On Tue, Feb 07, 2017 at 10:24:58PM +1300, Chris Lamb wrote:
> Hi Leo,
>
> > Since I am comparing the entire output of Python 2.7's build process,
> > there are a lot of files, and they *all* have different ctimes (we set
> > mtimes to epoch).
>
> So, we already ignore mtimes on specified
On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 08:39:00PM +, HW42 wrote:
> Leo Famulari:
> > def skip_unless_tool_is_older_than(tool, actual_ver, min_ver,
> > vcls=LooseVersion):
> > if tools_missing(tool):
> > -return pytest.mark.skip(reason="requires {}&qu
On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 04:23:51PM +, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> Though I'm using pytest 3.0.3.
> That test is skipped by using pytest.mark.skip(), which I don't see in
> the docs of pytest for 2.7.
> The changelog of pytest tells me pytest.mark.skip() is recognized as a
> skipping marker
On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 06:02:38PM +, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> > === FAILURES
> > ===
> > ___ test_superblock
> >
> >
> > differences = []
> >
> >
On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 12:05:13PM +0100, Chris Lamb wrote:
> Could you re-run the testsuite with:
>
> -vv -r sxX
>
> ... or similar? :) Many thanks.
Using '-vvv -r sxX' with pytest 2.7.3, the output of the test suite is
below. Please let me know if you need any more information.
Source: diffoscope
Dear Maintainer,
While building diffoscope 61 on GNU Guix's "core-updates" branch
(roughly analogous to Debian's testing branch), the test test_superblock
fails like this:
=== FAILURES ===
Source: diffoscope
Dear Maintainer,
I am maintaining the diffoscope package in GNU Guix [0].
I recently updated from version 34 to 49, and found that I could not
build diffoscope from source without the python-magic package from PyPi
[1].
However, diffoscope's README [2] says that:
Source: diffoscope
Severity: wishlist
Dear Maintainer,
It would be helpful if users could instruct diffoscope to not report
different mtimes and ctimes in the files being inspected.
Here is my use case:
I am hunting down some non-determinism in the python-2.7 package in GNU
Guix. Our build
Based on the fail2ban changelog, it looks like fail2ban added support
for systemd in 0.9.0. The stretch repos include 0.9.2-1.
source: https://github.com/fail2ban/fail2ban/blob/master/ChangeLog
It seems a shame that the Debian base system moved to systemd but left
fail2ban behind.
Also a shame
9 matches
Mail list logo
