Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/astropy/reproject/issues/414
Control: reassign -1 python3-astropy-healpix 1.0.0-1
Control: affects -1 src:reproject
Control: tags -1 +pending
This bug isn't in reproject, but in astropy-healpix and slided through
the CI tests there. A solution was found
Le Mon, Dec 11, 2023 at 02:55:50AM +0100, Kevin Price a écrit :
> When booting 6.1.0-15, my physical amd64/bookworm/gnome computer
> misbehaves in many ways, rendering it largely unusable. With kernels up
> to 6.1.0-13, and even briefly with the otherwise broken 6.1.0-14, all of
> this seemed
Hi,
Hmmm... strange. I cannot reproduce this. I tried to
(1) run tests locally with dh_elpa_test,
(2) run tests locally as autopkgtest supposed to with dh_elpa_test
--autopkgtest,
(3) run tests during build from scratch under sbuild,
(4) run tests with autopkgtest under sbuild.
Tests were
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Tue, 2023-12-12 at 17:18 -0500, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
> On 2018-05-21 16:01:59, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> > subject mostly says it all, but it'd be nice if KGB could support
> > password-protected IRC channels for notifications.
>
> The
Package: src:linux
Version: 6.5.10-1~bpo12+1
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: peter.ganzh...@gmail.com
Dear Maintainer,
the built-in microphone of my Lenovo ThinkPad P16s Gen 2, model 21K9... laptop
is not working.
The laptop has an AMD Ryzen 7 Pro 7840U CPU ('Raphael' / RPL) with an Audio
Control: close -1
On Tue, 2023-12-12 at 09:52 +0100, Patrick ZAJDA wrote:
> I removed the suppression of the lintian warning and sent the package again.
...
> Done in the last sent package of today.
Uploaded.
> I plan to generate a manpage using help2man then suggest it upstream
> after some
Hi Ted,
On Wed, Aug 18, 2021 at 01:41:36AM +0300, Faidon Liambotis wrote:
> I haven't received a response for this. We are now at the beginning of
> the aforementioned bookworm cycle, so I thought it may be a good
> opportunity to bump this :) Do you have any thoughts?
It's now been 2½ years
Package: glogic
Version: 2.6-6
Severity: serious
Dear Maintainer,
qlogic isn't usable any more in unstable and testing.
It fails to start as a calling of a Python function raises a
AttributeError.
$ glogic
/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/glogic/MainFrame.py:4: PyGIWarning: Gtk was
imported
On Thu, Nov 30, 2023 at 10:47:18PM +0100, Markus Koschany wrote:
> Source: libitext-java
> Version: 2.1.7-14
> Severity: serious
> Tags: ftbfs sid
> User: a...@debian.org
> Usertags: bouncycastle-1.77
> X-Debbugs-Cc: a...@debian.org
>
> Dear maintainer,
>
> libitext-java fails to build from
I missed this report while researching, so I ended up filing this one:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1058574
It looks like it was an upstream issue where certain code in python.el
was brought into emacs 28.2, but didn't make it to 29.
If it helps people, this is what I did on systems that automatically had
rebooted into the problematic kernel.
First, I uninstalled the 6.1.0-14 kernel and rebooted back into 6.1.0-13.
Then I used `last` to identify the time between the problematic reboot into
6.1.0-14 and the deliberate
Of course, as soon as I file the bug, THEN I find a likely duplicate:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1032522
On Tue, 12 Dec 2023 21:51:47 +0100
Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Source: libhinawa
> Version: 4.0.0-1
> Severity: serious
> Justification: FTBFS
> Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
> User: lu...@debian.org
> Usertags: ftbfs-20231212 ftbfs-trixie
>
> Hi,
>
> During a rebuild of
Package: emacs-el
Version: 1:28.2+1-15
Severity: important
Tags: upstream
X-Debbugs-Cc: dalg...@gmail.com
Dear Maintainer,
When editing the following file, emacs will reliably hang:
$ cat bug.py
def foo(self):
"""Foo."""
"""
pass
def baz(self):
"""Ba'r."""
pass
The problem
Source: bowtie
Version: 1.3.1-1
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: wuruil...@loongson.cn
Dear Maintainer,
bowtie has compilation errors on the loong64 architecture.
Please modify the debian/control file to add support for loong64.
The code is as follows:
Architecture: alpha any-amd64 arm64 loong64
Package: src:gnupg2
Version: 2.4.3-2
> gpg --quick-generate-key "A User " rsa2048
>
> ~
gpg: directory '/home//.gnupg' created
We need to generate a
Package: src:gnupg2
Version: 2.4.3-2
TPM2 support has been introduced into GnuPG since 2.3.
https://gnupg.org/blog/20210315-using-tpm-with-gnupg-2.3.html
While TPM2 support is not enabled for Debian's gnupg2 package
in experimental:
Source: bcal
Version: 2.4-2
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: wuruil...@loongson.cn
Dear Maintainer,
bcal has compilation errors on the loong64 architecture.
