Hi Beatrice,
On 25 January 2015 at 15:27, Beatrice Torracca wrote:
| Package: r-cran-digest
| Severity: minor
|
| Hi!
|
| with the recent change of the package description [1], the first line
| got lost. The description currently (0.6.7-1) starts with
|
| «of hash digests of arbitrary R object
Package: wnpp
Owner: Dirk Eddelbuettel
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: r-cran-pbkrtest
Version : 0.4-2-1
Upstream Author : Ulrich Halekoh and Søren Højsgaard
* URL or Web page : http://people.math.aau.dk/~sorenh/software/pbkrtest/
* License : GPL (>= 2)
Descript
On 27 December 2014 at 04:18, Ron wrote:
|
| Hi,
|
| Did you want to actually close or downgrade this bug now?
No, because nobody ever replied (including upstream, with whom I've worked on
RDieHarder for years, but whose email response rate is still, err, a little
erratic).
| The dieharder pa
(CCing upstream)
Salut Jérémy,
On 27 December 2014 at 19:26, Jérémy Bobbio wrote:
| Package: r-base-dev
| Version: 3.1.2-2
| Severity: wishlist
| Tags: patch
| User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
| Usertags: toolchain username timestamps
|
| Hi!
|
| While working on the “reproduc
Package: wnpp
Owner: Dirk Eddelbuettel
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: r-cran-readxl
Version : 0.1.0-1
Upstream Author : Hadley Wickham
* URL or Web page : http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/readxl/index.html
* License : GPL-3 (package) and BSD-2 (included code
On 6 May 2015 at 09:25, Ivan Rossi wrote:
| Package: smtm
| Version: 1.6.10
| Severity: grave
| Justification: renders package unusable
|
| Dear Maintainer,
|
|
| Since the middle of april 2015 smtm stopped working.
I doubt the middle of April part.
Finance::YahooQuote needed, and got, a fix
reassign 784426 libfinance-yahooquote-perl
severity normal
quit
On 6 May 2015 at 09:25, Ivan Rossi wrote:
| Package: smtm
| Version: 1.6.10
| Severity: grave
| Justification: renders package unusable
|
| Dear Maintainer,
|
|
| Since the middle of april 2015 smtm stopped working.
| Tested on di
Hi Jeremy,
Thanks again for the bug report. I can't recall if I replied to you
immediately (which I may not have, my bad). I did however contact upstream
immediately, and following a brief and cordial discussion it was decided I
should send a patch upstream to R.
And I have been trying to make
I have the first part done, which was pretty straightforward. Patch below --
it accepts a new option to R CMD INSTALL and pass it on; if set its value is
used. Tested when set and not set and the right thing happens.
But in doing this also learned that the worker function is called from the
mkde
On 11 January 2015 at 14:18, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
|
| I have the first part done, which was pretty straightforward. Patch below --
| it accepts a new option to R CMD INSTALL and pass it on; if set its value is
| used. Tested when set and not set and the right thing happens.
|
| But in
On 27 December 2014 at 15:29, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
|
| Hi Martin,
|
| On 27 December 2014 at 22:12, Martin Maechler wrote:
| | Dear Dirk,
| |
| | is this about R itself, or rather (I think) about building "external"
| | (e.g. CRAN) R packages?
| | Martin
|
| As I understan
On 11 January 2015 at 17:49, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
|
| On 27 December 2014 at 15:29, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| |
| | Hi Martin,
| |
| | On 27 December 2014 at 22:12, Martin Maechler wrote:
| | | Dear Dirk,
| | |
| | | is this about R itself, or rather (I think) about building "ext
On 12 January 2015 at 11:06, Jérémy Bobbio wrote:
| Martin Maechler:
| > I've committed these now to R-devel, svn rev r67422 and r67423.
| > (R devel should become R 3.2.0 in April)
Thanks so much Martin!
| That's great news. :) Dirk, thanks for your work. Tell me if you want to
| deploy your p
On 12 January 2015 at 14:50, Jérémy Bobbio wrote:
| Dirk Eddelbuettel:
| > On 12 January 2015 at 11:06, Jérémy Bobbio wrote:
| > | That's great news. :) Dirk, thanks for your work. Tell me if you want to
| > | deploy your patches to our experimental framework. I could either do the
On 12 January 2015 at 15:23, Jérémy Bobbio wrote:
| Dirk Eddelbuettel:
| > You need both my patches, and while I only tried them against r-devel they
| > should work as is on r-release.
| >
| > There is one thing I need to stick into debian/rules to set the env var for
| > make
Upon reflection, I'll make it 'adm'.
