Package: synce-serial
Version: 0.9.1-2
Severity: grave
Please follow udev/hotplug transition. The package depends currently
on hotplug, but current udev conflicts with hotplug and hotplug
is considered obsolete. Therefore it is not installable on a
up-to-date system.
-- System Information:
Debia
Package: initramfs-tools
Severity: normal
http://bugzilla.ubuntu.com/show_bug.cgi?id=17388
This issue is also valid in debian AFAIK, please manage this controller
adding both modules to the initramfs image. Of course, a workaround
is adding the right module to /etc/mkinitramfs/modules by hand.
-
Package: gpr
Version: 0.9deb-6
Followup-For: Bug #330523
/usr/sbin/dpkg-divert --list gpr
diversion of /usr/bin/lpr to /usr/bin/lpr.not.gpr by gpr
ls -l /usr/bin/lpr*
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 20 2005-06-05 23:14 /usr/bin/lpr ->
/usr/bin/lpr.not.gpr*
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 6568 2005-08-17 13:41
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Francesco Paolo Lovergine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: netgo
Version : 0.5
Upstream Author : Per Johansson
* URL : http://netgo.hjolug.org/
* License : GPL
Description : KDE tool to interactively
Package: dupload
Version: 2.6.3.2
Severity: normal
Result is:
announcing to
Exim is a Mail Transfer Agent. It is normally called by Mail User Agents,
not directly from a shell command line. Options and/or arguments control
what it does when called. For a list of options, see the Exim documentati
reassign 312216 lftp
thanks
Maintainer,
You should probably reassign this once more to libgnutls and/or check
if it's reproducible with current libgnutls12.
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMA
tags 207136 - wontfix
thanks
Next major version will use more than 1 configuration file in my init script.
So it's the case to move to /etc/proftpd/ dir in transition.
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EM
On Sun, Sep 11, 2005 at 04:51:37PM +1000, Andrew Pollock wrote:
> Package: proftpd
> Version: 1.2.10-15sarge1.0.1
> Followup-For: Bug #41089
>
> Hello,
>
> I've noticed this problem is still the case in the version in Sarge.
> ProFTPd supports a -t option to test the configuration, so it would be
Awaiting for transition to be buildable on sid... :-(
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: debpool
Version: 0.1.10
Severity: important
See for instance
http://pkg-grass.alioth.debian.org/debian-gis/dists/sarge/main/source/
It seems gpg fails (no errors logged btw) and generated empy file is
silently put in place.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT p
On Wed, Aug 31, 2005 at 11:25:43PM -0400, Terran Melconian wrote:
> Package: proftpd
> Version: 1.2.10
>
> In Proftpd 1.2.4, I had a configuration file with a section like this:
>
>
>
> DenyAll
>
>
>
>
>
> AllowAll
>
>
>
On Fri, Aug 26, 2005 at 11:10:06AM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 26, 2005 at 11:57:46AM +0200, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
> >Steve
> >
> >I would propose to add that specific patch for next stable release,
> >else pserver feature will be completely broken on sarge...
>
> Hmmm.
>
Package: kdebase-dev
Version: 4:3.3.2-1
Severity: grave
Dunno if you are waiting for c++ transition completion, anyway current
sid version is not installable. Any reason to not move the experimental
one in the sid pool? That's just for notice.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstab
Package: dircproxy
Version: 1.0.5-4
Severity: wishlist
Did you consider to add an init script to run dircproxy in daemon mode
if a global configuration file exists under /etc? I find it quite useful
in the fetchmail case. Someone could be interested in that for personal
workstations.
-- System In
tags 319849 + security
found 319849 1.2.10-15
thanks
done
On Sat, Aug 20, 2005 at 09:35:39AM +0200, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> OoO En cette matinée ensoleillée du jeudi 18 août 2005, vers 09:18,
> Francesco Paolo Lovergine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait:
>
> >> Shoul
On Thu, Aug 18, 2005 at 08:57:27AM +0200, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> OoO En cette matinée pluvieuse du lundi 25 juillet 2005, vers 10:42,
> "Francesco P. Lovergine" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait:
>
> > I pointed both bugs at the very start of july (or end of june?)
