package apt
tags 545208 + pending
# apt-cache truncated Descriptions upon non-ASCII
forcemerge 545208 461159
# kimiwitu: description trimmed
forcemerge 545208 487230
# use //TRANSLIT when recoding Description
forcemerge 545208 524406
thanks
Michael has merged a very simple patch from me,
which
package dpkg
tags 526774 - moreinfo unreproducible
found 526774 1.15.4
thanks
As APT with 0.7.24 now also include some experimental options to
make more aggressive use of the dpkg triggers you can now reproduce
it also with APT. (it avoids the problem by running
dpkg --triggers-only --pending
package apt
severity 548858 normal
thx
For your information:
APT tries to be over correct and want to ensure that essential and
important packages can be configured and this as fast as possible.
It does add an immediate flag to all these packages (since a long time)
and to all dependencies of
a bit of reordering of logic in FindSrc i assume. Will have a closer
look next week or so with hopefully a bit more time.
Best regards
David Kalnischkies
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas
regards
David Kalnischkies
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
that already in a branch
from Martin Pitt (he developed the gzipindexes feature) so this will
be fixed in a future version.
Best regards
David Kalnischkies
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas
and after that applied instead of downloading and applying them
patch after patch…
Lets see when someone will find the time to implement/fix this…
Best regards
David Kalnischkies
P.S.: Another message i found in my draft folder which should have
been sent out nearly a month before… strange
)
- -- David Kalnischkies kalnischk...@gmail.com Fri, 03 Dec 2010 17:06:28 +0100
+ -- David Kalnischkies kalnischk...@gmail.com Fri, 03 Dec 2010 17:30:52 +0100
apt (0.8.10) unstable; urgency=low
strings - we could
remove this, but as one of the strings is the usage message of apt-get
(which had only a line-addition) we figured that it should be okay to
fix this as well, but we can revert this if you want.
Best regards
David Kalnischkies
[0]
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/debian
On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 21:07, Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk wrote:
On Sat, 2011-01-29 at 19:58 +0100, David Kalnischkies wrote:
Potential in this regard as it is save as long as only one section
is worked on in the apt-ftparchive generate run but as soon as
multiple sections
look to useful even if it would be commented
in, so lets remove this and all references to it (if everything would be so
good documented as this 'not implemented' method…), if we really need it we
have it in the version control history…
Best regards
David Kalnischkies
apt-612009-reality-check
is real and also provided by some packages.
Should show now print a list of packages, show the record or both?
Best regards
David Kalnischkies
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
on.
Hope that helps.
Best regards
David Kalnischkies
test-bug-335925-rdepends-duplicates
Description: Binary data
uninstalled instead of showing
in the autoremove section and installing those (Closes: #604222)
is going made here, but I can't really see why at the moment.
(I get the expectable Broken packages error on my unstable system)
Best regards
David Kalnischkies
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian
squeeze-updates main contrib
#~~ cut end ~~
I hope this fixes the issue as we have no other report of such a failure.
Best regards
David Kalnischkies
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas
$rel_file = readdir LIST_DIR)) {
my $file_name = $list_dir/$rel_file;
-if ($rel_file =~ m/(.*)_Release$/) {
+if ($rel_file =~ m/(.*)_(In|)Release$/) {
$rel_file = $1;
}
else {
Thanks for work on this package and best regards,
David
regards
David Kalnischkies
apt-612986-big-endian-size
Description: Binary data
. Could you attach them to the bug?
Or, if you like you can also send them to me privately as its data
which most people prefer to keep not world-readable.
Best regards
David Kalnischkies
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble
of my patchset upstream today and
asked especially for a comment about the issue here, so lets see
what upstream will tell us. :)
Best regards
David Kalnischkies
use-dbus-to-set-scenario
Description: Binary data
merging virtual providers to one line.
So, to get back to the original bugreport and prefix display:
It should be relatively easy to check before printing the | if
another package in this or-group was not printed until now, too.
Best regards
David Kalnischkies
P.S. : For the patch itself: I noticed
can also sent
them privately to me, of course.
btw: Does this happen also without --purge switch?
