Control: severity -1 normal
thanks
On Sat, 9 Mar 2024 13:03:05 +0100 Sebastian Ramacher
wrote:
> Source: simage
> Version: 1.8.3+ds-1
> Severity: serious
> Tags: ftbfs
> Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the
past)
The bug is fixed in unstable. But the
Package: jupyter
Version: 5.3.2-1
Severity: normal
$ jupyter notebook
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/notebook/traittypes.py", line 235, in
_resolve_classes
klass = self._resolve_string(klass)
^^^
File
Hi,
Package glw has a serious bug against it because of an unapplied 64-bit time
patch. I don't know why it is not applied, but Michael Crusoe raised some
relevant questions about it, quoted in full below. Would the patch submitter
be able to review and advise?
On Mon, 11 Mar 2024 13:34:42
On Thursday, March 28, 2024 8:04:30 P.M. CDT Thomas Dickey wrote:
> I suppose that I _could_ have made a symlink in /usr/include/cdk,
> to address both old/new locations. You might consider that for
> the package...
That's a good idea. I've implemented your suggestion and closed the bug.
Hello Thomas!
Thanks for chiming in on this issue. I had sent a follow-up at about the same
time you did with a few details on the history as I could reconstruct it.
See https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1067771#18
In summary: I believe you changed the default location from to
On Tuesday, March 26, 2024 9:37:10 A.M. CDT Harald Welte wrote:
> Package: libcdk5-dev
> Version: 5.0.20230201-3
> Severity: normal
>
> It used to be the case (for probably more than a decade) that the main cdk.h
> file contained in libcdk5-dev is located in /usr/include/cdk/cdk.h
>
> This is
On Fri, 15 Mar 2024 01:46:05 +0100 Amr Ibrahim
wrote:
> Package: inventor
> Severity: normal
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> The current homepage is dead (Invalid URL), and apparently there is an effort
> to maintain Open Inventor on GitHub:
> https://github.com/aumuell/open-inventor
Thank you for
Control: tags 1066702 + pending
On Wed, 13 Mar 2024 13:08:23 +0100 Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Hi,
>
> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
> on amd64.
Uploaded new upstream version to experimental, which fixes this bug.
-Steve
signature.asc
Description: This
Control: tags 1065779 + pending
On Wednesday, March 13, 2024 5:53:11 A.M. CDT Thomas Dickey wrote:
> upgrading really is the simplest solution - not much depends on this,
> and nothing cares about the actual version:
I have uploaded the latest upstream to experimental, which should fix this.
Control: owner 986936 !
On Tue, 19 Jul 2022 13:02:08 +0200 "Jose G. López"
wrote:
> owner 986936 !
> retitle 986936 ITA: libcdk5 -- C-based curses widget library
> thanks
> I intend to adopt it as I worked on it before but never uploaded it as
> maintainer in Debian. I have special affection
On Tuesday, March 12, 2024 1:24:25 A.M. CDT Steve Langasek wrote:
> The quickest fix for this based on what we've done in Ubuntu is:
>
> - unpack cargo and libstd-rust debs to the root via dpkg-deb -x
> - use equivs to mock up packages by these names with no dependencies and
> install those
>
Peter convincingly argues (details in bug) that manual intervention is needed
for package "cargo":
On Sun, 10 Mar 2024 00:48:32 + Peter Michael Green
wrote:
> This will require manual intervention to resolve, either through
> cross-building or through building manually in a hacked-up
On Wednesday, March 6, 2024 7:42:55 P.M. CDT Steven Robbins wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Jul 2022 13:02:08 +0200 "Jose G. López"
> > I intend to adopt it as I worked on it before but never uploaded it as
> > maintainer in Debian. I have special affection for it because it
On Monday, March 4, 2024 11:14:37 A.M. CST Helge Kreutzmann wrote:
> Hello Steven,
>
> Am Sun, Mar 03, 2024 at 10:25:45PM -0600 schrieb Steven Robbins:
> > Thanks for the note!
> >
> > On Sun, 3 Mar 2024 19:59:28 + Helge Kreutzmann
> > > I wil
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
Hello,
I'm not sure what is being requested.
On Thu, 3 Aug 2017 18:51:10 -0700 Daniel Schepler wrote:
> Source: ghostscript
> Version: 9.21~dfsg-1
> Severity: wishlist
>
> It would be nice if the source package could be updated with build
> profile annotations
Hello!
Thanks for the note!
