for providing the 'firewalld' package with included fix via
the buster-backports repository.
Best Regards,
Maciej Delmanowski
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 10.0
APT prefers stable-updates
APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel
Package: dhcp-probe
Version: 1.3.0
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
The 'dhcp-probe' package generates the initial configuration for the daemon in
the /etc/dhcp-probe/ directory. The postinst script uses the '/sbin/ifconfig'
command to detect the network interfaces present on the system and
in the tarball archive, the only way to
restore the files is to do it manually by hand.
Thanks for your work on Debian,
Maciej Delmanowski
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 9.4
APT prefers stable-updates
APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64
operation, which might affect
other packages as well. If information about held packages is removed
unintentionally, this might affect system upgrades in unintended way, although
I'm not sure if the hold state of uninstalled packages is respected by the
'apt-get dist-upgrade' command.
Thanks for you
/changelogs/main/m/mosquitto/unstable_changelog
Best Regards,
Maciej Delmanowski
Package: nullmailer
Version: 1:1.13-1
Severity: grave
The nullmailer package keeps sensitive information like users and passwords to
the mail accounts on the remote SMTP servers in the '/etc/nullmailer/remotes'
file, which is secured by 600 permissions and owned by mail:mail. However,
after
On Apr 07, Daniel Stender wrote:
> The upstream tarball actually is the result of debops-update, manually
> stripped
> and tar-ed with --exclude-vcs. That appears to be the only way to get also the
> roles right now ...
> I don't have a clue yet how to create a get-orig-source target. For
On Apr 06, Daniel Stender wrote:
> yes, I agree, the main advantage would be to have also the playbooks and
> roles as a package.
One more thing, some of DebOps roles require Ansible v2.0+, can you set the
required Ansible package version accordingly?
Maciej
On Apr 06, Daniel Stender wrote:
> I've worked towards this now and prepared two packages, debops containing
> the scripts [1] and another one, debops-playbooks [2] containing the
> playbooks and the roles.
I was worried for a bit, but it looks like the debops-playbooks package works
fairly
Hello,
The base repository contains just scripts which are a frontend and glue
between Ansible and playbooks/roles. Any ideas how the rest of the project,
meaning the playbooks and roles themselves, should be handled, if at all, in
Debian?
Having a .deb package per role (separate git repository)
10 matches
Mail list logo