> > to both stable and testing sect
On Tue, Aug 16, 2005 at 02:08:26PM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 15, 2005 at 01:14:45AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > Joey Hess writes:
> > >altgcc
> >
> > I didn't realize that this one still does exist. Please remove it from
> > unstable.
>
> A number of libc5 related
On Fri, Jul 22, 2005 at 07:50:57PM +0200, Igor Genibel wrote:
> Package: proftpd
> Severity: important
>
>
> Hi Francesco,
>
> We encounter a serious problem with proftpd since the -10 version on our
> webhosting platform.
> The -9 version does not have this bug.
> We have machine in Sarge and w
On Wed, Jul 20, 2005 at 04:41:36PM +, Eduardo Pérez wrote:
> On 2005-07-20 01:04:37 +0200, Martin Pitt wrote:
> > Eduardo Pérez [2005-07-18 15:56 +]:
> > > I just upgraded aolserver4-nspostgres and it doesn't work anymore with
> > > postgresql-7.4 because it's compiled for postgresql-8.0 on
On Sat, Jul 16, 2005 at 02:08:45AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> reopen 318572
> thanks
>
> > Ok, should go whenever new libwxgtk2.4 will enter sid...
>
> No, there won't *be* another libwxgtk2.4 package in sid: libwxgtk2.4 is a
> C++ library, which means it must be renamed as part of the ABI tr
severity 318017 seriuos
thanks
Indeed smb4k 0.5.2 FTBS with gcc4 due to the same problem in the kdelibs4-dev
header file.
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Jul 08, 2005 at 12:41:21AM +0300, Delian Krustev wrote:
> Package: proftpd-doc
> Severity: normal
>
>
> >From doc-base package description:
> __
> Various third-party systems such as 'dwww', 'dhelp' and 'doc-central'
> use this data to provide a catalog of available documentation.
> __
>
severity 317282 normal
tags 317282 + unreproducible
tags 317282 + moreinfo
thanks
Please, do not presume your problem is a general one without verification.
Of course it installs perfectly in a fresh install on sarge (just
verified to be sure, but it's a quite macroscopic issue to be never
pointe
tags 315687 pending
thanks
Ok, Murphy's law in action...
Feel free to use my repos:
http://people.debian.org/debian/sarge/ ./
http://people.debian.org/debian/sid/ ./
ftp-master is moving so no new uploads until again available.
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PR
On Sat, Jun 25, 2005 at 12:09:31AM -0400, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 25, 2005 at 12:14:34AM +0200, Michael Bergbauer wrote:
> > Package: proftpd
> > Version: 1.2.10-17
> > Severity: critical
> > Justification: root security hole
>
> > This bug was not reproducable on 1.2.10-16, I had to in
tags 315687 sid
thanks
On Sat, Jun 25, 2005 at 12:14:34AM +0200, Michael Bergbauer wrote:
> Package: proftpd
> Version: 1.2.10-17
> Severity: critical
> Justification: root security hole
>
> In the most recent (1.2.10-17) version of proftpd, the permissions used
> by the daemon are somehome mixed
reopen 308313
retitle 308313 proftpd: 1.2.10-15 segfaults randomly when DelayEngine is on,
preventing users login
tags 308313 + sarge
tags 308313 + upstream
tags 308313 + fixed-upstream
thanks
This problem is apparently fixed by the patch suggested in
http://bugs.proftpd.org/show_bug.cgi?id=263
Package: dbs
Version: 0.35
Severity: minor
find: warning: you have specified the -maxdepth option after a
non-option argument -type, but options are not positional (-maxdepth
affects tests specified before it as well as those
specified after it). Please specify options before other arguments.
--
Package: autorespond
Version: 2.0.4-2
Severity: minor
Just look at the man page to understand what's the issue :)
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /
On Mon, Jun 13, 2005 at 11:04:00AM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> Package: proftpd
> Version: 1.2.10-16
> Severity: serious
> Justification: no longer builds from source
>
> This version of proftpd fails to autobuild on all architectures. Here's one
> of
> the failed build logs:
>
> http://buil
tags 312849 + wontfix
tags 312849 + sarge
thanks
On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 02:02:23PM -0500, John Goerzen wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 04:32:26PM +0200, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 08:38:56AM -0500, John Goerzen wrote:
> > > Note that this specifies a *storage* quot
On Sat, Jun 11, 2005 at 03:05:58AM +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 08, 2004 at 04:08:02PM -0800, Karsten M. Self wrote:
> >> In that case, 280706 is not a bug -- closing.