We still need to think through if this warrants an update for Jessie.
Dirk
--
http://dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | e...@debian.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? C
On 26 March 2015 at 18:03, Alexander Schlarb wrote:
| Package: r-base-core
| Version: 3.1.1-1+b2
| Severity: grave
| Justification: renders package unusable
|
| When installing the package `r-base-core` (or anything that depends on it) on
a
| clean jessie install (not upgraded) then the depricat
On 26 March 2015 at 19:01, Johannes Ranke wrote:
|
| Am Donnerstag, 26. März 2015, 12:48:37 schrieb Dirk Eddelbuettel:
| > On 26 March 2015 at 18:03, Alexander Schlarb wrote:
| > | Package: r-base-core
| > | Version: 3.1.1-1+b2
| > | Severity: grave
| > | Justification: renders p
On 1 March 2015 at 18:19, Allen Chan wrote:
| Package: quantlib-python
| Version: 1.4-2
| Severity: normal
|
| Dear Maintainer,
|
| Version 1.5-1 is available for most architectures, but not amd64. Combined
with
Hm. Looking at https://packages.debian.org/unstable/quantlib-python I do see
that
A closer look reveals that this failed with a compiler error on amd64:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=quantlib-swig&arch=amd64&ver=1.5-1&stamp=1423713512
Dirk
--
http://dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | e...@debian.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ.
On 4 March 2015 at 14:27, Matthias Klose wrote:
| Package: src:quantlib-swig
| Version: 1.5-1
| Tags: patch
|
| failed to build on powerpc with -O0 ... the default flags seem to work
everywhere.
|
|
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/199338723/quantlib-swig_1.5-1_1.5-1ubuntu1.diff.gz
It's more com
On 4 March 2015 at 14:27, Matthias Klose wrote:
| Package: src:quantlib-swig
| Version: 1.5-1
| Tags: patch
|
| failed to build on powerpc with -O0 ... the default flags seem to work
everywhere.
|
|
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/199338723/quantlib-swig_1.5-1_1.5-1ubuntu1.diff.gz
Do you have s
On 5 March 2015 at 14:35, Matthias Klose wrote:
| On 03/05/2015 01:52 PM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| >
| > On 4 March 2015 at 14:27, Matthias Klose wrote:
| > | Package: src:quantlib-swig
| > | Version: 1.5-1
| > | Tags: patch
| > |
| > | failed to build on powerpc wit
On 6 April 2015 at 23:52, shirish शिरीष wrote:
| Package: gretl
| Version: 1.9.92-1
| Severity: wishlist
That has long happened. Allin sends me announcements the day of the release,
and I have been packaging it on the day of the release for years. I happen
to have been on vacation last week.
Di
is below. It just adds an near-empty function
body beyond what you have. Both should be equivalent.
Thanks again for the quick reply and integration upstream.
Dirk
Description: Match function declaration and defintion
See #781724 for details
Author: Dirk Eddelbuettel
Bug-Debian: https://bugs.debia
On 18 April 2015 at 11:15, Philip Rinn wrote:
| Hi,
|
| I think this patch is more what I wanted.
| It now sets the build-timestamp to the time of the last changelog entry if the
| maintainer does not set builttimeStamp explicitly.
| With this change almost all GNU R packages in Debian would auto
On 18 April 2015 at 15:22, Johannes Ranke wrote:
| Am Samstag, 18. April 2015, 06:27:03 schrieb Dirk Eddelbuettel:
| > On 18 April 2015 at 11:15, Philip Rinn wrote:
| > | Hi,
| > |
| > | I think this patch is more what I wanted.
| > | It now sets the build-timestamp to the t
On 19 April 2015 at 15:05, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
| Package: rpy2
| Severity: wishlist
| User: py3porters-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
| Usertags: patchme-python3
| thanks
|
| Hello there!
|
| This package contains a trove classifier[1] in its `setup.py` like
| "Programming Language :: Python
On 21 April 2015 at 12:09, Philip Rinn wrote:
| Package: rquantlib
| Version: 0.4.0-2
| Severity: wishlist
| Tags: patch
|
| Hi Dirk,
|
| I guess you know what it's about.
| Here just a patch for your d/rules to make rquantlib build reproducible.
