Package: gnubiff
Version: 2.1.8-1
Severity: normal
I've been having this problem for some time, trying to find a
pattern to the behaviour - no success yet
Gnubiff works fine on startup and then for a few hours after
this, but then it stops noticing new email - i.e., the icon
does not
Hi Calum,
Thank you for the bug report. I can't yet see what the problem is.
Could you do a wajig update priori to the wajig toupgrade (as the
user and separately as root) and let me know again the output of the
two wajig toupgrades.
Thanks,
Graham
Received Sat 14 Jan 2006 2:03am +1100 from
Received Sat 05 Nov 2005 2:49pm +1100 from John V. Belmonte:
Package: wajig
Version: 2.0.29
Severity: normal
When running wajig source, hitting Ctrl-C at the Do you want to continue?
prompt causes wajig to behave as if you've entered yes.
Hi John,
Thanks for the bug report.
Could you
Thanks for the feedback John. I've reverted the SOURCE command to not
call build-depend. This will be in 2.0.30.
Regards,
Graham
Received Sat 05 Nov 2005 2:49pm +1100 from John V. Belmonte:
Package: wajig
Version: 2.0.29
Severity: normal
Starting with wajig 2.0.26, the source command
Received Wed 28 Sep 2005 7:18pm +1000 from John V. Belmonte:
Package: wajig
Version: 2.0.29
Severity: normal
Bash completion does not include the list-log command. Please confirm that
there are no others missing. Ideally the bash completion script would be
generated from wajig itself
Received Mon 07 Nov 2005 1:03am +1100 from John Belmonte:
Graham, since you removed the implicit apt-get build-dep, this is likely
no longer an issue for wajig source. However, it may be worth
investigating if other commands such as wajig build have a similar issue.
Yep. Now fixed.
Received Wed 13 Jul 2005 3:25pm +1000 from Kamaraju Kusumanchi:
Package: wajig
Version: 2.0.29
Severity: wishlist
Hi,
I love wajig and am hoping this would be easy to fix. When I have the
/etc/bash_completion sourced in ~/.bashrc, I can do
wajig install vim-coTAB
and it will
Received Sun 09 Oct 2005 5:49am +1000 from David Fedoruk:
package: wajig
replace: wajig
version: 2.0.29
replace: 2.0.20
severity: critical
I normally run wajig as an unprivialiged user from my home directory
using sudo like I do for all other packages install related commands.
Wajig
Received Sun 09 Oct 2005 7:34am +1000 from David Fedoruk:
HI:
I'm not sure why you think it might be a critical bug. It doesn't
render the system unusable. In fact, if it did overwrite sources.list
then I might even consider that a critical bug instead.
I was thinking along the
Received Sun 23 Oct 2005 5:34am +1000 from Florian Ragwitz:
Package: wajig
Version: 2.0.29
Severity: wishlist
Hello,
it would be nice to be able to search for packages that build-depend on
another. I don't like using grep-dctrl for that.
TIA,
Flo
Hi Flo,
Could you give some
Received Tue 15 Nov 2005 1:04am +1100 from Yves-Alexis Perez:
Package: wajig
Version: 2.0.30
Severity: normal
After doing an update, wajig counts new packages to present some stats.
It uses tail with a deprecated syntax: tail -|+N, while it should use tail
-n -|+N, so it doesnt work with
Thanks for the suggestion. I'll look into including it with the next
release.
Regards,
Graham
Received Sat 09 Sep 2006 6:04pm +1000 from Francesco Potorti:
Package: wajig
Version: 2.0.34
Severity: wishlist
Wajig is missing a `verify' command (? la rpm -K) for checking a
packag?s sum
Thanks for the feedback. A good point. I'll double check I don;t use
it dynamically, and then consider removing it from the distributed
code.
Regards,
Graham
Received Thu 02 Nov 2006 11:23pm +1100 from Reuben Thomas:
Package: wajig
Version: 2.0.34
Severity: minor
Why are you distributing
Thanks for that. It has been fixed and will be in 2.0.35.
Received Fri 03 Nov 2006 10:40am +1100 from Reuben Thomas:
Package: wajig
Version: 2.0.34
Severity: minor
The command list-section is listed twice by list-commands. The
second time it should be list-commands.
