Bug#869386: on man page say what ! means

2017-07-23 Thread D. B.
On Sun, Jul 23, 2017 at 3:05 PM, D. B. <db0...@gmail.com> wrote: > so file a bug upstream with a patch. I don't see why this should be > debian's problem. Fyi, the docs seem to come from here: > https://git.gnome.org/browse/gtk+/tree/docs/reference/gtk/ > gtk-query-setti

Bug#869386: on man page say what ! means

2017-07-23 Thread D. B.
so file a bug upstream with a patch. I don't see why this should be debian's problem. Fyi, the docs seem to come from here: https://git.gnome.org/browse/gtk+/tree/docs/reference/gtk/gtk-query-settings.xml?h=gtk-3-22

Bug#839122: Old GTK+ 3 Debian/Ubuntu patch causes Critical Warning every time a GtkComboBox is opened

2016-12-09 Thread D. B.
On Fri, Dec 9, 2016 at 8:40 PM, Michael Biebl wrote: > Hi Daniel > > > I see that you've been working with upstream, trying to resolve this. > Thanks a lot for that. > The latest stable release 3.22.5, contains your patches. > > What's unclear to me is whether your patches

Bug#847366: gtk apps die with 'Couldn't open libGL.so.1'

2016-12-09 Thread D. B.
#2 seems like the superior option, right? On Fri, Dec 9, 2016 at 4:17 PM, Dariusz Gadomski < dariusz.gadom...@canonical.com> wrote: > Looks like this behaviour was introduced with a change to cairo > in version 1.12.16-4 [1]. So looks like gtk was depending on being > linked to libGL.so

Bug#847153: All combo boxes under GTK 3 render off screen

2016-12-06 Thread D. B.
On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 3:53 AM, Jeffrey H. Ingber wrote: > Package: gtk+3.0 > Version: libgtk-3-0:amd64 > > All combo boxes under gtk 3 attempt to open in the very far upper-left > hand corner of the screen. Maybe you can see part of the combo box, and > maybe you

Bug#794064: Confirmed

2016-12-03 Thread D. B.
I get this sometimes in unstable of today, even without automatic login being enabled. Did anyone ever find a fix? This can be hugely disruptive. Sometimes messing around with the Ctrl+Alt+F1 etc works to get a working login screen, but I don't think this always works, so sometimes, the session

Bug#843810: libgtk-3-0: gtk3 >= 3.21.4-1 does not show a menu in Firefox, virt-manager and probably many others

2016-11-09 Thread D. B.
What Jason said. It's fine for me, on 3.22.2, and more info is needed in any case. Also, I suspect it's quite likely this is a duplicate of Bug#843418

Bug#843418: menus do not appear on high-DPI display

2016-11-06 Thread D. B.
Are you using X.org or Wayland, and which GTK+ theme?

Bug#842070: libgtk-3-0: Upgrade breaks gvim: Gtk-CRITICAL **: gtk_widget_set_size_request: assertion 'width >= -1' failed

2016-10-25 Thread D. B.
With respect (and forasmuch as I love anything that promotes vim) - if some program and/or theme has managed to request <= 0 size for a widget, then it's broken GTK+, not the other way around. That said, on a quick glance at the gtk-3-22 branch, I can't see any changes in gtkwidget.c that

Bug#839122: Affects: libgtk-3-0

2016-09-29 Thread D. B.
Package: libgtk-3-0 I'm still trying to figure out how this adventure game, I mean bugtracker, works - so forgive me if I seem to be spamming or failing comedically. In this case, I got the package name wrong, since the Package Tracker seems to use a different name from the Bug Tracker. Which is

Bug#839122: Old GTK+ 3 Debian/Ubuntu patch causes Critical Warning every time a GtkComboBox is opened

2016-09-29 Thread D. B.
Package: gtk-3.0 Version: 3.22.0-1 Hello, The problem here is this patch: https://sources.debian.net/src/gtk%2B3.0/3.22.0-1/debian/ patches/016_no_offscreen_widgets_grabbing.patch/ although its counterpart looks similarly old and ill-substantiated:

Bug#832077: gvim is affected by this bug

2016-09-25 Thread D. B.
That warning has been widely reported for countless packages and should be resolved by the app developer. Still, to keep people happy until then, it will be silenced by default in GTK+ 3.22.1 (accidentally got omitted in 3.22.0)

Bug#832301: [832391] firefox: Please reenable GTK3 support

2016-09-18 Thread D. B.
Hello, I also second this request, for whatever it's worth. As of now with Debian unstable I don't have GTK+3 in Firefox and can see no way to install/enable it. Cheers!

