Bug#320345: exim4: Misleading bounce report when message_size_limit exceeded

On Thu, 2005-07-28 at 17:16 +0100, Oliver Elphick wrote: > Package: exim4 > Version: 4.50-8 > Severity: normal > > When a message is rejected because message_size_limit is exceeded, a > misleading bounce message is sent. > > The bounce message says: "No transport provider was available for > deli

Bug#320392: apt : missing transcoded font packages when installing fvwm in a spanish system

package apt reassign 320392 fvwm thanks On Friday, July 29, 2005 3:24 AM, jose q <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Package: apt > Version: 0.5.28.6 > > Debian dists affected : Sarge , Etch > > When fvwm is installed using apt-get in a system with locale set to > spanish > > ( choosed in the menus of i

Bug#321263: libc6-dev: broken header file: linux/joystick.h

package libc6-dev severity 321263 serious reassign 321263 linux-kernel-headers 2.6.13+0rc3-1 merge 321263 320515 thanks On Thursday, August 04, 2005 3:15 PM, Bill Currie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Package: libc6-dev > Version: 2.3.2.ds1-22 > Severity: normal > Tags: patch > > > /usr/include/li

Bug#77383: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Bug#77383: Maintainer/submitterindexes should do URL-encoding]

Hi, On Sunday, December 03, 2000 5:28 AM, Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, Dec 03, 2000 at 05:18:51AM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote: >> The link "You might like to refer to the [elm-me+ package page]" >> is to http://packages.debian.org/elm-me%2b >> but gets redirected to >> http://c

Bug#146172: these need BYHAND uploads

On Tue, 2007-01-02 at 21:14 +0100, Santiago Vila wrote: [...] > Should I try to include everything currently in /debian/tools > and name it ftp.debian.org-tools? > > I see that lodlin16.zip already comes from the loadlin package, so such > file should be excluded. Is this the only file currently h

Bug#184966: current status of section base

Nathanael Nerode wrote, Sunday, September 10, 2006 3:47 PM > The following packages remain in section 'base' in unstable, not > counting packages scheduled for removal: > * ifupdown Now in admin > * sysv-rc-bootsplash Still in base, although the maintainer's active (last upload was yesterday).

Bug#312321: Both woody and sarge have Archive: stable in Release file

reassign 312321 apt merge 312321 153661 thanks Hi, On Tue, 2005-06-07 at 15:20 +0300, Dan B wrote: > Package: ftp.debian.org > > Both woody and sarge have Archive: stable in the Release file. That > affects package pinning, release a=stable does no longer differentiate > between them. This is p

Bug#395030: ftp.debian.org: Please remove clustalw 1.83-1 from unstable (non-free/science) in mipsel, s390, m68k.

retitle 395030 RM: clustalw [m68k s390] -- RoM; uninstallable thanks Hi, On Tuesday, October 24, 2006 2:28 PM, Charles Plessy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...] > clustalw was NMUed during the lesstif transition, but not rebuilt on > every arch on which it was already available. As a consequence, i

Bug#401498: Debian bug #401498

Hi, > This was downgraded to normal, without comment, by > "Adam D. Barratt" who is not a Debian developer and > is not listed in any ftpmaster documentation I can find > either in the list at http://www.debian.org/intro/organization > or http://ftp-master.debian.org/.

Bug#401498: Debian bug #401498

000, Adam D. Barratt wrote: [...] > > The main reason for doing so that is that the ftp team (at least those > > regularly processing removals) don't use severities for that processing. > > Curious. Why not? It seems to me that developers are not just random > in the sev

Bug#398899: Processed: Re: merging same remove request

unmerge 398899 severity 398899 serious reassign 398899 python-iconvcodec retitle 398899 python-iconvcodec: irrelevant for python 2.4; should not ship with etch unmerge 398039 severity 398039 serious reassign 398039 python-cjkcodecs retitle 398039 python-cjkcodecs: irrelevant for python 2.4, should

Bug#359044: Developers summary page only showing a fraction of his packages

On Fri, 2007-01-12 at 10:13 +0100, Marcus Better wrote: [...] > Shouldn't e-mail addresses be case insensitive? Since you asked ;-) - no, at least for local parts (i.e. the portion preceding the @). In fact, they MUST NOT (in the BCP14 meaning of that phrase) be. From RFC2821: Verbs and argume

Bug#395922: RM: oprofile-source -- please remove obsolete package

retitle 395922 RM: oprofile:oprofile-source -- RoM; obsolete, 2.4 kernels only thanks On Sat, 2006-10-28 at 11:13 -0600, Al Stone wrote: [...] > This package derives from the oprofile source package; do NOT > remove oprofile -- it is still highly useful. Only this part of > the results of buil

