On 24.11.05 Martin-Éric Racine ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Package: tetex-bin
Version: 3.0-10.1
Followup-For: Bug #334613
Seems to be a container for every failed installation. You didn't
mean eventually #340279?
Running fmtutil-sys. This may take some time. ...
warning: Could not open
On 26.11.05 Roland Stigge ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi,
(see the transcript file for additional information)
Output written on fmfmanps.dvi (40 pages, 115496 bytes).
Transcript written on fmfmanps.log.
mpost fmfsamp1; mpost fmfsamp2; mpost fmfsamp3; mpost fmfsamp4;
This is MetaPost,
notfound 334613 3.0-10.1
stop
On 25.11.05 Martin-Éric Racine ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
pe, 2005-11-25 kello 10:16 +0100, Hilmar Preusse kirjoitti:
Hi,
Seems to be a container for every failed installation. You didn't
mean eventually #340279?
Could be it too.
Let's just say
On 28.11.05 Martin-Éric Racine ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
ma, 2005-11-28 kello 10:16 +0100, Hilmar Preusse kirjoitti:
On 25.11.05 Martin-Éric Racine ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Let's just say that a bug titled Does not configure (aleph+omega
failed) doesn't ring a bell, while one titled
On 28.11.05 Martin-Éric Racine ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
ma, 2005-11-28 kello 19:22 +0100, Frank Küster kirjoitti:
Martin-Éric Racine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry, could you rephrase that?
Simply look at
On 13.11.05 Sean Finney ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Sat, Nov 12, 2005 at 07:13:08PM +0100, Hilmar Preusse wrote:
Hi,
For third party software we have a policy. If anybody is willing
to maintain the package as a separate one, please open an RfP or
ITP bug against wnpp.
it seems kind
On 28.10.05 Frank Küster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Michael Piefel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Michael,
It appears that the purging of tetex should at some point have at least
hinted at the existence of tex-common.
Why should it? I think most people would be rather annoyed by
that.
On 07.12.05 Frank Küster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
reopen 332562
stop
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Debian Bug Tracking System) wrote:
Your message dated Wed, 07 Dec 2005 06:32:11 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#335055: fixed in tetex-bin 3.0-11
has caused the
On 09.05.05 Thomas Weber ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi,
I've just found this error the hard way. Any chance of getting a
fix from upstream?
I've contacted the author recently. He said that the address we
forwarded to is no longer in use. Maybe that is the reason, why we
never get an answer.
On 15.05.05 Kurt Roeckx ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi,
Your package is failing to build in experimental. It
seems to be stuck in an endless loop doing this over and
over again:
eperl -P -o debian/common.functions debian/common.functions.in
eperl -P -o debian/rules debian/rules.in
test -e
On 16.05.05 Hilmar Preusse ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi,
I'm filing that bug as important, cause according to
apt-cache rdepends libpoppler0
no package uses your library and hence nobody is really affected.
Of course this is wrong: evince already depends on your package
(beside liboppler0
On 13.05.05 maximilian attems ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi,
these fonts are usefull for astronomical purpose as they include
the astronomical symbols.
the license is said to be lppl. no idea if that's good enough for
inclusion.
It is. LPPL = 1.3 is considered to be free according to the
clone 309185 -1
reassign -1 tetex-base
retitle -1 tetex-base: FTBFS in experimental: Endless loop on Linux 2.6
stop
On 16.05.05 Florent Rougon ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Kurt Roeckx [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi *,
Note that I'm doing this on a 2.6 kernel, which has sub-second
timestamps on
severity 309637 minor
stop
On 18.05.05 Juhapekka Tolvanen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi,
/root/.bashrc: line 40: /.bash_common.sh: No such file or directory
Line 40 in /root/.bashrc looks like this:
. ${HOME}/.bash_common.sh
And that file really exist. Somehow that environment
forwarded 299889 Thomas Esser [EMAIL PROTECTED]
stop
Hi Thomas,
This bug has been submitted at our BTS at the end of march. We've
escalated it to the LaTeX BTS and Johannes has merged them into the
babel doc. Please consider to update babel upon next teTeX revision.