Please modify the debian/control file to add support for loong64.
The code is as follows:
Architecture: amd64 arm64 loong64 ppc64 ppc64el
Source: debian-installer
Version: 20230607+deb12u4
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: debbugtr...@dan.heath.cc
Dear Maintainer,
I have installed debian via the ISO at
https://gemmei.ftp.acc.umu.se/debian-cd/current/amd64/iso-cd/debian-12.4.0-amd64-netinst.iso
and selecting the "Australia" locale
forwarded 1058568 https://github.com/bruceg/bglibs/issues/2
--
Playing the game for the games sake.
Web:
* Debian Wiki: https://wiki.debian.org/PhilWyett
* Website: https://kathenas.org
* Social Debian: https://pleroma.debian.social/kathenas/
* Social Instagram:
The build failure is due to the library python3-httpx. This library uses
python3-rfc3986, it's been upgraded lately [1], and it's now causing the
breakage.
There's a discussion about this issue upstream [2]. If we bump src:httpx
to version 0.24.0, the dependency on python3-rfc3986 goes away,
Package: bglibs
Version:2.04+dfsg-5
bglibs: crc-gentab has no manpage.
Tracking bug of maintainer.
Regards
Phil
--
Playing the game for the games sake.
Web:
* Debian Wiki: https://wiki.debian.org/PhilWyett
* Website: https://kathenas.org
* Social Debian:
forwarded 1038112 https://github.com/bruceg/bglibs/issues/3
Actually forwarded.
Regards
Phil
--
Playing the game for the games sake.
Web:
* Debian Wiki: https://wiki.debian.org/PhilWyett
* Website: https://kathenas.org
* Social Debian: https://pleroma.debian.social/kathenas/
* Social
This looks like it was never forwarded to upstream. Will do so to get their
opinions on the issue.
Regards
Phil
--
Playing the game for the games sake.
Web:
* Debian Wiki: https://wiki.debian.org/PhilWyett
* Website: https://kathenas.org
* Social Debian:
On Wed, Dec 13, 2023 at 01:33:59AM +0100, наб wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 12, 2023 at 05:55:38PM -0500, Thomas Dickey wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 12, 2023 at 11:09:13PM +0100, наб wrote:
> > > urlview 1c-1 whose xterm was killed but which didn't die consumes 100%
> > > CPU.
> > > The event loop is for(;;)
Source: python-tuspy
Version: 1.0.0-2
Severity: normal
Upstream has removed usage of python3-future in git.
I proposed a supplementary PR to also remove usage of python3-six.
https://github.com/tus/tus-py-client/pull/90
Greetings,
-- System Information:
Debian Release: trixie/sid
APT
Package: auto-apt-proxy
Version: 14.1
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
according to d#756656 [1] https-URLs cannot be given to `approx`.
Thus, the `approx` check should be skipped when an https URL is
requested.
Cheers,
Lars
[1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=756656
在 2023年12月12日星期二 CST 下午11:29:00，Patrick Matthäi 写道：
> Can you install the dbgsym packages and run it with gdb and send a
> backtrace?
>
> Am 12.12.2023 um 16:21 schrieb Bob Wong:
> > 在 2023年12月12日星期二 CST 下午11:05:29，您写道：
> >> Hey
> >>
> >> Am 05.12.2021 um 02:22 schrieb Bob Wong:
> >>> Package:
Source: emperor
Version: 1.0.3+ds-7
Severity: normal
python3-future is deprecated and being removed from the archive.
Please use attached patch to remove it from the packaging
Please check with upstream to update setup.py
Greetings,
Alexandre Detiste
-- System Information:
Debian Release:
tony mancill writes:
> So this is very possibly a bug in libreoffice-writer-nogui.
Sure seems like it. My guess would be that what files go in what
libreoffice binary packages got refactored somehow? Not sure what the
point of the nogui package is if it can't be used here any more.
[shrug]
Hi. This is from Alex Sisson, the upstream author:
Hi, there's a version to test from https://codeberg.org/alexs/shed , dev
branch, please give that a quick test and if you're happy with that and I'll
make a 1.16 release.
Thanks.
Source: biomaj3
Version: 3.1.23-1
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainers,
This package depends on on Python2->3 transition helper
"python3-future" which has now outlived it's usefulness.
Please remove it's use.
A MR has been submitted upstream to help remove it
and more old Python2 constructs.
