can select which dictionary they would like to
be active,
which GUI involves more than a single line of code.
--
Soren Stoutner
so...@stoutner.com
[1] https://www.stoutner.com/privacy-browser-pc/
[2] https://archlinux.org/todo/packaging-qtwebengine-dictionaries/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Do you have any idea why the system silently deleted the email instead of
sending a bounce email with an explanation of the problem?
On Saturday, September 24, 2022 4:16:33 AM MST Cord Beermann wrote:
> Hallo! Du (Soren Stoutner) hast geschrieben:
> > After removing the Content Preview
Package: dictionaries-common
Version: 1.28.18
Severity: wishlist
Tags: l10n
Qt WebEngine has the ability to use Hunspell dictionaries for spell checking
with the WebEngine, but for some reason they require that the dictionary files
be converted to a special binary format (.bdic). This
created a bug
report against dictionaries-common at https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/
bugreport.cgi?bug=1020387[1] . It would probably be a good idea to hold off on
uploading these changes until that consensus is reached.
--
Soren Stoutner
623-262-6169
so...@stoutner.com
[1] https
Source: hunspell-be
Version: 0.53-3.1
Severity: wishlist
Qt WebEngine has the ability to use Hunspell dictionaries for spell checking,
but they require that the dictionary files be converted to a special binary
format (.bdic). This conversion can be done using qwebengine_convert_dict from
the
Source: hunspell-ar
Version: 3.2-1.2
Severity: wishlist
Qt WebEngine has the ability to use Hunspell dictionaries for spell checking,
but they require that the dictionary files be converted to a special binary
format (.bdic). This conversion can be done using qwebengine_convert_dict from
the
Source: libreoffice-dictionaries
Version: 1:7.2.0-2
Severity: wishlist
Qt WebEngine has the ability to use Hunspell dictionaries for spell checking,
but they require that the dictionary files be converted to a special binary
format (.bdic). This conversion can be done using
Source: hunspell-fr
Version: 1:7.0-1
Severity: wishlist
Qt WebEngine has the ability to use Hunspell dictionaries for spell checking,
but they require that the dictionary files be converted to a special binary
format (.bdic). This conversion can be done using qwebengine_convert_dict from
the
Source: hunspell-eu
Version: 5.1-2
Severity: wishlist
Qt WebEngine has the ability to use Hunspell dictionaries for spell checking,
but they require that the dictionary files be converted to a special binary
format (.bdic). This conversion can be done using qwebengine_convert_dict from
the
Source: hunspell-en-med
Version: 0.0.20140410-4
Severity: wishlist
Qt WebEngine has the ability to use Hunspell dictionaries for spell checking,
but they require that the dictionary files be converted to a special binary
format (.bdic). This conversion can be done using qwebengine_convert_dict
Source: hunspell-dz
Version: 0.1.0-1.1
Severity: wishlist
Qt WebEngine has the ability to use Hunspell dictionaries for spell checking,
but they require that the dictionary files be converted to a special binary
format (.bdic). This conversion can be done using qwebengine_convert_dict from
Source: igerman98
Version: 20161207-9
Severity: wishlist
Qt WebEngine has the ability to use Hunspell dictionaries for spell checking,
but they require that the dictionary files be converted to a special binary
format (.bdic). This conversion can be done using qwebengine_convert_dict from
the
Source: hunspell-ca
Version: 3.0.7+repack1-1
Severity: wishlist
Qt WebEngine has the ability to use Hunspell dictionaries for spell checking,
but they require that the dictionary files be converted to a special binary
format (.bdic). This conversion can be done using qwebengine_convert_dict
Source: hunspell-br
Version: 0.12-2.1
Severity: wishlist
Qt WebEngine has the ability to use Hunspell dictionaries for spell checking,
but they require that the dictionary files be converted to a special binary
format (.bdic). This conversion can be done using qwebengine_convert_dict from
the
Source: hunspell-bo
Version: 0.4.0-1.1
Severity: wishlist
Qt WebEngine has the ability to use Hunspell dictionaries for spell checking,
but they require that the dictionary files be converted to a special binary
format (.bdic). This conversion can be done using qwebengine_convert_dict from
Source: hunspell-kk
Version: 1.1-2.1
Severity: wishlist
Qt WebEngine has the ability to use Hunspell dictionaries for spell checking,