Bug#382956: Mozilla still needs a serious bug for this...

clone 382956 -1 severity -1 serious reassign -1 mozilla thanks Hi, Removals from unstable aren't release- or time-critical. Hence, regardless of the maintainer or package's status, there needs to be an RC bug assigned to a package that has issues that should keep it out of the release so that the

Bug#395922: RM: oprofile-source -- please remove obsolete package

On Sat, 2006-10-28 at 14:39 -0600, Al Stone wrote: > On Sat, 2006-10-28 at 21:26 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > Once the new source package has been uploaded, the obsolete binary > > package will be removed semi-automagically. Since the current source > > package in unst

Bug#370436: Mozilla still needs a serious bug for this...

unmerge 370436 severity 370436 serious reassign 370436 mozilla thanks Hi, Removals from unstable aren't release- or time-critical. Hence, regardless of the maintainer or package's status, there needs to be an RC bug assigned to a package that has issues that should keep it out of the release so t

Bug#396600: New upstream version (3.1.7)

merge 396600 385450 thanks Hi, On Wed, 2006-11-01 at 13:37 -0500, Norbert Veber wrote: > Package: spamassassin > Version: 3.1.4-1 > Severity: wishlist > > http://www.nabble.com/ANNOUNCE%3A-Apache-SpamAssassin-3.1.7-available!-tf2415849.html Already reported as #385450; merging. Regards, Adam

Bug#397241: RM: chetcpasswd - Too insecure even to be in sid

retitle 397241 RM: chetcpaswd -- RoM; RC-buggy; security issues thanks Hi, On Mon, 2006-11-13 at 16:52 -0200, Eriberto wrote: > The upstream author is not willing to cooperate on fixing the reported > bugs and considers Debian to be "too demanding". Still, the upstream > disrespected the Debian P

Bug#397184: RM: qsynaptics [s390] -- Ro??

unmerge 397184 retitle 397184RM: qsynaptics [s390] -- Ro??; ANAIS thanks Hi, On Thu, 2006-11-16 at 19:28 +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote: > merge 397184 398892 > thanks. > > Hi, I did not notice there were bug filed here too. I am the package > maintainer. They're actually for different packages - qsy

Bug#294732: apt experimental 0.6.25 depends on obsolete libapt-pkg-perl 0.1.11.2 and blocks testing packages

On Friday, February 11, 2005 11:56 AM, Michal J. Gajda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Package: apt > Version: 0.6.25 > Severity: normal > Tags: experimental > > Since experimental apt gives release signature checking it seems quite > widely used. > Unfortunately it depends on long obsolete libapt-pk

Bug#294732: apt experimental 0.6.25 depends on obsolete libapt-pkg-perl 0.1.11.2 and blocks testing packages

# BTS control commands package apt severity 294732 wishlist retitle 294732 Please provide a package supporting apt/experimental reassign 294732 libapt-pkg-perl thanks On Friday, February 11, 2005 12:38 PM, Michal J. Gajda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Adam D. Barratt napisał(a): >

Bug#294809: apt: missing dependancies

package apt close 294809 merge 294684 284809 thanks On Fri, 2005-02-11 at 13:49 -0500, Ross Bemrose wrote: > Package: apt > Version: 0.5.28.1 > Severity: grave > Justification: renders package unusable > > apt-get install apt returns the following: > The following packages have unmet dependencies:

Bug#289959: exim4-config: Missing debconf question for LOCAL_DELIVERY

On Wednesday, January 12, 2005 2:11 PM, Marc Sherman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Marc Haber wrote: >> >> No, the feature is there for a reason. You can always edit >> /etc/exim4/update-exim4.conf.conf. What is not there is the >> debconf-based configuration possibility, but that's only gold plati

Bug#290761: exim: host_accept_relay cannot be set to IPv6 subnet

On Sun, 2005-01-16 at 15:25 +0100, Martin Pels wrote: [...] > host_accept_relay = 127.0.0.1/8 : 1 : 192.168.0.1/24 : 2001:838:3f7::1/64 > > The last part (2001:838:3f7::1/64) causes the following message to be > displayed in the logfile: > > 2005-01-16 15:12:30 Setting IPV6_V6ONLY on daemon's

Bug#290954: return_path macro generates invalid syntax

Package: exim4-config Version: 4.43-3 Hi, As noted on exim-users (the thread starting at http://www.exim.org/mail-archives/exim-users/Week-of-Mon-20050117/msg00036.html), the recent changes to return_path in update-exim4.conf lead to the generated configuration file failing to parse. This is d