Regards,
Hilmar
-
On 18.05.05 Florent Rougon ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi all,
Could you please insert the following lines:
@printf \nDebug\n
@ls -l --time-style=full-iso $(eperl_sourcefiles) \
debian/rules.in debian/rules
@printf /Debug\n\n
after:
# Eperl is simply
On 19.05.05 Florent Rougon ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi,
Could you try to remove commonstuff_update from the double-colon
rule and tell us if it loops again (and if so, attach the log file
with the debug snippets)? Normally, removing it from rules.in only
should be sufficient since after
On 13.12.05 Frank Küster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Ralf Stubner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Dec 03, 2005 at 05:02 -0800, Arias Hung wrote:
Hello Arias,
This is a summary of all `failed' messages and warnings:
`pdfetex -ini -jobname=latex -progname=latex -translate-file=cp227.tcx
On 12.01.06 Steve Langasek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 06:41:47PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
Hi *,
I was about to create a patch for the package, but I discovered
more issues. Most notably, the Makefile in the example directory
fails because it cannot find a file
On 09.01.06 Frank Küster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hilmar Preusse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Thanks for spotting. Patch attached.
It seems it was lost...
Next try.
H.
--
sigmentation fault
--- postinst.in.orig2005-12-28 13:17:27.0 +0100
+++ postinst.in 2006-01-13 19:01
On 08.12.05 Blars Blarson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi,
I had the same problem. My /tmp/tetex.postinst.XX* file attached.
1. Thanks for the debug output.
2. What makes you believe, you're seeing the same bug? In his partial
log one reads:
Error: `pdfetex -ini -jobname=latex
On 08.12.05 Frank Küster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi,
Hilmars mail was rejected by your spam filter (and marked as spam
by mine, too - Hilmar do you know why?), here it is again.
The IP range of my E-Mail provider was on the black list last year in
August. Actually I can't find out, if
On 08.12.05 Frank Küster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hilmar Preusse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 07.12.05 Debian Bug Tracking System ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi,
According to our analysis, the bug occurred because you kept
woody's configuration files and refused the update to the sarge
merge 335225 343104
stop
On 13.12.05 Norbert Preining ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi,
Dear jadetex maintainers: Your postinst script is very close to work
with tetex2 and tetex3, but there was small miss:
YOu define the variable
fmtutil=fmtutil
and if fmtutil-sys is present, then
On 14.12.05 Frank Küster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Helge Hafting [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Error: `ptex -ini -jobname=amsptex -progname=amsptex amsptex.ini' failed
[...]
(/usr/share/texmf/ptex/plain/base/kinsoku.tex))
! I can't find file `amstex'.
l.2 \input amstex
This file
On 15.12.05 Frank Küster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Helge Hafting [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Moin,
kpsewhich --progname=amsptex --var-value TEXINPUTS.amsptex
# kpsewhich --progname=amsptex --var-value TEXINPUTS.amsptex
On 01.11.05 Bonaccorso Salvatore ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi,
Installing tex-common give some litle warning ( i don't know if it
was appropriate to tell this):
Setting up tex-common (0.9) ...
chgrp: invalid group name `cachegroup'
-- debconf information:
tex-common/groupname:
On 02.11.05 Frank Küster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi,
When a pdf file is produced via latex/dvips/ps2pdf from the following
document:
\documentclass[12pt,twoside]{scrbook}
\usepackage[latin1]{inputenc}
\usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
\begin{document}
Das ist ein Test.
\end{document}
it
On 02.11.05 Frank Küster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hilmar Preusse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 02.11.05 Frank Küster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi,
it is not possible to search for anything (e.g. the letter a) in
Acrobat Reader. Don't yet know why...
Because the PS-Type3 fonts
On 19.10.05 Frank Küster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Vincent Lefevre [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I can't install tetex-bin 2.0.2-31 (from testing) due to the following
error:
Unpacking tetex-bin (from .../tetex-bin_2.0.2-31_i386.deb) ...
dpkg: error processing
On 02.11.05 Joe Drew ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi,
tex-common fails to install because it can't chmod an ls-R file.
/var/lib/texmf exists on my system, but the ls-R file doesn't.
Setting up tex-common (0.9) ...
chmod: cannot access `/var/lib/texmf/ls-R': No such file or directory
dpkg:
On 03.11.05 Frank Küster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hilmar Preusse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I can reproduce that bug. But only if I have configured debconf to
ask me the low questions too and selecting var at the first question
(BTW: Selecting cache is said to be the default, but it's
tags 327785 + patch
stop
On 12.09.05 Hilmar Preusse ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi,
just some minor things same to my attention in 0.7. Dunno if they're
fixed in SVN:
1. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ $ dpkg-deb -c tex-common_0.7_all.deb |grep \.svn
drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2005-08-24 17:18:05
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Hilmar Preusse [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: pfb2t1c2pfb
Version : 0.2
Upstream Author : Szabo Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://alioth.debian.org/projects/pkg-pfb2t1c2pfb/
* License : public domain (still
On 03.11.05 Eddie ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hilmar Preusse wrote:
On 24.10.05 Eddie ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Frank K?ster wrote:
Eddie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Please include this file if you report a bug.