> >
> > Disagreed:
> >
> > - It's a change in behavior.
> > - It's not documented.
> >
> > Either revert
On Wed, Jun 08, 2005 at 04:01:35AM -0700, Chris Waters wrote:
> Yes, I'm sorry, but if you need a non-threaded tcl core, you'll have
> to use the tcl8.3 packages, which are still provided for just this
> reason. As Francesco pointed out, some packages require a threaded
> tcl. This is not a bug,
On Wed, Jun 08, 2005 at 10:40:56AM +0200, Alain Degreffe wrote:
> Package: tcl8.4
> Version: 8.4.9-1
> Severity: important
>
> The forking mechanism is broken in all tcl version compiled with.
> threads This is well known for a long time. Upstream Maintainer.
> should fix that but in th
severity 312216 normal
tags 312216 + moreinfo
thanks
Would you please show your proftpd.conf setup?
How are you using lftp (args and so)? Would you please specify if auth
completes ok or not?
See
http://www.castaglia.org/proftpd/doc/contrib/ProFTPD-mini-HOWTO-Debugging.html
http://www.castaglia
On Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 08:01:37PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Well, this bug is now merged with 262395, but they seem to be opposite sides
> of the same bugfix; the dependency on efmt is a result of the changes in
> 1.9-9 that were supposed to fix 262395/306595.
>
> I don't really know anythin
On Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 03:22:07PM +0200, Francesco Paolo Lovergine wrote:
> I found the same problem on my desktop at work and my laptop.
> xmltex wrongly suppose the efmt is available:
>
> cat /etc/texmf/fmt.d/40xmltex.cnf
> xmltex tex language.dat&latex xml
I found the same problem on my desktop at work and my laptop.
xmltex wrongly suppose the efmt is available:
cat /etc/texmf/fmt.d/40xmltex.cnf
xmltex tex language.dat&latex xmltex.ini
pdfxmltex pdftex language.dat&pdflatex pdfxmltex.ini
cat /usr/share/texmf/tex/xmltex
A possible patch could be the following, but please check against the two
archs which give problem...
--- endian.h.old2005-05-28 18:03:12.157472224 +0200
+++ endian.h2005-05-28 18:06:03.729389328 +0200
@@ -26,15 +26,7 @@
#ifndef _endian_h_
#define _endian_h_
-#if G_BYTE_ORDER == G
reopen 308313
thanks
Sorry, too soon closed the issue. The problem persists after a good
number of logins. Currently on setting off DelayEngine works.
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, May 26, 2005 at 08:56:26PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
> >> However, I am a bit worried that this might break sbuild on hurd-i386,
> >> as networking inside the chroot is AFAIK not known to work reliably on
> >> the Hurd, and users of sbuild have reported trouble with it (though
> >> perhaps
On Thu, May 26, 2005 at 08:15:35PM +0200, Michael Banck wrote:
> The question rather is: Why does sbuild not run apt in the chroot? I
> guess the answer is: "Because upstream's (i.e. the one used on the
> official buildds) does not either, and there was no convincing argument
> to change it".
>
On Thu, May 26, 2005 at 05:49:20PM +0200, Alexis Sukrieh wrote:
> Note that the package on my repository was renamed:
> http://www.sukria.net/debian/source/bugzilla_2.16.7-7sarge1_i386.changes
>
> I followed Frankie's advices for making the t-p-u the right way.
>
> For me, the package is ready f
Would you please have a try. Of course you should set on the DelayEngine
directive.
Thanks. I hope this version would enter sarge.
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
merge 310863 271031
thanks
On Thu, May 26, 2005 at 02:53:50PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
> Package: sbuild
> Version: 0.35
> Severity: normal
>
> Hi,
>
> sbuild uses the non-chrooted install of apt, rather than the copy
> installed inside the chroot. I've not investigated why yet.
>
> If apt-li
On Wed, May 25, 2005 at 01:47:27AM +0200, Laszlo Boszormenyi wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-05-24 at 23:32 +0200, Francesco Paolo Lovergine wrote:
> > About that specific patch, the nice thing is that the nude patch applies
> > nicely to debian kernel source, but kernel-patch fails :-?