Bug#291018: www.debian.org: Broken packages-page for lusernet

On Tuesday, January 18, 2005 9:06 AM, Helge Kreutzmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Package: www.debian.org > Version: N/A; reported 2005-01-18 > Severity: minor > > I wanted to look at the RC bug > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?archive=no&bug=289601 > > which was closed without com

Bug#297899: spamassassin: Parsing of undecoded UTF-8 will give garbage when decoding entities

# BTS control commands package spamassassin tags 297899 + patch forwarded 297899 http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4046 merge 297899 291093 thanks On Thursday, March 03, 2005 1:20 PM, Colin Turner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Package: spamassassin > Version: 3.0.2-1 > Severity: nor

Bug#296055: exim permissions screwed

package exim # severities must match for merge to succeed severity 296055 important close 296055 reassign 296055 debianutils merge 296055 295850 thanks On Sun, 2005-02-20 at 10:16 +1100, Paul wrote: > Package: exim > Version: 3.36-13 > Severity: critical > > > There has been an update to exim T

Bug#297541: exim4: main option "local_scan_path" unknown; Invalid new configfile

# BTS control bot commands package exim4 tags 297541 + confirmed sid # severities must match for the merge to succeed severity 297541 serious close 297541 merge 297541 297282 thanks On Tuesday, March 01, 2005 11:20 AM, Jonathan Wheelhouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Package: exim4 > Version: 4.5

Bug#409883: Processed: reassign 409883 to ftp.debian.org

Hi, On Tue, 2007-02-06 at 10:33 -0800, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > > > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.27 > > reassign 409883 ftp.debian.org > Bug#409883: firefox-dbg: It should be removed from repository As fa

Bug#409883: Processed: reassign 409883 to ftp.debian.org

retitle 409883 RM: firefox -- RoM; superseded by iceweasel thanks On Tue, 2007-02-06 at 21:25 +0100, Mike Hommey wrote: [...] > Yes, it is. It has been superseded by iceweasel, and iceweasel being now > in testing, it is pretty much useless to keep firefox in the archive. Retitling to that effect

Bug#412757: devref: Please mention the package removals wiki page

Package: developers-reference Version: 3.3.8 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch Hi, It's been suggested to me that it would be useful for http://wiki.debian.org/ftpmaster_Removals to be referenced by the relevant section of the dev-ref. I've attached a patch to that effect; please consider applying

Bug#412887: libclamav1: version name is causing failed dependancy

reassign 412887 dansguardian # Uninstallable severity 411854 serious severity 412887 serious merge 412887 411854 retitle 411854 Please update to libclamav2 retitle 412887 Please update to libclamav2 thanks Hi, On Wed, 2007-02-28 at 13:35 -0500, Mark Horn wrote: > The following packages have unmet

Bug#340838: bts: support for 'fixed' 'notfixed'

Hi, On Sat, 2005-11-26 at 10:58 +0100, A Mennucc wrote: > Package: devscripts > Version: 2.9.8 > Severity: wishlist [...] > 'bts' has support for 'found' and 'notfound' > to change the 'found' part in a bug > > it would be nice if 'bts' had a support for > 'fixed' and 'notfixed', > (maybe using

Bug#416621: shows closed bugs as outstanding AND done

Hi, 2007-03-27, 10:51 UTC, Bastian Venthur wrote: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?pkg=reportbug-ng;dist=unstable currently shows: === Debian Bug report logs: package reportbug-ng in unstable (versions 0.2007.03.24, 0.2007.03.27, 0.2007.03.28) ... === Note

Bug#416827: bts: doesn't pay attention to usertags commands

On Fri, 2007-03-30 at 17:16 +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote: > On Fri, Mar 30, 2007 at 09:53:34AM -0500, Ken Bloom wrote: > > Package: devscripts > > Version: 2.10.2 > > Severity: normal > > > > I've been trying periodically to do as follows: > > $ bts usertags 372608 = . usertags 403803 = . usertags 4

Bug#416827: bts: doesn't pay attention to usertags commands

On Fri, 2007-03-30 at 14:05 -0400, James Vega wrote: > On Fri, Mar 30, 2007 at 05:16:25PM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote: > > Or should we modify bts to use $DEBEMAIL or $EMAIL as the default user > > if none is specified? > > I think in the case of bts, where you don't see the message before it's > s

Bug#416827: bts: doesn't pay attention to usertags commands

On Fri, 2007-03-30 at 17:16 +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote: > On Fri, Mar 30, 2007 at 09:53:34AM -0500, Ken Bloom wrote: > > Package: devscripts > > Version: 2.10.2 > > Severity: normal > > > > I've been trying periodically to do as follows: > > $ bts usertags 372608 = . usertags 403803 = . usertags 4