-- System
Received Sat 09 Sep 2006 6:04pm +1000 from Francesco Potorti:
Package: wajig
Version: 2.0.34
Severity: wishlist
Wajig is missing a `verify' command (? la rpm -K) for checking a
packag?s sum using debsums or whatever.
Do you know of specific debian commands to do this check?
Thanks,
Received Fri 03 Nov 2006 11:04am +1100 from Reuben Thomas:
Package: wajig
Version: 2.0.34
Severity: minor
A small thing, but a visual irritant.
Thanks. But where does this occur?
Regards,
Graham
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?
Received Fri 03 Nov 2006 10:25am +1100 from Reuben Thomas:
Package: wajig
Version: 2.0.34
Severity: wishlist
If you must have synonyms, please have list-commands group them.
wajig's command list is too long to take in easily, which is why I
don't think there should be synonyms, but at
Thanks Reuben. That is a very good list of suggestions. I will start
working my way through them. (May need patience things are quite
busy at present.)
Regards,
Graham
Received Sun 05 Nov 2006 4:54am +1100 from Reuben Thomas:
On Sat, 4 Nov 2006, Graham Williams wrote:
Thanks
Nov 2006 7:13am +1100 from Graham Williams:
Thanks Reuben. That is a very good list of suggestions. I will start
working my way through them. (May need patience things are quite
busy at present.)
Regards,
Graham
Received Sun 05 Nov 2006 4:54am +1100 from Reuben Thomas:
On Sat, 4 Nov
Thanks for the additional information Jeff and confirmation of the
problem on AMD64. Without access to such a machine its a little tricky
to debug but I'll see what I can do.
Regards,
Graham
Received Sun 06 Aug 2006 6:23am +1000 from Jeff King:
Package: wajig
Version: 2.0.34
Followup-For:
Received Mon 07 Aug 2006 8:46pm +1000 from Jeff King:
On Sun, Aug 06, 2006 at 02:30:46PM +1000, Graham Williams wrote:
Thanks for the additional information Jeff and confirmation of the
problem on AMD64. Without access to such a machine its a little tricky
to debug but I'll see what I
Received Tue 08 Jan 2008 9:25pm +1100 from Anthony Campbell:
Package: wajig
Version: n
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
My installed version of wajig has just been removed owing to a
dependency problem on python-apt, which in turn has other dependency
problems.
Package: gxine
Version: 0.5.11-4
Severity: important
gxine has started playing audio out of sync with video.
The audio is 2 seconds behind the video (repeatable).
It was working just fine a few days ago.
Seems to be the same irrespective of source (DVD, DVB, mpeg file)
I have not been able to
Received Thu 02 Jun 2005 4:09am +1000 from August Mayer:
Package: wajig
Version: 2.0.25
Severity: wishlist
It is sometimes useful to specify the target archive for dist-upgrade. For
example, to check whether new archives are in experimental, I would do
apt-get -t experimental dist-upgrade
Received Thu 02 Jun 2005 5:46am +1000 from Graham Williams:
Received Thu 02 Jun 2005 4:09am +1000 from August Mayer:
Package: wajig
Version: 2.0.25
Severity: wishlist
It is sometimes useful to specify the target archive for dist-upgrade. For
example, to check whether new archives
Received Tue 01 Feb 2005 8:08am +1100 from Alfie Costa:
On 1 Feb 2005 at 6:55, Graham Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
wajig list-names README ; echo $?
0
I have a fix for this bug and it will appear and be closed in 2.0.21.
Sounds good, you're the very model of a modern
Package: quodlibet
Version: 0.7-2
Severity: normal
Quod Libet is very nice - thanks for the application.
I notice that when I click Pause, the audio device remains locked.
Thus if I (or another user) want to play music with another player
I need to exit from Quod Libet.
Compare this to Rythm
Package: quodlibet
Version: 0.8-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Updataing my system this morning lead to Quod Libet failing:
$ quodlibet
Traceback (most recent call last):
File /usr/bin/quodlibet, line 2792, in ?
library.init(const.LIBRARY)
File
Received Sun 06 Feb 2005 4:15pm +1100 from Joe Wreschnig:
Can you send the output of the following Python script? Thanks.
#!/usr/bin/python
import locale
print locale.getdefaultlocale()
print locale.getpreferredencoding()
--
Joe Wreschnig [EMAIL PROTECTED]
$ cat test.py
Received Wed 16 Feb 2005 8:10pm +1100 from David Liontooth:
Package: wajig
Version: 2.0.22
Severity: minor
Something appears to have gone wrong with the new package count in recent
versions of wajig -- not sure where it started. Consider this snippet:
Replacing available packages
Received Wed 16 Feb 2005 10:25am +1100 from Matthew Hawkins:
Package: wajig
Version: 2.0.22
Severity: normal
When I do wajig changelog libgtk2.0-dev I get the following:
matthew:~wajig changelog libgtk2.0-dev | less
W: Unable to locate package gtk+2.0
E: No packages found
Thanks for
an installable package. Now fixed and will be available in 2.0.21 (in
That should be 2.0.23.
Regards,
Graham
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received Fri 18 Feb 2005 9:53am +1100 from A Costa:
Package: wajig
Version: 2.0.22
Severity: normal
Start 'gjig'. In Package(s): type 'foo'. Press 'List Names'.
A Gnome JIG viewer window appears with a list of names.
Highlight a package name, say 'foobillard'. Close the
Gnome JIG
Received Fri 18 Feb 2005 8:41pm +1100 from Francesco Potorti`:
Package: wajig
Version: 2.0.19-2
Severity: normal
Since a few versions ago, wajig has lacked complete documentation. The
README file still reports that complete documentation can be obtained
with `wajig doc', but this is not
Received Sun 13 Feb 2005 12:24pm +1100 from Diwaker Gupta:
Package: wajig
Version: 2.0.22
Severity: minor
Since the last 3 weeks or so, everytime I do a wajig update, after
downloading the package files, wajig sits there hogging the CPU for
~10-15 seconds. The same operation happens much
Received Sat 19 Feb 2005 8:39am +1100 from Reuben Thomas:
Package: wajig
Version: 2.0.22
Followup-For: Bug #288852
I too have observed this behaviour. The problem is that wajig is
running grep under my default locale (en_GB.UTF-8 in my case) which is
much slower than grep in C locale.
Received Sat 19 Feb 2005 7:51am +1100 from Diwaker Gupta:
On Friday 18 February 2005 12:32 pm, Graham Williams wrote:
Received Sun 13 Feb 2005 12:24pm +1100 from Diwaker Gupta:
Package: wajig
Version: 2.0.22
Severity: minor
Since the last 3 weeks or so, everytime I do a wajig
Received Sat 19 Feb 2005 8:39am +1100 from Reuben Thomas:
Package: wajig
Version: 2.0.22
Followup-For: Bug #288852
I too have observed this behaviour. The problem is that wajig is
running grep under my default locale (en_GB.UTF-8 in my case) which is
much slower than grep in C locale.
Received Sat 19 Feb 2005 9:23pm +1100 from Reuben Thomas:
On Sat, 19 Feb 2005, Graham Williams wrote:
Okay. I do have the framework in place for doing this. But I use a
lot of greps! Anyhow, in /usr/share/wajig/changes.py I have changed
line 172 from
perform.execute(command, noquiet
Received Sat 02 Apr 2005 4:40pm +1000 from David Liontooth:
Package: wajig
Version: 2.0.24
Severity: minor
A persistent error has snuck into recent versions of wajig. When listing
status or
status-match, it doesn't show Previous and Now for installed packages:
# wajig status-match
Received Wed 13 Apr 2005 2:39pm +1000 from David Liontooth:
Package: wajig
Version: 2.0.25
Severity: minor
wajig's new list-log feature is extremely useful for tracking which
packages may have caused problems -- thanks! A nitpick: the date
stamp is currently 2005-04-12T20:27
I
Received Mon 25 Apr 2005 3:23pm +1000 from Jerry Quinn:
Package: wajig
Version: 2.0.25
Severity: wishlist
I'm looking for an equivalent to rpm -q --scripts pkg.
Hi Jerry,
Thanks for the bug report. It looks like a useful idea. A little
more detail would help me though. What would you
Received Mon 25 Apr 2005 3:23pm +1000 from Jerry Quinn:
Package: wajig
Version: 2.0.25
Severity: wishlist
This would be useful output. I'd just put a letter in front of each
package name.
Thanks for the suggestion. This has been implemented and will be
released in version 2.0.26:
Received Sat 02 Apr 2005 4:40pm +1000 from David Liontooth:
Package: wajig
Version: 2.0.24
Severity: minor
A persistent error has snuck into recent versions of wajig. When listing
status or
status-match, it doesn't show Previous and Now for installed packages:
Hi David,
Is this still
Received Tue 26 Apr 2005 12:24pm +1000 from Jerry Quinn:
...
wajig list-scripts most
I'd want to see something like:
package most-2.3-1 scripts
[postinst]
#!/bin/sh
echo hi there
[prerm]
echo Are you sure
Thanks Jerry. I've implemented this for the next version (2.0.26) of
Received Sat 15 Jan 2005 3:47am +1100 from Calum Mackay:
Package: wajig
Version: 2.0.19-1
Severity: normal
For the last few days, certain wajig commands fail when run from root's
cron:
+ wajig update
Traceback (most recent call last):
File /usr/share/wajig/wajig.py, line 31, in ?
Received Fri 25 Feb 2005 5:11pm +1100 from David Liontooth:
Package: wajig
Version: 2.0.24
Severity: minor
This may be a bug in sysv-rc rather than wajig.
The wajig start cupsys command fails silently.
It calls invoke-rc.d cupsys start, which fails.
In contrast, /etc/init.d/cupsys
Received Tue 01 Mar 2005 8:10am +1100 from Karl Schmidt:
Package: wajig
Version: 2.0.22
Severity: wishlist
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (600, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-k7-smp
Locale: LANG=C,
Thanks for the Bug report David.
The HTML format has changed and I'll have to parse it
differently. Will be fixed once I get a chance.
Regards,
Graham
Received Sun 23 Sep 2007 4:12am +1000 from David Liontooth:
Package: wajig
Version: 2.0.34
Severity: minor
Not sure what happened
Received Fri 14 Sep 2007 5:10am +1000 from Alex Malinovich:
Package: wajig
Version: 2.0.37
Severity: normal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Seems that a change on the website has rendered whichpkg largely
useless.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ wajig whichpkg
Received Tue 02 Oct 2007 1:36am +1000 from Jeff King:
Package: wajig
Version: 2.0.37
Severity: wishlist
Running wajig new takes a very long time:
$ time wajig new
[... wajig new output, 5 packages ...]
real1m36.576s
user1m35.570s
sys 0m0.652s
I haven't profiled it
Received Fri 05 Oct 2007 4:13am +1000 from Jeff King:
On Thu, Oct 04, 2007 at 09:06:10PM +1000, Graham Williams wrote:
I've not been able to repeat. For example:
$ time wajig new
[27 packages]
real0m0.996s
user0m0.784s
sys 0m0.336s
$
Wajig is essentially
Hi Jonathon,
Thanks for the bug report below. I'm cleaning up the backlog of bugs
in wajig, and I can't replicate this bug at present. Does it still
happen for you?
Thanks,
Graham
Received Fri 31 Aug 2007 10:10am +1000 from Jonathan Wilson:
Package: wajig
Version: 2.0.34
Severity: normal
Received Mon 19 Mar 2007 7:39am +1100 from Chris AtLee:
Package: wajig
Version: 2.0.34
Severity: normal
wajig should depend on dselect since it requires it for the update
command at least.
Thanks. I've made the change. It will appear in the next release of
wajig.
Regards,
Graham
--
Received Mon 19 Mar 2007 9:53am +1100 from Michael Gilbert:
Package: wajig
Version: 2.0.34
Severity: normal
wajig currently suggests base-config, but this has been superseeded by
locales. the wajig suggests should be modified to reflect this change.
mike
Thanks. I have made the
Thanks for the suggestion.
I'm not sure that the apt-file functionality provides anything more
than what is already in wajig? The locate functionality is called
whichpkg in wajig (and perhaps I'll alias it to locate). Is there
other functionality you were looking for that apt-file provides and
Received Tue 08 May 2007 6:18am +1000 from Reuben Thomas:
On Mon, 7 May 2007, Graham Williams wrote:
I'm not sure that the apt-file functionality provides anything more
than what is already in wajig? The locate functionality is called
whichpkg in wajig (and perhaps I'll alias it to locate
Received Sat 12 May 2007 12:52am +1000 from Thomas Quas:
Hm, what I get here is this:
$ sudo apt-get remove wajig
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
The following packages will be REMOVED:
wajig
0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 1 to remove and 79 not upgraded.
Received Sat 12 May 2007 2:12am +1000 from Gary Koskenmaki:
Package: wajig
Version: 2.0.35
Followup-For: Bug #422596
I ran into this bug during an apt-get upgrade yesterday. After following the
workarounds you gave to
those who first reported this bug, I am still unable to resolve
Thanks Mikhail. That is a very good suggestion. If you had some code
changes to implement this I would be happy to include it. Otherwise it
may be a while before I get a chance to have a look at implementing
it.
Regards,
Graham
Received Thu 17 May 2007 3:03am +1000 from Mikhail Sokolov:
Package: apt
Version: 0.6.41
Severity: normal
Since the upgrade of apt (supporting gpg) into unstable, after the
release of 3.1, my local archive no longer works? I've tried tracking
the problem down on and off over the past few weeks but to no
avail. Not sure if this is an apt problem or a
Thanks for the bug report Kamaraju. I'm currently looking into add
the completion as suggested.
Received Wed 13 Jul 2005 3:25pm +1000 from Kamaraju Kusumanchi:
Package: wajig
Version: 2.0.29
Severity: wishlist
Hi,
I love wajig and am hoping this would be easy to fix. When I have the
Received Wed 27 Jul 2005 6:07pm +1000 from Karl Chen:
Package: wajig
Version: 2.0.29
Severity: normal
For some wajig commands, wajig executes sudo command1 |
sudo command 2..., which is impossible to authenticate
properly. Doing a sudo -v before any pipeline solves it.
Thanks for the
Received Thu 28 Jul 2005 7:11am +1000 from Karl Chen:
On 2005-07-27 02:56 PDT, Graham Williams writes:
For some wajig commands, wajig executes sudo command1 |
sudo command 2..., which is impossible to authenticate
properly. Doing a sudo -v before any pipeline solves
Received Thu 28 Jul 2005 8:28am +1000 from Karl Chen:
On 2005-07-27 14:45 PDT, Graham Williams writes:
Graham Thanks Karl. I'll include this in the next release.
Thanks!
Hi Karl,
After some testing, a problem with the proposed solution is that a
user may have sudo set up
Hi David,
Thanks for the suggestion.
But I would put this one outside the scope of wajig. The UNOFFICIAL
command queries www.apt-get.org and you are probably able to request
there that the experimental package archive be included in their
list.
Regards,
Graham
Received Sat 17 Sep 2005 10:33pm
Thanks Karl. I did use aptitude for a while but it did not interact
so well with apt-get and for various reasons I reverted to apt-get.
you will find various comments in the code relating to the issues with
aptitude. There will also be some discussion of this over the years in
the BTS. Perhaps
.
Regards,
Graham
On 2005-08-10 02:38 PDT, Graham Williams writes:
Graham Thanks Karl. I did use aptitude for a while but it
Graham did not interact so well with apt-get and for various
Graham reasons I reverted to apt-get. you will find various
Graham comments in the code
Received Sat 18 Jun 2005 1:10pm +1000 from David Liontooth:
Package: wajig
Version: 2.0.27
Severity: wishlist
It would be very useful to be able to install all new or all newupgrade
packages,
perhaps simply by allowing install as a parameter to those commands:
wajig new
Received Tue 21 Jun 2005 12:09am +1000 from John V. Belmonte:
Package: wajig
Version: 2.0.27
Severity: normal
When wajig which-pkg is given a package name with the '+' character, it
returns a cryptic message. I expect the following command to yield
libsigc++-1.2-dev, etc.
$ wajig
Package: apt-move
Version: 4.2.23
Followup-For: Bug #316492
I had the same problem. Seems like the new apt provides
libapt-pkg-libc6.3-5-3.9 and apt-move requires
libapt-pkg-libc6.3-5-3.3.
My fix was:
wajig source apt-move
cd apt-move-4.2.23
wajig build apt-move
wajig install
Received Sun 10 Jul 2005 9:25am +1000 from John V. Belmonte:
Package: wajig
Version: 2.0.29
Severity: wishlist
I'd like a wajig command that lists installed packages with distribution
info (i.e. stable, testing, unstable), similar to apt-show-versions.
Thanks for the suggestion John.
