Bug#737057: debmirror: Please add xz support

n.org/debian/dists/sid/main/i18n/ - -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org `. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de `-GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-

Bug#800817: patch

upstream patches unless they fix an important or security issue and I think this particular bug is just a minor annoyance. It will be fixed automatically once we have a new upstream version of engrampa in Debian. So there is no need to backport this patch. Adrian -- .''`. John Paul Adrian

Bug#800912: zimlib: FTBFS on sh4 due to mismatched symbols file

Package: zimlib Version: 1.2-6 Severity: normal Hello! zimlib currently fails to build from source on sh4 due to a mismatched symbols file [1]: dpkg-gensymbols: warning: some symbols or patterns disappeared in the symbols file: see diff output below dpkg-gensymbols: warning:

Bug#799611: exiv2: FTBFS on mips64el and sparc464 due to mismatched symbols file

Package: exiv2 Version: 0.25-2 Severity: normal Hi! The title says it all. exiv2 currently FTBFS on mips64el and sparc64 due to mismatched symbols file(s) [1]: === --- debian/libexiv2-14.symbols

Bug#799612: botan1.10: FTBFS when building with DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS 'nocheck nobench'

the rules file accordingly that your package honours when 'nobench' or 'nocheck' are set and just skips the testsuite instead of failing to build from source? Thanks, Adrian > [1] > https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=botan1.10=sh4=1.10.10-6=1442717447 -- .''`. John Paul

Bug#766998: patch

t again. Adrian -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org `. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de `-GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913

Bug#766998: diff -u

On 09/23/2015 04:29 PM, ZenWalker wrote: > @@ -209,8 +209,13 @@ > (...) That's not the complete diff. You cut away the diff signatures. -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org `. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaub...@physik.fu-ber

Bug#799611: exiv2: FTBFS on mips64el and sparc464 due to mismatched symbols file

Control: retitle -1 exiv2: FTBFS on mips64el and sparc464 due to mismatched symbols file On Sun, Sep 20, 2015 at 10:18:31PM +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > The title says it all. exiv2 currently FTBFS on mips64el and sparc64 due to > mismatched symbols file(s) [1]: After I tri

Bug#799613: caja: segmentation fault on testing since 3 weeks !!!

on unstable nor on stretch. Please provide a backtrace as otherwise debugging this problem is not possible as long as we cannot reproduce the issues. Thanks, Adrian -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org `. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaub...@phys

Bug#807331: samba: Fails to build from source when not being able to download docbook.xsl

he buildds blindly download files from third party servers. Cheers, Adrian -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org `. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de `-GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913

Bug#807331: [Pkg-samba-maint] Bug#807331: samba: Fails to build from source when not being able to download docbook.xsl

d it is able to download and parse the file. However, when I sbuild samba, it still fails. I can't really wrap my head around what happens here. I will do more debugging and see whether I can pin-point the actual problem. Adrian -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : :' : Debian Developer - glaub..

Bug#806591: qscintilla2: FTBFS on sparc64 due to mismatched symbols files

On 11/29/2015 01:23 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > qscintilla2 currently fails to build from source on sparc64 due to several > symbols files having mismatched symbols for this architecture. > > Please update the symbols file using the diff provided in the build log [1]. I j

Bug#806837: qtwebkit: FTBFS on sparc64

gt; Good catch! Indeed I missed it. The patch looks fine and qt4's > upstream status is "no more changes", so I'm applying it as a > Debian delta. Awesome, thank you very much! Adrian - -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org `. `' Freie

Bug#807108: ghc: Please add platform detection support for sh4 (patch supplied)

ream. Do you want to upstream it > (by opening a ticket at http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ and > attaching it)? Yeah, will do. My idea was to get it into Debian first to be able to iron out all the details first and once things are working, I will upstream everything. Adrian - --

Bug#782058: Pegasos II: installer boots up to 'returning from prom_init'

am pretty sure this is again radeonfb messing with the GPU as the symptoms are the same. Adrian - -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org `. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de `-GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426

