Bug#633465: lists.debian.org: please create new list debian-dug-by

2011-07-10 Thread Alexander Reshetov
Package: lists.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
Usertags: newlist

Hello,

Name: debian-dug-by

Rationale: in Belarus we have now fast growing Debian Community which consists
of Debian Contributors, Maintainers (Developers in the future ;)) and
users. So the main goal of this list is to gather all debianers in Belarus
together in this ML to be able to coordinate their work and various local
events.

Short Description: Discussion list for the Belarusian Debian Community

Long Description: Discussion list for the Debian community in Belarus
without being tied to a particular group in order to link all groups and
individuals in the country and facilitate the coordination of local
events.

Subscription Policy: open

Post Policy: open

Web Archive: yes


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#633465: lists.debian.org: please create new list debian-dug-by

2011-07-10 Thread Alexander Reshetov
On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 08:45:46PM +, Cord Beermann wrote:
 Hallo! Du (Alexander Reshetov) hast geschrieben:
 
  Name: debian-dug-by
 
 Before i ask you the following:
 
 | After filing the request, it would be very much appreciated if several 
 | other people interested in the new list would send a mail to the bug,
 | in order to record their interest.
 
 we should talk about the listname. 
 
 We suggest to ask for a list with the name debian-user-belarus. 
 
 Your suggestion is far away from any existing list in our system.
 
 If that is ok for you, you should change the request and then show us
 that there is enough interest in this list...

Hello.

Thanks for such  question, but I (and others I think) would to leave
debian-dug-by. This choise is simple.

debian-user-language mailing lists is for support for Debian users
that speak in this language. In Belarus most people speak russian. But
for russian-speaking people exists debian-russian@l.d.o ML. There is no
need (unfortunately) in creation of ML for belarusian-speaking people
while small percentage of such people.

But on the other hand we need mailing list for those reasons which I
described in first message.

BTW, it isn't so far away from any existing list because there is two
-dug- mailing lists (debian-dug-in and debian-dug-mx) for which
exists -dug- paradigm [0].

 0 : http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=588668#28

This -dug- mailing lists can be also included in separate type of lists on
lists.debian.org.

-- 
Best regards,
Alexander Reshetov


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#603206: www.debian.org: Document the official @debian identi.ca account that users can follow

2011-05-14 Thread Alexander Reshetov
Hello,

here is yet another mockup http://debian-by.org/~eof/wdo-identica-logo.png


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#608400: re-organize how to contribute documentation per-profile

2011-05-14 Thread Alexander Reshetov
Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
 Out of curiosity in response to various DPL inquiries about how can I help
 Debian?, I've reviewed a bit the various pieces of documentation on the
 subject and compared it with what other distros do.  A remarkable difference
 seems to be a per-profile organization of the available material,
 i.e. organizing the how to contribute page with a top-level distinction
 among, say: developers, translators, bug triager, artists, donors, etc.
 
 I believe there is some value in such a distinction, simply because the users
 interested into helping out usually knows pretty well what they are able and
 willing to do.  I hence suggest to reorganize the content of
 http://www.debian.org/intro/help according to the various profiles.
 
 Just for reference, here a few links to what others (random sampling, not
 necessarily representative) have been doing in that respect:
 
 - Fedora: http://fedoraproject.org/en/join-fedora (scrolling a bit down)
 - Ubuntu: http://www.ubuntu.com/community
 - OpenSUSE: http://en.opensuse.org/Portal:How_to_participate

Good idea.
I just found at wiki.d.o page Debian for non coder contributors [1].
I think it can be a good start point. We can start from this wiki page and
when it will be more or less finished it can be copied to www.d.o.

 1 : http://wiki.debian.org/DebianForNonCoderContributors


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#621128: http://www.debian.org/CD/http-ftp/ suggests proprietary download managers

2011-04-07 Thread Alexander Reshetov
Thanks for the notice. I agree with this opinion.
Another possible solution (or even additional) -- point people to the
comparison of download managers [0].

 0 : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_download_managers

On this page lists download managers which compared by:
 * License
 * Interface (CLI / GUI)
 * Platforms (Linux / Windows / Mac OS)
 * Also presented supported by DMs protocols and their features.