Package: minissdpd
Version: 1.6.0-1
Severity: normal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Looks like bugs #890584 and #901605 are back again. I'm getting lots
of "minissdpd[810]: peer xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:y is not from a LAN"
messages in my syslog. The "peer" involved is my WiFi
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: bullseye
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
X-Debbugs-Cc: python-django-image...@packages.debian.org, sanv...@debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:python-django-imagekit
[ Reason ]
This release fixes Bug #991650 FTBFS
On 12/12/2023 08.14, Jian-Hong Pan wrote:
...
Also, took Fedora's gdm patch "udev: Stick with wayland on hybrid
nvidia with vendor driver" [2]
> [2]:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/gdm/blob/rawhide/f/0001-udev-Stick-with-wayland-on-hybrid-nvidia-with-vendor.patch
If you want that patch
On Tue, Dec 12, 2023 at 04:45:07PM -0500, Jeremy Bícha wrote:
> > > I can do a riscv64 test build in a special Ubuntu PPA if you want to
> > > turn that into a patch.
>
> I built with -DENABLE_JIT=OFF -DENABLE_C_LOOP=ON
> -DENABLE_WEBASSEMBLY=OFF but the build fails.
>
On Tue, Dec 12, 2023 at 11:09:13PM +0100, наб wrote:
> Package: libncursesw6
> Version: 6.4+20231121-1
> Severity: normal
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> urlview 1c-1 whose xterm was killed but which didn't die consumes 100% CPU.
> The event loop is for(;;) switch(getch()) ... and ignores -1
If it's
Package: auto-apt-proxy
Version: 14.1
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
Hello,
in my environment the name `apt-proxy` resolves to both an IPv4 and an
IPv6 address.
In `/usr/bin/auto-apt-proxy` the hostname `apt-proxy` is resolved via
the following command:
getent hosts apt-proxy
But the
On Tue, Dec 12, 2023 at 09:35:44AM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Source: gpredict
> Version: 2.3-115-g0f3beb6-2
> Severity: serious
> Justification: FTBFS
> Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
> User: lu...@debian.org
> Usertags: ftbfs-20231212 ftbfs-trixie
It feels slightly icky becau
Control: tags -1 +patch
On 2018-05-21 16:01:59, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> subject mostly says it all, but it'd be nice if KGB could support
> password-protected IRC channels for notifications.
The library backing KGB does support it, so it seems it's only a matter
of a few lines patch:
Hi Bart,
> That should be suitable for a watch file. Right?
Yes, while that is true, the page is updated frequently with older
versions replaced with the new version.
In Debian, usually, we can't package the latest version as quickly as
possible due to bootstrapping requirements.
Hence, a
Package: libncursesw6
Version: 6.4+20231121-1
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
urlview 1c-1 whose xterm was killed but which didn't die consumes 100% CPU.
The event loop is for(;;) switch(getch()) ... and ignores -1
(https://git.sr.ht/~nabijaczleweli/urlview-ng/tree/1c/item/urlview.c#L576).
Hi,
The issue described in this bug report is invalid, however, there was
another one which I just fixed (adding Fix_invalid_assert_calls.patch).
I'll use the same bug report then.
Cheers,
Thomas Goirand (zigo)
On Mon, Dec 11, 2023 at 10:41 AM Alberto Garcia wrote:
>> On Mon, Dec 11, 2023 at 10:23:36AM -0500, Jeremy Bícha wrote:
> > > Considering that the upstream bug (265082) has been open for
> > > a month maybe we can work this around with -DENABLE_JIT=OFF
> > > -DENABLE_C_LOOP=ON (I haven't tested
在 2023-12-12星期二的 12:23 +，Chris Lamb写道：
> Boyuan Yang wrote:
>
> > Package python-hiredis claimed to be using system libhiredis library
> > through
> > a custom patch. However, the built binary library is not linked against
> > libhiredis […]
>
> Oh, well spotted. How did you find this? :)
>
Source: python-disptrans
Version: 0.0.1-2
Followup-For: Bug #1058480
X-Debbugs-Cc: kd8...@gmail.com
Hi Graham,
Upstream relies on the numba for its functions. In the future I will
include numba in recommends as you suggested.
Thank you,
Yogeswaran.
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: bullseye
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
X-Debbugs-Cc: vlf...@packages.debian.org, sanv...@debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:vlfeat
[ Reason ]
This release fixes Bug #991066: FTBFS with new imagemagick.
