycomb lx2: partial success, network and issues with raid/lvm/grub

Package: installation-reports Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: vagr...@debian.org Boot method: network Image version: https://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/arm64/20220624-02:19/netboot/netboot.tar.gz Date: 2022-06-24 after breakfast but before lunch Machine: Solidrun Honeycomb LX2 Partitions: udev

Bug#1013677: RM: pynac -- RoM; obsolete

Package: ftp.debian.org X-Debbugs-CC: debian-science-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org The pynac package was in Debian for sagemath, and sagemath recently merged pynac, so that pynac isn't needed anymore. And by merged I really don't mean vendored: the pynac project itself has been merged into

Bug#1013676: ITP: rust-rustls-native-certs -- rustls use of platform native certificate store

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Jonas Smedegaard X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 * Package name: rust-rustls-native-certs Version : 0.6.2 Upstream Author : Joseph Birr-Pixton * URL :

Bug#1013582: libapache-jena-java: Jena shell utilities are missing

> I would also call the binary package > apache-jena-bin and omit the lib prefix because this one is reserved for > libraries only. On second thought, maybe we can just ship the shell scripts with libapache- jena-java. It is an arch:all package anyway and space is not an issue here.

Bug#1013582: libapache-jena-java: Jena shell utilities are missing

Control: severity -1 wishlist Am Freitag, dem 24.06.2022 um 13:17 +0200 schrieb David Haller: > Package: libapache-jena-java > Version: 3.17.0-3 > Severity: normal > X-Debbugs-Cc: david.hal...@fau.de > > Hello there, > > the package includes the Java libraries of Jena only, but not their

Bug#1013674: haskell-wl-pprint-text_1.2.0.1-1+b2_mips64el-buildd.changes REJECTED

Source: haskell-wl-pprint-text Version: 1.2.0.1-1 Severity: serious On 2022-06-22 16:08, Debian FTP Masters wrote: > libghc-wl-pprint-text-dev_1.2.0.1-1+b2_mips64el.deb: has 1 file(s) with a > timestamp too far in the past: > usr/share/doc/libghc-wl-pprint-text-dev/changelog.gz (Thu Jan 1

Bug#1013673: harfbuzz: CVE-2022-33068

Source: harfbuzz Version: 2.7.4-1 Severity: important Tags: security upstream Forwarded: https://github.com/harfbuzz/harfbuzz/issues/3557 X-Debbugs-Cc: car...@debian.org, Debian Security Team Hi, The following vulnerability was published for harfbuzz. CVE-2022-33068[0]: | An integer overflow

Bug#1013672: g-s-custom-session: redundant because 'g-s-selector' is not installed

Package: gnome-session-bin Version: 42.0-1 Severity: wishlist File: /usr/bin/gnome-session-custom-session Tags: patch X-Debbugs-Cc: akbarkhon.variskha...@gmail.com Dear Maintainer, Out of sheer curiosity, I ran 'g-s-c-s' to see what it does. To my surprise and wonder, it killed the active

Bug#1013526: libtickit-widget-scrollbox-perl: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: /usr/bin/perl Build test --verbose 1 returned exit code 255

Control: tag -1 + unreproducible On Fri, 24 Jun 2022 12:07:04 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > Source: libtickit-widget-scrollbox-perl > Version: 0.11-1 > Severity: serious > Justification: FTBFS > Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs > User: lu...@debian.org > Usertags: ftbfs-20220624 f

Bug#896017: "/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lstdc++" when building with clang

Package: clang Version: 1:13.0-54 Followup-For: Bug #896017 Control: affects -1 src:xtensor Yes, libstd++ is installed. I get the same error running xtensor tests using clang clang Depends: clang13 Depends: libstdc++-11-dev libstdc++-11-dev installs libstd++ as

Bug#1013671: vlc: Video display in a separate window, even if 'integrate video in main video' is enabled

Package: vlc Version: 3.0.17.4-4 Severity: normal -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Dear Maintainer, After upgrading vlc in unstable, video is always displayed in a separate window, even if the 'Integrate video in interface' is ticked. It looks like this option isn't taken into

