for redistribution.
These files are located in
warmux-11.04/data/weapon/supertux/superman.png
warmux-11.04/data/weapon/supertux/supertux_ico.png
warmux-11.04/data/weapon/supertux/supertux.png
--
*Grant H.
*Email: sirgr...@member.fsf.org
*Ask me for my GPG key
*I'm an FSF member -- Help us support
Package: gkermit
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
The description for the gkermit package states The non-free package ckermit
adds connection establishment, character-set translation and scripting
features. However as of version 301-1 ckermit is now DFSG free and in the
main repository. We
I should also mention (sorry, forgot) I have tried to contact the
maintainer quite a while ago (a few months ago) with no response. As
far as I can gather he is MIA. Many bugs from this package with his
last response was in the early - mid 2000's.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
I should also mention (sorry, forgot) I have tried to contact the
maintainer via email quite a while ago (a few months ago) with no
response. As far as I can gather he is MIA. Many bugs from this
package with his last response was in the early - mid 2000's.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Package: earcandy
Version: 0.9+bzr12-2
Severity: wishlist
User: trisq...@trisquel.info
Usertags: libreplanet, trisquel
The current description of earcandy states[1] (also viewable via
apt-cache show earcandy):
Features include: fade out music/video players on Skype call, [...]
I believe we
Package: xchat
Version: 2.8.8
Description
Summary: Source package xchat refers to a non-free browser in its URL
handler section. This non-free browser is not even in the Ubuntu
repositories (free non-free) so we should not be using it as a URL
handler. A URL-handler for an appropriate free
Package: bnetd
Version: 0.4.25-8
Severity: wishlist
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: proposed-removal
Dear Maintainer,
While reviewing some packages, your package came up as a possible
candidate for removal from Debian, because:
* No maintainer upload in the last years (March
that be enough to fix the issue, in LibrePlanet's view?
If you don't, I would understand. But in that case please leave this bug
open and tag it as wontfix, as the purpose of the bug reporting
exercise is to document this kind of issues and their current state in
Debian.
--
*Grant H.
*Email: sirgr
free software license which will meet the DFSG.
He says he will release an updated tarball. I will ask him to possibly
contact you when that is complete for re-packaging.
On 09/11/2012 10:59 PM, Bdale Garbee wrote:
Grant H. sirgr...@member.fsf.org writes:
After reviewing the copyright file[1
(gratis or in exchange of a fee)?
Distributing modified copies?
None of these activities is explicitly permitted.
As a consequence, this license does not (clearly) meet the DFSG.
[1]http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2012/09/msg00018.html
--
*Grant H.
*Email: sirgr...@member.fsf.org
*Ask me for my
://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/y/yforth/yforth_0.1beta-21/copyright
[2]http://packages.debian.org/source/squeeze/yforth
[3] http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2012/09/msg00017.html
--
*Grant H.
*Email: sirgr...@member.fsf.org
*Ask me for my GPG key
*I'm an FSF member -- Help us support
can't really comment.
4) I will mark this bug as wishlist as you instructed.
On 09/05/2012 10:32 AM, Osamu Aoki wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Sep 03, 2012 at 10:24:30AM -0700, Grant H. wrote:
Sorry, also to just clarify the bug and what the issue is.
Thanks. maybe I should have read link in detail
Severity: wishlist
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
://lists.debian.org/debian-project/2012/07/msg00016.html
--
*Grant H.
*Email: sirgr...@member.fsf.org
*Ask me for my GPG key
*I'm an FSF member -- Help us support software freedom!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas
. It is a bug/wishlist against Stefano's idea to get
Debian endorsed by the GNU project.
[1]http://lists.debian.org/debian-project/2012/07/msg00016.html
[2]https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
--
*Grant H.
*Email: sirgr...@member.fsf.org
*Ask me for my GPG key
*I'm
I believe the direction of this bug should be changed slightly. Debian
shouldn't advise users to use non-free plug-ins at all. HPLIP should be
modified so it doesn't do that.
Stefano Zacchiroli is trying to get Debian on the GNU Projcet's endorsed
distro list[1]. A program recommending
Package: nvclock
Version: 0.8b4+cvs20100914-3
User: trisq...@trisquel.info
Usertags: trisquel libreplanet
Stefano Zacchiroli has called for a Free-ness assessment to work with
the FSF on getting Debian endorsed[1]. According to the Guidelines for
Free System Distributions a free system can't
it which Stefano called for. I should also add that this is
just my personal opinion and not the FSF's.
--
*Grant H.
*Email: sirgr...@member.fsf.org
*Ask me for my GPG key
*I'm an FSF member -- Help us support software freedom!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
Package: psutils
Version: 1.17-32
Severity: serious
User: gnewsense-...@nongnu.org
Usertags: gnewsense libreplanet
The license file in the psutils source code [1] contains the statement
=Quote=
The included files, md68_0.ps and
Severity: serious
This should be marked as serious because something being under a
non-commercial license is a violation of Debian Free Software Guidelines
--
*Grant H.
*Email: sirgr...@member.fsf.org
*Ask me for my GPG key
*I'm an FSF member -- Help us support software freedom
20 matches
Mail list logo