The bug was
Source: skimage
Version: 0.22.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20231212 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[2]: Enter
Source: seqkit
Version: 2.3.1+ds-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20231212 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules bin
Source: msolve
Version: 0.6.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20231212 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Enter
Source: binutils-or1k-elf
Version: 1.0.9
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20231212 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/ru
Source: parallel
Version: 20221122+ds-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20231212 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[4]: Enter
Source: node-js-sdsl
Version: 4.1.4-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20231212 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Enter
Source: science.js
Version: 1.9.3+dfsg-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20231212 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[2]: Enter
Source: git-buildpackage
Version: 0.9.32
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20231212 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Enter
Source: autopkgtest
Version: 5.31.1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20231212 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Enter
Source: plastex
Version: 3.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20231212 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering direct
Source: sahara-plugin-spark
Version: 10.0.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20231212 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: node-globby
Version: 13.1.3+~cs16.25.40-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20231212 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> deb
Source: esnacc
Version: 1.8.1-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20231212 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Enter
Source: node-ytdl-core
Version: 4.11.2+dfsg+~cs4.10.8-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20231212 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: node-redis
Version: 4.5.1+~1.1.2-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20231212 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: ditaa
Version: 0.10+ds1-1.3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20231212 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules bin
Source: node-openpgp-asmcrypto.js
Version: 2.3.3~0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20231212 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: node-node-pty
Version: 1.0.0+~6.3.0-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20231212 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> deb
Source: libhinawa
Version: 4.0.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20231212 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Enter
Source: golang-google-api
Version: 0.61.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20231212 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: heat
Version: 1:21.0.0-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20231212 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: node-rollup-plugin-node-polyfills
Version: 0.2.1+dfsg+~0.11.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20231212 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part
Source: libitext5-java
Version: 5.5.13.3-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20231212 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/ru
Source: yash
Version: 2.55-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20231212 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[3]: Entering direct
Source: calamares-extensions
Version: 1.3.2-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20231212 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: node-csstype
Version: 3.1.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20231212 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Enter
Source: libqtdbustest
Version: 0.3.2-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20231212 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[3]: Enter
Source: node-resolve
Version: 1.22.1+~cs5.31.10-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20231212 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: node-babel7
Version: 7.20.15+ds1+~cs214.269.168-5
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20231212 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: dired-du
Version: 0.5.2-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20231212 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Enter
Source: libhinoko
Version: 1.0.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20231212 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Enter
Source: node-mdn-browser-compat-data
Version: 5.2.20+~3.33.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20231212 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: qstopmotion
Version: 2.5.2-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20231212 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules bu
Source: fiat-ecmwf
Version: 1.0.0-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20231212 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Enter
Source: node-es-module-lexer
Version: 1.1.0+dfsg-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20231212 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: dvdisaster
Version: 0.79.10-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20231212 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[2]: Enter
Source: node-rollup
Version: 3.29.4-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20231212 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Enter
Source: node-signal-exit
Version: 4.1.0-6
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20231212 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: telegram-desktop
Version: 4.11.8+ds-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20231212 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: ntpsec
Version: 1.2.2+dfsg1-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20231212 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Enter
Source: kaidan
Version: 0.9.1-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20231212 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Enter
Source: node-jest
Version: 29.6.2~ds1+~cs73.45.28-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20231212 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: libpdfbox-java
Version: 1:1.8.16-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20231212 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: node-regexpp
Version: 3.2.0-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20231212 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Enter
Source: golang-github-shenwei356-util
Version: 0.5.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20231212 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: ayatana-indicator-sound
Version: 22.9.2-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20231212 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: lua-zlib
Version: 1.2-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20231212 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules bu
Source: prometheus-blackbox-exporter
Version: 0.24.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20231212 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: libqtdbusmock
Version: 0.9.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20231212 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[3]: Enter
On 12.12.2023 14:07, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
Hi Andreas,
thanks for the report, I'll remove the manual page and the perl script
from texlive-bibtex-extra .
Hilmar
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to install
because it tries to overwrite other packages files without
Hi,
Am 30.11.23 um 09:05 schrieb Peter Krefting:
we are experiencing that the Apache httpd locks up, filling the
error.log with errors after the nightly maintenance (not every night,
though):
[Wed Nov 29 00:00:01.922731 2023] [mpm_event:notice] [pid 62346:tid
139841215223680] AH00489:
On Fri, Nov 3, 2023 at 7:30 PM Bastian Germann wrote:
> The reverse dependencies are all gone now. Please consider filing a RM bug.
> If nobody reacts I am going to file one when gamin is removed from testing.
Yes, we approve of the removal of gamin. Thank you for filing the RM bug.
On behalf
Control: tags -1 upstream
Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/DataBiosphere/toil/issues/4718
As boto upstream explained[1] boto does not support Python3.12 and
toil upstream rather should switch to boto3.
Kind regards
Andreas.
[1] https://github.com/boto/boto/issues/3951
Am Tue, Dec
1 - 100 of 538 matches
Mail list logo