With this link people will have freedom of choice of programm.
So patch can looks like this (attached).
@@ -14,10 +14,12 @@
 qttwgetnbsp;-cnbsp;/ttemURL/em/q or
 qttcurlnbsp;-Cnbsp;-nbsp;-Lnbsp;-Onbsp;/ttemURL/em/q.
 Under Windows, you might want to try
-a href=http://www.freedownloadmanager.org/;Free Download Manager/a or 
-a href=http://www.getright.com/;GetRight/a.
+a href=http://www.freedownloadmanager.org/;Free Download Manager/a.
 Under Macnbsp;OS, have a look at
-a href=http://www.yazsoft.com/;Speed Download/a./p
+a href=http://code.google.com/p/cocoawget/;CocoaWget/a.
+Or you can look at a
+href=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_download_managers;comparison/a
+of download managers and choose program that you like./p
 
 pThe following Debian images are available for
 download:/p


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#610429:

2011-01-19 Thread Alexander Reshetov
I also found this link [1]
I hope that it will be helpful.

[1] http://piuparts.debian.org/sid/initdscript_lsb_header_issue.html



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#610395: Subject: xmonad: missed text in section Description of the debian/control

2011-01-18 Thread Alexander Reshetov
Package: xmonad
Version: 0.9.1-2+b1
Severity: minor

In Description section of the debian/control file missed text.
Here is diff of the control file:

--- control.orig2011-01-18 11:42:54.0 +0200
+++ control 2011-01-18 11:44:37.0 +0200
@@ -30,6 +30,10 @@
 Replaces: xmonad-rebuild
 Suggests: dmenu
 Description: A lightweight X11 window manager
+ This package provides a library for the Haskell programming language.
+ See http://www.haskell.org/ for more information on Haskell.
+ .
+ Xmonad is a minimalist tiling window manager for X, written in
  Haskell.  Windows are managed using automatic layout algorithms,
  which can be dynamically reconfigured. At any time windows are
  arranged so as to maximise the use of screen real estate. All

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 6.0
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-686 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=ru_RU.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages xmonad depends on:
ii  libc6 2.11.2-8   Embedded GNU C Library: Shared lib
ii  libffi5   3.0.9-3Foreign Function Interface library
ii  libgmp3c2 2:4.3.2+dfsg-1 Multiprecision arithmetic library
ii  libx11-6  2:1.3.3-4  X11 client-side library
ii  libxext6  2:1.1.2-1  X11 miscellaneous extension librar
ii  libxinerama1  2:1.1.1-1  X11 Xinerama extension library
ii  x11-utils 7.5+4  X11 utilities

Versions of packages xmonad recommends:
ii  libghc6-xmonad-dev0.9.1-2+b1 A lightweight X11 window manager
ii  libghc6-xmonad-doc0.9.1-2A lightweight X11 window manager;

Versions of packages xmonad suggests:
pn  dmenu none (no description available)


-- no debconf information



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#610429: update-rc.d: warning: apcupsd runlevel arguments do not match LSB Default values

2011-01-18 Thread Alexander Reshetov
Package: apcupsd
Version: 3.14.8-2
Severity: normal

After 'apt-get install apcupsd' i get warnings:

Setting up apcupsd (3.14.8-2) ...
update-rc.d: warning: apcupsd start runlevel arguments (1 2 3 4 5) do
not match LSB Default-Start values (2 3 4 5)
update-rc.d: warning: apcupsd stop runlevel arguments (0 6) do not
match LSB Default-Stop values (0 1 6)

$ grep Default /etc/init.d/apcupsd
# Default-Start:2 3 4 5
# Default-Stop: 0 1 6

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 6.0
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-686 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=ru_RU.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages apcupsd depends on:
ii  libc6 2.11.2-8   Embedded GNU C Library: Shared lib
ii  libgcc1   1:4.4.5-10 GCC support library
ii  libwrap0  7.6.q-19   Wietse Venema's TCP wrappers libra

Versions of packages apcupsd recommends:
pn  apcupsd-doc   none (no description available)

Versions of packages apcupsd suggests:
pn  apcupsd-cgi   none (no description available)
pn  hal   none (no description available)
ii  udev  164-3  /dev/ and hotplug management daemo

-- no debconf information



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org