Best regards
David Kalnischkies
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
David Kalnischkies
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
packages and therefore removes them - later it notices that installed
garbage packages depend on this new garbage, so it reinstalls them
but it forgets to install the dependencies of these new garbage packages…
Best regards
David Kalnischkies
apt-617257-dependencies-of-reinstalled-garbage
with FullName, but then
we would have to strdup for all packages and not just the multiarch ones,
so that bit of duplication is good as it is. :)
Best regards
David Kalnischkies
¹ bzr: ERROR: Revision is not compatible with
KnitPackRepository('file:///…/apt/.bzr/repository/')
… Whatever: too
Hi Tong Sun,
2010/1/30 Tong Sun sunt...@cpan.org:
$ apt-get source -t unstable --only-source uswsusp=0.8-1.2
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
W: Ignore unavailable version '0.8-1.2' of package 'uswsusp'
E: Unable to find a source
is still
valid as it changes only on apt-get update, so the srcpkgcache.bin
is reused and only the statusfile is parsed, which should happen
pretty fast as this file isn't that long compared to the Packages files in
/var/lib/apt/lists …
Best regards / Mit freundlichen Grüßen,
David Kalnischkies
DonKult Kalnischkies
2010/1/10 David Kalnischkies kalnischkies+deb...@gmail.com:
Hello Ben Hutchings,
Each invocation of apt-cache was taking about 3 seconds (with a warm
disk cache) and it was invoked once for each of ~400 binary package
names. I think that must be a bug in APT, and indeed
(okay, everything was planed so well and now with one mail...
so in short: I want to write earlier but [insert an excuse here]
and i want to wait for the other things to be ready before
responding but the process was slower than expected because
[insert yet another excuse] and now we have
package apt aptitude
reassign 542767 aptitude
thanks
Hi Fabrizio Furnari,
I've tried with
aptitude unmarkauto kde-standard
but when I try to remove akonadi-server, for example:
aptitude remove akonadi-server
[...]
First of all: Thanks for your report, but i guess it is reported
against the
(sry, i thought i had sent this email a bit earlier)
2009/11/17 Goswin von Brederlow goswin-...@web.de:
Do some buildds install recommends and others don't? But even that
doesn't seem to explain it:
Looking again on it, the mips buildd had docbook-xsl installed
while it fails to build and have
Hi Michal Suchanek,
As I see it pinning is only a hint as to what packages I prefer. For
one, if I install an unstable package and a newer version is uploaded
into unstable then that version should be installed, too, regardless
of pinning other repository higher.
Goswin von Brederlow is
Hi Olaf Zaplinski,
include /etc/apt/sources.list.d/*
Is this really the end of your sources.list file?
If yes, please remove this invalid line. [1]
There is no include directive for sources.list
as apt automatically include all files in sources.list.d. [2]
If this not fix your problem it would
and *_arch.deb packages and
NOT *_anotherarch.deb as before… right?
Best regards / Mit freundlichen Grüßen,
David Kalnischkies
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
point after squeeze…
Best regards / Mit freundlichen Grüßen,
David Kalnischkies
P.S.: I fail to see why /var/lib is a better place for trusted keys than /etc.
APT doesn't modify it while running, it isn't bound to a specific host
(why i should not share my trusted keys between my boxes as i do
tend to use the
wrong words and i have the mad-typist-superpower. q.e.d. ;)
Best regards / Mit freundlichen Grüßen,
David Kalnischkies
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Hello Jidanni,
First of all: Thanks for your report:
2010/1/9 jida...@jidanni.org:
Apt-cache showpkg shows repeated lines
$ apt-cache showpkg iceweasel|sort|uniq -c|sort -n|tail -n 4
2 xul-ext-notify,iceweasel
2 xul-ext-pwdhash,iceweasel
2
package apt
retitle 564112 cachefile srcpkgcache.bin is discarded without good reason
tag 564112 confirmed
thanks
Hello Ben Hutchings,
Each invocation of apt-cache was taking about 3 seconds (with a warm
disk cache) and it was invoked once for each of ~400 binary package
names. I think that
Hi Jörgen Tegnér, Francesco Poli Michael Prokop,
First of all: Thanks for the reports!
2010/1/14 Michael Prokop m...@debian.org:
* Francesco Poli f...@firenze.linux.it [20100114 16:37]:
It's not just about .disabled files, it also affects any manually
modified configuration files (resulting
a patch for it
i guess this will be better than nothing. This is btw also true for
the rest of the patch [0] as all my questions in the LongDesc thread [1]
remained unanswered…
Best regards / Mit freundlichen Grüßen,
David Kalnischkies
[0] http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~donkult/apt/sid/revision/1920
tags 568294 + pending
thanks
Hello helix84!