but they require that the dictionary files be converted to a special binary
format (.bdic). This conversion can be done using qwebengine_convert_dict from
the
Source: medicalterms
Version: 20220425-1
Severity: wishlist
Qt WebEngine has the ability to use Hunspell dictionaries for spell checking,
but they require that the dictionary files be converted to a special binary
format (.bdic). This conversion can be done using qwebengine_convert_dict from
Source: uzbek-wordlist
Version: 0.6-6
Severity: wishlist
Qt WebEngine has the ability to use Hunspell dictionaries for spell checking,
but they require that the dictionary files be converted to a special binary
format (.bdic). This conversion can be done using qwebengine_convert_dict from
the
Source: dutch
Version: 1:2.20.19-2
Severity: wishlist
Qt WebEngine has the ability to use Hunspell dictionaries for spell checking,
but they require that the dictionary files be converted to a special binary
format (.bdic). This conversion can be done using qwebengine_convert_dict from
the
Source: hunspell-ml
Version: 0.1-2.1
Severity: wishlist
Qt WebEngine has the ability to use Hunspell dictionaries for spell checking,
but they require that the dictionary files be converted to a special binary
format (.bdic). This conversion can be done using qwebengine_convert_dict from
the
Source: hunspell-lv
Version: 1.4.0-2
Severity: wishlist
Qt WebEngine has the ability to use Hunspell dictionaries for spell checking,
but they require that the dictionary files be converted to a special binary
format (.bdic). This conversion can be done using qwebengine_convert_dict from
the
Source: hunspell-dict-ko
Version: 0.7.92-1
Severity: wishlist
Qt WebEngine has the ability to use Hunspell dictionaries for spell checking,
but they require that the dictionary files be converted to a special binary
format (.bdic). This conversion can be done using qwebengine_convert_dict from
mechanism for tracking when the packaging of the .bdic dictionaries is
completed for each package.
--
Soren Stoutner
so...@stoutner.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Wednesday, October 5, 2022 5:07:50 AM MST Agustin Martin wrote:
> El jue, 22 sept 2022 a las 21:30, Soren Stoutner
> One noticeable thing is that bdic generation failed for some hunspell
> dicts I have installed
That’s concerning.
> ++ processing an_ES.aff
> [100
I submitted three upstream bugs.
https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-107599[1]
https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-107600[2]
https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-107601[3]
--
Soren Stoutner
so...@stoutner.com
[1] https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-107599
[2] https
On Wednesday, October 5, 2022 9:38:09 AM MST Soren Stoutner wrote:
> > ++ processing gl_ES.aff
> > gl_ES.dic_delta not found.
> > Reading gl_ES.aff
> > Reading gl_ES.dic
> > Serializing...
> > Verifying...
> > Word does not match!
> >
> &g
tags 1001064 patch
thanks
I have created a MR in Salsa that should contain everything needed to release
version 4.3.2.
--
Soren Stoutner
so...@stoutner.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
The MR can be seen at the following URL:
https://salsa.debian.org/cryptocoin-team/electrum/-/
merge_requests[1]
--
Soren Stoutner
so...@stoutner.com
[1] https://salsa.debian.org/cryptocoin-team/electrum/-/
merge_requests
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message
severity 1001064 grave
The version of Electrum currently available in Debian is too old to connect to
the Electrum network, making the package unusable for all Debian users.
--
Soren Stoutner
so...@stoutner.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
obably not notice. If we go this route we need
to make sure we are only editing temporary files used to generate the .bdic as
those using the standard Hunspell system should not end up with an inferior
experience just to accommodate a custom binary format.
--
Soren Stoutner
so...@stoutn
UTF-8 as described above, would
that mean that
it is safe to assume that these are arch:all?
--
Soren Stoutner
so...@stoutner.com
[1]
https://sites.google.com/a/chromium.org/dev/developers/how-tos/editing-the-spell-checking-dictionaries
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally s
ainst system hunspell into chromium upstream, provided bdic support
> made it into upstream hunspell.
I think that would be the way to go if both the upstreams would support it.