Bug#416827: bts: doesn't pay attention to usertags commands

On Fri, 2007-03-30 at 13:58 -0500, Ken Bloom wrote: [bts usertags] > I'm pretty sure that it used to support $EMAIL or $DEBEMAIL at some > point, and indeed it seems to still support $EMAIL. > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ bts --sendmail=/bin/cat usertags 1 = > From: Ken Bloom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To:

Bug#416827: bts: doesn't pay attention to usertags commands

Hi, On Fri, 2007-03-30 at 15:39 -0500, Ken Bloom wrote: > On Friday 30 March 2007 14:37, you wrote: > > On Fri, 2007-03-30 at 13:58 -0500, Ken Bloom wrote: > > [bts usertags] [...] > It appears that I even get a syslog message that the message is sent, > but nothing happens. > > Mar 30 15:31:13

Bug#409106: Bug #409106: devscripts: [dget] The URL format doe snot support file:// protocol

tags 409106 + moreinfo thanks Hi, On Thu, 2007-01-18 at 00:03 +0200, Jari Aalto wrote: [...] > However this does not accept file:// URLs as defined in > http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1738.txt (See 3.10 FILES). An example: > > cd $HOME > dget -x file:///tmp/foo-1.1.dsc Could you be a litt

Bug#409028: checkbashisms: need to check for pattern expansions, error expansions, length expansion, varnames expansions

tags 409028 + patch thanks Hi, On Tue, 2007-01-30 at 11:52 +, martin f krafft wrote: > also sprach Alexander Gattin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007.01.30.1125 +]: > > OK, looks like only ${!P*} and [EMAIL PROTECTED] need to be > > considered by checkbashisms. Do you agree? > > Yes. Attached i

Bug#404635: devscripts: GREP_OPTIONS seems to be the cause of this problem

tags 404635 + patch thanks Hi, On Thu, 2006-12-28 at 12:53 +, Julian Gilbey wrote: > On Wed, Dec 27, 2006 at 05:27:19PM -0500, Kamaraju Kusumanchi wrote: > > A little more debugging, I found that the culprit is either of GREP_OPTIONS, > > GREP_COLOR environment variables. Both these options a

Bug#382884: Bug #382884: Re: tagpending: option to add 'confirmed' tag

tags 382884 + patch thanks Hi, On Mon, 2006-08-14 at 00:00 +0100, martin f krafft wrote: > Package: devscripts > Version: 2.9.20 > Severity: wishlist > File: /usr/bin/tagpending > > I often tag pending bugs confirmed as well. It would be nice if > tagpending could take an option to set 'confirme

Bug#386124: please allow the specification of the bug severity

tags 386124 + patch thanks Hi, On Tue, 2006-09-05 at 14:56 +0200, martin f krafft wrote: > Package: devscripts > Version: 2.9.21 > Severity: wishlist > File: /usr/bin/mass-bug > > subject says it all. As does the attachment. :-) Regards, Adam --- devscripts-2.9.27.orig/mass-bug.pl 2006-11-08

Bug#412104: Man page for gcc missing on Etch

On Fri, 2007-02-23 at 12:05 -0500, Bob Kline wrote: > Package: gcc-4.1 > > Installing gcc on Etch does not provide a man page. I've never seen a > system (including previous versions of Debian) where gcc didn't come > with a man page. You want gcc-doc, which is in contrib, and will install

Bug#414200: bts: "unrecognised BTS URL type" breaks bts for me

Hi, On Fri, 2007-03-09 at 22:31 +0100, Loïc Minier wrote: > bee% bts --mbox show 129933 > bts: in href_to_filename: unrecognised BTS URL type: href="bugreport.cgi?bug=129933;mbox=yes;mboxstatus=yes"> [...] > Happens with plenty of bugs, and this results in an incomplete mailbox. The BTS recentl

Bug#414907: devscripts: Please include missing_manpage_finder script

Hi, On Wed, 2007-03-14 at 18:57 +, Julian Gilbey wrote: > On Wed, Mar 14, 2007 at 11:10:18AM -0700, Josh Triplett wrote: > > Please include Branden's missing_manpage_finder script, from his Write the > > Fine Manual presentation. I have attached an updated version that Branden > > mailed me;

Bug#414907: devscripts: Please include missing_manpage_finder script

On Wed, 2007-03-14 at 22:09 +, Julian Gilbey wrote: > On Wed, Mar 14, 2007 at 08:17:31PM +0000, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > I've attached my current revision of the script, which > > steals^Wincorporates some of the changes from your revision. My version > > adds a de

Bug#414907: devscripts: Please include missing_manpage_finder script

Julian Gilbey wrote: On Thu, Mar 15, 2007 at 12:17:03AM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: [...] Personally I still prefer the find solution, but it really depends how we want to handle non-executable files located in the folders being traversed. There shouldn't be any non-executable fil