I was about to bark "but the patch to R already
On 22 April 2015 at 20:01, Philip Rinn wrote:
| Package: r-base
| Version: 3.2.0-2
| Severity: serious
| Tags: upstream
| Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
|
| Hi Dirk,
|
| I was trying to understand why GNU R FTBFS in the reproducible build env[1]
|
On 23 April 2015 at 06:36, Ben Finney wrote:
| Dirk Eddelbuettel writes:
|
| > Can you recommend a debian/rules and debian/control for me to look at?
| >
| > The package mygrated happily from python 2.3, 2.4, ... to now 2.7; but
| > I have yet to work with python3 so a gentle n
Hi Philip,
On 22 April 2015 at 23:20, Philip Rinn wrote:
| Sure, I don't question that. And I think it's important to stress that R does
| _not_ FTBS on the buildds. I'm aware of that.
+1
| The reproducible team does to check for software quality and to ensure builds
are
| reproducible in Debi
On 22 April 2015 at 17:49, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
| Euch! Sorry Dirk! I ment to reply, but I'm the worst.
No beans.
| Sure. How can I help, sorry about that. I'd be happy to check out any
| changesets or help out with moving it.
It's probably good enough if you can just point me to "a" package
On 23 April 2015 at 10:09, Ben Finney wrote:
| Dirk Eddelbuettel writes:
|
| > On 23 April 2015 at 06:36, Ben Finney wrote:
| > | I'll gladly work with you on this, Dirk.
| > |
| > | The existing source package doesn't have a ‘Vcs-*’ field.
| >
| > That is ort
I declare defeat.
I rewrote debian/rules following a current python3 package but I am hitting a
brick wall as the substvers does not work. And maybe the package does not
build the same way. For the (new) python3 I get
./usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/rpy2/rinterface/_rpy_device.cpython-34m-
On 22 April 2015 at 22:07, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
| On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 08:59:49PM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| > I declare defeat.
|
| Aw, sorry to hear that edd. That sucks. We should really document this
| to make it look better :\
I took another look ... and things got bet
On 24 November 2015 at 17:07, Iain Lane wrote:
| Control: reopen -1 =
| Control: block 805814 by -1
|
| On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 09:12:09AM +, Iain Lane wrote:
| > On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 02:17:16PM -0600, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| > >
| > > On 11 November 2015 at 11:45,
On 24 November 2015 at 11:14, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
|
| On 24 November 2015 at 17:07, Iain Lane wrote:
| | Control: reopen -1 =
| | Control: block 805814 by -1
| |
| | On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 09:12:09AM +, Iain Lane wrote:
| | > On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 02:17:16PM -0600, Dirk Eddelbuet
two packages impossible whereas the idea of
renaming is presumably to allow that.
Anything else wrong in debian/control you can see? It is included below.
Dirk
|
| Cheers,
| Julien
Source: gsl
Section: math
Priority: optional
Maintainer: Dirk Eddelbuettel
Standards-Version: 3.9.6
Build-Depends:
On 29 November 2015 at 19:41, Krzysztof Marczak wrote:
| Source: gsl
| Version: 2.1+dfsg
| Severity: normal
|
| Dear Maintainer,
|
| I cannot compile libgsl from source, because configure script gives folowing
| error:
|
| config.status: error: cannot find input file: `doc/examples/Makefile.in'
On 30 November 2015 at 09:37, Edmund Grimley Evans wrote:
| Source: quantlib
| Version: 1.7-1
| User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
| Usertags: arm64
|
| You've probably noticed that quantlib sometimes fails to build on the
| arm64 builds:
|
| https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=quantlib
On 30 November 2015 at 14:50, Edmund Grimley Evans wrote:
| > Should we even consider not building at all?
|
| I think you should build it on arm64, where it could easily be useful.
|
| I'm not so sure about people using quantlib on armel systems, which
| are typically very low-performance, but,
On 6 December 2015 at 17:01, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
| On 03-12-15 19:11, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
| > On 03/12/15 19:07, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
| >> Because libgsl0-dev is not a transitional package to pull in libgsl-dev
| >> and libgsl2, all gsl rdeps need to update their build d
On 25 October 2015 at 23:14, Hilko Bengen wrote:
| Package: ess
| Severity: grave
C'mon now. Even though it may block the bulk update (which is an artificial
test, no user works that way) the bug is not "grave" but trivial.