--
Soren Stoutner
so...@stoutner.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Before this dictionary can be build a .bdic the following upstream bug needs to
be
fixed (reported both to Qt and to Google):
https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-107600[1]
https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=1374955[2]
--
Soren Stoutner
so...@stoutner.com
[1
://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-107601[3]
https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=1374957[4]
These upstream bugs have been submitted to both Qt and Google.
--
Soren Stoutner
so...@stoutner.com
[1] https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-107599
[2] https://bugs.chromium.org/p
Would you be interested in a patch that updates this package to the current
upstream (4.3.2)? If so, I would be willing to submit a MR to the Salsa
repository.
--
Soren Stoutner
so...@stoutner.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Does anyone from the Chromium team have any insights
into the feasibility of Chromium using a system-wide
directory for .bdic files?
--
Soren Stoutner
so...@stoutner.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
nce to look further into
> this. Unfortunately, there's a few other high-priority things I need to
> deal with before I can take a look.
That’s fine. This is a low priority, so it can wait until whenever you have
time to look at it.
--
Soren Stoutner
so...@stoutner.com
signature.asc
Description: T
at
https://doc.qt.io/qt-5/qtwebengine-features.html#spellchecker[2]
On Monday, December 26, 2022 9:08:38 AM MST Dmitry Shachnev wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 13, 2022 at 10:43:06AM -0700, Soren Stoutner wrote:
> > Can one of the Debian Qt/KDE maintainers weigh in on the feasibility of
> > either
, 2023 4:26:19 AM MST Dmitry Shachnev wrote:
> However, if none of the dictionaries is installed, the symlink will be
> dangling. Do you think it's okay, or we should find how to fix this?
>
> --
> Dmitry Shachnev
--
Soren Stoutner
so...@stoutner.com
signature.asc
Description: This
:20 AM MST Soren Stoutner wrote:
> Dmitry, can you also comment about adding a symlink from /usr/share/qt5/
> qtwebengine_dictionaries to /usr/share/hunspell-dict as part of one of the
> libqt5webengine packages and from /usr/share/qt6/qtwebengine_dictionaries
> as part of one of the lib
the Expat-licensed file after the LGPL block.
>
> Understood. However I do not feel confident that I can correctly make
> these changes by hand. The above is just one example where I found that
> using a glob would require an additional section/exception. There are
> likely many more.
>
> Th
ow; you have posted your ITP, you have invited sponsors, you have done
> your thing. Now in my experience, a few months can go by until someone
> finds the time, and wants to spend the time to sponsor your package.
>
> No offence; this is only my perspective as someone who relie
cannot think of any way
this particular symlink could pose a security risk.
On Monday, January 9, 2023 7:46:15 AM MST Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Fri, 6 Jan 2023 at 12:22, Dmitry Shachnev wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 05, 2023 at 03:18:14PM -0700, Soren
,
but it is a possible solution if the symlink is unacceptable.
On Monday, January 9, 2023 11:29:25 AM MST Soren Stoutner wrote:
> Although I can think of some circumstances where a dangling symlink can pose
> a security risk (depending on where it is located, where it
to salsa. Currently
> installdeb-myspell will fail if no conversion tool is found.
--
Soren Stoutner
so...@stoutner.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
ges to
build-depend on qwebengine_convert_dict and wouldn’t require reworking all of
those packages’ build scripts every time the version of Qt in Debian changes."
Thanks.
--
Soren Stoutner
so...@stoutner.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
convert_dict) and that it expects .dic
>> file as entry, Fixed.
>
>Just noticed that it is also in package and path you set, there are
>two possibilities. Expect new dictionaries-common package soon.
--
Soren Stoutner
so...@stoutner.com
[1] mailto:agmar...@debian.org
ated aff file (and be a plain wordlist), but just
> checked that even that requires an empty aff file.
Good catch. For some reason I thought the documentation said to use the .aff
file, but I see now that it was just working around my not using it
idiomatically.
--
Soren St
ian.net/debian/pool/main/d/d11amp/d11amp_0.59-1.dsc
>
> Changes for the initial release:
>
> d11amp (0.59-1) unstable; urgency=low
--
Soren Stoutner
so...@stoutner.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
I created an MR:
https://salsa.debian.org/debian/dictionaries-common/-/merge_requests/5[1]
Please review and make sure I haven’t missed anything or misrepresented the
consensus.
