Bug#776273: [Pkg-fonts-devel] Bug#776273: Bug#776273: [googlefonts-discuss] sfd files for Play font

2015-10-03 Thread Dave Crossland
On 3 October 2015 at 03:57, Paul Wise <p...@debian.org> wrote: > On Sat, Oct 3, 2015 at 10:26 AM, Fabian Greffrath wrote: > > Am Freitag, den 02.10.2015, 07:27 -0600 schrieb Dave Crossland: > >> The official name is the rfn name; that's why the maintainer reserved > &g

Bug#776273: [Pkg-fonts-devel] Bug#776273: [googlefonts-discuss] sfd files for Play font

2015-10-02 Thread Dave Crossland
A format conversion is listed explicitly in the ofl as modification triggering rfn permission / renaming, and converting source to binary is a kind of format change On Oct 2, 2015 6:02 AM, "Norbert Preining" wrote: > > What is the relationship between the googlefonts repos and

Bug#776273: [Pkg-fonts-devel] Bug#776273: [googlefonts-discuss] sfd files for Play font

2015-10-02 Thread Dave Crossland
On Oct 2, 2015 7:32 AM, "Norbert Preining" <prein...@logic.at> wrote: > > On Fri, 02 Oct 2015, Dave Crossland wrote: > > A format conversion is listed explicitly in the ofl as modification > > triggering rfn permission / renaming, and converting source to bin

Bug#776273: [googlefonts-discuss] sfd files for Play font

2015-10-02 Thread Dave Crossland
On Oct 2, 2015 4:49 AM, "Paul Wise" <p...@debian.org> wrote: > > On Wed, 2 Sep 2015 13:49:33 -0400 Dave Crossland wrote: > > > All the source files there not available elsewhere will resurface in > > github.com/googlefonts/ soon :) > > Why there instea

Bug#776273: [googlefonts-discuss] sfd files for Play font

2015-10-02 Thread Dave Crossland
On 2 October 2015 at 07:50, Paul Wise <p...@debian.org> wrote: > On Fri, 2015-10-02 at 07:27 -0600, Dave Crossland wrote: > > > Sources and binaries are not the same stuff. > > They are two different forms of the same stuff. > > One form is used by designers/dev

Bug#776273: [googlefonts-discuss] sfd files for Play font

2015-09-02 Thread Dave Crossland
Hi On 1 September 2015 at 04:55, wrote: > Hi, > > I'm maintaining the Play font in Debian, which currently builds the Play > font from the sfd sources (attached) which was present in the google code > repository. And I've been trying to figure out a bug[0] where the

Bug#661363: [Fontforge-devel] Is the script-handling in fontforge-nox equivalent to fontforge's

2012-02-26 Thread Dave Crossland
On 26 February 2012 17:33, Martin Erik Werner martinerikwer...@gmail.com wrote: Is the handling of fontforge scripts by fontforge-nox equivalant to that of standard fontforge? Yes, I believe so. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of