>
On Tue, May 24, 2005 at 11:20:06PM +0200, Laszlo Boszormenyi wrote:
> Hi Francesco again,
>
> On Tue, 2005-05-24 at 14:20 +0200, Francesco Paolo Lovergine wrote:
> > If you think this package is anyway useful at least with
> > an up-to-date vanilla kernel and sure that it app
Package: kernel-patch-ttl
Version: 2.4.24-1
Severity: grave
Dear Pawel Wiecek
As reported in http://people.debian.org/~frankie/kernel-patches-checks.txt,
kernel-patch-ttl does not
apply clean to a current kernel-source. If you think this package is anyway
useful at least with
an up-to-
Package: kernel-patch-quota
Version: 2.4.24-1
Severity: grave
Dear Pawel Wiecek
As reported in http://people.debian.org/~frankie/kernel-patches-checks.txt,
kernel-patch-quota does not
apply clean to a current kernel-source. If you think this package is anyway
useful at least with
an up
Package: kernel-patch-2.4-kgdb
Version: 1.9-1
Severity: grave
Dear Brandt Dusthimer
As reported in http://people.debian.org/~frankie/kernel-patches-checks.txt,
kernel-patch-2.4-kgdb does not
apply clean to a current kernel-source. If you think this package is anyway
useful at least wit
Package: kernel-patch-relayfs
Version: 2.6.9-1
Severity: grave
Dear Yann Dirson
As reported in http://people.debian.org/~frankie/kernel-patches-checks.txt,
kernel-patch-relayfs does not
apply clean to a current kernel-source. If you think this package is anyway
useful at least with
an
Package: kernel-patch-grsecurity2
Version: 2.1.5-1
Severity: grave
Dear Laszlo Boszormenyi (GCS)
As reported in http://people.debian.org/~frankie/kernel-patches-checks.txt,
kernel-patch-grsecurity2 does not
apply clean to a current kernel-source. If you think this package is anyway
use
Package: kernel-patch-psd
Version: 2.4.24-1
Severity: grave
Dear Pawel Wiecek
As reported in http://people.debian.org/~frankie/kernel-patches-checks.txt,
kernel-patch-psd does not
apply clean to a current kernel-source. If you think this package is anyway
useful at least with
an up-to-
Package: kernel-patch-quota
Version: 2.4.24-1
Severity: grave
Dear Pawel Wiecek
As reported in http://people.debian.org/~frankie/kernel-patches-checks.txt,
kernel-patch-quota does not
apply clean to a current kernel-source. If you think this package is anyway
useful at least with
an up
Package: kernel-patch-time
Version: 2.4.24-1
Severity: grave
Dear Pawel Wiecek
As reported in http://people.debian.org/~frankie/kernel-patches-checks.txt,
kernel-patch-time does not
apply clean to a current kernel-source. If you think this package is anyway
useful at least with
an up-t
Package: kernel-patch-badram
Version: 2.6.5.2-1
Severity: grave
Dear Yann Dirson
As reported in http://people.debian.org/~frankie/kernel-patches-checks.txt,
kernel-patch-badram does not
apply clean to a current kernel-source. If you think this package is anyway
useful at least with
an
Package: kernel-patch-cryptoloop
Version: 2.4.22.0-25.1
Severity: grave
Dear Juergen Strobel (private)
As reported in http://people.debian.org/~frankie/kernel-patches-checks.txt,
kernel-patch-cryptoloop does not
apply clean to a current kernel-source. If you think this package is anyway
Package: kernel-patch-2.4-cobalt
Version: 13
Severity: grave
Dear Russell Coker
As reported in http://people.debian.org/~frankie/kernel-patches-checks.txt,
kernel-patch-2.4-cobalt does not
apply clean to a current kernel-source. If you think this package is anyway
useful at least with
Package: kernel-patch-2.4-cobalt
Version: 13
Severity: grave
Dear Russell Coker
As reported in http://people.debian.org/~frankie/kernel-patches-checks.txt,
kernel-patch-2.4-cobalt does not
apply clean to a current kernel-source. If you think this package is anyway
useful at least with
Package: kernel-patch-2.4-cobalt
Version: 13
Severity: grave
Dear Russell Coker
As reported in http://people.debian.org/~frankie/kernel-patches-checks.txt,
kernel-patch-2.4-cobalt does not
apply clean to a current kernel-source. If you think this package is anyway
useful at least with
Package: kernel-patch-2.4-cobalt
Version: 13
Severity: grave
Dear Russell Coker
As reported in http://people.debian.org/~frankie/kernel-patches-checks.txt,
kernel-patch-2.4-cobalt does not
apply clean to a current kernel-source. If you think this package is anyway
useful at least with
Package: kernel-patch-2.4-cobalt
Version: 13
Severity: grave
Dear Russell Coker
As reported in http://people.debian.org/~frankie/kernel-patches-checks.txt,
kernel-patch-2.4-cobalt does not
apply clean to a current kernel-source. If you think this package is anyway
useful at least with
Package: kernel-patch-2.4-cobalt
Version: 13
Severity: grave
Dear Russell Coker
As reported in http://people.debian.org/~frankie/kernel-patches-checks.txt,
kernel-patch-2.4-cobalt does not
apply clean to a current kernel-source. If you think this package is anyway
useful at least with
Package: kernel-patch-2.4-cobalt
Version: 13
Severity: grave
Dear Russell Coker
As reported in http://people.debian.org/~frankie/kernel-patches-checks.txt,
kernel-patch-2.4-cobalt does not
apply clean to a current kernel-source. If you think this package is anyway
useful at least with
Package: kernel-patch-2.4-cobalt
Version: 13
Severity: grave
Dear Russell Coker
As reported in http://people.debian.org/~frankie/kernel-patches-checks.txt,
kernel-patch-2.4-cobalt does not
apply clean to a current kernel-source. If you think this package is anyway
useful at least with
Package: kernel-patch-2.4-cobalt
Version: 13
Severity: grave
Dear Russell Coker
As reported in http://people.debian.org/~frankie/kernel-patches-checks.txt,
kernel-patch-2.4-cobalt does not
apply clean to a current kernel-source. If you think this package is anyway
useful at least with
Package: kernel-patch-2.4-cobalt
Version: 13
Severity: grave
Dear Russell Coker
As reported in http://people.debian.org/~frankie/kernel-patches-checks.txt,
kernel-patch-2.4-cobalt does not
apply clean to a current kernel-source. If you think this package is anyway
useful at least with
Package: kernel-patch-2.4-cobalt
Version: 13
Severity: grave
Dear Russell Coker
As reported in http://people.debian.org/~frankie/kernel-patches-checks.txt,
kernel-patch-2.4-cobalt does not
apply clean to a current kernel-source. If you think this package is anyway
useful at least with
Package: kernel-patch-adamantix
Version: 1.7
Severity: grave
Dear Javier Fernandez-Sanguino Pen~a
As reported in http://people.debian.org/~frankie/kernel-patches-checks.txt,
kernel-patch-adamantix does not
apply clean to a current kernel-source. If you think this package is anyway
usef
Package: kernel-patch-adamantix
Version: 1.7
Severity: grave
Dear Javier Fernandez-Sanguino Pen~a
As reported in http://people.debian.org/~frankie/kernel-patches-checks.txt,
kernel-patch-adamantix does not
apply clean to a current kernel-source. If you think this package is anyway
usef
Package: kernel-patch-adamantix
Version: 1.7
Severity: grave
Dear Javier Fernandez-Sanguino Pen~a
As reported in http://people.debian.org/~frankie/kernel-patches-checks.txt,
kernel-patch-adamantix does not
apply clean to a current kernel-source. If you think this package is anyway
usef
Package: kernel-patch-adamantix
Version: 1.7
Severity: grave
Dear Javier Fernandez-Sanguino Pen~a
As reported in http://people.debian.org/~frankie/kernel-patches-checks.txt,
kernel-patch-adamantix does not
apply clean to a current kernel-source. If you think this package is anyway
usef
On Thu, May 19, 2005 at 05:26:50PM +0200, Alexis Sukrieh wrote:
>
> The package source is available on my repository:
>
> deb-src http://www.sukria.net/debian ./
>
> I don't know what is the best thing to do here, as this is an update of
> the 2.16 package (which is in testing) and our sid p
On Fri, May 20, 2005 at 10:24:36AM +0200, Rainer Schöpf wrote:
> Thanks for fixing this. I notice that the correction didn't make it into
> sarge (yet).