Bug#1013437: cups: Nothing prints from driverless IPP queues unless added via lpadmin

tags 1013437 moreinfo thanks On Thu 23 Jun 2022 at 17:00:31 +0100, Gareth Evans wrote: > Package: cups > Version: 2.3.3op2-3+deb11u2 > Severity: normal > X-Debbugs-Cc: donots...@fastmail.fm > > Dear Maintainer, > > *** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate

Bug#1013451: openssh-client: double free or corruption

GNU gdb (Debian 12.1-2) 12.1 Copyright (C) 2022 Free Software Foundation, Inc. License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it. There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law. Type "show

Bug#974944: "documented"

Hi, I think this bugreport is documenting don't use ' in password. Groeten Geert Stappers https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1003157#15 -- a dog's life

Bug#1013608: marked as done (ncbi-entrez-direct: FTBFS: cannot find package "github.com/shirou/gopsutil/mem")

"Debian Bug Tracking System" writes: >* d/rules: Pass right location of gopsutil/mem (Closes: #1013608) Thanks for looking into this report! FWIW, I reckon it should be possible to do away with this dependency altogether by retiring the shim that used it in favor of system

Bug#1002830: How to reproduce

control: tag -1 moreinfo > Could somebody fix the misleading message? I think that is waiting on how to reproduce the message. What were the wrong permissions and what are the correct permission on /var/lib/mailman3/templates/lists/test-l.example.org/en/list:member:regular:footer.txt ?

Bug#1008022: keepass2: CVE-2022-0725 information disclosure

On Fri, Jun 24, 2022 at 05:16:41PM +0200, Enrico Zini wrote: > I failed to reproduce this on Gnome on a freshly installed buster > system. > > I failed to reproduce this on Gnome on a freshly installed bullseye > system with wayland. I also failed to reproduce this on a freshly installed

Bug#1013670: transition: srt

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Dear Release Team, please grant a transition slot for the srt transition. Upstream has changed the soname from 1.4 to 1.5, and the srt packaging has been adjusted to reflect this. The

Bug#1008022: keepass2: CVE-2022-0725 information disclosure

On Sun, Mar 20, 2022 at 06:16:41PM +0100, Markus Koschany wrote: > Steps to reproduce the problem (according > to https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2052696) > > Step 1: Run "journalctl -f" in a terminal window. > Step 2: Double click a password in KeePass. > Step 3: Wait for the clear

Bug#1002227: golang-github-templexxx-xor: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: cd obj-x86_64-linux-gnu && go test -vet=off -v -p 4 github.com/templexxx/xor returned exit code 1

Hi, On 24/06/22 at 22:48 +0800, Shengjing Zhu wrote: > On Wed, Dec 22, 2021 at 12:42 AM Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > > > Source: golang-github-templexxx-xor > > Version: 0.1.2-5 > > Severity: serious > > Justification: FTBFS > > Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs > > User: lu...@debian.org > > Usertags:

Bug#1013657: node-espree: FTBFS: make[1]: *** [debian/rules:31: override_dh_auto_test] Error 9

Control: tags -1 + moreinfo On 24/06/2022 16:36, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: Source: node-espree Version: 9.3.1~dfsg-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20220624 ftbfs-bookworm Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your

Bug#1013669: Error: expected integer but got "" on hresize/sash drag (fixed upstream)

Package: gitk Version: 1:2.30.2-1 Severity: important X-Debbugs-Cc: jonathan.winterfl...@gmail.com Dear Maintainer, Since upgrading to bullseye, this bug: https://public- inbox.org/git/1f6e179c-d9c3-e503-3218-0acf4ff27...@mit.edu/ severly impedes the useability of gitk: The error dialog blocks

Bug#1013451: openssh-client: double free or corruption

Hi, I confirm the very same issue here. I've found another "solution" (if exchanging your ssh-keys is an option for you): Just create new keys with ssh-keygen and push them with ssh-copy-id to your target hosts. This works for me (but is for sure a nuisance when you have lots of hosts to feed

Bug#1012771: python-bids-validator: autopkgtest regression in testing

Control: fixed -1 1.9.4-1 Control: close -1 fixed in latest upatream. -- Best, Nilesh signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#1013668: RFP: openseachest -- Cross platform utilities useful for performing various operations on SATA, SAS, NVMe, and USB storage devices.