Bug#414907: devscripts: Please include missing_manpage_finder script

On Thu, 2007-03-15 at 09:40 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Julian Gilbey wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 15, 2007 at 12:17:03AM +0000, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > [...] > > There shouldn't be any non-executable files in those folders except > > for symlinks. Why make life

Bug#414907: devscripts: Please include missing_manpage_finder script

On Thu, 2007-03-15 at 21:36 +, Julian Gilbey wrote: [...] > Another change which might be considered: either prepend each missing > manpage name with its directory (eg /usr/bin/foo rather than just foo) > or sort the list of missing manpages. Thanks for the suggestion - displaying full paths c

Bug#415247: exim4 and exim4-debian maintainers too stupid and irresponsible

On Sat, 2007-03-17 at 13:12 +, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: > Package: exim4 > Version: 4.24-3 You do realise that the version quoted above is nearly three and a half years old? It's even eight upstream releases older than the version in sarge. > this bug is in response to several bug

Bug#415240: devscripts: French manpages badly encoded

Hi, On Sat, 2007-03-17 at 13:23 +0100, Thomas Huriaux wrote: [...] > The French manpages are encoded in utf-8 while they must be in > iso-8859-1. > > Adding the following options to the devscripts-po4a.conf file should fix > the problem: > > [po4a_alias:man] man opt_fr:"-L iso-8859-1" > [po4a_al

Bug#415309: tagpending should not use pend-excl=done to not continuously retag -done bugs

Hi, On Sun, 2007-03-18 at 00:40 -0700, Don Armstrong wrote: > Package: devscripts > Version: 2.9.27 > Severity: minor > Tag: patch > > tagpending currently uses pend-excl=done, which excludes bugs which > have been marked done; this is incorrect, as it results in bugs which > have been marked don

Bug#418884: /usr/bin/tagpending: [tagpending] is now utterly broken.

Hi, Pierre Habouzit wrote: Package: devscripts Version: 2.10.2 Severity: important File: /usr/bin/tagpending technically, it just does not work anymore. Version from etch works flawlessly. Now it says that bugs do not belong to the package *sigh*. Are the bugs you expect to be tagged alread

Bug#419462: grep-excuses ikiwiki also shows tikiwiki

Hi, On Sun, 2007-04-15 at 16:14 -0400, Joey Hess wrote: > Package: devscripts > Version: 2.10.2 > Severity: normal > File: /usr/bin/grep-excuses > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~>grep-excuses ikiwiki > ikiwiki (1.48 to 1.49) > Maintainer: Joey Hess > Too young, only 6 of 10 days old > Not con

Bug#419754: devscripts: Fails to install -- file conflicts with kdesdk-scripts

Hi, Daniel Schepler wrote: On Tuesday 17 April 2007 15:08:31 pm you wrote: See http://lists.debian.org/debian-qt-kde/2007/04/msg00253.html Still, even if it's removed from kdesdk-scripts, the newer devscripts packages need versioned Replaces, and possibly Conflicts, against older versions of

Bug#419880: devscripts: dch finds wrong changelog entry for multiple maintainers

Hi, Jörgen Hägg wrote: [...] Example: package_name (1.0) unstable; urgency=low [ Maintainer_name_1 ] * item 1 [ Maintainer_name_2 ] * item 1 * item 2 [ Maintainer_name_1 ] * item 2 * item 3 Now I try to use dch as Maintainer_name_1: Instead of placing the cursor after '* item 3' as

Bug#419880: devscripts: dch finds wrong changelog entry for multiple maintainers

Hi, On Wed, 2007-04-18 at 13:41 -0400, Joey Hess wrote: > Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > That's a side-effect of the change introduced for #383542 in the last > > version, in order not to create changelogs resembling the above but only > > one block per maintainer. >

Bug#419916: devscripts: file conflict with kdesdk-scripts

severity 419916 serious merge 419916 419754 thanks Hi, On Wed, 2007-04-18 at 18:08 +0200, Michael Koch wrote: > Package: devscripts > Version: 2.10.2 > Severity: important > > > devscripts 2.10.3 contains the file /usr/bin/licensecheck. The package > kdesdk-scripts contains /usr/bin/licensechec

Bug#420169: [debchange] Use of uninitialized variable at lines 191 and 213 (TZ-related)

tags 420169 + pending merge 420169 419863 thanks Hi, On Fri, 2007-04-20 at 16:59 +0300, Damyan Ivanov wrote: > Since the TZ support was implemented in debchange, I get warnings upon > invocation: > > $ dch > Use of uninitialized value in concatenation (.) or string at > /usr/bin/dch line