Bug#782058: Pegasos II: installer boots up to 'returning from prom_init'

which have very negligible user base given the fact that those were rather expensive due to their low production numbers. So my opinion remains unchanged: Drop radeonfb by any means as it's obsolete and breaks the way more ubiqutous radeon KMS driver. Cheers, Adrian -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz

Bug#807108: ghc: Please add platform detection support for sh4 (patch supplied)

tps://lists.debian.org/debian-superh/2015/12/msg0.html -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org `. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de `-GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913 Description: Add platf

Bug#807006: qemu: FTBFS on sparc64 due to incompatible linker parameters

e same problem and fixed the issue by setting "-no-relax" for sparc [1]. Please apply a similar fix for qemu. Cheers, Adrian > [1] https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/3791 -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org `. `' Freie Unive

Bug#806837: qtwebkit: FTBFS on sparc64

ased' now in any case. Thanks, Adrian -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org `. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de `-GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913

Bug#806837: qtwebkit: FTBFS on sparc64

On 12/02/2015 10:32 AM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > On 12/02/2015 02:26 AM, David Matthew Mattli wrote: >> qtwebkit currently fails to build for sparc64. I was able to >> fix the build by adding sparc64 to the list of non-JIT archs >> in debian/rules > > FW

Bug#806837: qtwebkit: FTBFS on sparc64

ely isn't enough. Cheers, Adrian > [1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?att=1;msg=5;bug=806837;fil ename=fix-sparc64.diff - -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org `. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de `-

Bug#800112: "Unsupported socketcall: 20" when using apt-get under s390 chroot

progress yet in debugging this issue? I have checked some recent s390x buildd logs and they don't seem to show the warning anymore. Cheers, Adrian -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org `. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de

Bug#800112: "Unsupported socketcall: 20" when using apt-get under s390 chroot

On 12/02/2015 02:46 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > Interestingly, we're seeing the same warning on qemu-m68k [1], more > specifically in Laurent Vivier's fork which adds full m68k support > to qemu which normally supports the reduced ColdFire instruction > set only: Oops, for

Bug#807589: libechonest: FTBFS on all architectures due to mismatched symbols file(s)

already and works with all currently deployed versions of dpkg. Cheers, Adrian -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org `. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de `-GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913

Bug#807589: libechonest: FTBFS on all architectures due to mismatched symbols file(s)

n take care of the ports architectures in case something breaks. Adrian -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org `. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de `-GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913

Bug#807589: libechonest: FTBFS on all architectures due to mismatched symbols file(s)

ry. It's not important for me to do it myself, especially when others can learn from this experience. I have done such fixes endless times, I don't find them entertaining anymore ;-). Just make sure everything is fixed properly to avoid additional uploads. Adrian -- .''`. John Paul Adr

Bug#807589: libechonest: FTBFS on all architectures due to mismatched symbols file(s)

On 12/11/2015 02:36 PM, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > I'm looking at it soon. You don't have to. Stefan has already made a proposed change which I will testbuild later today or tomorrow. I'm just still at work :). Adrian -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : :' : Debian Developer - gl

Bug#807548: jemalloc: FTBFS on almost all architectures due to testsuite failure

, including apt, things could become really ugly for the architectures affected. Thus, please fix jemalloc as soon as possible and also forward it your fixes upstream. Cheers, Adrian > [1] > https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=jemalloc=arm64=3.6.0-4=1448973166 -- .''`. John Paul

Bug#807554: src:nghttp2: Please remove jemalloc as a build-dependency on m68k

tps://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=699246 > [2] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=807548 -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org `. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de `-GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 000

Bug#807777: ghc: Please adjust linker options for sparc64 (patch supplied)

On 12/12/2015 10:27 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > I just successfully built the first ghc Debian packages for sparc64 with the > help of bootstrapping ghc on amd64. In order to successfully build ghc on > sparc64, I had to add -optl-Wl,-no-relax to SRC_HC_OPTS as otherwise gc