>
> Should I raise the severity to release-critical? It certainly is for me.
>
> Kind regards,
>Rainer Schöpf
I'm quite confident importa
On Thu, May 19, 2005 at 08:50:24AM -0700, Rupa Schomaker wrote:
> aha, replaced with prior version and all is well.
>
Previous version of libldap2 I suppose :)
> On 5/19/2005 5:04 AM, Francesco Paolo Lovergine wrote:
> > On Thu, May 19, 2005 at 03:29:10AM -0700, Rupa
On Thu, May 19, 2005 at 03:29:10AM -0700, Rupa Schomaker wrote:
> Package: proftpd-ldap
> Version: 1.2.10-13
> Severity: important
> File: /usr/sbin/proftpd
>
> After dist-upgrade I ge the following:
>
> sudo /etc/init.d/proftpd start
> Starting ProFTPD ftp daemon: /usr/sbin/proftpd: error while
Package: teapop
Version: 0.3.7-3
Severity: wishlist
Some options like '-n' or '-N' could be passed in /etc/default/teapop by
the admin. Please, modify the init script to allow that nicely.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (500, 't
On Sun, May 15, 2005 at 05:48:54PM +0200, Heinrich Wendel wrote:
> Package: proftpd-ldap
> Version: 1.2.10-10
> Severity: normal
>
> After upgrading proftp-ldap to 1.2.10-11 from 1.2.10-10 PAM
> authentication isn't working. I get the following in my syslog:
>
> May 15 17:15:37 korinth proftpd:
>
severity 308861 important
tags 308861 + pending
thanks
Justification: it renders LDAP unusable with TLS, with obviuous security
impact :-(
On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 09:35:14PM +0200, Robert Schüler wrote:
>
> Package: proftpd-ldap
> Version: 1.2.10-11
>
> While updating proftpd-ldap to 1.2.10-11
tags 308578 + upstream
tags 308578 + fixed-upstream
tags 308578 + patch
thanks
On Wed, May 11, 2005 at 10:39:49AM +0200, Rainer Schöpf wrote:
> Package: proftpd
> Version: 1.2.10-10
> Severity: important
>
> I maintain a large anonymous ftp server, ftp.dante.de a.k.a.
> dante.ctan.org. We rely on
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Francesco P. Lovergine" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: gstat
Version : 2.4.4
Upstream Author : Edzer J. Pebesma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> et al.
* URL : http://www.gstat.org/
* License : GPL
Description : A program f
On Tue, May 10, 2005 at 10:07:45AM -0400, jlivings wrote:
> I recently attempted to install Openmosixview 1.5-7 and encountered the
> same bug Jesús did. Checking on packages.debian.org revealed that
> /usr/bin/openmosixcollector was not installed. I then downloaded the
> soruce package for 1.5-7
On Sun, May 08, 2005 at 05:13:34PM +0200, Klaus Ethgen wrote:
> Package: proftpd
> Version: 1.2.10-11
> Followup-For: Bug #237050
>
> As this makes the new version not work anymore this seems to be no
> normal bug than an important one. (I do not know if and how to increase
> the severity of a all
severity 308065 minor
thanks
On Sat, May 07, 2005 at 12:28:40PM -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> Package: sbuild
> Version: 0.35
>
> The file /usr/share/sbuild/README-buildd.chroot.pre-sarge states
> the following:
>
> buildd.chroot
> =
> - a debootstrap script by Ryan Murray, mo
tags 304275 + upstream
thanks
On Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 09:37:26AM +0800, Dan Jacobson wrote:
> Package: grass-doc
> Version: 5.7.0+6.0.0beta2-1
> Severity: normal
> File: /usr/share/doc/grass-doc/html/
>
> Do any of the files here pass "validate", the Offline HTMLHelp.com
> Validator http://www.h
severity 298613 normal
tags 298613 + upstream wontfix
forwarded 298613 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
thanks
Me and upstream consider this kind of issue quite secondary.
Upstream will not fix it AFAIK.