On Sun, 3 Mar 2024 19:59:28 + Helge Kreutzmann
wrote:
> Package: ghostscript
> Version: 10.0.0~dfsg-11+deb12u3
> Severity: normal
>
> Hello Steve,
> ghostscript used to contain German man pages, however, they were not
> properly maintained. As detailed in [1]
Control: -1 tags + moreinfo
I'm having trouble understanding the content of this bug.
On Sat, 6 Sep 2003 12:54:55 +0200 (CEST) Nils Bokermann
wrote:
> When using magicfilter with Nec P6 filter, a gs commandline with @necp2x.upp
is
> fired up. This file says (line 2)
> -sDEVICE=uniprint
>
Control: -1 tags + moreinfo
On Fri, 16 Mar 2012 17:43:25 -0300 ASD Consultoria
wrote:
> Em Tue, 28 Feb 2012 16:20:01 +0100
> "Didier 'OdyX' Raboud" escreveu:
>
> > b) once "locally" from the stable machine (that's the case I'm
> > interested in)
>
> Attached file error.
I'm sorry that no
Control: tags -1 +moreinfo
On Mon, 2 Dec 2013 13:54:19 +0100 Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> Package: ghostscript
> Version: 9.05~dfsg-8
> Severity: normal
>
> ps2pdf should not change the embedded fonts except by optimizing them
> (e.g. compressing them), but a simple test shows that it changes the
>
Control: -1 tags + help confirmed
On Sun, 18 Feb 2024 14:10:37 +0100 Stephan Böttcher wrote:
>
> Tha attached ps file was made with [ ... ]
Thank you. I can reproduce the ps2epsi failure. I have no idea what is
wrong.
-Steve
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed
I've just tested with ghostscript 10.02.1 and found the situation remains as
described in 2015, below. Specifically, I checked that:
* the four files attached in message #15 all render without issues using evince
* tp2A_scilab_N1.pdf renders fine with xpdf, but many warning are emitted on
the
Hello,
I've recently adopted ghostscript, so I can't answer the direct question of
why libgsN-common ships a dangling symlink. I am curious what folks think of
this.
It's not clear to me whether there are bad consequences of a dangling symlink.
For example is it treated differently than a
On Wed, 05 Feb 2020 16:13:51 +0100 Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > > I maintain the Ghostscript package, but am not skilled in the various
> > > tools using Ghostscript. It seems more sensible to me to first
> > > investigate toolchain problems further back in the chain, where (I
> > > assume)
On Thu, 23 Oct 2008 12:31:07 +0200 martin f krafft wrote:
> Package: ghostscript
> Version: 8.62.dfsg.1-3.1
> Severity: normal
> File: /usr/bin/gs
>
> When I run
>
> gs -q -sDEVICE=pdfwrite -dAutoRotatePages=/None -sOutputFile='graphs/
snowball-sampling.pdf' - -c quit <
On Fri, 09 Feb 2024 16:08:00 +0100 Stephan Boettcher wrote:
> Package: ghostscript
> Version: 10.02.1~dfsg-3
> Severity: normal
>
> The version 10.0.0~dfsg-10 works and produces the expected output.
> 10.01.2~dfsg-1 works as well.
>
> 10.02.1~dfsg-3 does not:
>
> $ ps2epsi hvosc-doc_sch.ps
On Tue, 30 Jun 2015 09:17:06 +0100 supp...@compress-pdf.co.uk wrote:
> package: ghostscript
> version: 9.06~dfsg-2
>
> When running ghostscript, the following errors are being generated in
> great quantity:
> stderr: " File has unbalanced q/Q operators (too many Q's) "
>
> resulting
On Thu, 28 Mar 2013 02:21:25 +0100 Sebastien Desreux wrote:
> I do realize that the PS file above is not an EPS. Yet this option also
worked
> for PS files with AFPL gs and then ESP gs. Besides, a search for "crop" on
> http://ghostscript.com/doc/7.07/Use.htm
> yielded only the EPS case.
On Saturday, January 6, 2024 11:58:56 A.M. CST Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> But all xpdf,
> zathura and atril have no issues with the file generated by the
> current ps2pdf. This confirms a good change in ghostscript.
Excellent! Thanks for the additional testing and feedback!
-Steve
tags -1 + moreinfo
thanks
On Wed, 06 Jan 2016 11:20:41 +0100 Stephan Grossberndt
wrote:
> Package: ghostscript
> Version: 9.06~dfsg-2+deb8u1
> * What led up to the situation?