Bug#807777: ghc: Please adjust linker options for sparc64 (patch supplied)

On 12/13/2015 12:05 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > Ok, this seems to be a bit more complicated as the linker settings have > to be explicitly set in the ghc source code directly. I have tried > building hscolour manually which initially works but eventually fails > with: &

Bug#807777: ghc: Please adjust linker options for sparc64 (patch supplied)

On 12/12/2015 10:27 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > ghc upstream actually contains a fix for this [1] which, unfortuntely, > applies to sparc but not sparc64 as the latter is not natively supported > by ghc yet and not detected as ArchSPARC. Oops, forgot the link: &g

Bug#807589: libechonest: FTBFS on all architectures due to mismatched symbols file(s)

speed up the build process similar to m68k. Hopefully I can do that today, I still had to spend lots of time into getting ghc fixed on sparc64 :). Adrian -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org `. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaub...@physik.fu-ber

Bug#801262: tagging 801262

should close the bug. I don't really understand the logic. Explain, please. Adrian -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org `. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de `-GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913

Bug#807554: src:nghttp2: Please remove jemalloc as a build-dependency on m68k

Control: reassign -1 jemalloc Control: tags -1 patch On 12/10/2015 06:06 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > On 12/10/2015 06:04 PM, Andreas Schwab wrote: >>> nghttp2 is currently BD-Uninstallable on m68k as it build-depends on >>> jemalloc which currently FTBFS on

Bug#807777: ghc: Please adjust linker options for sparc64 (patch supplied)

On 12/13/2015 07:04 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > On 12/13/2015 12:32 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: >> I am about to file an upstream bug report in ghc so upstream can >> develop a proper fix similar to the older fix for sparc [2]. > > Attaching a proposed

Bug#807777: ghc: Please adjust linker options for sparc64 (patch supplied)

On 12/13/2015 12:32 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > I am about to file an upstream bug report in ghc so upstream can > develop a proper fix similar to the older fix for sparc [2]. Attaching a proposed fix which I have also posted upstream [1]. Cheers, Adrian > [1] https://ghc.ha

Bug#805827: qemu-sh4*: Segfaults on amd64 hosts when using chroot

ng Laurent, so he can maybe comment on this question. > BTW, your patch included the original file too, signal.c.orig, > which is obviously not what you intended to do. Oops, that was obviously unintentional. Sorry. Adrian -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : :' : Debian Deve

Bug#807777: ghc: Please adjust linker options for sparc64 (patch supplied)

it several days maybe so you might as well upload 7.10.3-4 right away with my updated patch. Thanks for making me review my changes and test build them! Adrian > [1] https://git.haskell.org/ghc.git/commitdiff/9756690fe7aa26aee6955d0b720377d53170c542 -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz :

Bug#805827: qemu-sh4*: Segfaults on amd64 hosts when using chroot

Le 12/12/2015 13:31, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz a écrit : >> On 12/12/2015 01:26 PM, Michael Tokarev wrote: >>> While your patch looks sane, I don't know enough about linux-user >>> to judge wheenver it does the right thing. So unlike #805826, >>> I can't reall

Bug#805827: qemu-sh4*: Segfaults on amd64 hosts when using chroot

> On Dec 12, 2015, at 4:38 PM, Laurent Vivier wrote: > > It is safe to apply: it only modifies SH4 linux-user functions. So if it > breaks something (I doubt) it is linux-user for SH4 on 32bit host (as > this patch is a fix for broken 64bit host). Very good! Michael, does

Bug#807343: RM: ghc [armel] -- ROM; Not supported on armel any more

so far? Not yet. I have postponed it to the weekend. I was busy with fixing up ghc on sparc64 and was also a bit overwhelmed by the Perl transition. Matthias Klose also asked me to build Ada for m68k, sh4 and sparc64 which I have now commenced with. Adrian - -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz

Bug#807995: postnews sponsorship

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 12/15/2015 07:01 PM, gregor herrmann wrote: > On Tue, 15 Dec 2015 11:32:22 -0500, Robert James Clay wrote: > >> On 05/16/2013 10:48 +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: >>> Please ping me back once you have 0.6 ready,

Bug#807554: src:nghttp2: Please remove jemalloc as a build-dependency on m68k

m=3 to configure. Ah, good to know. We should probably retitle this bug report and reassign it to jemalloc itself. Adrian -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org `. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de `-GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0

Bug#807589: libechonest: FTBFS on all architectures due to mismatched symbols file(s)

est-build it on one of the buildds. Adrian -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org `. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de `-GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913

Bug#807554: src:nghttp2: Please remove jemalloc as a build-dependency on m68k

which is a bit older than current jemalloc upstream. Thanks for asking! Adrian - -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org `. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de `-GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913

Bug#807590: soprano: FTBFS on m68k due to mismatched symbols file

https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=soprano=m68k=2.9.4%2Bdfsg-3=1449041094 -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org `. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de `-GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913

Bug#807589: libechonest: FTBFS on all architectures due to mismatched symbols file(s)

architectures, even on older architectures like m68k or sh4. If you need assistance updating the symbol files for these architectures, please let me know and I will help as I am an active porter for most Debian Ports architectures. Cheers, Adrian -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : :' : Debian

Bug#807777: ghc: Please adjust linker options for sparc64 (patch supplied)

yet and not detected as ArchSPARC. Native sparc64 support could possibly happen in the future though since ghc already seems to have NGC support for SPARCv9 according to the source code. Anyway, please apply the attached patch to make ghc build on sparc64. Thanks, Adrian -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Gla

Bug#697821: ITP: ppsspp -- ppsspp: A portable PSP emulator.

> [1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=650601 -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org `. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de `-GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913

Bug#809509: Processed: retitle 809509 to gcc-6: Please build with -mcpu=ultrasparc on sparc64 when building 32-bit binaries

On 01/04/2016 02:48 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > On 01/01/2016 02:36 PM, Matthias Klose wrote: >> how was this tested? The last time I checked that option was ignored. > > Argh, you are right, I actually mentioned that earlier [1]. So, looking at the code [1] it s

Bug#809928: linux-image-4.3.0-1-m68k: does not boot any more (on ARAnyM)

at Michael Schmitz built from git without any issues on elgar (A4000). Adrian -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org `. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de `-GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913

Bug#809509: Processed: retitle 809509 to gcc-6: Please build with -mcpu=ultrasparc on sparc64 when building 32-bit binaries

g/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=792204#35 > [3] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=792204 -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org `. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de `-GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913

Bug#809319: jessie-pu: package sane-backends/1.0.24-8

rted package with "dch --bpo", this will generate the correct changelog entry format and version: sane-backends (1.0.24-8~bpo8+1) jessie-backports; urgency=medium * Rebuild for jessie-backports. * -- John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de> Mon, 04 Jan 201

Bug#809319: jessie-pu: package sane-backends/1.0.24-8

On 01/04/2016 03:39 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > That makes no sense. This is a stable update, not a backport. Ah, sorry, I missed that. I'll have another look. The word "jessie" just triggered the bpo mechanism in my head :). -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : :' : Deb

Bug#809509: Processed: retitle 809509 to gcc-6: Please build with -mcpu=ultrasparc on sparc64 when building 32-bit binaries

it? Adrian -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org `. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de `-GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913

Bug#809509: Processed: retitle 809509 to gcc-6: Please build with -mcpu=ultrasparc on sparc64 when building 32-bit binaries

ltrasparc as v7 is too old for many things. I guess Matthias can use the OPT_FLAGS you suggested. Adrian -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org `. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de `-GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546

Bug#750593: xsltproc: bus error on some architectures

te it a lot if anyone could suggest something else to try. Adrian -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org `. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de `-GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913

Bug#750593: xsltproc: bus error on some architectures

On 01/03/2016 03:05 PM, Jelmer Vernooij wrote: > On Sun, Jan 03, 2016 at 11:45:45AM +0100, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: >> We are constantly running into this issue on sparc64 as well. > Thank you for taking the time to look into this in more detail, much > appreciat