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist * Package name: openseachest Version : 22.05 Upstream Author : opensou...@seagate.com * URL : https://github.com/Seagate/openSeaChest * License : MPL-2-0 Programming Lang: C Description : Cross platform utilities useful

Bug#1009010: fix remaining bugs

Hello, please find as an attachment a patch to fix #1012190 and #981703 and close them. Best regards, Georges. tags 1012190 + patch thank you -- Georges KHAZNADAR et Jocelyne FOURNIER 22 rue des mouettes, 59240 Dunkerque France. Téléphone +33 (0)3 28 29 17 70 diff --git

Bug#1012798: libecap: diff for NMU version 1.0.1-3.3 fix FTBFS on riscv arch

Am 20.06.22 um 09:16 schrieb xiao sheng wen(肖盛文): Let's do update libecap3.symbols to remove it, please see it in attachment. Please review and help to upload it to sid. I have just uploaded another NMU with the provided symbols file. The debdiff is attached.diff -Nru

Bug#1013615: hiredis: FTBFS: 2 TESTS FAILED ***

>> #54 Does not return a reply when the command times out: FAILED I suspect that the root cause here is that Redis 7.x is now in unstable (vs. 6.x). // Chris

Bug#1002227: golang-github-templexxx-xor: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: cd obj-x86_64-linux-gnu && go test -vet=off -v -p 4 github.com/templexxx/xor returned exit code 1

On Wed, Dec 22, 2021 at 12:42 AM Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > Source: golang-github-templexxx-xor > Version: 0.1.2-5 > Severity: serious > Justification: FTBFS > Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs > User: lu...@debian.org > Usertags: ftbfs-20211220 ftbfs-bookworm > > Hi, > > During a rebuild of all packages

Bug#1011523: systemd-logind: lightdm ignores keyboard input for the first 3 seconds

On 2022-06-24 15:57:22 +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > On 2022-05-25 20:43:50 +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: > > I don't think there's really code in the display manager to specifically > > handle keyboards, I'd assume it's in the X part, but I might be wrong. > > The issue could also be in the

Bug#1013667: virt-manager: FTBFS: tests failed

Source: virt-manager Version: 1:4.0.0-2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20220624 ftbfs-bookworm Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > mak

Bug#1002227: golang-github-templexxx-xor: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: cd obj-x86_64-linux-gnu && go test -vet=off -v -p 4 github.com/templexxx/xor returned exit code 1

Control: severity -1 serious Control: tags -1 - moreinfo reproducible On 13/02/22 at 15:02 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > Hi Roger, > > On 17/01/22 at 00:56 +0900, Roger Shimizu wrote: > > control: tags -1 +moreinfo unreproducible > > control: severity -1 important > > > > Dear Lucas, > > > >

Bug#1013666: apertium-srd-ita: FTBFS: configure: error: Package requirements (apertium-lex-tools >= 0.2.7) were not met

Source: apertium-srd-ita Version: 1.1.0-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20220624 ftbfs-bookworm Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > checking

Bug#1013665: apertium-spa-arg: FTBFS: configure: error: Package requirements (apertium-lex-tools >= 0.2.7) were not met

Source: apertium-spa-arg Version: 0.5.0-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20220624 ftbfs-bookworm Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > check

Bug#1013663: apertium-hbs-slv: FTBFS: configure: error: Package requirements (apertium-lex-tools >= 0.2.6) were not met

Source: apertium-hbs-slv Version: 0.5.1-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20220624 ftbfs-bookworm Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > check

Bug#1013662: core-async-clojure: FTBFS: make[1]: *** [debian/rules:22: override_dh_auto_test] Error 1

Source: core-async-clojure Version: 1.3.610-5 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20220624 ftbfs-bookworm Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > mak