On Thursday, November 17, 2022 2:25:17 PM MST Soren Stoutner wrote:
> At this point, the only question left is wh
Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez
Meyer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, 9 Nov 2022 at 15:13, Soren Stoutner wrote:
> [snip]
>
> > This would also require the the Debain Qt/KDE Maintainers add a symlink
> > from / usr/share/qt5/qtwebengine_dictionaries and /usr/share/qt6/
&
.
>
> mh, what documentation are you talking about??
The documentation for any packager of future Hunspell languages so that they
know that
they need to include compiled .bdic files, where they should be placed, and how
to do it.
--
Soren Stoutner
so...@stoutner.com
[1] https://www.sto
if nobody else prefers to do so
instead.
--
Soren Stoutner
so...@stoutner.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
arate bug about this issue, as it is my belief
that Lintian
should consider an Expat license in debian/copyright to not be a conflict with
a MIT license
in an AppStream metainfo.xml file.
--
Soren Stoutner
so...@stoutner.com
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MIT_License#Ambiguity_an
I created a new bug report to discuss this issue as the root cause ends up
being different than what was originally reported here.
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1029055[1]
--
Soren Stoutner
so...@stoutner.com
[1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug
elines-and-templates/[1]
On Monday, January 16, 2023 11:48:48 PM MST Soren Stoutner wrote:
> There appears to be some question of opinion as to if the Debian MIT (Expat)
> License is the same as the SPDX MIT License.
>
> https://www.debian.org/legal/licenses/mit[1]
>
> https://
There appears to be some question of opinion as to if the Debian MIT (Expat)
License is
the same as the SPDX MIT License.
https://www.debian.org/legal/licenses/mit[1]
https://spdx.org/licenses/MIT.html[2]
Can somebody at Debian Legal please comment?
--
Soren Stoutner
so...@stoutner.com
), there probably shouldn’t be any question that these are
simply two
different names for the same license (for reasons that probably shouldn’t
surprise me,
open-source people can’t just get along and agree on a name).
--
Soren Stoutner
so...@stoutner.com
[1] https://spdx.org/licenses
Package: lintian
Version: 2.115.3
Severity: wishlist
Debian has recently started requesting that graphical programs install
AppStream metainfo.xml files.
https://appstream.debian.org/sid/main/issues/electrum.html
The AppStream specification has a very restricted listed of possible licenses
, of course, prefers the Expat name as it is more precise.
Which leads to this Lintian warning:
inconsistent-appstream-metadata-license debian/metainfo.xml (mit != expat)
[debian/
copyright]
--
Soren Stoutner
so...@stoutner.com
[1]
https://freedesktop.org/software/appstream/docs/chap
I recently came across this bug report while working on cleaning up Lintian
errors on
qtwebengine-opensource-src.
The summarized version of the problem is that the file was originally licensed
under a non-
DFSG-free license, but was later changed by Unicode to be under a DFSG-free
licence.
Source: binaryen
Version: 108-1
Severity: wishlist
Your source contains a copy of ConvertUTF.cpp at
third_party/llvm-project/ConvertUTF.cpp.
As https://lintian.debian.org/tags/license-problem-convert-utf-code indicates,
the license listed at the top of the file is not DFSG-free.
However, as
There is some additional information in the Lintian bug:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=854209[1]
--
Soren Stoutner
so...@stoutner.com
[1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=854209
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Once this bug has been fixed, it would probably make sense to update the
Lintian description to indicate that the problematic file can be appropriately
relicensed to a DFSG compatible license, with a link to this bug report for
information about the details.
--
Soren Stoutner
so
Would you be interested in a patch to fix the false positives in this Lintian
check?
--
Soren Stoutner
so...@stoutner.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
It would probably be helpful to update the documentation at
https://lintian.debian.org/manual/index.html#format-of-override-files[1] to
describe the new pointed hints format.
--
Soren Stoutner
so...@stoutner.com
[1] https://lintian.debian.org/manual/index.html#format-of-override
> I think the answer is that what Debian calls "MIT (Expat)" on that
> page matches what SPDX calls "MIT" (I don't think they are "the same"
> because the underlying concepts of what a license is and so forth are
> not the same).