Bug#798134: Seems fixed in 1.12.1-1

You don't need to write "thanks" when using the syntax "Control:". Both are mutually exclusive. "thanks" actually means "stop parsing for BTS" commands but since you prefixed and therefore marked all commands with "Control:", it doesn't make any sense to tell tha BTS when to stop parsing for

Bug#809500: gcc-5-cross-ports: Only builds sparc64 cross toolchain binary packages, rest missing

.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org `. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de `-GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913

Bug#809498: gcc-5: Please enable gnat-5 on sh4

, the best way to get gnat-5 on sh4 is to enable it in the source package right now and let me build the binary package manually to resolve the circular dependency on gnat-5. Cheers, Adrian -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org `. `' Freie

Bug#750593: xsltproc: bus error on some architectures

On 01/03/2016 03:59 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > Further research shows that it might actually be a glibc bug which > occurred first with glibc_2.21. The problem never occurred with > glibc_2.19. Ok, more information: Downgrading libxml2 from 2.9.3+dfsg1-1 to 2.9.2+zdfsg

Bug#697821: ITP: ppsspp -- ppsspp: A portable PSP emulator.

> On Jan 7, 2016, at 8:58 PM, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > > well, libpng16 is nowhere near to start, if by start you mean being > uploaded to unstable and starting the actual transition. Well, I've been receiving multiple bug reports through various lists in the past days from

Bug#807020: ghc: FTBFS on armel: selected processor does not support `strd r0, r1, [r7, #64]' in ARM mode

s – in my cases > don’t :-)) Thanks. I just want to make sure I don't interfere with the work of my fellow Debian Developers. Adrian - -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org `. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de `-G

Bug#807020: ghc: FTBFS on armel: selected processor does not support `strd r0, r1, [r7, #64]' in ARM mode

ad by far stretch, so your assumptions *are* non-sense. Instead of telling others what to do, I suggest you use your energy to fix bugs instead or sponsor packages for Debian maintainers or maybe help new people become DDs by becoming an AM. Cheers, Adrian -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : :'

Bug#807020: ghc: FTBFS on armel: selected processor does not support `strd r0, r1, [r7, #64]' in ARM mode

to build ghc for armel without any issues, takes around 12 hours on my 4-core Xeon E31220. Hope this helps, Adrian - -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org `. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de `-GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 295

Bug#808788: higan: Outdated Homepage field in debian/control

;-). Cheers, Adrian -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org `. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de `-GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913

Bug#807343: RM: ghc [armel] -- ROM; Not supported on armel any more

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 12/18/2015 10:02 AM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > Not yet. I have postponed it to the weekend. I was busy with fixing > up ghc on sparc64 and was also a bit overwhelmed by the Perl > transition. So, I am now doing testbuilds a

Bug#807020: ghc: FTBFS on armel: selected processor does not support `strd r0, r1, [r7, #64]' in ARM mode

s that we should just drop it right away. Please let's keep Debian universal. Adrian -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org `. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de `-GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913

Bug#807020: ghc: FTBFS on armel: selected processor does not support `strd r0, r1, [r7, #64]' in ARM mode

ume that in the future, we will be able to drop this workaround again and hopefully have ghc's build system differenriate between armel and armhf which is what would have prevented this regression in the first place. Cheers, Adrian -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.