Package: hdparm
Version: 6.1-2
Severity: minor
I'm using hdparm -a8 -u on /dev/hda (a CD/DVD).
I need to do this so that DVD viewing is smooth
(at least this is a solution that works) .
Wanted to maintain this over a reboot.
Editted /etc/hdparm.conf as suggested in README.Debian
Symlinked
Received Sat 11 Jun 2005 12:21pm +1000 from Stephen Gran:
This one time, at band camp, Graham Williams said:
I'm using hdparm -a8 -u on /dev/hda (a CD/DVD).
I need to do this so that DVD viewing is smooth
(at least this is a solution that works) .
Wanted to maintain this over a reboot
Received Thu 16 Jun 2005 5:39am +1000 from David Liontooth:
Package: wajig
Version: 2.0.24 (reproduced in 2.0.27)
Severity: minor
If you have bug report checking turned on, and respond n to an upgrade
because of a bug
report, you get a messy error -- this may be a feature, but spilling
Received Sat 30 Jul 2005 9:45am +1000 from Karl Chen:
On 2005-07-28 12:53 PDT, Graham Williams writes:
Graham After some testing, a problem with the proposed
Graham solution is that a user may have sudo set up with the
Graham NOPASSWD option for certain commands. sudo -v
Received Wed 03 Aug 2005 1:39pm +1000 from Mozai:
Package: wajig
Version: 2.0.29
Severity: normal
Unpacking wajig (from .../archives/wajig_2.0.29_all.deb) ...
Setting up python2.3-apt (0.6.12.2) ...
Setting up python-apt (0.6.12.2) ...
Setting up wajig (2.0.29) ...
Received Fri 05 Aug 2005 1:00am +1000 from Karl Chen:
On 2005-07-30 15:06 PDT, Graham Williams writes:
Graham Thanks. But I was more wondering how the problem
Graham manifests itself. What happened that caused you to
Graham submit a bug report? I don't think I've ever noticed
Received Sat 06 Aug 2005 12:55am +1000 from Karl Chen:
On 2005-08-04 13:14 PDT, Graham Williams writes:
Graham command = setroot + sh -c '%s' % command
This would work for me, but won't work for people that either can
only run certain commands, or have NOPASSWD for certain commands
Maybe I need to have an alias so that reportbug is the same as bug
in wajig, but the command is there:
wajig bug wine
Regards,
Graham
Received Sat 31 May 2008 2:51am +1000 from Karl Chen:
Package: wajig
Version: 2.0.38
Severity: wishlist
Suggestion: wajig reportbug PKG runs
Thanks for the suggestions Reuben. Comments are below...
Received Sat 26 Apr 2008 6:20am +1000 from Reuben Thomas:
Package: wajig
Version: 2.0.38
Severity: wishlist
I often go through my packages and purge configuration files of removed
packages. It'd be nice to do at least one of two
Received Sun 01 Jun 2008 10:47pm +1000 from Reuben Thomas:
On Sun, 1 Jun 2008, Graham Williams wrote:
Thanks for the suggestions Reuben. Comments are below...
Received Sat 26 Apr 2008 6:20am +1000 from Reuben Thomas:
Package: wajig
Version: 2.0.38
Severity: wishlist
I often go through
Package: gallery2
Version: 2.1-1
Followup-For: Bug #359013
I finally managed to get to the gallery2 site admin page by replacing
gallery/ with gallery2/ in the URL several times. Then I was able to go
to the URL Rewrite module configuation and reactivate the Migration
option. My Gallery is now
Hi David,
Thank you for the bug report. Could you give me an example that
illustrates what you observe.
Thanks,
Graham
Received Sat 15 Apr 2006 3:38am +1000 from David Liontooth:
Package: wajig
Version: 2.0.31
Severity: minor
wajig purge package no longer changes the status of that
Received Sat 15 Apr 2006 12:52pm +1000 from David Liontooth:
Graham Williams wrote:
Hi David,
Thank you for the bug report. Could you give me an example that
illustrates what you observe.