>
> "gs -o proper.pdf -sDEVICE=pdfwrite -dPDFSETTINGS=/prepress
programmheft_2016.pdf" with
tags 1052652 upstream
forwarded 1052652 https://bugs.ghostscript.com/show_bug.cgi?id=707368
thanks
On Mon, 25 Sep 2023 20:05:27 +0200 Roland Rosenfeld wrote:
> Package: ghostscript
> Version: 10.02.0~dfsg-2
> Severity: important
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> upgrading ghostscript from
On Sun, 04 Jun 2006 18:54:06 -0500 Ron Johnson wrote:
> The PDF v1.6 spec has been out for 2 years, but ps2pdf is still "stuck"
> at v1.4.
>
> Is this because there is nothing more to gain in the v1.5 & v1.6 specs
> in a blind ps-to-pdf converter?
I don't know the answer to that question. I
tags 564546 + moreinfo
thanks
Hello,
Apologies for the massive delay in responding!
On Sat, 09 Jan 2010 23:45:30 -0500 John Lindgren
wrote:
> Package: ghostscript
> Version: 8.70~dfsg-2
> Severity: wishlist
It's now 13 years on, so I have to first ask whether this issue still remains?
> A
On Mon, 7 Feb 2011 13:09:45 -0600 Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> reopen 379901
> submitter 379901 !
> severity 379901 normal
> tags 379901 = upstream moreinfo
> done
>
> Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>
> > This is a 5-year old bug report, I changed email addresses in the
> > meantime (congrats for finding a
On Tue, 16 Sep 2014 01:06:55 +0200 Philip Rinn wrote:
> reassign 469761 ghostscript
> retitle 469761 file crashes ps2pdf/epstool/ghostscript
>
> thanks
>
> Hi,
>
> I think it's actually a bug in ghostscript as ps2pdf throws the same error
as epstool.
Tested with ghostscript 10.02.1 and the
Package: lists.debian.org
Severity: normal
When reading lists via the web archive, there are three links below each
message that allow a reply. The reply contains the Subject and In-Reply-To
headers, but the message body is blank.
In contrast, the BTS archives provide the body of the message
retitle 1022718 'ITA: ghostscript -- interpreter for the PostScript language
and for PDF'
owner 1022718 s...@debian.org
done 1036869
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Mon, 24 Oct 2022 15:17:20 +0200 Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> I have orphaned the ghostscript package, due to lack of time.
I'm willing to take on -- and hopefully, share -- the ghostscript maintenance.
If anyone wants to team up, let me know!
-Steve
signature.asc
Description: This is a
severity 1057344 normal
thanks
On Sun, 3 Dec 2023 21:10:39 +0100 Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> Package: libgmp10
> Version: 2:6.2.1+dfsg1-1.1
> Severity: grave
> Tags: security upstream
> Justification: user security hole
I understand the bug may have severe consequences but it doesn't appear to
Hi,
Re-uploaded to NEW with requested changes.
On Thursday, October 26, 2023 12:37:25 P.M. CST Thorsten Alteholz wrote:
> Hi Steve,
>
> On 26.10.23 05:23, Steven Robbins wrote:
> > On Monday, October 23, 2023 1:00:09 P.M. CDT Thorsten Alteholz wrote:
> >> Hi,
> &
On Monday, October 23, 2023 1:00:09 P.M. CDT Thorsten Alteholz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> please ask upstream to add all licenses of embedded stuff like
> ./sources/plugins/shared/hidapi
Could you expand on this request? Each file notes "At the discretion of the
user of this library, this software may
Hi,
Just FYI: I applied the suggested patch (thanks Flavien!) to ITK. Let me
know if "sight" now builds.
-Steve
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Steve M. Robbins"
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, debian-...@lists.debian.org
* Package name: ubpm
Version : 1.9.0
Upstream Contact: Thomas Löwe
* URL : https://codeberg.org/LazyT/ubpm
* License : GPL v3
On Sunday, August 27, 2023 12:43:31 P.M. CDT Karine Crèvecœur wrote:
> (gdb) disassemble
>…
>0x76cc20e8 <+136>: movaps %xmm8,%xmm4
>0x76cc20ec <+140>: mov%edx,-0x4c(%rsp)
>0x76cc20f0 <+144>: mov0x38(%r9),%rdx
>0x76cc20f4 <+148>:
On Thu, 17 Aug 2023 11:34:56 +0200 Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Source: csh
> Version: 20110502-7
> Severity: serious
Is this really a serious enough issue to warrant removal from Debian?
>
> Hi,
>
> this package is maintained by ubuntu-devel-disc...@lists.ubuntu.com,
> which is not a suitable
Hello Rainer,
Debian now has 8.1.0 uploaded to testing. I'm wondering if you can test that
and report back whether the issue persists or not.
Thanks,
-Steve
On Mon, 01 May 2023 23:37:00 +0200 Rainer Dorsch wrote:
> Comment 35 in upstream bugreport:
>
>
On Saturday, August 19, 2023 11:53:35 A.M. CDT you wrote:
>Hi Steve,
>
>I'm afraid, it doesn't prevent digikam from crashing.
>
>Here is what I did (after fetching the latest updates from "testing" this
> morning):
[ ... ]
>Not sure if my approach is the preferred way to test
On Monday, August 14, 2023 8:52:14 A.M. CDT Steven Robbins wrote:
> So I'm back to square 1, very confused by your crash.
I have made a change to digikam and uploaded 8.1.0-3 last night. It should
avoid calling SSE 4 functions if only SSE 2 is detected. I'd appreciate if
you could
On Monday, August 14, 2023 1:25:23 A.M. CDT Detlef Matthiessen wrote:
>Hi Steve,
>
>right after I replied to the bug report, I noticed:
>
> dm@fluke:/tmp$ diff test-no-sse4 test-sse4
> dm@fluke:/tmp$
>
>Can you confirm that the attached binaries are identical?
Nice catch. They are
On Sun, 30 Jul 2023 07:27:51 +0200 Detlef Matthiessen
wrote:
>
>Hi Steve,
>
>I've got:
>
> Program received signal SIGILL, Illegal instruction.
> 0x76cc20d3 in operator* (m1=..., m2=...) at
> /usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnu/qt5/
QtGui/qmatrix4x4.h:642
> Downloading source file
On Sun, 30 Jul 2023 10:22:19 +0200 Detlef Matthiessen
wrote:
> On 30.07.23 07:45, Detlef Matthiessen wrote:
> > 642QMatrix4x4 m = m1;
>
>On a related note: a quick search for "digikam" and "642" yields the
following bug report:
>
tag 1024793 + wontfix
thanks
On Fri, 25 Nov 2022 11:18:41 +0800 zhangdandan wrote:
> Package: gmp
> Version: 6.2.1+dfsg1-1.1
> Severity: wishlist
> Tags: patch
> User: debian-de...@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: loongarch64
>
> Hi gmp maintainers,
>
> - update symbols for loongarch64.
> gmp
clone 1028507 -1
retitle -1 Create face-recognition data package
thanks
On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 5:38:21 A.M. CDT Gregor Riepl wrote:
> Would it be possible to create a separate Debian package with this data
> and add it as a Recommends: dependency?
Yes, and thanks for the reminder. The
On Thursday, July 27, 2023 3:23:07 A.M. CDT Detlef Matthiessen wrote:
> after updating digikam from 7.9.0-2 to 8.1.0-2, it crashes almost instantly:
> dm@fluke:~$ digikam
> Illegal instruction
>
> (...)
>
> If you need more information, please let me know.
Thanks -- we'll need a backtrace from
On Tuesday, July 4, 2023 10:03:27 A.M. CDT Peter Green wrote:
> Package: facet-analyser
> Version: 0.0~git20221121142040.6be10b8+ds1-3
> Tags: trixie, sid
> Severity: serious
> Justification: rc policy - "packages must be buildable within the same
> release" User: debian...@lists.debian.org
>
On Thu, 29 Jun 2023 13:40:42 +0300 Adrian Bunk wrote:
> 1153 | #error\
> | ^~
> 1154 | DCMTK was configured to use C++17 features, but your compiler does
not or was not configured to provide them.
> | ~
> ...
>
>
>
> This is due to:
>
On Monday, June 26, 2023 6:15:06 P.M. CDT Adrian Bunk wrote:
> Control: reassign -1 libinsighttoolkit5-dev 5.3.0-3
> Control: affects -1 src:plastimatch
>
> There are actually tow separate issues, both in libinsighttoolkit5-dev:
Thanks for bringing this to my attention.
> 1. The VTK build
On Sunday, May 28, 2023 11:08:52 A.M. CDT Martin Hostettler wrote:
> [ Risks ]
>
> Steven Robbins described the problem the following way:
> > I couldn't say "harmless", but "mostly harmless", I'd think.
If it helps: Inventor is a system for visualizing 3D s
On Tue, 23 May 2023 10:21:29 +0200 Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> fonts-urw-base35 does not provide the old "numeric" font names
> gsfonts-x11 had.
Thanks for this. Do you happen to know of a package that does ship those
fonts, even if a different name?
> (gsfonts-x11 is now an empty transitional
forwarded 1028507 https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=438317
thanks
On Thu, 12 Jan 2023 06:24:07 +0100 Christoph Anton Mitterer
wrote:
> Every time when starting digikam, a dialog pops up asking to download
> some engines for redeye removal and face detection from the internet,
> which would
Severity: normal
thanks
On Tue, 25 Apr 2023 22:49:03 -0500 Steven Robbins wrote:
> Given that no-one else has reported this,
> I'm leaning towards downgrading the severity to keep digikam in the upcoming
> release.
Setting severity to normal. If anyone reading this has encountered
On Friday, April 28, 2023 2:45:05 A.M. CDT Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> Processing control commands:
> > block 1034908 by -1
>
> Bug #1034908 [libabsl-dev] Update libabsl-dev to new upstream
> version/snapshot for newer protobuf 1034908 was not blocked by any bugs.
> 1034908 was blocking:
On Tuesday, April 25, 2023 12:50:39 P.M. CDT Rainer Dorsch wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 25. April 2023, 03:51:44 CEST schrieben Sie:
> > I'd be interested to know if the issue persists on your system after
> > upgrading.
>
> Yes, it repros always.
OK.
> -- System Information:
> Debian Release: 12.0
>
Hi Rainer,
On Sun, 16 Apr 2023 09:38:07 +0200 Rainer Dorsch wrote:
> Let me elaborate a somewhat:
>
> The spash screen bug I found is visible in the backtrace in comment 5:
>
> https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=466170#c5
>
> According to Maik, the bug is triggered by a race condition
Just a note to say that I have used a Debian "testing" chroot environment and
can reproduce the reported crash. I will be investigating more in the coming
days.
-Steve
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Fri, 14 Apr 2023 14:24:31 +0200 Rainer Dorsch wrote:
> Thanks Marco, that is a good link.
>
> I provided a backtrace and upstream acknowledged the bug to be fixed in
8.1.0:
Hello Rainer,
I've looked at the upstream bug, and all the information you provided. That's
awesome -- I wish that
On Saturday, February 25, 2023 3:57:45 P.M. CST you wrote:
> Please don’t. I plan to upload the whole of Plasma 5.27.2 targeting
> bookworm.
Awesome, thanks!
> But please do follow-up on this and if the patch doesn’t make into the
> 5.27.2 upstream release you’re welcome to report it here so we
On Sunday, February 5, 2023 7:04:26 P.M. CST Santiago Vila wrote:
> El 5/2/23 a las 21:54, Steven Robbins escribió:
> > the test manifestly runs fine on buildds
>
> Actually, that's not really true.
>
> The tests do not even *run* on the buildds, because they are skipped.
There are a couple of odd things about this bug.
First: it doesn't seem like an RC bug because the test manifestly runs fine on
buildds -- see https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=sshfs-fuse
I'd suggest to downgrade the bug on this basis.
Second: the bug log shows python 3.9.2 is
Hello,
Was looking yesterday for an RC bug to fix and noticed #1027965 against VTK --
a build failure in gdcm caused by missing dependency. The fix proposed by
Mathieu seems reasonable to me.
Anton: I'm writing to ask your opinion about the commits in salsa since the
last upload (June 2022);
On Sunday, January 29, 2023 11:10:22 A.M. CST Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 15, 2022 at 3:05 PM Steven Robbins wrote:
> > On Tuesday, November 15, 2022 7:44:13 A.M. CST Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> > > jpeg-xl unit tests cannot be run on GNU/Hurd. It seems to be stuck
On Tue, 17 Mar 2015 14:53:06 +0100 Matthias Klose wrote:
> Package: src:insighttoolkit4
> Version: 4.6.0-3
>
> insighttoolkit is only built on amd64 and i386, while insighttoolkit3 worked
on
> some more architectures.