2010/2/3 helix84 heli...@centrum.sk:
.po attached
Thanks! Christian Perrier has already commit it to the branch. :)
Best regards / Mit freundlichen Grüßen,
David Kalnischkies
P.S.: I will take a look at the n-gettext strings over the week
you
.
I will look over the week into the code to find a suitable place to fix it.
Thanks so far to everyone involved! :)
Best regards / Mit freundlichen Grüßen,
David Kalnischkies
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
-Christmas and a happy New Year!
David Kalnischkies
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
such problems in the future.
Thanks for your help so far and a happy new year!
David Kalnischkies
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
.
The bugreport(s) are currently still open just for two reasons:
a) Michaels patch for not downloading to big files was not applied (somehow).
b) Goswin von Brederlow feature request sounds reasonable.
Your problem could be reason c) but we would need more information.
Happy new year!
David
2009/12/26 Francesco Poli f...@firenze.linux.it:
This bug report (#80123) was filed quite some time ago (on December
2000!).
You might know or might not know that Matt Zimmerman is/was
a (previous) member of the APT Team, so this is/was always a todo
list entry which nobody has picked up by now
tags 565213 + patch
thanks
Patch should include:
+ * apt-pkg/contrib/fileutl.cc:
+- Fix the newly introduced method GetListOfFilesInDir to not
+ accept every file if no extension is enforced
+ (= restore old behavior). (Closes: #565213)
+ * apt-pkg/policy.cc:
+- accept also
package apt
retitle 566275 difference between src- and pkgcache.bin isn't documented
thanks
2010/1/22 jida...@jidanni.org:
deb-src lines in sources.list files. However this is a wasteful
assumption... possibly doubling startup times!
Nope. It even lower the startup time, because:
Or maybe
Hello Modestas Vainius,
the patch attached is trivial and probably needs only a couple of minutes to
review. Could this be done any time soon?
I am not an apt maintainer, so this is not an official review,
but i have a little comment on your patch, beside my comment that it is
not always a
found 433007 0.7.21
thanks
The patch proposed by Chanoch Bloom stops the execution of writeStateFile
then APT is in dry-run mode, but in bug #498799 it is mentioned that adding
checks against APT config items in the generic libapt is discouraged and
i guess the patch was therefore rejected
tag 189866 patch
thanks
Hi Jelle de Jong,
Hello everybody else reading this,
Prolog: I don't think the developers are not aware of this bug/wishlistitem
or need some (more) motivation. ;)
First of all, this is a minor thing because only a subset of the users use
the preference file and even
2010/5/12 Marco d'Itri m...@linux.it:
On May 12, David Kalnischkies kalnischkies+deb...@gmail.com wrote:
It would be really cool if udev could depend on the new kernel - or
Developers are supposed to know that other packages cannot depend on
kernel packages.
Good that i am not a developer so
2010/5/13 Raphael Hertzog hert...@debian.org:
On Wed, 12 May 2010, Marco d'Itri wrote:
On May 12, David Kalnischkies kalnischkies+deb...@gmail.com wrote:
Good that i am not a developer so i can say crap and ask afterwards
for pointers to a documentation which tells me why udev can't e.g
please?
apt-get install -f -o Debug::pkgOrderList=1 -o Debug::pkgPackageManager=1
It could be also interesting to see what dpkg thinks about the situation
dpkg --audit
These two together should tell us in a bit more detail what is wrong.
Best regards / Mit freundlichen Grüßen,
David
follow a specific
release, but cherrypick updates - automatically apt will
never suggest a single package update as all preferences
are below 100…
Best regards,
David Kalnischkies
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble
.
Good luck, thanks so far and
Best regards,
David Kalnischkies
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
magically disappear)
the warning is important… (user configuration could be disappeared too)
A linked /etc/apt isn't a problem (at least not for me).
The dir is btw by default empty - as is sources.list.d and trusted.gpg.d …
Best regards,
David Kalnischkies
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian
2010/5/5 Goswin von Brederlow goswin-...@web.de:
David Kalnischkies kalnischkies+deb...@gmail.com writes:
2010/5/4 Raphael Hertzog hert...@debian.org:
On Mon, 03 May 2010, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
Processing triggers for menu ...