Bug#416827: bts: doesn't pay attention to usertags commands

Hi, On Fri, 2007-03-30 at 22:12 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, 2007-03-30 at 15:39 -0500, Ken Bloom wrote: > > On Friday 30 March 2007 14:37, you wrote: > > > On Fri, 2007-03-30 at 13:58 -0500, Ken Bloom wrote: > > > [bts usertags] > [...] >

Bug#417633: devscripts: [debchange] missing dependency to liburi-perl

severity 417633 normal tag 417633 + wontifx thanks Hi, On Tue, 2007-04-03 at 22:16 +0200, Teemu Ikonen wrote: > $ dch > Can't locate URI/Escape.pm in @INC (@INC contains: /etc/perl > /usr/local/lib/perl/5.8.8 /usr/local/share/perl/5.8.8 /usr/lib/perl5 > /usr/share/perl5 /usr/lib/perl/5.8 /usr/sha

Bug#417633: devscripts: [debchange] missing dependency to liburi-perl

tags 417633 - wontfix retitle 417633 [debchange] Better document dependencies thanks Hi, On Wed, 2007-04-04 at 00:37 +0200, Teemu Ikonen wrote: > On 4/4/07, Adam D. Barratt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...] > > It does, however, suggest all of the relevant packages and both the &

Bug#417633: devscripts: [debchange] missing dependency to liburi-perl

On Tue, 2007-04-03 at 23:56 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: [...] > Hmmm, good point. The control file in 2.10.2 was updated to include the > new liburi-perl dependency: > > - debchange/dch: automagically add entries to debian/changelog files > [wget, > liburi-perl] >

Bug#360171: ftp.debian.org: Request to add debian-installer sections for experimental and non-free

Hi, On Sat, 2006-04-29 at 11:06 +0200, Frans Pop wrote: > severity 360171 important > thanks > > > To prepare for this please add new debian-installer sections for: > > - experimental/main > > - experimental/non-free > > - unstable/non-free > > - testing/non-free > > This request is now a month

Bug#386295: Yodl: new upstream release

reassign 386925 yodl thanks On Wednesday, September 06, 2006 3:29 PM, Frank B. Brokken <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Package: bugs.debian.org > Severity: wishlist > > > Dear Colin, > > I just uploaded a new Yodl upstream version to mentors. I [...] > Please review the modifications, and up

Bug#387076: copied text disappears from clipboard when treeline exits

Hi, On Friday, September 29, 2006 11:00 AM, Andrew Schulman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > FYI, this bug is fixed in the upstream version 1.1.0, but that > version is still quite buggy and unstable at present. I think you might have meant 3870*8*6. The bug you actually sent it to is a samba bug...

Bug#390637: Remove some architectures for vzctl

Hi, On Monday, October 02, 2006 10:50 AM, Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm writing this to request the removal of some built packages > from unstable/testing. You'll need to ask the Release Team ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) in order to get the packages removed from testing. Regards, Adam

Bug#390637: Remove some architectures for vzctl

Hi, On Mon, 2006-10-02 at 15:50 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Hi, > > On Monday, October 02, 2006 10:50 AM, Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I'm writing this to request the removal of some built packages > > from unstable/testing. > > Yo

Bug#390694: [arm] Internal consistency failure while building OpenSER 1.1.0-3

Hi, On Mon, 2006-10-02 at 18:52 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > Julien BLACHE writes: > > Package: gcc-4.1 > > Version: 4.1.1-13 > > Severity: important > > > > Hi, > > > > gcc-4.1 bails out with an error while build OpenSER 1.1.0-3 on arm, see > > > >

Bug#390637: Remove some architectures for vzctl

[G... let's see if we can send it with some content this time...] Hi, On Mon, 2006-10-02 at 21:32 +0200, Ola Lundqvist wrote: [...] > One question. > If I change the architecture list (remove or add). Do you need to manually > do things in order for it to take effect (especially remove) or ca

Bug#390637: Remove some architectures for vzctl

On Mon, 2006-10-02 at 21:32 +0200, Ola Lundqvist wrote: [...] > One question. > If I change the architecture list (remove or add). Do you need to manually > do things in order for it to take effect (especially remove) or can I control > it myself this way? > > Regards, > > // Ola > > > Regards,

Bug#379332: Please remove all 2.2 kernel packages from unstable

retitle 379332 RM: kernel-patch-2.2.25-m68k -- RoQA; obsolete thanks Hi, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote, Thursday, August 03, 2006 12:29 PM [...] > On Wed, Aug 02, 2006 at 08:05:34PM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote: > > OK, it's clear from http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/07/msg5