>
> Richard
--
Thank you.
On Wednesday, January 18, 2023 2:47:01 PM MST Axel Beckert wrote:
> But I'll at least try to update doc/lintian.rst so that at least the
> content is ready once we can update the website again.
--
Soren Stoutner
so...@stoutner.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a dig
expressed so
far have run the gamut on both sides, but my sense is they lean a little
towards shipping them in the existing Hunspell packages so as to not add 80+
new packages to Debian that only contain a few files each.
Is there anyone who feels strongly that they should not be shipped in the
PM MST Soren Stoutner wrote:
> The next question that needs to be answered is if we should create new
> binary packages for the .bdic files or if we should ship them as part of
> the existing Hunspell language binary packages. The opinions that have
> been expressed so far have r
the traditional Hunspell
system.
https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-107600[1]
https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=1374955[2]
--
Soren Stoutner
so...@stoutner.com
[1] https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-107600
[2] https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail
Before Hungarian and Ukrainian can be packaged, the IGNORE command will
need to be dealt with.
https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-107600[1]
https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=1374955[2]
--
Soren Stoutner
so...@stoutner.com
[1] https://bugreports.qt.io/browse
e, but that file does not include an
IGNORE
command and doesn’t produce an error when compiled to the .bdic format. Does
anyone
know if ckb.aff exists in Debian?
https://packages.debian.org/search?
searchon=contents=ckb.aff=path=unstable=any[3]
--
Soren Stoutner
so...@stoutner.com
[1
]
Soren
--
Soren Stoutner
so...@stoutner.com
[1] https://salsa.debian.org/debian/dictionaries-common/-/merge_requests/6
[2] https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/qt6-webengine
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "privacybrowser":
* Package name : privacybrowser
Version : 0.1-1
Upstream contact : Soren Stoutner
* URL : https://www.stoutner.com/privacy-
the versions of Qt change in
Debian.
All you should need to do is the following:
1. Build-depends on `convert-bdic`.
2. Use /usr/bin/convert-bdic to do the dictionary conversion.
3. Place the .bdic files in /usr/share/hunspell-bdic.
Thanks,
Soren
--
Soren Stoutner
so...@stoutner.com
t support the Unicode standard. This phrase does not
exist in the license that Unicode adopted later and which they relicensed
their files to use.
--
Soren Stoutner
so...@stoutner.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
There is a Salsa merge request that fixes this problem.
https://salsa.debian.org/lintian/lintian/-/merge_requests/461[1]
--
Soren Stoutner
so...@stoutner.com
[1] https://salsa.debian.org/lintian/lintian/-/merge_requests/461
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed
Examples of how to appropriately relicense files that fail under this new
Lintian check are
below:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1033134[1]
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1033135[2]
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1033136[3]
--
Soren
rds,
>
> Mezgani Ali
> +212 6 44 17 94 51
> ali.mezg...@nativelabs.ma
> https://wiki.debian.org/mezgani
>
> ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ Active member of IETF, GNU, Debian, FreeBSD and Kernel.
> ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁
> ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀
> ⠈⠳⣄⠀
>
> > On 15/03/2023, at 19:52, Soren Stoutner wrote:
>
coverage in oldstable).
Soren
On Wednesday, March 15, 2023 11:34:58 AM MST Dmitry Shachnev wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> On Tue, Mar 14, 2023 at 06:41:55PM -0700, Soren Stoutner wrote:
> > Paul,
> >
> > I /am/ one of the Debian Qt WebEngine maintainers, and I also submit
nor stable updates of Qt WebEngine
> for current/previous Debian releases so far, but I am very glad to hear
> that they are being worked on for the Debian bookworm release at least.
>
> https://lists.debian.org/debian-security-announce/
> https://lists.debian.org/debian-announce/
--
PM MST you wrote:
> On Sat, 2023-03-11 at 14:41 -0700, Soren Stoutner wrote:
> > * URL : https://www.stoutner.com/privacy-browser-pc/
> > privacybrowser - web browser that respects your privacy
>
> I note that this browser depends on Qt WebEngine, all the Q
of Qt change in
Debian.