Bug#832077: Info received (emacs clutter screen on windows switch)

2016-09-13 Thread D. B.
Are you using unstable? Then you have no right to be melodramatic about people "demolishing" the distro. It's not the maintainers fault if 3rd-party software is not up to date with the libraries on which it relies. And by using unstable or testing, the user accepts the very likely possibility of

Bug#837031: libgtk-3-0: Inconsistent double click behaviour in file chooser

2016-09-08 Thread D. B.
t; It has already been reported, I forgot to add links. I hope they fix this > problem but maybe would be faster to use the Ubuntu patch. > > https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=766089 > https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=758065 > > 2016-09-07 21:12 GMT-03

Bug#837031: libgtk-3-0: Inconsistent double click behaviour in file chooser

2016-09-07 Thread D. B.
As a fellow user I would request that you file this bug upstream so that GTK+ are aware of how annoying it is, if no one has already filed such a ticket (I could not find one on an extremely brief search) This annoyance is not debian specific, so why (A) burden the deb maintainers, (B) not make

Bug#836246: libgtk-3-0: Upgrade from 3.20.9 to 3.21.5 broke Mate desktop

2016-09-01 Thread D. B.
On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 10:47 AM, Cesare Leonardi <celeo...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 01/09/2016 09:01, D. B. wrote: > >> Why did you log this against 3.20.9 if that one is fine? >> > > I reply only to the constructive part of your message. > No, you reply only to

Bug#834457: libgtk-3-0: inconsistent signed/unsigned length parameter in gtk_builder_new_from_string() and gtk_builder_add_from_string()

2016-08-16 Thread D. B.
Why are you reporting this here? Upstream would be happy to hear about it, but it's not Debian's problem (and nor is it serious enough to warrant a distro-specific patch) On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 10:51 PM, Joe Pfeiffer wrote: > Package: libgtk-3-0 > Version: 3.21.4-1

Bug#831977: FW: [LibreOffice Calc Bug 100841] Dragging a cell's frame to Fill Series, etc - no longer shows a tooltip indicating currently reached value

2016-07-20 Thread D. B.
Package: libreoffice-calc Version: 5.1.4.2 and 5.1.5.1 Build ID: 1:5.1.4~rc2-2 and 1:5.1.5~rc1-1 Dear Maintainer, Tooltips are no longer shown in LibreOffice Calc when dragging to 'fill series' - and possibly in other location that use the same kind of tooltips. (Note that normal GTK+ tooltips

Bug#824835: tex-common: fmtutil fails

2016-05-21 Thread D. B.
Thanks, Paul: I can confirm the below on unstable. Executing sudo aptitude install context sorted this... ...but seeing as this pulled in a whopping 365 MB of archives (and that's just the compressed version), which I might've never voluntarily installed, possibly just to get a single file that

Bug#824891: gtk+3.0: latest version breaks external themes

2016-05-20 Thread D. B.
Yup, I'm beginning to think it'd be good if Debian reverted to 3.18 until 3.20 is less broken. The latter will be great when it's ACTUALLY ready - but right now, it's a rushed-out, poorly tested mess in various areas. Maybe they felt meeting some deadline took precedence over actually testing

Bug#824841: libgtk-3-0: Properly include upstream changelog

2016-05-20 Thread D. B.
You asked for "the upstream bug [log, presumably]", so it was reasonable for people to presume you wanted a list of bugfixes. upstream is git.gnome.org and browse for gtk+ On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 4:15 PM, Ximin Luo wrote: > Michael Biebl: > > Am 20.05.2016 um 12:15

Bug#824506: overlay scrollbars do not work properly

2016-05-16 Thread D. B.
Don't. That's blaming Debian for upstream's problems, which are outwith the distro's control. Complain to the source. Then everyone who uses the upstream package benefits. Did you think that if you complain loudly enough to Debian, that its maintainers will wrangle with upstream on your behalf?

Bug#775445: License updates, music included, ready for review (I hope)

2015-02-10 Thread D B
Hi, After speaking with the author of the menu music, he has licensed it under CC-BY-3.0. The latest package reflects this: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/b/bitfighter/bitfighter_019d+dfsg-14.dsc I also replaced the 'Play' font usage with 'LiberationSans' so it isn't so ugly

Bug#775445: Bug #775445 - RFS: bitfighter ready for next review

2015-02-10 Thread D B
Bitfighter is ready for another review. See the package here: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/b/bitfighter/bitfighter_019d+dfsg-14.dsc Please forgive the double post. I had used poor subjects for previous e-mails. Thanks! David -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Bug#776273: Screenshots for fonts-play

2015-01-26 Thread D B
Sorry about the delay, first message got caught by the debian spam filter. Here are the screenshots. Attached. Thanks, David

Bug#775445: RFS: bitfighter/019d-2 [ITP]

2015-01-15 Thread D B
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal [important for RC bugs, wishlist for new packages] Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package bitfighter * Package name: bitfighter Version : 019d-2 Upstream Author : Chris Eykamp watusim...@bitfighter.org * URL

Bug#705303: back on mentors.debian.net

2015-01-15 Thread D B
I have a crude package building again on mentors.debian.net: http://mentors.debian.net/package/bitfighter

Bug#705303: Restoration of deleted package 'bitfighter'

2015-01-14 Thread D B
Hello, I am attempting to continue the work of a previous developer on packaging the game 'bitfighter'. He had previously uploaded a package here: https://mentors.debian.net/package/bitfighter However, I find that this has been deleted. Is there any possible way to restore it? He had

Bug#705303: Restoration of deleted package 'bitfighter'

2015-01-14 Thread D B
: On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 4:23 AM, D B wrote: However, I find that this has been deleted. Is there any possible way to restore it? I checked on the mentors server already (for someone else?) and found no copies, however his packaging is present in the upstream code repository: https

Bug#705303: Continue bitfighter work

2015-01-07 Thread D B
Hi, I am attempting to continue the work that Bryan started for packaging bitfighter. Wish me good fortune! David -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org