Bug#391038: clamscan dies with "ERROR: Can't get information about user clamav" when run as root

Hi, On Wed, 2006-10-04 at 09:41 -0400, Graham wrote: > Package: clamav > Version: 0.88.4-2 > > When I run "clamscan" as root, it shows this message: > > ERROR: Can't get information about user clamav > > then exits without scanning anything. > > Indeed, there does not seem to be a "clamav"

Bug#391171: ITP: grepcidr -- Filter IP addresses matching IPv4 CIDR/network

On Thursday, October 05, 2006 9:06 AM, Ryan Finnie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Package: wnpp > Severity: wishlist > Owner: Ryan Finnie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > * Package name: grepcidr Erm... didn't you already submit this as #391168? :) Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMA

Bug#391359: general: packages.debian.org package view could have a link to see the source changelog.

reassign 391359 qa.debian.org thanks On Friday, October 06, 2006 9:51 AM, Raúl Sánchez Siles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Package: general > Severity: wishlist > > With aptitude changelog is quite easy to know the latest modifications > of a package, but it quite often refers to new upstream re

Bug#355466: collatinus override disparity

Hi, On Mon, 2006-03-06 at 19:00 +0100, Georges Khaznadar wrote: > Debian Installer a écrit : > > There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the > > override file for the following file(s): > > > > collatinus-doc_7.14-1_all.deb: package says section is text, override says > >

Bug#373908: RM: zmailer -- RoQA; orphaned, RC-buggy

package ftp.debian.org merge 373908 382940 thanks On Sat, 2006-08-19 at 14:57 +0200, Matej Vela wrote: > retitle 373908 RM: zmailer -- RoQA; orphaned, RC-buggy > reassign 373908 ftp.debian.org > thanks > > I think we should remove zmailer. Already requested in #382940 by Nathanael Nerode (althou

Bug#392403: #392403 (Remove discover1-data source package, it is merged into discover-data)

retitle 392403 RM: discover1-data -- RoM; superseded by discover-data thanks Hi, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote, Wed, 11 Oct 2006 18:52:41 +0200 > I just uploaded a new version of the discover-data source which > now replaces the discover1-data source package completely. It > generates the discover1

Bug#386579: Patch: apt: please mention in the manpage, that --option can be used multiple times

Hi, On Monday, September 11, 2006 8:17 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Somehow the patch for the docu didn't make it. I'm submitting it with > this mail. You may have done so, but it wasn't attached to the mail that arrived at the bts... Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE,

Bug#387154: Document including .orig.tar.gz when moving section

Package: developers-reference Version: 3.3.7 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch Hi, As discussed on #d-devel earlier today, it is necessary to include the .orig.tar.gz again when uploading a package to a new section, in order not to fall foul of a bug in dak (see #367267 and others). The attached pat

Bug#387327: No SELinux policy for exim

Hi, On Wed, 2006-09-13 at 19:06 +0200, Erich Schubert wrote: > Package: exim > Severity: normal > > There is no SELinux policy for exim available so far. > Until this is resolved, users should use postfix or sendmail if they > intend to run SELinux. You've filed this bug against the exim 3 packa

Bug#387738: Uninstallable due to binNMU-safe dependency on gnomeicu-common

Package: gnomeicu Version: 0.99.10-1+b1 Severity: grave Tags: patch Hi, gnomeicu is currently uninstallable on i386 due to a dependency on exactly the same version of gnomeicu-common. The latter is Arch: all, and this dependency therefore breaks when gnomeicu is bin-NMUed. This issue can be reso

Bug#387916: Please remove "ferm" from experimental

retitle 387916 [auto-cruft] RM: ferm/experimental -- RoM; NVIU thanks Hi, On Sun, 2006-09-17 at 15:12 +0200, Max Kellermann wrote: > Package: ftp.debian.org > > The new version 1.2 of "ferm" has entered unstable, rendering version > 1.1.0.trunk.r433-1 in experimental useless. Please remove it.

Bug#388381: DAK sends mail in UTF-8 without Content-Type

package ftp.debian.org severity 388381 wishlist merge 388381 337968 thanks Hi, On Wednesday, September 20, 2006 8:58 AM, Robert Millan [ackstorm] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...] > See: > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=384285;msg=28;mbox=yes > > Mail contains UTF-8 characters (b

Bug#384179: Outstanding mozilla related removal bugs

package ftp.debian.org block 382907 with 370436 block 384179 with 370436 block 378751 with 370436 block 378752 with 370436 severity 382907 normal thanks mate Hi, As Jeroen pointed out in #370436 a while ago, mozilla won't be removed from the archive until a suitable replacement (i.e. seamonkey) i