Dirk
| Dear maintainers,
|
| After reporting a bug earlier today, I
On 25 October 2015 at 15:43, Hilko Bengen wrote:
| Package: ess
| Version: 15.09-1
| Severity: grave
| Tags: patch
|
| While upgrading emacs24 from 24.5+1-2 to 24.5+1-3 today, the
| installation paused and I got the the following prompt:
C'mon now 2 of 2. It is mostly to signal that I consider
nd it will
| > normally make it to rpy2-2.7.3.
| >
| > Best,
| >
| >
| > Laurent
| >
| > 2015-10-25 15:36 GMT-04:00 Dirk Eddelbuettel :
| >>
| >> Salut Laurent,
| >>
| >> This just in from doko aka Matthias (who is among the more clueful
Debian/Ub
On 8 October 2015 at 21:56, Julien Puydt wrote:
| Package: python-rpy2
| Version: 2.7.0-1
| Severity: wishlist
|
| Hi,
|
| first, the binary python-rpy2 package suggests python-rpy-docs which
| doesn't exist (python-rpy-doc does, but it's for the previous version!).
|
| Could you please ship a
ted motivation in chasing this down.
rpy2 2.7.1 is now Debian, a little more delayed than usual as I was out of
the country for a bit.
Dirk
| L.
|
| P.S.: Enjoy Tokyo.
|
|
| On Thu, Oct 8, 2015, 6:32 PM Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
|
|
| On 8 October 2015 at 21:56, Julien Puydt wrote:
|
On 15 June 2015 at 20:10, Eli Bonner wrote:
| Package: smtm
| Version: 1.6.10
| Severity: important
|
| Dear Maintainer,
|
| I am a long-time user of smtm, and for the past month or two have not been
| able to launch the program successfully. The issue occurs whether I use my
| own portfolio fi
On 11 November 2015 at 11:45, Iain Lane wrote:
| Package: gsl
| Version: 2.0+dfsg-1
| Severity: normal
| Tags: patch
| User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com
| Usertags: origin-ubuntu xenial ubuntu-patch
|
| I noticed when rebuilding packages for the gsl transition in Ubuntu that
| mrtrix FTBFS due
On 20 November 2015 at 11:45, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
| On 09-11-15 18:21, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
| > On 06/11/15 15:06, Bas Couwenberg wrote:
| >> Package: release.debian.org
| >> Severity: normal
| >> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
| >> Usertags: transition
| >> Forward
On 23 November 2015 at 20:45, Julien Cristau wrote:
| On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 01:46:26 +0100, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
|
| > altree (1.3.1-2) cannot be built after updating the build dependency to
| > libgsl-dev, because some other dependency still pulls in libgsl0ldbl
| > causing a conflict
Hi Andreas,
On 7 November 2015 at 20:17, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
| Hi Dirk,
|
| On Fri, 06 Nov 2015 15:06:14 +0100 Bas Couwenberg
| wrote:
| > An uncoordinated transition to GSL 2.0 has started in unstable.
|
| please file RC bugs against the packages that have a versioned B-D on
| libgsl0-dev
On 8 November 2015 at 12:44, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
| > | Also make the bugs block this transition bug:
| >
| > I'll try to look up how to do that :)
|
| You can do that with the bts tool from devscripts:
|
| $ bts block 804246 by bug1 bug2 bug3 ... bugN
|
| Where bug1 to bugN are the bu
Package: gnuradio
Severity: serious
The GNU GSL, upon which your package as a build- and run-time dependency, had
a 2.0 release [1] which introduced minor incompatibilities with the previous
(1.6) release. I had left the package for many years at libgsl0ldbl because
such a transition was never ne
Package: openms
Severity: serious
The GNU GSL, upon which your package as a build- and run-time dependency, had
a 2.0 release [1] which introduced minor incompatibilities with the previous
(1.6) release. I had left the package for many years at libgsl0ldbl because
such a transition was never need
Package: orpie
Severity: serious
The GNU GSL, upon which your package as a build- and run-time dependency, had
a 2.0 release [1] which introduced minor incompatibilities with the previous
(1.6) release. I had left the package for many years at libgsl0ldbl because
such a transition was never neede
Package: pspp
Severity: serious
The GNU GSL, upon which your package as a build- and run-time dependency, had
a 2.0 release [1] which introduced minor incompatibilities with the previous
(1.6) release. I had left the package for many years at libgsl0ldbl because
such a transition was never needed
Package: ruby-gsl
Severity: serious
The GNU GSL, upon which your package as a build- and run-time dependency, had
a 2.0 release [1] which introduced minor incompatibilities with the previous
(1.6) release. I had left the package for many years at libgsl0ldbl because
such a transition was never ne
Package: step
Severity: serious
The GNU GSL, upon which your package as a build- and run-time dependency, had
a 2.0 release [1] which introduced minor incompatibilities with the previous
(1.6) release. I had left the package for many years at libgsl0ldbl because
such a transition was never needed
Package: snd
Severity: serious
The GNU GSL, upon which your package as a build- and run-time dependency, had
a 2.0 release [1] which introduced minor incompatibilities with the previous
(1.6) release. I had left the package for many years at libgsl0ldbl because
such a transition was never needed.
Package: yorick-ygsl
Severity: serious
The GNU GSL, upon which your package as a build- and run-time dependency, had
a 2.0 release [1] which introduced minor incompatibilities with the previous
(1.6) release. I had left the package for many years at libgsl0ldbl because
such a transition was never
On 8 November 2015 at 17:15, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
|
| On 8 November 2015 at 12:44, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
| | > | Also make the bugs block this transition bug:
| | >
| | > I'll try to look up how to do that :)
| |
| | You can do that with the bts tool from devscripts:
On 9 November 2015 at 01:12, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
| Control: block -1 by 804495 804496 804497 804498 804499 804500 804501 804502
|
| On 09/11/15 00:40, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| >
| > On 8 November 2015 at 17:15, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| > |
| > | On 8 November 2
On 9 November 2015 at 10:02, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
| On Sun, 8 Nov 2015 19:38:36 -0600 Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| >
| > On 9 November 2015 at 01:12, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
| > | > edd@max:~$ bts block 802246 by 804495 804496 804497 804498 804499
804500 804501 804502
| &
On 11 November 2015 at 11:45, Iain Lane wrote:
| Package: gsl
| Version: 2.0+dfsg-1
| Severity: normal
| Tags: patch
| User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com
| Usertags: origin-ubuntu xenial ubuntu-patch
|
| I noticed when rebuilding packages for the gsl transition in Ubuntu that
| mrtrix FTBFS due
On 2 July 2015 at 02:54, Yuriy M. Kaminskiy wrote:
| On 25.06.2015 01:13, Yuriy M. Kaminskiy wrote:
| > Patch (debdiff) to add Multi-Arch support attached (I've followed
| > https://wiki.debian.org/Multiarch/Implementation), passes very limited
| > check (coinstallation of :i386 and :amd64 runti
Package: wnpp
Owner: Dirk Eddelbuettel
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: r-cran-cubature
Version : 1.1-2-1
Upstream Author : Balasubramanian Narasimhan and Steven G. Johnson
* URL or Web page : http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/cubature/index.html
* License : GPL
Package: wnpp
Owner: Dirk Eddelbuettel
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: r-cran-pkgkitten
Version : 0.1.1-1
Upstream Author : Dirk Eddelbuettel
* URL or Web page : http://dirk.eddelbuettel.com/code/pkgkitten.html
* License : GPL (>= 2)
Description : GNU R pack
Package: wnpp
Owner: Dirk Eddelbuettel
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: r-cran-acepack
Version : 1.3.3.3-1
Upstream Author : Phil Spector, Jerome Friedman, Robert Tibshirani, and
Thomas Lumley
* URL or Web page : http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/acepack/index.html
Package: wnpp
Owner: Dirk Eddelbuettel
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: r-omegahat-xmlrpc
Version : 0.3-0
Upstream Author : Duncan Temple Lang
* URL or Web page : http://www.omegahat.org/XMLRPC/
* License : BSD
Description : GNU R package for RPC over XML
This
On 9 November 2014 at 08:31, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
| Source: fnonlinear
| Version: 2100.76-4
| Severity: serious
| Tags: jessie sid
| User: debian...@lists.debian.org
| Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20141108 qa-ftbfs
| Justification: FTBFS in jessie on amd64
We have
https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?pack
Hallo Detlev,
On 9 November 2014 at 19:21, Detlev Brodowski wrote:
| Package: r-base
| Version: 3.1.2-1
| Severity: wishlist
|
| Hello Maintainer,
|
| Please build the r-base source-package against the default tcl/tk version
(8.6)
Ooops. Must have missed when we moved from 8.5 to 8.6. Will d
On 28 October 2014 at 00:33, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote:
| Package: ess
| Version: 14.09-1
|
| Package ess depends on r-base-core, which is a 19MB download, and rather
| useless for people programming in Julia. Please downgrade this to
| a Recommends.
I disagree.
Dirk
--
http://dirk.eddelbuett
On 28 October 2014 at 01:54, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote:
| > | Package ess depends on r-base-core, which is a 19MB download, and rather
| > | useless for people programming in Julia. Please downgrade this to
| > | a Recommends.
|
| > I disagree.
|
| May I most humbly request a slightly more verbo
On 28 October 2014 at 12:39, Michał Masłowski wrote:
| Package: gsl-doc-info
| Version: 1.16-1
| Severity: normal
|
| Dear Maintainer,
|
| GSL documentation is free now: upstream commit
| ea3a0d3f6a81f1b67ff40be684e556a8b4fd9553 removed the invariant sections
| and cover texts [0]. That change
On 28 October 2014 at 08:59, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote:
| severity 767043 minor
| thanks
|
| > The vast majority of users of ESS deploy it with R, and expect M-x R to
work.
|
| AFAIK, that's what Recommends is for -- install by default, don't prevent
| uninstallation. (The rare user who knows a
On 15 September 2014 at 17:33, Andreas Tille wrote:
| On Sat, Sep 13, 2014 at 11:38:48AM +0200, ruben.undh...@gmail.com wrote:
| > Please provide feedback on the naming of the package!
| > Perhaps the name "abc" is a bad name to use in debian although
| > it's the correct upstream name.
|
| I adm
On 16 September 2014 at 20:33, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
| Package: littler
| Version: 0.2.0-1
| Severity: serious
|
| littler is built using the -march=native GCC option. Besides the fact
| the that it is not something supported on all architectures, it means
| the package requires at least the same
Package: wnpp
Owner: Dirk Eddelbuettel
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: r-cran-rcmdrmisc
Version : 1.0-1
Upstream Author : John Fox
* URL or Web page : http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/RcmdrMisc/index.html
* License : GPL (>= 2)
Description : GNU R Comman
Emmanuel,
On 9 August 2014 at 23:52, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
| Hi Dirk,
|
| As I understand the default R configuration contains the path to Java 7:
|
| ebourg@icare:~$ R CMD config JAVA_CPPFLAGS
| -I/usr/lib/jvm/java-7-openjdk-amd64/jre/../include
|
| Would it be possible to change the defa
On 14 August 2014 at 14:20, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
| Le 14/08/2014 13:58, Dirk Eddelbuettel a écrit :
|
| > We really need / want a JDK as rJava is often used to /program/ with Java,
| > not just to run.
|
| I don't know R so I may be missing something, but if you depend on
When
Hi Emmanuel,
On 15 August 2014 at 22:56, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
| Le 14/08/2014 14:46, Dirk Eddelbuettel a écrit :
|
| > Sorry if I missed something ere, and I rushed the email out as I am on my
way
| > out of the door.
|
| Ok, let me recap.
|
| r-base build depends on default-jdk.