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe"
On Sat, Apr 02, 2005 at 03:26:32AM +0200, Michael Banck wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 02, 2005 at 01:57:21AM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
> > The file /usr/share/doc/sbuild/README.Debian says:
> >
> > NOTE: sbuild must be run in the directory that has the
> > chroot-{stable,testing,unstable} symlink or it w
On Fri, Mar 25, 2005 at 10:17:06PM +0100, Michael Banck wrote:
> tags 300145 +patch
> thanks
>
> On Fri, Mar 18, 2005 at 12:03:24AM +0100, Michael Banck wrote:
> > sbuild overrides the distribution with 'unstable' by default if nothing
> > else is specified. However, as an end-user tool, sbuild s
On Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 07:35:09PM -0600, Georg Lehner wrote:
> Package: aolserver4
> Version: 4.0.10-1
> Severity: wishlist
>
>
> Hello!
>
> I am using aolserver4 since about two/three years in production, and have been
> very glad you made these great Debian Package.
>
> This weekend I finall
tags 301275 + upstream
forwarded 301275 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
thanks
On Thu, Mar 24, 2005 at 10:09:42PM +0100, Michiel Brandenburg wrote:
> Package: proftpd
> Version: 1.2.10-10
> Severity: important
>
> Hi,
> I have had several machines now ( identical setups ) that have had their
> proftpd
> die
On Sat, Mar 19, 2005 at 02:33:30AM -0800, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>
> > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.11
> > severity 300367 normal
> Bug#300367: libc5-altdev: /usr/i486-linuxlibc1 not FHS compliant
> Severit
On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 12:08:06PM -0500, sean finney wrote:
>
> that would be helpful. also, could you try the latest uploaded version?
> i believe that 4.0.24-2 may fix this problem anyway.
>
Yes, -2 seems ok, on both boxes. Feel free to close the report.
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
--
To
tags 296790 + upstream
thanks
On Thu, Feb 24, 2005 at 06:55:11PM +0100, Michal J. Gajda wrote:
> Package: smb4k
> Version: 0.5.1-1
> Severity: normal
>
> When mounting a share, the IP should be taken from NMB lookup instead of
> DNS. (Like WinXP does.) It breaks WinXP shares compatibility when
>
On Sat, Feb 19, 2005 at 12:52:38PM -0700, Joel Aelwyn wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 19, 2005 at 10:10:59AM +0100, Francesco Paolo Lovergine wrote:
> > Package: debpool
> > Version: 0.1.10
> > Severity: important
> >
> > Current experimental pkg creates invalid .source
Package: debpool
Version: 0.1.10
Severity: important
Current experimental pkg creates invalid .source files, which do miss the
.dsc entry. That renders 'apt-get source' unusable on a debpool archive.
See debian-gis archive for an example:
http://pkg-grass.alioth.debian.org/debian-gis
-- System I
On Fri, Feb 18, 2005 at 08:26:38PM +0100, Mattia Dongili wrote:
> retitle 295834 Always create startup scripts and warn if cpufreqd cannot start
> thanks
>
> On Fri, Feb 18, 2005 at 08:08:32PM +0100, Francesco Paolo Lovergine wrote:
> [...]
> > of needed modules at run-tim
On Fri, Feb 18, 2005 at 07:51:31PM +0100, Mattia Dongili wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 18, 2005 at 01:46:17PM +0100, Francesco Paolo Lovergine wrote:
> > Package: cpufreqd
> > Version: 1.2.2-2
> > Severity: normal
> >
> > Just installed on my new thinkp
Package: cpufreqd
Version: 1.2.2-2
Severity: normal
Just installed on my new thinkpad, all works but symlinks missed.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.
On Mon, Feb 14, 2005 at 12:04:12AM +0100, Michael Banck wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 29, 2005 at 02:00:57AM +0100, Santiago Vila wrote:
> > This package should use /usr/share/sbuild instead of /usr/lib/sbuild,
> > as it does only contain architecture-independent stuff.
>
> Actually, I think we should move
On Sun, Feb 13, 2005 at 12:07:06PM +1100, Paul Hampson wrote:
> > So what if we had two editions of libmysqlclient, one of them
> > ssl-enabled and the other - as currently - not? That would allow
> > using ssl whenever possible. I think that could be done, without
> > breaking things.
>
> That's
301 - 400 of 409 matches
Mail list logo