Bug#807020: ghc: FTBFS on armel: selected processor does not support `strd r0, r1, [r7, #64]' in ARM mode

myself have already done a lot of work, too, not just ghc. The message from the ghc is simply "we know it's broken and we're going to fix it", that's all. I assume ghc upstream development hasn't stopped, has it? Or what exactly did you try to convey here? Adrian -- .''`. Joh

Bug#807020: ghc: FTBFS on armel: selected processor does not support `strd r0, r1, [r7, #64]' in ARM mode

On 12/20/2015 11:09 AM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > First, copy the attached patch to the ghc source package but do > not add it to the series file. Instead, add the following to > debian/rules: PS: I will clean the patch up after I have verified it to work. So please

Bug#808766: doxygen: Please drop llvm-dev and libclang-dev B-D for ppc64

? Not being able to build doxygen blocks several packages on ppc64. Adrian -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org `. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de `-GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913

Bug#807020: ghc: FTBFS on armel: selected processor does not support `strd r0, r1, [r7, #64]' in ARM mode

On 12/20/2015 11:18 AM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > PS: I will clean the patch up after I have verified it to work. > So please don't add it as-is. Alright, the fix works. Attaching a debdiff with my suggested changes. As I said before, this package should be built on an arm

Bug#806204: ibidl-2-0: conflict with libidl0:amd64 0.8.14-1

Control: merge 806192 806204 Hi Arthur! I already filed this as #806192 [1], thus merging both bug report. Please always check existing bug reports before filing a new one to avoid duplicates. Cheers, Adrian > [1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=806192 -- .''`. John P

Bug#806591: qscintilla2: FTBFS on sparc64 due to mismatched symbols files

https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=qscintilla2=sparc64=2.9.1%2Bdfsg-3=1448229603 -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org `. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de `-GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913

Bug#806192: libidl-2-0: Missing Breaks, Conflicts or Replaces with libidl0

Adrian -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org `. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de `-GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913

Bug#806191: ruby-fast-xs: Missing Breaks or Conflicts with ruby-hpricot

434617 -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org `. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de `-GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913

Bug#806208: src:gegl: FTBFS on sparc64, tools/introspect segfaults

exp-combine|dropshadow|kuwahara|box-percentile|disc-percentile|snn-percentile|line-profile|buffer-cache|warp|mandelbrot|hstack" make[3]: *** [examples] Error 138 Cheers, Adrian > [1] > https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=gegl=sparc64=0.3.2-1=1448442183 -- .''`. John Paul Adrian G

Bug#806202: openjdk-8: FTBFS on sparc64, unsupported cpu sparc64

-8_8u72-b05-1~sparc64.log -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org `. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de `-GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913

Bug#806202: openjdk-8: FTBFS on sparc64, unsupported cpu sparc64

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 11/25/2015 01:54 PM, Steven Chamberlain wrote: > Hi! > > John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: >> configure: error: unsupported cpu sparc64 > > Does this help? No, unfortunately not. The error message remains unchanged and o

Bug#806191: ruby-fast-xs: Missing Breaks or Conflicts with ruby-hpricot

to avoid such issues in the future. I will rebuild ruby-hpricot on m68k and sh4 with test enabled in the mean time to have this issue resolved. Thanks, Adrian - -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org `. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaub...@physik.f

Bug#806202: openjdk-8: FTBFS on sparc64, unsupported cpu sparc64

at helps. I haven't waited for the full build to finish, but at least this patch resolves the issue with sparc64 not being properly detected. Adrian - -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org `. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.d

Bug#806784: gcc-5: FTBFS on sparc64 due to mismatched lib32gfortran3.symbols.sparc64

Package: gcc-5 Version: 5.2.1-27 Severity: important User: debian-sp...@lists.debian.org Usertags: sparc64 Hi! Unfortunately, the latest upload of gcc-5 (5.2.1-27) fails to build from source for us due to a mismatched lib32gfortran3.symbols.sparc64 symbols file [1]. Cheers, Adrian > [1] >

Bug#806667: emacs24: FTBFS on sparc64, Bus Error during lucid build

faster. Adrian -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org `. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de `-GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913

Bug#806312: libgc: FTBFS on sparc due to mismatched symbol file

tps://jenkins.debian.net/job/rebootstrap_sparc_gcc5_nobiarch/71/console > [2] https://jenkins.debian.net/view/rebootstrap/ -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org `. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de `-GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E