All you should need to do is the following:
1. Build-depends on `convert-bdic`.
2. Use /usr/bin/convert-bdic to do the dictionary conversion.
3. Place the .bdic files in /usr/share/hunspell-bdic.
Thanks,
Soren
--
Soren Stoutner
so...@stoutner.com
signature.asc
documentation
at:
file:///usr/share/doc/dictionaries-common-dev/dsdt-policy.html#hunspell-bdic[1]
Thanks,
Soren
--
Soren Stoutner
so...@stoutner.com
[1] file:///usr/share/doc/dictionaries-common-dev/dsdt-policy.html#hunspell-bdic
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message
Package: lintian
Version: 2.116.3
Severity: wishlist
Lintian currently produces warnings like the following:
inconsistent-appstream-metadata-license appdata.xml (gfdl-1.3 != gfdl-niv-1.3+)
[debian/copyright]
AppStream metadata defines a specific short list of acceptable licenses as
described
documentation
at:
file:///usr/share/doc/dictionaries-common-dev/dsdt-policy.html#hunspell-bdic
Thanks,
Soren
--
Soren Stoutner
so...@stoutner.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
ated in 2015, it looks like
those
particular licenses were only fixed in the repository in April 2022. Which
explains the
Chromium 108/111 difference.
> > with the license at:
> Yeah, breakpad's LICENSE file needs to be corrected. I can send a patch
> upstream for that.
Thanks.
--
Soren St
ays a PITA. And I do not
> expect that to change, I'm afraid.
--
Soren Stoutner
so...@stoutner.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
; (trixie or whatever), of course, but if it's easier for the dependency
> chain; I'm open to discussing having chromium provide it.
>
> I haven't followed all of this very long thread, so it may be
> irrelevant at this point. :)
--
Soren Stoutner
so...@stoutner.com
sign
concern. But the burden on Qt packagers, myself
or others, going forward is very minimal.
On Thursday, February 16, 2023 11:22:01 AM MST Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez
Meyer wrote:
> El jueves, 16 de febrero de 2023 13:42:42 -03 Soren Stoutner escribió:
> > Seeing as this is how Qt
I have recently started working on Electrum. I see this bug, which is for a
really old version. Can you confirm if it is still a problem?
--
Soren Stoutner
so...@stoutner.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
I have recently started working on the Element package. I noticed this bug
for a really old version. Can you confirm if it still exists in the current
package?
--
Soren Stoutner
so...@stoutner.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
I recently started working on the Electrum package and noticed this bug report
for a very old version. Can you confirm if this is still an issue?
--
Soren Stoutner
so...@stoutner.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
I have recently started working on the Electrum package and came across
this old bug. Can you confirm that it is still an issue. It looks like at
least
some aspects of it have already been addressed upstream.
https://github.com/spesmilo/electrum/issues/4637[1]
--
Soren Stoutner
so
I have added a proposed README file, which can be seen at:
https://salsa.debian.org/cryptocoin-team/electrum/-/merge_requests/16[1]
Let me know if there is anything else I should add or if you think anything
should be
reworded.
Soren
--
Soren Stoutner
so...@stoutner.com
[1] https
can
add about the
hardware wallets you use:
https://salsa.debian.org/cryptocoin-team/electrum/-/merge_requests/16[1]
Soren
--
Soren Stoutner
so...@stoutner.com
[1] https://salsa.debian.org/cryptocoin-team/electrum/-/merge_requests/16
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Soren Stoutner
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org
* Package name: privacybrowser
Version : 0.1
Upstream Contact: Soren Stoutner
* URL : https://www.stoutner.com/privacy-browser-pc/
* License : (GPLv3
in /usr/share/hunspell-bdic.
More detailed information can be found in the dictionary packager
documentation at:
file:///usr/share/doc/dictionaries-common-dev/dsdt-policy.html#hunspell-bdic
Thanks,
Soren
--
Soren Stoutner
so...@stoutner.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed
documentation
at:
file:///usr/share/doc/dictionaries-common-dev/dsdt-policy.html#hunspell-bdic
Thanks,
Soren
--
Soren Stoutner
so...@stoutner.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
201 - 300 of 350 matches
Mail list logo