# just list linux-image-2.6.16-alsa-agp
rc linux-image-2.6.16-alsa-agp
Received Thu 27 Jan 2005 5:08pm +1100 from A Costa:
Package: wajig
Version: 2.0.19-2
Severity: minor
wajig -v help | grep -n Tacker
9: bugCheck reported bugs in package using the Debian Bug
Tacker
s/Tacker/Tracker/
Thanks for the bug report. Fixed in
Received Thu 27 Jan 2005 7:25pm +1100 from A Costa:
Package: wajig
Version: 2.0.19-2
Severity: normal
Start 'gjig', type a package name in the Package(s) box,
click on Dependees. Error message says:
The command 'dependees' was not recognised
Perhaps it is not yet
Received Thu 27 Jan 2005 5:54pm +1100 from A Costa:
Package: wajig
Version: 2.0.19-2
Severity: normal
Some odd data -- at least on my system:
wajig list-alts | grep -n READ
5:README
...any package by that name?
wajig list-names README ; echo $?
0
Received Fri 28 Jan 2005 11:23am +1100 from Alfie Costa:
On 27 Jan 2005 at 23:41, Graham Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks again. I have fixed up the README problem, and I believe this
closes this bug. It will be in Version 2.0.20.
You're speedy! I'll test it when it comes out
Received Fri 28 Jan 2005 11:09am +1100 from A Costa:
Package: wajig
Version: 2.0.19-2
Severity: normal
Failed searches return successful error codes:
wajig list-names README ; echo $?
0
Return codes are handy for scripting.
Trivia: 'dglob' (in the 'debian-goodies'
Received Sat 13 May 2006 5:51am +1000 from Michael Vogt:
Hi,
I looked into wajigs code and it turns out that the problem is that
the latest apt uses MMap inside the pkgTagFile that is used on a pipe
from wajig. This obviously does no longer work. I'll investigate what
can be done about it.
Package: gallery2
Version: 2.1-1
Severity: important
I upgraded from 2.0.4-1. The web-based upgrade appeared to work just
fine.
Visiting /gallery2/ I can login, visit an album but then thumbnails are
not found and links go to /gallery/ instead of /gallery2/ and are not
found! If I can select an
Package: gramps
Version: 2.0.10-1
Severity: important
On starting up gramps:
XXX rd_object called with exception set
Traceback (most recent call last):
File /usr/share/gramps/gramps.py, line 81, in ?
import gramps_main
File /usr/share/gramps/gramps_main.py, line 59, in ?
import
Thanks. Has it ever worked for you? It looks like a problem with the
apt_pkg package rather than wajig? I'll investigate.
Regards,
Graham
Received Sat 08 Apr 2006 2:58am +1000 from Francesco Potorti`:
Package: wajig
Version: 2.0.31
Severity: important
# wajig reinstall wajig
Traceback
Received Sat 08 Apr 2006 9:28am +1000 from Francesco Potorti`:
Thanks. Has it ever worked for you?
Yes. I always use wajig.
Thanks.
It looks like a problem with the apt_pkg package rather than wajig?
apt-get worked when wajig failed. I could reinstall apt-get, maybe.
How do I do it?
Received Sun 09 Apr 2006 1:08pm +1000 from Ferenczi Viktor:
Package: wajig
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
I've a default sudo and wajig installation on Debian Stable.
When trying to perform administrative commands like install,
hold, etc. wajig says Access
Received Thu 02 Feb 2006 9:18am +1100 from John V. Belmonte:
Package: wajig
Version: 2.0.31
Severity: normal
The backports.org archive uses a dash in their archive name (sarge-backports).
Apparently wajig strips dashes in its command line processing, so the
following doesn't work:
$
Hi David,
Could you give some more context on where this message appears. I don't
get it with a wajig update.
Regards,
Graham
Received Mon 19 Jun 2006 4:35pm +1000 from David Liontooth:
Package: wajig
Version: 2.0.33
Severity: minor
When issuing wajig update, it gives the receipt
Received Tue 20 Jun 2006 4:27am +1000 from David Liontooth:
Graham Williams wrote:
Hi David,
Could you give some more context on where this message appears. I don't
get it with a wajig update.
Interesting. This sort of thing:
# wajig update
snip
Get: 56 2006-06-14-1351.33
Received Tue 06 Jun 2006 9:27pm +1000 from Francesco Potorti`:
Package: wajig
Version: 2.0.32
Severity: normal
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wajig whichpkg /usr/share/fonts/X11/TTF
JIG Warning: Could not contact the Debian server at
packages.debian.org
Perhaps it is down or
1 - 100 of 124 matches
Mail list logo