Do you still have the file, or can you reproduce it, and send it to us
On 05.11.05 Eddie ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hilmar Preusse wrote:
On 03.11.05 Eddie ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hilmar Preusse wrote:
On 24.10.05 Eddie ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi,
fmtutil-sys: running `etex -ini -jobname=jadetex -progname=jadetex
latex jadetex.ini
On 08.11.05 Marcin Owsiany ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Mon, Nov 07, 2005 at 06:21:18PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
Hi,
So what can we do to further debug this? You could do the
following: Save the attached file as /usr/local/sbin/fmtutil and
then run the necessary commands to trigger
On 09.11.05 Sven Joachim ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi,
Package: tetex-doc
Version: 3.0-10
Severity: serious
The Debian changelog is missing in the /usr/share/doc/tetex-doc
directory. Please add it there as mandated by section 12.7 of the
Policy Manual.
Hmm, we have a line
On 24.10.05 Elrond ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Fri, Oct 21, 2005 at 04:28:25PM +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
3. Some possible splitting schemes
===
[...]
3.2 tetex-base
For tetex-base, the additional splitting-off of a type1-fonts-x11
package can be
On 27.10.05 Frank Küster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Julian Gilbey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
/usr/bin/pktogf (convert packed font files to generic font files)
/usr/bin/gftopk (and back)
This is used by mktexpk!
So we should keep them in -core. I just checked whether we
On 07.11.05 Hilmar Preusse ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On 05.11.05 Eddie ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hilmar Preusse wrote:
On 03.11.05 Eddie ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi,
I forgot to mention that the file tetex.postinst.XXgqP8eU was
reproduced by another setup as the orginal file
On 08.11.05 Frank Küster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
clone 334613 -1
found -1 3.0-10.1
retitle -1 Should make sure the TEXFONTPATH setting is correct
severity -1 normal
submitter -1 Kenward Vaughan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
stop
I guess you forgot to put [EMAIL PROTECTED] into Bcc. At least I
On 10.11.05 Frank Küster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hilmar Preusse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
If the user now refuses to replace the local version by that one
from the maint (which is the default) fmtutil now starts creating
formats with the old configuration. --- *bamm*
That's how
On 11.11.05 Eric Valette ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi,
Setting up tex-common (0.10) ...
debconf: Unable to load Debconf::Element::Dialog.
Isn't that a message from debconf?
Further the File Debconf/Element/Dialog.pm does not exist in the
unstable distribution, especially not in the package
notfound 334613 3.0-10.1
stop
On 11.11.05 Frank Küster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
clone 334613 -1
found -1 3.0-10.1
retitle -1 Should make sure the TEXFONTPATH setting is correct
severity -1 normal
submitter -1 Kenward Vaughan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
stop
--
sigmentation fault
--
To
On 11.11.05 Norbert Preining ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Fre, 11 Nov 2005, Hilmar Preusse wrote:
Hi,
Setting up tex-common (0.10) ...
debconf: Unable to load Debconf::Element::Dialog.
Isn't that a message from debconf?
Strange. Which version of debconf do you have?
My
Package: tetex-bin
Version: 3.0-10.1
Severity: wishlist
The man page page of TeX still refers to a program called initex,
which has been removed from teTeX (was a only link to /usr/bin/tex
anyway). Please clean up the man page.
H.
--
sigmentation fault
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
On 11.11.05 Junichi Uekawa ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi,
About manual, initex feature is there forever so manual doesn't
stop to mention initex feature. So this doesn't mean removal of
initex is premature. (even right now, if you call tex with the
name initex, it behaves as such.)
On 21.12.05 Jens Seidel ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am 20.12.05 15:05:45:
Jens Seidel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
attached you will find an update of the German PO file de.po.
Note that this is a semi automatic created mail which contains all
On 23.12.05 Martin-Éric Racine ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi,
texte-base installation fails because it needs to execute
update-language (from tex-common), which is not yet unpacked or
configured during a fresh install. This in turn breaks installation
of jadetex and other TeX bits, which
On 18.12.05 Frans Pop ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi,
When installing a new system (unstable), tasksel, while showing a
progress bar, fails at the end of downloading packages with the
following error:
Can't call method 'description' on an undefined value.
Attached are two screenshots
Package: tetex-bin
Version: 2.0.2-30
Severity: normal
Hi,
this is a spin off from #342247. The submitter refused to replace his
hand crafted config files by these from the package, which caused his
upgrade to fail. I've experienced similar problems, upon upgrading
from woody to sarge but didn't
On 31.12.05 simon raven ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi,
same bug as in version 3.0-10 or 11, can't remember which version
this first popped up pasting the /tmp/tetex* file. (forgot to
enter 'attach file', sorry).
This is *not* the same bug.
1. You see completely different error messages
reopen 335477
tags 335477 + patch
stop
On 03.01.06 Jochen Sprickerhof ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi,
in tetex.postinst line 794 the alternative for oxdvi.bin is
removed, butt in line 814 it's again created.
Thanks for spotting. Patch attached.
H.
--
sigmentation fault
--
To
On 02.01.06 SR, ESC ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Le lun 2006-01-02 a 07:13:28 -0500, Hilmar Preusse [EMAIL PROTECTED] a dit:
Hi,
What do the following commands tell you:
- locate mf.pool mp.pool tex.pool pdfetex.pool omega.pool
(note that i ran find and not locate).
Should not make
On 03.01.06 SR, ESC ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Le mar 2006-01-03 a 12:42:12 -0500, Hilmar Preusse [EMAIL PROTECTED] a dit:
Hi,
That /var/lib/texmf/web2c/mf.pool etc. does not belong to any
package. So simply remove/rename the files in question, run
mktexlsr and then try again. It should
Package: mutt
Version: 1.5.11-5
Followup-For: Bug #277864
Hi,
I believe I see the same bug here. The bug occurs, when I use my IMAP
INBOX.
The error occurs sometimes, when I look for a long time at an E-Mail. Then
I type i to get back to the index. The index has changed meanwhile and
mutt tries
On 04.10.05 Andrei Emeltchenko ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi,
pdflatex refman.tex
This is pdfeTeX, Version 3.14159-1.10b-2.1 (Web2C 7.4.5)
entering extended mode
(./refman.tex{/usr/share/texmf/pdftex/config/pdftex.cfg}
LaTeX2e 2001/06/01
Babel v3.7h and hyphenation patterns
snip
On 05.10.05 Eythan Weg ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi Eythan,
Package: tetex-bin
Version: 3.0-7
Severity: normal
Tags: experimental
AFAICT a2ping can work without having sam2p installed. Do you agree,
that Suggests is sufficient in that case?
H.
--
sigmentation fault
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
On 14.06.05 Hilmar Preusse ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On 13.06.05 Marcin Owsiany ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi,
See attached typescript. I also attach all *.log files present in
/var/lib/texmf/web2c
This is a summary of all `failed' messages and warnings:
`pdftex -ini -translate-file
On 06.10.05 Frank Küster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Arne Ahrend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I have also useed find to seek for updmap.* files.
/var/lib/texmf/web2c/updmap.cfg
/usr/share/man/man1/updmap.1.gz
/usr/share/texmf/web2c/updmap.cfg
/usr/share/tetex-base/updmap.cfg
On 10.09.05 Hilmar Preusse ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Last Remark,
TODO:
Do we have to provide the Adobe Font metrics of the fonts? If yes the
packages providing the sym links has to contain the afm files too,
which are not contained in the tar balls provided by teTeX.
H.
--
sigmentation
On 24.10.05 Eddie ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Frank K?ster wrote:
Eddie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
fmtutil failed. Output has been stored in
/tmp/tetex.postinst.XXKSxUFW
^^^
This filename differs from the name of the file you sent us (if I
assume you didn't
On 25.10.05 Prakash Countcham ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi,
latex fails with the following error on the joined file:
! Package amsmath Error: Multiple \label's: label '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' will be
lost.
See the amsmath package documentation for explanation.
Type H return for immediate
On 20.09.05 Sean Finney ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi Sean,
Sorry for late response!
would you consider including the clrscode package in tetex-extra?
i'm not sure how additional 3rd party latex packages are managed in
debian, but i think it would make the most sense to have it added
to
On 07.11.05 Frank Küster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Pierre THIERRY [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
When generating the Postscript, dvips puts the filename of the
DVI in the Title:
%%Title: foo.dvi
It should be possible to have the document's title when it is
somewhat available,
On 12.11.05 Junichi Uekawa ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi all,
anyway, the following changes will be applied to Debian whizzytex default
configuration to work around the problem.
--- whizzytexrc 24 Mar 2005 23:19:26 - 1.4
+++ whizzytexrc 12 Nov 2005 03:42:20 -
@@
On 13.11.05 Frank Küster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hilmar Preusse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I guess a much better idea is to use the interface provide by
fmtutil if you need additional formats. In the Debian TeX
policy (from tex-common) we mention that. In the Version as of
18th
On 30.08.03 Tim Connors ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi,
The -e flag means that when rm -f returns 1 in libkpathsea3.postinst
when it can't rm the directory (because /usr/doc/tetex-lib is a
direcory, not a symlink, because I have symlinked /usr/share/doc back
to the old /usr/doc (which I
On 14.11.05 Frank Küster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hilmar Preusse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
That bug has the tag wontfix. Another simple approach would be to
remove the offending code now and then close that bug. The tetex-lib
- libkpathsea transition should be over for a while now
On 22.11.05 Christian Hammers ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi,
tetex-bin prevented my package from beeing build by the autobuilders.
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?pkg=mysql-dfsg-5.0ver=5.0.16-1arch=hppastamp=1132626014file=logas=raw
This is a summary of all `failed' messages and
On 06.12.06 Frank Küster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi,
This symlink is an absolute reference to the source tree on the
builder's machine. How could that possibly be useful on anyone else's
random machine? If it were a symlink to /usr/src/linux* that would be
a different story. Note
On 06.12.06 Frank Küster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hilmar Preusse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 06.12.06 Frank Küster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi,
I agree. However, before submitting a bugreport I'd like to know
whether this problem still exists. Does anyone have a linux source
Package: tetex-doc
Version: 3.0.dfsg.3-3
Severity: minor
Hi,
the doc-base actually registers the teTeX docs in Section: Apps/Text .
As there is another section Tex it should probably go there.
H.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'),
On 13.12.06 Frank Küster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hilmar Preusse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
the doc-base actually registers the teTeX docs in Section: Apps/Text .
As there is another section Tex it should probably go there.
Are you sure?
No.
On my system, the only package
submitter 350186 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
reopen 350186
stop
On 09.09.06 Noah Slater ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi,
Yes I am sorry for the confusion caused by the wrong address on the
bug ticket.
Changed.
As far as I remember I was trying to run `pdftex -interaction
batchmode' which at the time
On 11.09.06 Frank Küster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hilmar Preusse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 09.09.06 Noah Slater ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi,
As far as I remember I was trying to run `pdftex -interaction
batchmode' which at the time was not running in batch mode, but
instead
On 13.09.06 Noah Slater ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi,
I have been on holiday this past few days. Please allow me chance
to find the original problem input file etc tonight and reply. If I
cannot I will let you know.
I hope this is ok.
Yes, it is. Please call back if you found something.
tags 367842 + fixed-upstream
stop
On 28.06.06 Ralf Stubner ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Tue, May 23, 2006 at 09:34:12PM +0200, Ralf Stubner wrote:
Hi,
down here in the Debian Bug tracking system Eugeniy Meshcheryakov
reported incorrectly handled bookmarks using unicode characters. This is
tags 382075 + wontfix
severity 382075 wishlist
retitle 382075 bibtex should be able to handle unicode
stop
On 15.08.06 Ralf Stubner ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Tue, Aug 15, 2006 at 12:37 +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
martin f krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
bibtex cannot deal with
On 06.11.06 François Valenduc ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hilmar Preusse a écrit :
On 06.11.06 François Valenduc ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi,
Since one of the last upgrades of tetex-bin, I get such errors when
I convert dvi document to pdf:
dvips: Font ecrm2074 at 8000 not found
On 06.11.06 Frank Küster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hilmar Preusse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Wrong bug number. #396826 would be correct. How to best reopen
#396823 and close #396826?
control at bugs.debian.org? Should I do?
I've already done that on Friday.
Sorry, I should read
On 29.04.06 Alain Bench ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Friday, April 28, 2006 at 10:54:17 +0400, Dmitry E. Oboukhov wrote:
Hi all,
I'll use Your patch, thank You. :-\
You're welcome.
I'm using it too. However it would be nice if it could be included in
the Debian package or even be
On 13.11.06 Gabor Gombas ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi,
pdflatex dies with Segmentation fault when called by the pdfnup
utility; the last part of the strace output looks like:
I'm sorry. My first try was to call pdfnup this way:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ pdfnup svn-book.pdf
This is pdfnup
On 08.10.06 Oleg Verych ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On 2006-10-06, Hilmar Preusse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi *,
The box has rather experimental status. Hmm, I should rather make
a backup of /home before booting into rc1...
no need, if `break' boot option used. And all we need is just
On 14.11.06 Frank Küster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Gabor Gombas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
On AMD64 with the same library versions (including libpoppler)
there is no SIGSEGV, just typing 'pdflatex' works, but the same
pdfnup command still gives
What does mean typing pdflatex. Did you
On 09.03.06 Martin Pitt ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi,
We upgraded to poppler 0.5.1 in Ubuntu, which grew a better unicode
string handling. Unfortunately this broke the API a bit, so that
the patch needs updating.
I attach the new patch-poppler, and an interdiff between the old
and new
On 27.10.06 Aurelien Jarno ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi,
Package: pfb2t1c2pfb
Severity: important
0.3-1 I guess.
Usertag: debianrulestarget
pfb2t1c2pfb's source package contains a debian/rules file which
does not contain the binary-indep target. This target required by
both the
On 03.11.06 Ralf Stubner ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Fri, Nov 03, 2006 at 10:48 -0800, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
* Clear up the description about user-specific configuration in
TeX-on-Debian, many thanks to Géraud Meyer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(closes: #396823)
On 06.11.06 François Valenduc ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi,
Since one of the last upgrades of tetex-bin, I get such errors when
I convert dvi document to pdf:
dvips: Font ecrm2074 at 8000 not found; scaling 600 instead.
dvips: Such scaling will generate extremely poor output.
Altough
On 24.07.06 Hilmar Preusse ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On 22.07.06 Frank Küster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hilmar Preuße [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 21.07.06 Frank K?ster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi Frank,
- non-commercial
- renamed copies may not be distributed at all, only
On 13.02.06 Vincent Lönngren ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi Vincent,
[including babelbib in teTeX]
Please, don't worry about me personally - I had installed the
package from CTAN before I even reported the bug. I just thought it
could be of more general interrest.
This was the last
On 01.03.06 Frank Küster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Florent Rougon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
retitle 354008 debian/templates should be generated from a
templates.in file to automatically get the right octal mode for
the cache directories
The bug description speaks explicitely about
Package: linux-image-2.6.18-1-686
Version: 2.6.18-2
Severity: minor
Upon loading the driver for the CD-Rom on my Notebook the driver spits out
weird messages. I'm attaching the relevant part of dmesg. The part of the
lilo.conf reads:
image=/boot/vmlinuz-2.6.18-1-686
label=Lin_2.6.18-1
On 05.10.06 Oleg Verych ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Tue, Oct 03, 2006 at 06:32:51PM +0200, Jens Axboe wrote:
On Tue, Oct 03 2006, Oleg Verych wrote:
Hi,
[Jens, let me cc you.]
It's an ide core thing, not an ide-cd problem. Perhaps Alan or Bart has
a good idea.
OK
Hilmar,
On 05.10.06 Oleg Verych ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Thu, Oct 05, 2006 at 09:49:58AM +0200, Hilmar Preusse wrote:
Hi,
Are the ready made Debian packages or do I have to build myself?
I will, but it will be my first one (in the .deb). And i don't know
how it will run, because i must cross
On 19.09.06 Frans Pop ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi,
I'm seeing the same errors on my sparc64 (log file looks the same
too).
Relevant log message seems to be:
(/usr/share/texmf-tetex/tex/latex/base/latex.ltx
! LaTeX must be made using an initex with no format preloaded.
l.78 ... using an
reassign 388407 latex-ucs-doc
stop
On 20.09.06 Samuel Mimram ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi all,
The latest version (0.29) of tex-common fails to be installed here:
Preparing to replace tex-common 0.28 (using .../tex-common_0.29_all.deb) ...
Unpacking replacement tex-common ...
dpkg: error
On 25.09.06 Frank Küster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Even worse, there doesn't seem to be a license statement with the
files on CTAN. Do you have the book? I can imagine that the
license statement is in the book or on the accompanying CD.
We'd
Package: mp3c
Version: 0.29-2
Severity: wishlist
Hi,
mp3c depends on cdda2wav, which has been converted into a dummy package
recently (9:1.1.0-1). Please swap over the dependence from cdda2wav to
icedax.
Thanks,
Hilmar
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
APT prefers unstable
APT
1 - 100 of 1684 matches
Mail list logo