Bug#806202: openjdk-8: FTBFS on sparc64, unsupported cpu sparc64

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hello! On 11/25/2015 03:12 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > Yes, that helps. I haven't waited for the full build to finish, > but at least this patch resolves the issue with sparc64 not being > properly detected. I ca

Bug#806202: openjdk-8: FTBFS on sparc64, unsupported cpu sparc64

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 11/26/2015 05:48 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > I can confirm that these changes fix openjdk-8 on sparc64, I just > successfully built openjdk-8 on sparc64 which I will now upload to > 'unreleased'. @Steven: Could you please

Bug#806202: openjdk-8: FTBFS on sparc64, unsupported cpu sparc64

obably fix openjdk-8 soon as well ;-). Adrian - -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org `. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de `-GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version:

Bug#805630: elfutils: FTBFS on sparc64, fixed in upstream 0.164

all Debian patches, I'm not sure whether my package is actually properly packaged for Debian. But at least it should be enough to build systemd again on sparc64. Cheers, Adrian -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org `. `' Freie Universitaet Berl

Bug#805631: src:systemd: Should build-depend on elfutils >= 0.158

f 2.69. Invocation command line was Thus, src:systemd should build-depend on elfutils >= 0.158, the last successful build of elfutils on sparc64 was 0.157-3 which is why the missing versioned build dependency became visible. Cheers, Adrian -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : :' : De

Bug#805679: libgc: FTBFS on sparc and sparc64 due to moved assembly source files

for the package in unstable as well. I assume it's ok to perform an NMU as the package is set to LowNMU? Thanks, Adrian -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org `. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de `-GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956

Bug#805680: libgc: FTBFS on sparc64 due to mismatched symbols file

1:7.2d GC_push_next_marked_dirty@Base 1:7.2d dh_makeshlibs: failing due to earlier errors Please update the symbols file accordingly. Unless there are any objections, I would fix #805679 and this issue via an NMU. Cheers, Adrian -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : :' : Debian Developer

Bug#805826: qemu-sh4*: Unsupported syscall: 186

n. However, since we are planning to use qemu to set up additional build environment for Debian's sh4 port, it would be very important for us to have the problem fixed in Debian rather soon. > [1] https://wiki.debian.org/SH4/sbuildQEMU > [2] https://bugs.launchpad.net/qemu/+bug/1516408 -- .''`.

Bug#805846: openjdk-7: FTBFS on sparc64, missing asm/ptrace header, patch attached

ch I just uploaded to 'unreleased'. The changes can be safely implemented in the sense that they affect sparc64 only and therefore should not introduce regressions on any other architectures. See my attached debdiff. Adrian -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : :' : Debian Develope

Bug#805570: libsigsegv: FTBFS on sparc64 due to outdated definition of SIGSEGV_FAULT_STACKPOINTER

arc64 and sparc (V9/V8+). Please apply the patch to help us with the porting efforts for sparc64. Credits for the patch to Romain Dolbeau <rom...@dolbeau.org>. Adrian -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org `. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaub...@ph

Bug#805573: mate-session-manager: mate-session-inhibit manpage and the way it works is confusing

> [$] mate-session-inhibit --inhibit:idle:logout > > Failed to execute --inhibit:idle:logout Well, you used the wrong syntax. It's "mate-session-inihibit --inhibit idle:logout", there is no colon after "--inhibit" as you can see from the help text which clearly states "mate-session-inhibit

Bug#805573: mate-session-manager: mate-session-inhibit manpage and the way it works is confusing

> On Nov 19, 2015, at 6:10 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz > <glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de> wrote: > > >> [$] mate-session-inhibit --inhibit:idle:logout >> >> Failed to execute --inhibit:idle:logout > > Well, you used the wrong syntax. > > I

Bug#790762: src:hplip: Many PPD files for postscript drivers are missing in printer-driver-postscript-hp

Hi! On 07/01/2015 05:22 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > While setting up a new print server on the network, we noticed that the binary > package printer-driver-postscript-hp is missing the PPDs for many postscript > printers actually supported by hplip. Just saw that hplip wa

<    4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   >