Bug#366886: Overrides: libgnutls11 should be Priority: optional

Hi, > Mike Hommey wrote, Thursday, May 11, 2006 10:47 PM >> I figured out libgnutls11, 12, and 13 were pulled out when >> debootstraping a fresh sid. We may want to drop the priority for the >> libgnutls11 one from important to optional. There shouldn't be any >> reverse dependency requiring it be

Bug#382907: Upgrade

block 382907 with 370436 block 384179 with 370436 block 378751 with 370436 block 378752 with 370436 thanks On Wed, 2006-09-20 at 17:08 -0400, Filipus Klutiero wrote: > unblock 382907 with 370436 [...] > >As Jeroen pointed out in #370436 a while ago, mozilla won't be removed from > >the archive unt

Bug#382907: Block

Hi, On Thursday, September 21, 2006 5:55 AM, Filipus Klutiero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Adam D. Barratt a écrit : > >> [...] >>>> On that basis, this is just a quick ping to confirm that these >>>> bugs will not be actioned until mozilla has actually

Bug#382330: ftp.debian.org: please remove gmime2.1 source package

retitle 382330 RM: gmime2.1 -- RoM; superseded by gmime2.2 thanks On Sun, 2006-09-24 at 11:40 +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote: > On Thu, Aug 10, 2006 at 07:32:41PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: [...] > > > Once gmime2.2 is accepted in the archive, and tomboy, beagle, balsa and &

Bug#389308: RM: hardinfo [alpha arm ia64 m68k s390] -- RoM

merge 385781 389308 thanks On Monday, September 25, 2006 1:12 AM, Agney Lopes Roth Ferraz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Package: ftp.debian.org > Severity: normal > > On bug #385781 I forgot to ask to remove hardinfo from unstable too. I > want to remove support to alpha, arm, ia64, m68k, s390 on

Bug#389713: cpp-3.3: gcc package dependency problem

Hi, On Wednesday, September 27, 2006 11:46 AM, Klemens Kasemaa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Package: cpp-3.3 > Version: gcc-3.3-base Erm... that's not a version number of the package cpp-3.3. > Severity: important > Cannot install gcc because of dependency problem: > cpp-3.3: Depends: gcc-3.3

Bug#382007: clamav: Clam AntiVirus Win32-UPX Heap Overflow (Remote DOS or Exploit)

On Tuesday, August 08, 2006 10:55 AM, Benoit Panizzon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Package: clamav > Version: 0.88.3-0volatile1 > Severity: critical > Tags: security > Justification: causes serious data loss > > > Looks like this has not been reported yet: Well, except that you already did, 15

Bug#382249: bugs.debian.org: BTS search by email address is case-sensitive; should not be

reassign 382249 debbugs merge 382249 89569 thanks Hi, On Wed, 2006-08-09 at 14:08 -0400, Kevin B. McCarty wrote: [...] > If I go to http://bugs.debian.org/ and do a search by submitter email, > the following searches give different results: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > (The lat

Bug#382330: ftp.debian.org: please remove gmime2.1 source package

retitle 382330 [auto-cruftable] RM: gmime2.1 -- RoM; superseded by gmime2.2 thanks Hi, On Thu, 2006-08-10 at 13:32 +0200, Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo wrote: [...] > Once gmime2.2 is accepted in the archive, and tomboy, beagle, balsa and pan > are > recompiled gmime2.1 source package can be remove

Bug#382781: RM: source packages mozilla-thunderbird-locale-* -- superseded by thunderbird-locales

package ftp.debian.org retitle 382781 RM: mozilla-thunderbird-locale-cs -- Ro??; superseded by thunderbird-locales tags 382781 + moreinfo thanks Hi, On Sun, 2006-08-13 at 12:14 +0200, Hans Öfverbeck wrote: > Could you please remove the following SOURCE packages: > mozilla-thunderbird-locale-cs [

Bug#382781: FW: Re: Bug#382781: RM: source packages mozilla-thunderbird-locale-* -- superseded by thunderbird-locales

package ftp.debian.org retitle 382781 RM: mozilla-thunderbird-locale-cs -- RoM; superseded by thunderbird-locales tags 382781 - moreinfo thanks --- Begin Message --- On Sun, 2006-08-13 at 14:25 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > package ftp.debian.org > retitle 382781 RM: mozilla-thunderbird-

Bug#394044: ftp.debian.org: REMOVE ctsim-athlon binary from ctsim source

# Purely for documentation retitle 394044 RM: ctsim:ctsim-athlon -- RoM; NBS thanks Hi, On Thursday, October 19, 2006 4:32 AM, Kevin Rosenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...] > The ctsim source package no longer supports or builds the ctsim-athlon > package (due to that CPU declining in populari

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >