Source: ruby-beaker-hostgenerator
Version: 1.1.22-1.1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ruby3.0
Hi,
We are about to enable building against ruby3.0 on unstable. During a test
rebuild, ruby-beaker-hostgenerator was found to
Source: ruby-benchmark-memory
Version: 0.1.2-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ruby3.0
Hi,
We are about to enable building against ruby3.0 on unstable. During a test
rebuild, ruby-benchmark-memory was found to fail to bu
Source: ruby-barby
Version: 0.6.8+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ruby3.0
Hi,
We are about to enable building against ruby3.0 on unstable. During a test
rebuild, ruby-barby was found to fail to build in that situa
Source: ruby-backports
Version: 3.16.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ruby3.0
Hi,
We are about to enable building against ruby3.0 on unstable. During a test
rebuild, ruby-backports was found to fail to build in that s
Source: ruby-axiom-types
Version: 0.1.1-1.1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ruby3.0
Hi,
We are about to enable building against ruby3.0 on unstable. During a test
rebuild, ruby-axiom-types was found to fail to build in t
Source: ruby-awesome-print
Version: 1.8.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ruby3.0
Hi,
We are about to enable building against ruby3.0 on unstable. During a test
rebuild, ruby-awesome-print was found to fail to build in
Source: ruby-avl-tree
Version: 1.2.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ruby3.0
Hi,
We are about to enable building against ruby3.0 on unstable. During a test
rebuild, ruby-avl-tree was found to fail to build in that situ
Source: ruby-attr-encrypted
Version: 3.1.0-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ruby3.0
Hi,
We are about to enable building against ruby3.0 on unstable. During a test
rebuild, ruby-attr-encrypted was found to fail to build
Source: ruby-arbre
Version: 1.2.1-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ruby3.0
Hi,
We are about to enable building against ruby3.0 on unstable. During a test
rebuild, ruby-arbre was found to fail to build in that situation.
Source: ruby-appraiser
Version: 0.2.0-3.1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ruby3.0
Hi,
We are about to enable building against ruby3.0 on unstable. During a test
rebuild, ruby-appraiser was found to fail to build in that
Source: ruby-acts-as-tree
Version: 2.8.0-1.1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ruby3.0
Hi,
We are about to enable building against ruby3.0 on unstable. During a test
rebuild, ruby-acts-as-tree was found to fail to build in
Source: ruby-api-pagination
Version: 4.8.2-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ruby3.0
Hi,
We are about to enable building against ruby3.0 on unstable. During a test
rebuild, ruby-api-pagination was found to fail to build
Source: ruby-addressable
Version: 2.8.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ruby3.0
Hi,
We are about to enable building against ruby3.0 on unstable. During a test
rebuild, ruby-addressable was found to fail to build in tha
Source: ruby-acts-as-list
Version: 1.0.3-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ruby3.0
Hi,
We are about to enable building against ruby3.0 on unstable. During a test
rebuild, ruby-acts-as-list was found to fail to build in t
Source: ruby-activerecord-nulldb-adapter
Version: 0.4.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ruby3.0
Hi,
We are about to enable building against ruby3.0 on unstable. During a test
rebuild, ruby-activerecord-nulldb-adapter w
Source: pry
Version: 0.13.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ruby3.0
Hi,
We are about to enable building against ruby3.0 on unstable. During a test
rebuild, pry was found to fail to build in that situation.
To reproduc
Source: ruby-active-model-serializers
Version: 0.10.10-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ruby3.0
Hi,
We are about to enable building against ruby3.0 on unstable. During a test
rebuild, ruby-active-model-serializers was f
Source: r10k
Version: 3.7.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ruby3.0
Hi,
We are about to enable building against ruby3.0 on unstable. During a test
rebuild, r10k was found to fail to build in that situation.
To reprodu
Source: atig
Version: 0.6.1-6
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ruby3.0
Hi,
We are about to enable building against ruby3.0 on unstable. During a test
rebuild, atig was found to fail to build in that situation.
To reprodu
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Antonio Terceiro
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org
* Package name: typeshed
Version : n/a
Upstream Author : Several authors
* URL : https://github.com/python/typeshed
* License
On Sun, Oct 10, 2021 at 10:51:13PM +0200, Thomas Liske wrote:
> Hi,
>
> could you please provide the output of `needrestart -lv`?
Sure:
8<8<8<-
$ sudo needrestart -lv
[main] eval /etc/needrestart/needrestart.conf
[main] needrestart
rules: remove embedded CA certificate store
+ * Add dependency on ca-certificates
+
+ -- Antonio Terceiro Sun, 10 Oct 2021 09:24:03 -0300
+
ruby-httpclient (2.8.3-2) unstable; urgency=medium
* Team upload.
diff --git a/debian/control b/debian/control
index e50868f..e38581d 100644
--- a/d
uster; urgency=medium
+
+ * Add simple autopkgtest to check a basic SSL connection
+ * Add patch to use the system certificate store (Closes: #995448)
+ * debian/rules: remove embedded CA certificate store
+ * Add dependency on ca-certificates
+
+ -- Antonio Terceiro Sun, 10 Oct 2021 09:24:03
Control: reassign -1 ruby-httpclient
Control: retitle -1 ruby-httpclient: uses stale copy of CA certificates
Control: severity -1 serious
Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/nahi/httpclient/issues/445
On Tue, Oct 05, 2021 at 06:45:39PM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote:
> On Tue, 05 Oct 2021 11:55:
On Tue, Oct 05, 2021 at 08:44:06PM -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> Control: tag -1 + patch
>
> On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 06:56:58PM -0300, Rogério Brito wrote:
> > Package: apt-show-versions
> > Version: 0.17
> > Severity: important
> >
> > Hi.
> >
Control: tag -1 + patch
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 06:56:58PM -0300, Rogério Brito wrote:
> Package: apt-show-versions
> Version: 0.17
> Severity: important
>
> Hi.
>
> On my system, apt-show-versions started complaining with the message:
>
> Error: No information about packages! (Maybe no deb
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
We would like to add support for ruby3.0 in ruby-defaults.
Ben file:
title = "ruby3.0-add";
is_affected = (.depends ~ /ruby2.7 | .depends ~ /ruby3.0/) & !.source ~
/^(ruby2.7|ruby3.0|r
On Fri, Oct 01, 2021 at 07:43:35PM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Am 01.10.21 um 19:27 schrieb Antonio Terceiro:
> > I tracked this down to an issue between apt-listbugs (or ruby-soap4r, or
> > something else below that) and apt-cacher-ng. If I disable
> > apt-cacher-ng, ap
On Fri, Oct 01, 2021 at 05:42:32PM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote:
> > Versions of packages apt-listbugs depends on:
> > ii apt 2.3.9
> > ii ruby1:2.7+2
> > pn ruby-debian
> > pn ruby-gettext
> > ii ruby-soap4r 2.0.5-5
> > pn ruby-unicode
> > pn ruby-xml
Control: affects -1 apt-listbugs
On Fri, Oct 01, 2021 at 05:42:32PM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote:
> Control: severity -1 important
> Control: tags -1 + unreproducible
> Control: reassign -1 ruby-soap4r 2.0.5-5
>
> On Fri, 1 Oct 2021 09:23:10 -0300 Antonio Terceiro wrote:
>
Package: apt-listbugs
Version: 0.1.35
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Dear Maintainer,
The old Let's Encrypt root certificate expired recently. Let's Encrypt
has moved on from that certificate a long time ago, and in principle
only old devices who don't get their CA store
Package: needrestart
Version: 3.5-4
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
Recently every time I install something, needrestart seems to think that
rabbitmq-server needs to be restart, even when there were norelated
upgrades. I tried calling needrestart right after booting, and even then
it reported r
On Fri, Aug 27, 2021 at 10:26:39PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Sorry my previous message was weird.
>
> On 27-08-2021 22:11, Paul Gevers wrote:
> > On 27-08-2021 21:58, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> >> One thing that happens when you do this type of change wit
On Sun, Sep 19, 2021 at 10:48:47PM +0200, Cédric Boutillier wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> Le Sun, Sep 19, 2021 at 10:13:59PM +0200, Daniel Leidert a écrit :
> > Am Sonntag, dem 19.09.2021 um 17:31 +0200 schrieb Cédric Boutillier:
> > > I have been looking at the bugs on ruby-nokogiri before trying to up
On Sun, Aug 22, 2021 at 07:14:30PM +0300, Sergei Golovan wrote:
> Hi Thomas,
>
> On Sun, Aug 22, 2021 at 6:55 PM Thomas Goirand wrote:
> >
> > Hi Damir, Sergei, the release team,
> >
> > First of all, thanks for your bug report, Damir.
> >
> > Debian Bullseye was released on the 14th of Aug. Then
On Fri, Aug 27, 2021 at 03:40:55PM -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> Package: rabbitmq-server
> Version: 3.8.9-3
Messed up the version, already fixed in a separate control message. This
applies only to 3.9.4-1 (currently in sid)
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
ages.
rabbitmq-server suggests no packages.
-- no debconf information
From 7b61f0cf4d0f7bf262fea90370442c5edbae0e24 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Antonio Terceiro
Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2021 15:33:04 -0300
Subject: [PATCH] Depends: fix typo in erlang version
---
debian/changelog | 8
d
On Fri, Aug 13, 2021 at 01:35:44PM +0200, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
> Package: auto-apt-proxy
> Version: 13.3
> Severity: important
> Tags: patch
> User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com
> Usertags: origin-ubuntu impish ubuntu-patch
> X-Debbugs-Cc: j...@debian.org
>
> In Ubuntu, the attached patch w
Package: shim-signed
Version: 1.38+15.4-7
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org
Hi,
Thanks for you work on shim-signed.
I have read both the package changelog and the NEWS file, and I
understand the reason for dropping the signed shim support for arm64.
I'm opening this bug t
On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 09:34:43PM +, Holger Levsen wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 08:35:11PM +0100, Paul Gevers wrote:
> > Unfortunately, we're hitting infrastructure issues if we don't cap the
> > logs [1]. However, I think we should save the last part (and not the
> > first part) if we hav
Source: e2fsprogs
Version: 1.46.3-1
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source
e2fsprogs currently fails to build on s390x buildd, and I was just able
to reproduce it on a porter box.
The full build log is attached, but the only part that I found that
looks relevant is this:
f_b
Hi,
On Wed, Jul 14, 2021 at 07:46:09AM +0200, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> Package: gem2deb
> Version: 1.4
> Tags: patch
>
> Traditionally, packages could enable debhelper addons using
> --with=ADDON. That's what works today and is most commonly used.
> Recently, debhelper added another way of doing so
On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 12:48:49PM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 12, 2021 at 09:10:15PM -0400, Ryan Kavanagh wrote:
> > This bug seems to be, in part, due to a potentially (?) broken ruby
> > upgrade behaviour. I've been running unstable on this laptop for ~6
> > years, but still had
> >
/debian/changelog
+++ b/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
+auto-apt-proxy (13.3) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+ * autopkgtest: cope with auto-apt-proxy being pre-installed (Closes: #989776)
+
+ -- Antonio Terceiro Fri, 18 Jun 2021 22:51:34 -0300
+
auto-apt-proxy (13.2) unstable; urgency=medium
Hi,
On Sun, May 23, 2021 at 11:53:56AM -0400, Stefano Rivera wrote:
> Control: tags 988998 + pending
>
> Dear maintainer,
>
> I've prepared an NMU for lava (versioned as 2020.12-4.1) and
> uploaded it to DELAYED/5. Please feel free to tell me if I
> should delay it longer.
Thanks for looking in
I'm fixing this with the following change.
From 9d145f91c555101314c10e8b6472665d2672cde7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Antonio Terceiro
Date: Wed, 12 May 2021 10:54:06 -0300
Subject: [PATCH] Reintroduce wrongly removed
/etc/logrotate.d/lava-scheduler-log
This was a tricky one. What happene
618744303&raw=0
I just uploaded -2 with the following fix:
----8<8<8<-
From: Antonio Terceiro
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2021 17:50:12 +
Subject: Revert "Make host_* values consistent with target_*"
See https://bugs
On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 03:22:24PM +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Apr 2021 12:05:29 +0200 Moritz Muehlenhoff
> wrote:
> > https://www.ruby-lang.org/en/news/2021/04/05/xml-round-trip-vulnerability-in-rexml-cve-2021-28965/
> >
> > Why is there a separate package duplicating rexml from src
On Sun, 11 Apr 2021 03:04:42 +0530 Utkarsh Gupta wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
> X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-r...@lists.debian.org
>
> Hello,
>
> Upstream has recently released a bug-fix only release after a
>
On Wed, Apr 07, 2021 at 02:20:34PM -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 07, 2021 at 04:49:38PM +0530, Nilesh Patra wrote:
> > And I tried changing the second "-lib" entry to ruby-lib (it does not
> > mean anything, this is a random example)
> >
> > an
On Wed, Apr 07, 2021 at 04:49:38PM +0530, Nilesh Patra wrote:
> And I tried changing the second "-lib" entry to ruby-lib (it does not
> mean anything, this is a random example)
>
> and I get the same offending term: ruby lib^@ruby-lib
> attaching the output, for ref
>
> So it looks like more than
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 05, 2021 at 10:14:47PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Control: severity -1 serious
> Control: retitle -1 debci: autopkgtest regularly times out
>
> Hi Chris,
>
> On 02-04-2021 22:13, Chris Hofstaedtler wrote:
> > This can also be seen on armhf, and amd64:
> >
> > https://ci.debian.
On Sat, Mar 20, 2021 at 10:43:05AM +0200, Sebastian Dröge wrote:
> On Tue, 2021-03-16 at 13:39 -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
>
> As a user, I don't even know about all the stuff that could be better;
> pitivi worked ok for me as an amateur video editor. It just failed at
> th
regressions on non-malicious code.
[ Checklist ]
[x] all changes are documented in the d/changelog
[x] I reviewed all changes and I approve them
[x] attach debdiff against the package in testing
unblock ruby-kramdown/2.3.0-5
commit b80244870c477d90090305f569eea39f7bd2b3f5
Author: Antonio Terceiro
ages.
Versions of packages universal-ctags suggests:
ii vim 2:8.2.2434-3
ii vim-gtk3 [vim] 2:8.2.2434-3
-- no debconf information
From 490f13d5b473059dd873deab5f1f1b64e12f4f40 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Antonio Terceiro
Date: Sat, 3 Apr 2021 17:05:57 -0300
Subject: [PATCH 2/2]
er-security; urgency=high
+
+ * Team upload.
+ * Add upstream patch to fix arbitrary code execution vulnerability
+[CVE-2021-28834] (Closes: #985569)
+
+ -- Antonio Terceiro Sat, 03 Apr 2021 13:05:12 -0300
+
ruby-kramdown (1.17.0-1+deb10u1) buster-security; urgency=high
* Non-maintaine
On Sat, Feb 06, 2021 at 08:55:41PM +0100, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
> 00:00:00 + [ 204 -gt 60 ]
> 00:00:00 + rm -f /tmp/.auto-apt-proxy-1000/cache
> 00:00:00 + [ -f /tmp/.auto-apt-proxy-1000/cache ]
> 00:00:00 + __detect__
> 00:00:00 + detect_DNS_SRV_record
> 00:00:00 + + shuf
> 00:00:00 hostna
57aba94cc1e81ccc40970bf9cf68631 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Antonio Terceiro
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2021 17:23:07 -0300
Subject: [PATCH] debian/rules: install openssl/configuration.h to multiarch
dir
This makes a foreign libssl-dev coinstallable with it's native
counterpart.