On 28 September 2014 at 19:42, David Suárez wrote:
| Source: r-cran-rms
| Version: 4.2-0-1
| Severity: serious
| Tags: jessie sid
| User: debian...@lists.debian.org
| Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20140926 qa-ftbfs
| Justification: FTBFS on amd64
|
| Hi,
|
| During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your pa
On 28 September 2014 at 19:22, David Suárez wrote:
| Source: its
| Version: 1.1.8-4
| Severity: serious
| Tags: jessie sid
| User: debian...@lists.debian.org
| Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20140926 qa-ftbfs
| Justification: FTBFS on amd64
|
| Hi,
|
| During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package f
On 28 September 2014 at 19:41, David Suárez wrote:
| Source: r-cran-rcmdrmisc
| Version: 1.0-2-1
| Severity: serious
| Tags: jessie sid
| User: debian...@lists.debian.org
| Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20140926 qa-ftbfs
| Justification: FTBFS on amd64
|
| Hi,
|
| During a rebuild of all packages in sid, y
On 2 October 2014 at 23:38, Greg Bognar wrote:
| Package: beancounter
| Version: 0.8.10
| Severity: grave
| Justification: renders package unusable
|
| Dear Maintainer,
|
| beancounter quits with the following error message:
|
| install_driver(Pg) failed: Can't locate DBD/Pg.pm in @INC (you may
Package: wnpp
Owner: Dirk Eddelbuettel
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: r-cran-rneos
Version : 0.2-7-1
Upstream Author : Bernhard Pfaff
* URL or Web page : http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/rneos/index.html
* License : GPL (>= 2)
Description : GNU R pack
On 15 February 2016 at 13:20, Chris Lamb wrote:
| Source: rjava
| Version: 0.9-8-1
| Severity: serious
| Justification: fails to build from source
| User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
| Usertags: ftbfs
| X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
|
| Dear Maintainer,
On 16 February 2016 at 07:40, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
|
| On 15 February 2016 at 13:20, Chris Lamb wrote:
| | Source: rjava
| | Version: 0.9-8-1
| | Severity: serious
| | Justification: fails to build from source
| | User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
| | Usertags: ftbfs
| | X
Something is out of whack with openjdk-8-jdk and R. I need to talk to
upstream, and that may take a moment.
It all works if only one runs 'R CMD javareconf' but I don't see a way to
shoehorn that in as root. Oh well.
The package has no reverse dependencies. So worst case we just remove it.
Di
On 17 February 2016 at 22:05, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
|
| Something is out of whack with openjdk-8-jdk and R. I need to talk to
| upstream, and that may take a moment.
I think a simple rebuild of R (package r-base-core) will do. The last
version (3.2.3-5 on Jan 25) used openjdk-7-jdk; we now
On 24 February 2016 at 09:48, Chris Lamb wrote:
| Source: ess
| Version: 15.09.2-1
| Severity: serious
| Justification: fails to build from source
| User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
| Usertags: ftbfs
| X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
|
| Dear Maintainer,
On 25 January 2016 at 13:57, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
| * Dirk Eddelbuettel [2016-01-24 10:45]:
| >
| > On 22 January 2016 at 14:26, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
| > | > We've seen similar breakage with R packages with ABI/API changes.
| > |
| > | You were right. I
On 2 February 2016 at 13:43, Joost van Baal-Ilić wrote:
| Package: wnpp
| Severity: wishlist
|
| * Package name: r-cran-markdown
| Version : 0.7.7
| Upstream Author : Yihui Xie
| * URL : https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/markdown/
| * License : GPL e.a.
On 3 February 2016 at 23:31, Chris Lamb wrote:
| Source: multcomp
| Version: 1.4-2-1
| Severity: serious
| Justification: fails to build from source
| User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
| Usertags: ftbfs
| X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
|
| Dear Maintaine
Hi Seb,
On 8 January 2016 at 14:54, Sébastien Villemot wrote:
| Package: r-base-core
| Version: 3.2.3-1
| Severity: grave
That will deprive a couple (ten or hundred) thousand users of R because ...
| Control: affects -1 r-cran-ncdf4 r-cran-afex r-cran-coin r-cran-scales
r-cran-ape r-cran-rms r
On 8 January 2016 at 14:54, Sébastien Villemot wrote:
| Package: r-base-core
| Version: 3.2.3-1
| Severity: grave
| Control: affects -1 r-cran-ncdf4 r-cran-afex r-cran-coin r-cran-scales
r-cran-ape r-cran-rms r-cran-timeseries r-cran-dosefinding r-cran-maps
r-cran-statmod
|
| -BEGIN PGP SIG
On 8 January 2016 at 16:12, Sébastien Villemot wrote:
| Le vendredi 08 janvier 2016 à 08:59 -0600, Dirk Eddelbuettel a écrit :
|
| > On 8 January 2016 at 14:54, Sébastien Villemot wrote:
| > | Package: r-base-core
| > | Version: 3.2.3-1
| > | Severity: grave
| >
| > That wil
On 8 January 2016 at 16:44, Sébastien Villemot wrote:
| Le vendredi 08 janvier 2016 à 09:35 -0600, Dirk Eddelbuettel a écrit :
|
| > We can probably square this up. It smells like something due to gcc-5 as
the
| > same code worked for years. Every now and then we do have to te
701 - 800 of 2430 matches
Mail list logo