Bug#1013661: apertium-swe-dan: FTBFS: configure: error: Package requirements (apertium-lex-tools >= 0.2.2) were not met

Source: apertium-swe-dan Version: 0.8.1-2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20220624 ftbfs-bookworm Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > checking

Bug#1013660: apertium-spa-ita: FTBFS: configure: error: Package requirements (apertium-lex-tools >= 0.2.7) were not met

Source: apertium-spa-ita Version: 0.2.1-2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20220624 ftbfs-bookworm Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > check

Bug#1013659: apertium-spa: FTBFS: configure: error: You don't have lrx-comp installed

Source: apertium-spa Version: 1.1.0~r79716-2.1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20220624 ftbfs-bookworm Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully

Bug#1013658: apertium-fra-cat: FTBFS: configure: error: Package requirements (apertium-lex-tools >= 0.2.3) were not met

Source: apertium-fra-cat Version: 1.9.0-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20220624 ftbfs-bookworm Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > checking

Bug#1013656: node-zrender: FTBFS: make: *** [debian/rules:8: binary] Error 25

Source: node-zrender Version: 5.3.1+dfsg-2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20220624 ftbfs-bookworm Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > deb

Bug#1013655: apertium-por-cat: FTBFS: configure: error: Package requirements (apertium-lex-tools >= 0.2.3) were not met

Source: apertium-por-cat Version: 0.10.0-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20220624 ftbfs-bookworm Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > check

Bug#1013652: canl-java: FTBFS: Failed to execute goal org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-resources-plugin:3.1.0:testResources

Source: canl-java Version: 2.7.0-3 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20220624 ftbfs-bookworm Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > debian/rules bu

Bug#1013654: apertium-cat-ita: FTBFS: configure: error: Package requirements (apertium-lex-tools >= 0.2.2) were not met

Source: apertium-cat-ita Version: 0.2.1-3 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20220624 ftbfs-bookworm Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > checking

Bug#1013653: apertium-hbs-eng: FTBFS: configure: error: Package requirements (apertium-lex-tools >= 0.2.6) were not met

Source: apertium-hbs-eng Version: 0.5.1-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20220624 ftbfs-bookworm Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > check

Bug#1013651: nbsphinx: FTBFS: KeyError in code-cells.ipynb: 'state'

Source: nbsphinx Version: 0.8.7+ds-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20220624 ftbfs-bookworm Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > make[1]: Enter

Bug#1013650: apertium-urd-hin: FTBFS: configure: error: You don't have lrx-comp installed.

Source: apertium-urd-hin Version: 0.1.0~r64379-3 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20220624 ftbfs-bookworm Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully

Bug#1013649: libjpeg: FTBFS: dpkg-buildpackage: error: dpkg-source -b . subprocess returned exit status 2

Source: libjpeg Version: 0.0~git20220615.842c7ba-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20220624 ftbfs-bookworm Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully

Bug#1013648: apertium-nno-nob: FTBFS: configure: error: Package requirements (apertium-lex-tools >= 0.2.2) were not met

Source: apertium-nno-nob Version: 1.3.0-2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20220624 ftbfs-bookworm Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > checking

Bug#1013647: apertium-es-gl: FTBFS: configure: error: Package requirements (apertium-lex-tools >= 0.2.7) were not met

Source: apertium-es-gl Version: 1.0.9-2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20220624 ftbfs-bookworm Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > check

Bug#1013646: apertium-swe-nor: FTBFS: configure: error: Package requirements (apertium-lex-tools >= 0.2.2) were not met

Source: apertium-swe-nor Version: 0.3.1-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20220624 ftbfs-bookworm Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > checking

Bug#1013644: erlang-p1-tls: FTBFS: test failed

Source: erlang-p1-tls Version: 1.1.15-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20220624 ftbfs-bookworm Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > mak

Bug#1013645: apertium-spa-cat: FTBFS: configure: error: Package requirements (apertium-lex-tools >= 0.2.2) were not met

Source: apertium-spa-cat Version: 2.2.0-2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20220624 ftbfs-bookworm Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > check

  1   2   3   >