---
debian/rules
On Tue, Mar 09, 2021 at 08:38:44AM -0500, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> Control: reassign -1 golang-github-containers-common
> Control: tag -1 wontfix
> Control: severity -1 normal
> Control: affects -1 podman
>
> On Mon, Jan 4, 2021 at 3:47 PM Antonio Terceiro wrote:
>
> &
On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 04:45:39PM +0200, Sebastian Dröge wrote:
> On Tue, 2021-03-16 at 11:16 -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> The version of pitivi in bullseye is affected by the bug listed above:
> rendered videos have A/V out of sync by a few seconds
Package: pitivi
Version: 2020.09.2-2
Severity: grave
Tags: upstream patch
Justification: renders package unusable
Forwarded: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/pitivi/-/issues/2498
Dear Maintainer,
The version of pitivi in bullseye is affected by the bug listed above:
rendered videos have A/V out of
On Mon, Mar 08, 2021 at 02:50:18PM +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote:
>
>
> On 2021, മാർച്ച് 8 1:24:48 AM IST, Antonio Terceiro
> wrote:
[...]
> >I don't think that will be needed. I reverted to 5.0.0 locally, added a
> >few patches, and at least all of our reverse depen
On Sun, Mar 07, 2021 at 11:01:16PM +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote:
> [adding release team]
>
> On Sun, Mar 7, 2021 at 10:49 pm, Utkarsh Gupta wrote:
> > Hi Praveen,
> >
> > On Sun, Mar 7, 2021 at 10:15 PM Pirate Praveen
> > wrote:
> > > It looks like we will have to remove ruby-vcr and we will ha
On Sun, 31 Jan 2021 00:22:25 +0300 Nicholas Guriev wrote:
> Hello!
>
> On Sat, 2021-01-30 at 21:54 +0100, Paul Gevers wrote:
> > You recently added an autopkgtest to your package xdg-utils, great.
> > However, it fails. Currently this failure is blocking the migration to
> > testing [1]. Can you
Package: binutils-dev
Version: 2.35.2-2
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Dear Maintainer,
I'm trying to cross build some code that uses libbfd (not for Debian).
However, I can't install binutils-dev:${foreign-arch} because is depends
on binutils.
In #842439, all libraries previously provided by binu
Package: systemtap-sdt-dev
Version: 4.4-2
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Dear Maintainer,
systemtap-sdt-dev is missing a `Multi-Arch: same` field to make it
possible to co-install binaries from different architectures.
The fix is trivial, and I am attaching a patch.
-- System Information:
Debian
Package: libfuse-dev
Version: 2.9.9-4
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Dear Maintainer,
libfuse-dev is missing `Multi-Arch: same` field, what makes it
impossible to co-install binaries from different architectures.
The fix is trivial, and a patch is attached.
-- System Information:
Debian Release:
Package: libcap-ng-dev
Version: 0.7.9-2.2+b1
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Dear Maintainer,
libcap-ng-dev is missing the `Multi-Arch: same` field. This makes it
impossible to co-install libcap-ng-dev from two architectures.
The fix is trivial, I'm attaching a patch.
-- System Information:
Debia
On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 11:12:30AM +0900, Ryutaroh Matsumoto wrote:
> Package: debci
> Version: 2.15
> Severity: normal
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> Autopkg test scripts in some packages assume that
> an ordinary user (e.g. debci) in the testbed can do
> "sudo" in qemu testbeds, see, for example:
> h
On Tue, Feb 23, 2021 at 02:48:47PM +0100, Romain Porte wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 2021-02-22 18:45 CET, Antonio Terceiro:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 12:03:08PM +0100, Romain Porte wrote:
> > > This library is used to access run commercial BrowserStack
Hi,
On Tue, 23 Feb 2021 08:49:22 +0100 Christian Marillat
wrote:
> Package: binutils
> Version: 2.35.2-2
> Severity: serious
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> Fell free to reassign this bug if needed.
>
> Since this binutils version I'm unable to build any package.
>
> I'm building i386 packages unde
Hi,
On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 12:03:08PM +0100, Romain Porte wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: Romain Porte
> X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, deb...@microjoe.org
>
> * Package name: python-browserstack-local
> Version : 1.2.2
> Upstream Author : fran
Control: reassign -1 release.debian.org
Hello David,
On Sun, Feb 21, 2021 at 07:53:08AM -0400, David Prévot wrote:
> Package: debci
> Severity: normal
> X-Debbugs-Cc: Debian Release Team
>
> Hi,
>
> I recently added an autopkgtest to a package, and the autopkgtest failed
> on all suites. I’m s
Package: autopkgtest
Version: 5.16
Severity: normal
8<8<8<-
$ cat debian/tests/control
Test-Command: rm -rf /tmp/autopkgtest*
8<8<8<-
$ autopkgtest -B . -- null
autopkgte
Control: tags -1 + wontfix
On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 10:01:18PM -0500, Matt Corallo wrote:
> Package: lxc
> Version: 1:4.0.6-1
>
> I've been happily using lxc on debian for some time, without dnsmasq-base or
> lxc-net. The recent addition of dnsmasq-base and lxc-net as a required
> dependency is so
Package: buildah
Version: 1.19.3+dfsg1-2
Severity: important
Forwarded: https://github.com/containers/buildah/pull/2993
Tags: patch
Dear Maintainer,
This is a variation of #981849.
If you have the following Containerfile:
───┬──
│ File: Containerfile
───┼─
Package: pristine-lfs
Version: 20210209.0-1
Severity: normal
8<8<8<-
$ pristine-lfs
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/bin/pristine-lfs", line 33, in
sys.exit(load_entry_point('pristine-lfs==20210209.0', 'console_scr
On Sat, Feb 06, 2021 at 10:10:23AM +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 04, 2021 at 04:08:22PM -0600, Corey Minyard wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 04, 2021 at 09:10:40AM -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> > > Beyond adding an NEWS entry, another easy thing you could do is
> >
On Thu, Feb 04, 2021 at 09:02:37PM +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
> Package: ruby-rspec
> Version: 3.9.0c2e2m1s3-1
> Severity: serious
> Tags: ftbfs
> Justification: fails to build from source
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> During a rebuild of the package for Bullseye, it is seen that the
> package fa
Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/containers/podman/issues/9233
On Thu, Feb 04, 2021 at 11:51:09AM -0500, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> Control: tags -1 upstream
>
> On Thu, Feb 4, 2021 at 10:33 AM Antonio Terceiro
> wrote:
>
> >
> > After upgrading from 3.0.
Package: podman
Version: 3.0.0~rc2+dfsg1-2
Severity: normal
After upgrading from 3.0.0~rc1+dfsg1-1, which was in experimental, to the
version that was just uploaded to unstable, `podman build` stopped using the
cache when building images. See the log below. The build before
the upgrade uses the ca
On Thu, Feb 04, 2021 at 08:30:58AM +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 03, 2021 at 12:27:52PM -0600, Corey Minyard wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 03, 2021 at 10:40:46AM -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> > > Package: ser2net
> > > Version: 4.3.2-2
> > >
For the benefit of others stumbling upon this, this is how my
configuration was converted to the new format.
old configuration in /etc/ser2net.conf:
8<8<8<-
BANNER:hikey01:\r\nser2net - hikey01
2000:telnet:600:/dev/serial/by-id/usb-
Package: ser2net
Version: 4.3.2-2
Severity: important
Hi,
Thanks for maintaining ser2net.
When upgrading from 3.5 to 4.3.2, it now uses /etc/ser2net.yaml instead
of the previously used /etc/ser2net.conf. This breaks any local
configuration on upgrade. I don't expect my existing configuration to
Control: tag -1 + wontfix
Hello Laurent,
On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 10:34:24AM +0100, Laurent Bigonville wrote:
> Source: gem2deb
> Version: 1.2.1
> Severity: important
> Tags: ftbfs
> Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
>
> Hello,
>
> It looks like that
Control: tags -1 + unreproducible moreinfo
On Sun, 24 Jan 2021 08:28:21 +0100 lenny wrote:
> Package: libpython3.9
> Version: 3.9.1-3
> Severity: critical
> Justification: breaks the whole system
> X-Debbugs-Cc: lenni_...@yahoo.de
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> after running a normal apt update and a
Hi,
FYI I have reopened this bug in a separate control message.
On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 05:09:16PM -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 07:20:12PM +0100, Martin wrote:
> > On 2021-01-18 14:28, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> > > In special, I need to stop includ
On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 07:20:12PM +0100, Martin wrote:
> On 2021-01-18 14:28, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> > In special, I need to stop including the standalone plugin files,
> > because it's already included in the main file. This wasn't the case in
> > the previous
Hi,
On Sun, Jan 17, 2021 at 12:03:54PM -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
[...]
> After a bit of investigation, this looks more like a larger change in
> API of the package. In the previous version:
>
> - the main jquery.flot.js does *not* include the plugins
> - minified versions of
Control: reopen -1
The minified files are now there, but they are empty because there is a
typo (f -> j) in debian/rules. I was able to fix that locally with this
patch:
8<8<8<-
diff --git a/debian/rules b/debian/rules
index dbf4bc4.
Control: retitle -1 libjs-jquery-flot: breaking API change
Control: severity -1 serious
On Sun, Jan 17, 2021 at 09:07:09AM -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> Package: libjs-jquery-flot
> Version: 4.2.1+dfsg-2
> Severity: important
> Control: affects -1 debci
>
> Dear Maintaine
Package: libjs-jquery-flot
Version: 4.2.1+dfsg-2
Severity: normal
Forwarded: https://github.com/flot/flot/issues/1708
Tags: patch
Dear Maintainer,
With the upgrade to 4.x, flot lost the ability to control the legenda
background. All legends come up with black text on black blackground,
and theref
Package: libjs-jquery-flot
Version: 4.2.1+dfsg-2
Severity: important
Control: affects -1 debci
Dear Maintainer,
Thanks for updating flot.
The previous version provided minified files, but the new version drops
those. Below is the diff between the version currently in testing and the
one in unsta
On Sat, Jan 09, 2021 at 12:58:05PM +0200, Faidon Liambotis wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> On Thu, Dec 31, 2020 at 01:39:52PM -0500, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> > As I thought. Experimental has version 2.2, unstable/testing currently 2.1
> > What you are asking for is one (maybe the?) major new feature intro
Source: ruby-rmagick
Version: 2.16.0-6+b3
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Justification: fails to build from source
Rebuilding ruby-rmagick on current unstable leads to a test suite
failure:
test_format: F
==
On Sun, Oct 04, 2020 at 05:50:17PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Sep 09, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
>
> > Systems installed by d-i get such an entry, but chroots created with
> This is a bit questionable, because non-toy systems already have their
> name in the DNS and hen
On Thu, Dec 31, 2020 at 11:26:49AM -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> Control: done -1 2.2.1+dfsg1-1
>
> On Thu, Dec 31, 2020 at 08:14:08AM -0500, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> > Can you please try the podman version in experimental? I believe what you
> > describe (the shortna
Package: lighttpd
Version: 1.4.57-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Dear Maintainer,
After media-types has been upgraded to 1.1.0, lighttpd fails to start,
complaining about duplicated media types.
jan 04 11:17:27 lemur systemd[1]: Starting Lighttpd Daemon...
jan 04 11:17
Control: tag -1 + moreinfo unreproducible
Hello Francesco, thanks for your bug report.
On Sun, Jan 03, 2021 at 11:37:41AM +0100, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
> Package: auto-apt-proxy
> Version: 13.1
> Severity: normal
>
> (sid)frankie@aragorn:~
> $ time auto-apt-proxy
> http://127.0.0.1:3142
>
Control: done -1 2.2.1+dfsg1-1
On Thu, Dec 31, 2020 at 08:14:08AM -0500, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> Can you please try the podman version in experimental? I believe what you
> describe (the shortnames) should work with version 2.2 just fine thanks to
> the shortnames.conf file.
Ah yes the version
501 - 600 of 2004 matches
Mail list logo