W: Unable to read /etc/apt/preferences.d
-broken (-f) option here to force
apt to unpack the source again (all changes will be lost!)
As it is super simple i have implemented it straight away and
think this is all we can do about it so i would close it with this feature.
Do you agree?
Best regards,
David Kalnischkies
change, as the other change to the acquire classes
have nothing to do with std containers but with the constructor.
(at least as far as i can remember…)
Best regards / Mit freundlichen Grüßen,
David Kalnischkies
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
will use for the
next boot…
Best regards,
David Kalnischkies
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
*
Attached is a diff against +lenny1 which should fix it (i haven't even
compile-tested it by now), we will see if i can trick Michael into finding
the time for testupload - it is just that time is highly limited currently.
Best regards,
David Kalnischkies
stable-fix-999-chars.diff
Description
,
David Kalnischkies
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
to help you as much as possible
to get it into the official version. Features like the recently added
--arch option (in experimental) are the best example for it…
Best regards / Mit freundlichen Grüßen,
David Kalnischkies
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
/ Mit freundlichen Grüßen,
David Kalnischkies
P.S.: After all, we are talking here about ~25 packages -- i accept bets now
then the bugcount talking about essential packages exceeds the actual
count of packages marked as essential…
[0] http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~donkult/apt/sid/revision/1972
2010/3/22 Santiago Vila sanv...@unex.es:
On Sun, 21 Mar 2010, David Kalnischkies wrote:
2010/3/21 Santiago Vila sanv...@unex.es:
This is a bug because, for example, once you upgrade an essential
package like the real diff to a non-essential one like the dummy diff,
the old essential
from essential packages.
They are just there - always.
Best regards / Mit freundlichen Grüßen,
David Kalnischkies
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
or should we add a little note about it?
And do you have any suggestions on the note itself and/or at which place?
Best regards / Mit freundlichen Grüßen,
David Kalnischkies
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas
.
Configuration Item: APT::Cache::AllVersions.
Best regards / Mit freundlichen Grüßen,
David Kalnischkies
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
packages from different releases.
You have been warned./para
Best regards,
David Kalnischkies
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
,
David Kalnischkies
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
patch which should apply fine on top of the
recent apt's in version 0.7.25 or 0.7.26~exp2 --
and it would be brilliant if someone could test it. :)
Thanks again and
Best regards / Mit freundlichen Grüßen,
David Kalnischkies
fallback-for-filesystem-without-mmap.patch
Description: Binary data
freundlichen Grüßen,
David Kalnischkies
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
an
extended_state is out of question.
Best regards / Mit freundlichen Grüßen,
David Kalnischkies
P.S.: Sorry, the message is not well-prepared (i don't even have the source)
and doesn't include much details/answers, but i want to answer now non the
less as i am not available in the next few days
to use a specific one also for the real
validation - it is just not set by default and therefore the method will use
the strongest available hashmethod. Only in invocations with --print-uris
the default is changed to md5sum.
Best regards / Mit freundlichen Grüßen,
David Kalnischkies
2010/4/17 Goswin von Brederlow goswin-...@web.de:
Yeah, I run into the same problem trying to modify dpkg. The problem is
that an arch=all package being installed or not does no longer suffice
to see if it fullfills a dependency. You need to recursively check what
the arch=all package depends
be added to the command line
to avoid the need of a setting file)
Do you agree?
Best regards / Mit freundlichen Grüßen,
David Kalnischkies
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Hi Thomas Schwinge!
First of all: Thanks for your report! :)
2010/4/16 Thomas Schwinge tho...@schwinge.name:
I had installed packages with ``apt-get --no-install-recommends'', now
wanted to additionally install the packages' ``Recommends:'', and
wondered how to do that in an automated
of apt-cache policy git-svn ?
Best regards / Mit freundlichen Grüßen,
David Kalnischkies
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
,
David Kalnischkies
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
' definition
/lib/libpthread.so.0: could not read symbols: Bad value
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
make: *** [../build/bin/apt-ftparchive] Error 1
I don't know who deserves a bugreport for this…
apt-ftparchive at least doesn't use pthreads.
Best regards / Mit freundlichen Grüßen,
David
of converted chars to wchar_ts. (mbstowcs)
I haven't test it by now, but at least it seems to works
in LANG=C de_DE correctly.
Best regards / Mit freundlichen Grüßen,
David Kalnischkies
apt-cache-align-versions.diff
Description: Binary data
on the output
it is more likely that it will break with a \t instead of a space
compared to X spaces instead of one.
Best regards / Mit freundlichen Grüßen,
David Kalnischkies
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
2010/4/20 Goswin von Brederlow goswin-...@web.de:
David Kalnischkies kalnischkies+deb...@gmail.com writes:
2010/4/18 Goswin von Brederlow goswin-...@web.de:
And even if the script knows about it the setting can not be overriden.
The config (sub)trees can be removed with the clear command
on hold and will be done with it…
Best non-essential regards,
David Kalnischkies
[0] http://lists.debian.org/deity/2010/01/msg00088.html
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
2010/4/28 Toni Mueller supp...@oeko.net:
On Wed, 28.04.2010 at 21:14:52 +0200, David Kalnischkies
kalnischkies+deb...@gmail.com wrote:
2010/4/28 Matt Taggart tagg...@debian.org:
2) diffutils and dash are Priority: required/Essential: yes in
unstable, but weren't in lenny.
Every time we
or are
e.g. in the case of dash essential as a shell but not really used by
a package itself -- but you can never be sure…
Best regards,
David Kalnischkies
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
) as a package with
this name is already installed and satisfy this dependency, but it
is also a dummy package, so you have created a timeframe in
which no package provides the diff functionality…
The solution is a versioned pre-depends, but i am not sure if this
is worthed the hassle…
Best regards,
David
package apt aptitude
reassign 574956 apt
thanks
Hi Celejar and to the others involved!
Is this the complete output of apt-get policy?
From your description it sounds like bug #574072 and friends,
but for this bug it would need a few more versions…
Best regards / Mit freundlichen Grüßen,
David
replace localhost with the right archive and which software do you use
to mirror the archives?
(I remember a bugreport in which a mirror creater application messed
up the files causing unexpected behavior of apt and friends)
Best regards,
David Kalnischkies
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian
…
Best regards / Mit freundlichen Grüßen
David Kalnischkies
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
completely and
writing a full-blown version number normalizer just for this small
use case seems to be over-engineering…
Best regards,
David Kalnischkies
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas
to debian/changelog
- add two comments to be able to understand the hex-values still tomorrow
So in essence: Your patch - with a bit of juicy in my debian-sid :)
http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~donkult/apt/sid/revision/1985
Again: Thanks and best regards / Mit freundlichen Grüßen,
David Kalnischkies
quite a bit at 0 and at the end) loading and saving 30 MB in the
sid Packages case is a bit to much to be done immediately but it should
really be (much) faster than an hour…
Best regards,
David Kalnischkies
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
(= compiles my modified apt).
Best regards / Mit freundlichen Grüßen,
David Kalnischkies
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
to have apt-listrepostory (with a
new name and written by someone who can actually write perl/python/whatever)
in an important package as the use case is pretty limited…
Best regards / Mit freundlichen Grüßen,
David Kalnischkies
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ
Grüßen,
David Kalnischkies
forcehash.patch
Description: Binary data
and untouched
cherries have most of the time the biggest bugs. ;)
Best regards / Mit freundlichen Grüßen,
David Kalnischkies
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
repository creator do you use.)
Oh, and if someone want to look at the VersionHash method:
It is located at apt-pkg/deb/deblistparser.cc [0].
Best regards / Mit freundlichen Grüßen,
David Kalnischkies
[0]
http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~mvo/apt/debian-sid/annotate/head%3A/apt-pkg/deb/deblistparser.cc
with a
different versionnumber, e.g. 4:4.6.2-1+b1~yourname
instead of rebuilding with 4:4.6.2-1. Following a version scheme
like this will help identifying your rebuilt packages on the first look
rather than depending on your memory. :)
Best regards / Mit freundlichen Grüßen,
David Kalnischkies
[0] http
modification: add of 0-Epoch treatment).
Hopefully libdpkg is faster in becoming a stable library than it is libapt,
so this wild mixture of codecopy and rewrite we currently call
version comparison in apt can be dropped in the future. :)
Best regards / Mit freundlichen Grüßen,
David Kalnischkies
[0] http
1 - 100 of 1102 matches
Mail list logo
