Would you be able to file an upstream report for this?
Would it be out of scope for dpkg-buildflags or debhelper or something else
notionally build system agnostic to do this?
On Fri, 16 Aug 2024 at 20:57, Shengjing Zhu wrote:
> Package: dh-golang
> Version: 1.62
> Severity: wishlist
> X-Debbugs-Cc: debian...@lists.debian.org, z...@debian.org
>
> Mo
Package: mescc-tools
Version: 1.5.2-1
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
X-Debbugs-Cc: michael.hud...@ubuntu.com
User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com
Usertags: origin-ubuntu oracular ubuntu-patch
Dear Maintainer,
This package fails to build in Ubuntu currently but not Debian.
Investigation seemed to rev
This is because America/Godthab was renamed to America/Nuuk in tz 2020a and
the former is now only in tzdata-legacy.
Adding tzdata-legacy to build depends fixes the build but a better fix is
probably to update libgweather4's data to follow the tz database changes.
I filed https://gitlab.gnome.org
Package: mrtdreader
Followup-For: Bug #1066260
User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com
Usertags: origin-ubuntu noble ubuntu-patch
X-Debbugs-Cc: michael.hud...@ubuntu.com
Control: tags -1 patch
Dear Maintainer,
In Ubuntu, the attached patch was applied to achieve the following:
* Add #include of t
Package: nvi
Followup-For: Bug #1066285
User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com
Usertags: origin-ubuntu noble ubuntu-patch
X-Debbugs-Cc: michael.hud...@ubuntu.com
Control: tags -1 patch
Dear Maintainer,
In Ubuntu, the attached patch was applied to achieve the following:
* d/patches/add-prototypes.
Package: nsis
Version: build fails if version number has buildX or ubuntuX suffix
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com
Usertags: origin-ubuntu noble ubuntu-patch
X-Debbugs-Cc: michael.hud...@ubuntu.com
Dear Maintainer,
In Ubuntu we don't do binNMUs, we build sourceful
Package: libesmtp
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com
Usertags: origin-ubuntu noble ubuntu-patch
X-Debbugs-Cc: michael.hud...@ubuntu.com
Dear Maintainer,
Apologies for submitting this as only one report. libesmtp was failing
on Ubuntu on armhf only because although st
Package: epic5
Followup-For: Bug #1066505
User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com
Usertags: origin-ubuntu noble ubuntu-patch
X-Debbugs-Cc: michael.hud...@ubuntu.com
Control: tags -1 patch
Dear Maintainer,
In Ubuntu, the attached patch was applied to achieve the following:
* d/patches/define-xopen-
Package: tpm2-abrmd
Severity: serious
Tags: patch ftbfs
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com
Usertags: origin-ubuntu noble ubuntu-patch
X-Debbugs-Cc: michael.hud...@ubuntu.com
Dear Maintainer,
In Ubuntu, the attached pa
Package: gxr-openvr
Severity: serious
Tags: patch ftbfs
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com
Usertags: origin-ubuntu noble ubuntu-patch
X-Debbugs-Cc: michael.hud...@ubuntu.com
Dear Maintainer,
In Ubuntu, the attached pa
Package: gambas3
Severity: serious
Tags: patch ftbfs
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com
Usertags: origin-ubuntu noble ubuntu-patch
X-Debbugs-Cc: michael.hud...@ubuntu.com
Dear Maintainer,
In Ubuntu, the attached patc
Package: createrepo-c
Followup-For: Bug #1066292
User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com
Usertags: origin-ubuntu noble ubuntu-patch
X-Debbugs-Cc: michael.hud...@ubuntu.com
Control: tags -1 patch
Dear Maintainer,
In Ubuntu, the attached patch was applied to achieve the following:
* Fix printing t
Package: perdition
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com
Usertags: origin-ubuntu noble ubuntu-patch
X-Debbugs-Cc: michael.hud...@ubuntu.com
Dear Maintainer,
In Ubuntu, the attached patch was applied to achieve the following:
* d/patches/remove-strcasestr.patch: remov
Package: x11vnc
Followup-For: Bug #1067076
User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com
Usertags: origin-ubuntu noble ubuntu-patch
X-Debbugs-Cc: michael.hud...@ubuntu.com
Control: tags -1 patch
Dear Maintainer,
In Ubuntu, the attached patch was applied to achieve the following:
* debian/patches/0007-us
Package: trantor
Severity: important
Tags: patch
User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com
Usertags: origin-ubuntu noble ubuntu-patch
X-Debbugs-Cc: michael.hud...@ubuntu.com
Dear Maintainer,
In Ubuntu, the attached patch was applied to achieve the following:
* Drop spurious Depends on libssl3 as pac
Package: bitlbee-facebook
Severity: important
Tags: patch
User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com
Usertags: origin-ubuntu noble ubuntu-patch
X-Debbugs-Cc: michael.hud...@ubuntu.com
Dear Maintainer,
In Ubuntu, the attached patch was applied to achieve the following:
* Remove explicit depedency on
It's hard to see from the log but the failures that are causing issues are
the "path_info" gitweb tests such as
expecting success of 9500.70 'path_info: project': gitweb_run "" "/.git"
not ok 70 - path_info: project
# gitweb_run "" "/.git"
It's *impossible* to see from the log afaict but the reas
0 +1200
+++ pymupdf-1.23.7+ds1/debian/patches/fz_pixmap_size2024-03-20
14:23:27.0 +1300
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+Description: Remove incorrect prototype for function now declared in mupdf's
headers.
+Author: Michael Hudson-Doyle
+Origin: vendor
+Forwarded: no
+Last-Update: 2024-03-20
+---
+This patc
Package: libspf2
Followup-For: Bug #1065792
User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com
Usertags: origin-ubuntu noble ubuntu-patch
X-Debbugs-Cc: michael.hud...@ubuntu.com
Control: tags -1 patch
Dear Maintainer,
In Ubuntu, I just uploaded the following rather than try to be in any
way clever:
* d/pat
Package: libspf2
Version: 1.2.10-8.1
Severity: important
Tags: patch
User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com
Usertags: origin-ubuntu noble ubuntu-patch
X-Debbugs-Cc: michael.hud...@ubuntu.com
Dear Maintainer,
This prevents installation on a system that has been affected by the t64
transition.
In Ubu
Package: user-session-migration
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com
Usertags: origin-ubuntu noble ubuntu-patch
X-Debbugs-Cc: michael.hud...@ubuntu.com
Dear Maintainer,
In Ubuntu, the attached patch was applied to achieve the following:
* Do not use "%ld" specifier
defines interferes with this files attempt to
+ interpose both open and open64
+Author: Michael Hudson-Doyle
+Forwarded: no
+Last-Update: 2024-03-20
+---
+This patch header follows DEP-3: http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep3/
+--- a/src/vdetaplib/libvdetap.c
b/src/vdetaplib/libvdetap.c
+@@ -
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: ftp.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: remove
X-Debbugs-Cc: michael.hud...@ubuntu.com
A month or so ago I NMUed consolekit2 1.2.6-3.1~exp1 to experimental,
which ftbfs and turned out to be unnecessary. The package can be
removed.
Cheers,
mwh
On Fri, 15 Mar 2024 at 08:51, Mark Hindley wrote:
> Control: notfound -1 1.2.6-3
>
> On Wed, Mar 13, 2024 at 10:40:40PM +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> > Followup-For: Bug #1061493
> > Control: found -1 1.2.6-3.1~exp1
> > Control: severity -1 serious
> > Control: tag -1 ftbfs
> >
> > This change
5 10:55:23.0 +1300
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+libcanberra (0.30-12.2) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * Fix build depedency on dpkg-dev to use >= not >> (sorry).
+
+ -- Michael Hudson-Doyle Tue, 05 Mar 2024
10:55:23 +1300
+
libcanberra (0.30-12.1) unstable; urgen
(1:0.4.34-4.2) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * Fix build depedency on dpkg-dev to use >= not >> (sorry).
+
+ -- Michael Hudson-Doyle Tue, 05 Mar 2024
10:54:56 +1300
+
orc (1:0.4.34-4.1) unstable; urgency=medium
* Non-maintainer upload.
diff -Nru or
00 +1300
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+glibmm2.4 (2.66.6-3.2) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * Fix build depedency on dpkg-dev to use >= not >> (sorry).
+
+ -- Michael Hudson-Doyle Tue, 05 Mar 2024
10:51:53 +1300
+
glibmm2.4 (2.66.6-3.1) unstable; urgency=medium
*
000 +1300
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+gtkmm3.0 (3.24.8-3.2) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * Fix build depedency on dpkg-dev to use >= not >> (sorry).
+
+ -- Michael Hudson-Doyle Tue, 05 Mar 2024
10:53:03 +1300
+
gtkmm3.0 (3.24.8-3.1) unstable; urgency=medium
*
5 10:49:44.0 +1300
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+glibmm2.68 (2.78.1-2.2) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * Fix build depedency on dpkg-dev to use >= not >> (sorry).
+
+ -- Michael Hudson-Doyle Tue, 05 Mar 2024
10:49:44 +1300
+
glibmm2.68 (2.78.1-2.1) unstable; urgency=medium
2.2) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * Fix build depedency on dpkg-dev to use >= not >> (sorry).
+
+ -- Michael Hudson-Doyle Tue, 05 Mar 2024
09:37:53 +1300
+
gegl (1:0.4.48-2.1) unstable; urgency=medium
* Non-maintainer upload.
diff -Nru gegl-0.4.48/d
2-29 00:10:42.0 +1300
+++ lucene++-3.0.9/debian/changelog 2024-03-04 23:42:22.0 +1300
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+lucene++ (3.0.9-3.1) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * Add build depedency on dpkg-dev (>= 1.22.5) for time_t transition.
+ (Closes: #1065284
og 2024-02-29 09:08:28.0 +1300
+++ libcanberra-0.30/debian/changelog 2024-03-04 23:41:54.0 +1300
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+libcanberra (0.30-12.1) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * Add build depedency on dpkg-dev (>= 1.22.5) for time_t transition.
+ (Closes: #106
g2024-02-29 09:04:43.0 +1300
+++ gtkmm3.0-3.24.8/debian/changelog2024-03-04 23:41:24.0 +1300
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+gtkmm3.0 (3.24.8-3.1) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * Add build depedency on dpkg-dev (>= 1.22.5) for time_t transition.
+ (Closes: #1065278
02-28 15:41:41.0 +1300
+++ glade-3.40.0/debian/changelog 2024-03-04 23:38:30.0 +1300
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+glade (3.40.0-4.1) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * Add build depedency on dpkg-dev (>= 1.22.5) for time_t transition.
+ (Closes: #1065265)
+
+ --
g2024-02-29 04:22:27.0 +1300
+++ gtkmm2.4-2.24.5/debian/changelog2024-03-04 23:40:46.0 +1300
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+gtkmm2.4 (1:2.24.5-5.1) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * Add build depedency on dpkg-dev (>= 1.22.5) for time_t transition.
+ (Closes: #106
27.0 +1300
+++ orc-0.4.34/debian/changelog 2024-03-04 23:40:36.0 +1300
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+orc (1:0.4.34-4.1) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * Add build depedency on dpkg-dev (>= 1.22.5) for time_t transition.
+ (Closes: #1065272)
+
+ -- Michael Hudson-Doyle
2-29 03:29:46.0 +1300
+++ gsound-1.0.3/debian/changelog 2024-03-04 23:40:14.0 +1300
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+gsound (1.0.3-3.1) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * Add build depedency on dpkg-dev (>= 1.22.5) for time_t transition.
+ (Closes: #1065271)
+
+ --
log 2024-02-28 15:49:12.0 +1300
+++ glibmm2.68-2.78.1/debian/changelog 2024-03-04 23:35:03.0 +1300
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+glibmm2.68 (2.78.1-2.1) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * Add build depedency on dpkg-dev (>= 1.22.5) for time_t transition.
+ (Closes:
og 2024-02-28 15:45:03.0 +1300
+++ glibmm2.4-2.66.6/debian/changelog 2024-03-04 23:39:52.0 +1300
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+glibmm2.4 (2.66.6-3.1) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * Add build depedency on dpkg-dev (>= 1.22.5) for time_t transition.
+ (Closes: #106
15:37:42.0 +1300
+++ gegl-0.4.48/debian/changelog2024-03-04 23:38:29.0 +1300
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+gegl (1:0.4.48-2.1) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * Add build depedency on dpkg-dev (>= 1.22.5) for time_t transition.
+ (Closes: #1065260)
+
+ -- Mi
Thanks for being so accommodating! A lot of disruption to go around...
On Thu, 29 Feb 2024 at 17:11, Sebastiaan Couwenberg
wrote:
> On 2/28/24 8:33 PM, Michael Hudson-Doyle wrote:
> > Hi, thanks for taking the NMU. Unfortunately it looks like you uploaded
> > just slightly too early and the package was built with 32 bit time_t on
> ARM
>
>
cy on dpkg-dev to guard against accidental backports
+with wrong ABI. (Closes: #1062545)
+
+ -- Michael Hudson-Doyle Thu, 29 Feb 2024 16:16:34 +1300
+
falcosecurity-libs (0.14.1-5) unstable; urgency=medium
* Rename libraries for 64-bit time_t transition (Closes: #1062545)
diff -Nru falcosec
(the first patch had the same number as the package I uploaded to
experimental and so got rejected. oops!)
On Thu, 29 Feb 2024 at 12:21, wrote:
> Dear maintainer,
>
> Please find attached a final version of this patch for the time_t
> transition. This patch is being uploaded to unstable.
>
> No
Hi, thanks for taking the NMU. Unfortunately it looks like you uploaded
just slightly too early and the package was built with 32 bit time_t on ARM
:(
@@
+e2fsprogs (1.47.0-2.1) UNRELEASED; urgency=medium
+
+ [ Helmut Grohne ]
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * Fix FTBFS when systemd.pc changes systemdsystemunitdir. (Closes: #-1)
+
+ [ Michael Hudson-Doyle ]
+ * Account for changes in udevudevdir as well.
+
+ -- Helmut Grohne Tue, 26 Sep 2023 20:57:57
Here is a patch with the sections that get confused by in-tree symlinks
hacked out. I assume the package still ftbfs though.
nmu_ceph.debdiff
Description: Binary data
Here's an updated diff that strips the abi tag rather than appending to it.
nmu_libcdk5.debdiff
Description: Binary data
Additional testing showed that the previous patch was incomplete, here is
an updated one.
nmu_ace.debdiff
Description: Binary data
The previous patch missed a required change to debian/rules, new version
attached.
nmu_vtk9.debdiff
Description: Binary data
And that patch had a lot of cruft in it.
On Tue, 27 Feb 2024 at 09:27, Michael Hudson-Doyle <
michael.hud...@canonical.com> wrote:
> Apologies, I missed some things in the first version of this patch. Here's
> an update.
>
nmu_python3.11.debdiff
Description: Binary data
Note that this diff includes the changes attached to bug 1053111.
+
+ [ Helmut Grohne ]
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * Fix FTBFS when systemd.pc changes systemdsystemunitdir. (Closes: #-1)
+
+ [ Michael Hudson-Doyle ]
+ * Account for changes in udevudevdir as well.
+
+ -- Helmut Grohne Tue, 26 Sep 2023 20:57:57 +0200
+
e2fsprogs (1.47.0-2) unstable; urgency
> I published an updated consolidated report this morning. As you can see,
> there is an ABI change due to LFS in raft/uv.h
>
>
https://adrien.dcln.fr/misc/armhf-time_t/2024-02-22T10%3A55%3A00/compat_reports/libraft-dev/base_to_lfs/compat_report.html
>
> It is possible some API is not supposed to b
FWIW adding a quirk to the analysis confirms that this package is
unaffected by both the lfs and time_t transitions.
Sigh, attached to *this* mail
nmu_libzypp.debdiff
Description: Binary data
I've just reuploaded the package to experimental, new debdiff attached.
> There are no mentions of 'time_t' in the public headers of this
> library.
Uh, this is not the case? zypp-core/Date.h contains a class with public
time_t members. Were you grepping the wrong library or something?
The library is also affected by the off_t transition.
> The logs shows that it's
I have taken the patch from this bug, applied it to 1.3.5012+dfsg-2.1 from
unstable and uploaded it to experimental. Feel free to ignore this /
overwrite it if it interferes with other plans but we want to make sure it
passes binary NEW before we start uploading things to unstable.
On Wed, 21 Feb 2024 at 21:49, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> 21.02.2024 11:26, Michael Hudson-Doyle wrote:
> > I have prepared another patch on top of what is in experimental now
> (attached as nmu_samba.debdiff), does it look better?
> >
> > I have also prepared a patch on top
I have prepared another patch on top of what is in experimental now
(attached as nmu_samba.debdiff), does it look better?
I have also prepared a patch on top of what is currently in unstable,
attached as nmu_samba_unstable.debdiff.
I think the ideal way forward would be to upload to experimental
Hi, thanks so much for this. I've updated the diff in bug 1064090 to
include your changes (and uploaded the new package to experimental as
~exp2).
On Wed, 31 Jan 2024 at 22:03, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Jan 31, 2024 at 1:09 AM wrote:
> > If you have any concerns about this patch, please reach out ASAP.
> Although
> > this package will be uploaded to experimental immediately, there will be
> a
>
> Are you going to nuke my w
Package: libevolution
Version: 3.50.3-1
Severity: important
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: time-t
Dear maintainers,
Analysis of the archive for the 64-bit time_t transition[0][1]
identifies libevolution as an affected package, on the basis that the
headers could not be compiled and a
Package: tcl-expect
Version: 5.45.4-2build1
Severity: serious
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: time-t
Dear maintainers,
Analysis of the archive for the 64-bit time_t transition[0][1] identifies
tcl-expect as an affected package, on the basis that the headers could
not be compiled and a
1.4.2+dfsg/debian/changelog 2019-09-12 11:17:28.0 +
+++ dante-1.4.2+dfsg/debian/changelog 2024-02-05 02:19:17.0 +
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+dante (1.4.2+dfsg-7.1~exp1) experimental; urgency=medium
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * Rename libraries for 64-bit time_t transition.
+
userland / arm64
+kernels without COMPAT_ALIGNMENT_FIXUPS as found in Ubuntu.
+
+ -- Michael Hudson-Doyle Fri, 09 Feb 2024 15:26:59 +1300
+
h5py (3.10.0-1) unstable; urgency=medium
* Team upload.
diff -Nru h5py-3.10.0/debian/patches/fix-unaligned-access.patch h5py-3.10.0/debian/patches/fix
In addition to uploading a reversed debdiff, I didn't actually upload it to
experimental, I'm attaching the debdiff that I just uploaded (which I
realized I forgot to add the ~exp suffix to, apologies).
The upload to experimental was based on the contents of unstable, which is
newer that what was
> I believe these are the two cases:
>
> - The public 'struct curl_fileinfo' contains a time_t struct member, used
for
> FTP wildcard callbacks.
>
> - The public API curl_getdate() takes a time_t pointer in its second
argument.
>
> If 'time_t' changes size, those two will not be ABI compatible.
Apologies, previous version of patch was incorrect.
nmu_compiz.debdiff
Description: Binary data
Apologies, the initial message had an incorrect debdiff attached. Here's a
better one (that has been uploaded to experimental).
nmu_combblas.debdiff
Description: Binary data
I think that is the sort of conclusion upstream is coming to in
https://inbox.sourceware.org/libc-alpha/20231003201151.1406279-1-siddh...@sourceware.org/T/#e9123bc53d892ab6552e05109ce939d531d741092
too. In any case, the upstream bug tracker / mailing list is probably the
place to start with this.
This is because upstream builds with -Werror -Wall by default, and that's
usually a bad idea for distro packages. I fixed this like this:
.PHONY: override_dh_auto_build
override_dh_auto_build: $(MAINT_SCRIPTS)
-dh_auto_build
+dh_auto_build -- WERROR=
Not really sure if this is
On Tue, 12 Jul 2022 at 04:30, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> On 2022-07-11 10:06, Michael Hudson-Doyle wrote:
> > It looks like a no-change rebuild fixed this in Ubuntu fwiw.
>
> Thanks, I confirm that in Debian too. Do you have an idea why? It could
> be a missing or too loose depend
It looks like a no-change rebuild fixed this in Ubuntu fwiw.
On Mon, 11 Jul 2022 at 09:54, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> Source: glibc, wcc
> Control: found -1 glibc/2.34-0experimental4
> Control: found -1 wcc/0.0.2+dfsg-4.1
> Severity: important
> Tags: experimental
>
> Dear maintainers,
>
> The auto
On Mon, 20 Jun 2022 at 14:59, Shengjing Zhu wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 20, 2022 at 08:42:51AM +1200, Michael Hudson-Doyle wrote:
> > Ah yes but that patch doesn't actually work in practice. I've been slack
> on
> > this :(
> >
> > IIRC the problem with https://
Ah yes but that patch doesn't actually work in practice. I've been slack on
this :(
IIRC the problem with https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/339370 is
that lto causes some of the references in the linked executable to
disappear, meaning cgo can't do the analysis it needs to do. It's a shame
FWIW upstream just made a release that claims to fix this bug.
Source: python-websockets
Version: 9.1-1
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
I don't know when this started, but this package is based on the sdists
from pypi which currently do not contain the tests. So the tests aren't
run during build, and we don't find out that e.g. the legacy submodule
is brok
Source: ntpsec
Version: 1.2.1+dfsg1-3
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
The ntpsec binary package on Ubuntu still depends on libssl1.1 despite
being built against openssl3. The reason for this turns out to be very
mundane:
mwhudson@anduril:~/src/pkg/ntpsec-1.2.1+dfsg1$ grep ssl1.1 --before 1
de
I think an update to 3.3.5 will fix this. I have no idea how hard mailman3
upstream updates are :)
On Thu, 11 Nov 2021 at 10:49, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Hi Michael,
>
> On Wed, 10 Nov 2021 16:16:53 +1300 Michael Hudson-Doyle
> wrote:
> > Hi, thanks for this fix. I think it meets the threshold for NMU (and also
> > the maintainer seems to have been awol since 2015
Hi, thanks for this fix. I think it meets the threshold for NMU (and also
the maintainer seems to have been awol since 2015) so I'm uploading it to
DELAYED/10.
Yes indeed, we dropped the Ubuntu delta at some point without me noticing
and the autopkgtests have been passing fine on s390x.
On Fri, 1 Oct 2021 at 01:14, Christoph Berg wrote:
> Version: 13.1-1
>
> Re: Michael Hudson-Doyle
> > I don't think Debian currently runs aut
On Wed, 8 Sept 2021 at 07:04, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Hi Aurelien
>
> Am 07.09.21 um 12:41 schrieb Aurelien Jarno:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On 2021-09-07 10:39, Michael Hudson-Doyle wrote:
>
> >> What's happening is that systemd is running with the old glibc
On Tue, 7 Sept 2021 at 17:49, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Control: reassign -1 libc6
> Control: found -1 2.32-1
> Control: severity -1 serious
> Control: affects -1 + systemd
>
> Hi Michael
>
> Am 07.09.21 um 00:39 schrieb Michael Hudson-Doyle:
> > On Tue, 7 Sep
On Tue, 7 Sept 2021 at 10:21, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Am 06.09.21 um 23:45 schrieb Vincent Bernat:
> > Package: systemd
> > Version: 247.9-1
> > Severity: normal
> >
> > Hey!
> >
> > After upgrading to libc6 2.32-1, some services are unable to restart.
> > In my case, systemd-resolved, systemd
og 2021-09-06 21:36:54.0 +1200
@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
+radicale (3.0.6-4ubuntu1) UNRELEASED; urgency=medium
+
+ * d/tests/control: Unset http_proxy when running tests.
+
+ -- Michael Hudson-Doyle Mon, 06 Sep 2021
21:36:54 +1200
+
radicale (3.0.6-4) unstable; urgency=medium
* set LogsDir
This is already fixed in testing I think.
On Mon, 6 Sept 2021 at 03:45, matteo wrote:
> Package: snapd
> Version: 2.49-1+b5
> Severity: important
> X-Debbugs-Cc: eng.matteo.nunzi...@gmail.com
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
>* What led up to the situation?
> tring to install any package with the snap
Source: boost1.74
Version: 1.74.0-9
X-Debbugs-CC: mwhud...@debian.org
Hi, the tests for the boost1.74 source package binaries from the boost1.71
source package:
https://salsa.debian.org/debian/boost/-/blob/master/debian/tests/control
That can't be intended :)
Cheers,
mwh
I see there is a fix in the git repo now. Are you planning an upload any
time soon, or only after the buster release?
Package: src:request-tracker5
Version: 5.0.1+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Justification: fails to build from source
Dear Maintainer,
As can be seen at
https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/request-tracker5.html
or
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/reques
I concocted a test case that was independent from ghc, confirmed it still
reproduced with current binutils git and filed an upstream bug:
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26902. I even made a little
patch that fixes the problem but I don't know if it's in any way correct.
it's easy to fix the base64 related failures (patch attached) but then the
build hangs for me.
--- a/kubernetes/config/kube_config.py
+++ b/kubernetes/config/kube_config.py
@@ -97,7 +97,7 @@
if use_data_if_no_file:
if self._base64_file_content:
self._file = _c
This trivial fix seems to fix the problem:
diff -Nru nototools-0.2.13/debian/rules nototools-0.2.13/debian/rules
--- nototools-0.2.13/debian/rules 2020-09-29 11:11:13.0 +1300
+++ nototools-0.2.13/debian/rules 2020-11-11 14:13:22.0 +1300
@@ -22,3 +22,4 @@
override_dh_auto_clean:
In that case, someone should upload something like this:
(master *)mwhudson@anduril:~/src/pkg/DHG_packages/p/ghc$ git diff
diff --git a/p/ghc/debian/rules b/p/ghc/debian/rules
index a5fd42860b..af3f8851d3 100755
--- a/p/ghc/debian/rules
+++ b/p/ghc/debian/rules
@@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ endif
# once #901
I think this is a gold bug, and even better I think it is a gold bug that
was fixed already, in this commit from a few weeks back:
commit fa40fbe484954c560ab1c0ff4bc1b2eeb1511344
Author: Alan Modra
Date: Fri Oct 9 16:56:33 2020 +1030
[GOLD] Power10 segv due to wild r2
Calling non-pcre
Source: python-bitstring
Version: 3.1.5-2
Severity: normal
Tags: upstream
User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: python3.9
Dear Maintainer,
I think an upstream update will fix this.
Cheers,
mwh
-- System Information:
Debian Release: bullseye/sid
APT prefers focal-updates
APT policy:
Ah luckily my upload got rejected thanks to an orig mismatch. In which case
please consider this bug report as a request to merge the linked branch!
On Fri, 23 Oct 2020 at 15:33, Michael Hudson-Doyle
wrote:
> Source: python-mpd
> Severity: normal
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> Hi,
1 - 100 of 394 matches
Mail list logo