True. It became untenable to support other architectures and that hasn't
On Wednesday, December 7, 2022 4:12:09 A.M. CST Bas Couwenberg wrote:
> Package: ftp.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: ftp.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: remove
> X-Debbugs-Cc: digi...@packages.debian.org
> Control: affects -1 + src:digikam
> Control: block 1025671 by -1
>
>
On Sunday, November 27, 2022 3:49:18 P.M. CST you wrote:
> Package: digikam
> Version: 4:7.7.0-3+b1
> Severity: normal
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> Would be nice to ave this version in bookworm
Will certainly get a new version into bookworm. It looks like there will be a
7.9.0 in the next week
On Tuesday, November 15, 2022 7:44:13 A.M. CST Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> jpeg-xl unit tests cannot be run on GNU/Hurd. It seems to be stuck for
> infinite time.
That is curious. It would help greatly if you had a minimal example.
-Steve
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed
Hi,
I'll start by a short digression. If you know the answer to this: what must I
do to get reliable replies to bugs sent to my email box? In my recollection
that was routine a number of years ago but nowadays I essentially never see
replies and only find them by happenstance -- when
On Thu, 8 Sep 2022 16:11:33 +0200 Paul Gevers wrote:
> With a recent upload of hdf5 the autopkgtest of libsis-jhdf5-java fails
> in testing when that autopkgtest is run with the binary packages of hdf5
> from unstable. It passes when run with only packages from testing.
I find the same holds
On Mon, 22 Aug 2022 09:24:41 +0200 Sebastian Ramacher
wrote:
> > I can't reproduce this. The main difference between the one that built and
the
> > one that didn't is the new libc, so that's the most likely culprit.
>
> The 4th attempt on the buildds filed again:
Heads up for those following this bug: qtav appears to be unmaintained
upstream.
My only interest in the package was to enable video playback in digikam.
Digikam upstream has taken most of the qtav code, incorporated into digikam
source tree and fixed it up. The next release of digikam
On Thursday, July 21, 2022 11:24:03 A.M. CDT Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> > severity 1004769 important
>
> Bug #1004769 [src:digikam] Video support missing (FTBFS with ffmpeg 5.0)
> Severity set to 'important' from 'serious'
I had
On Sunday, July 17, 2022 4:09:20 A.M. CDT you wrote:
> Le 16/07/2022 à 18:50, Steven Robbins a écrit :
> > I would say that there may well be others in your situation so if you do
> > find a method please report back to this bug.
>
>For my personnal use, until upstream p
On Saturday, July 16, 2022 12:28:33 P.M. CDT Christian Marillat wrote:
> On 16 juil. 2022 12:02, Steven Robbins wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > Certainly one can propose. However, one cannot really expect upstream to
> > change their architecture away from ffmpeg by a given ti
On Tue, 5 Jul 2022 10:13:20 +0200 Sebastian Ramacher
wrote:
> > > Reverse dependencies had 4 months to fix their bugs, so I'm going
> > > ahead with this one.
> >
> > Not even close to enough time for all affected upstream teams.
>
> The 4 months only reflects the Debian timeline. If
On Friday, July 15, 2022 6:27:51 P.M. CDT you wrote:
>Hi,
>
>This bug is rather anoying as I'm using digikam to manage my video.
I agree it is annoying. I feel the same pain.
Given the hard-transition of ffmpeg [1], it is not possible to build with video
in unstable today. Digikam
On Monday, July 11, 2022 1:38:31 A.M. CDT Christian Marillat wrote:
> After a rebuild under pbuilder, I confirm that libheif-dev is missing
> from Build-Depends. Adding libheif-dev in Build-Depends fix this issue.
Thank you for debugging this. I have uploaded -2 with the added build-
depends.
On Monday, July 11, 2022 1:02:23 A.M. CDT you wrote:
> (The more problems I see related to major library upgrades in debian,
> the less convinced I am that only supporting a single (major) version
> for all libraries really is a good idea. Then I again I am not the one
> doing the work, so I am
On Saturday, July 9, 2022 8:26:21 A.M. CDT Christian Marillat wrote:
> Package: digikam
> Version: 4:7.7.0-1
> Severity: normal
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> Since the last version .heic files aren't
> displayed correctly. See attached screen capture.
I agree that does look odd. Can you share the
On Thursday, June 16, 2022 2:06:04 P.M. CDT Vincent Danjean wrote:
> According to the answer, this bug is already fixed in 7.7.0.
Digikam 7.7.0 was uploaded to Debian a few days ago; closing bug.
-Steve
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
control: severity -1 normal
On Fri, 25 Feb 2022 22:55:12 +0100 Sebastian Ramacher
wrote:
> On 2022-02-21 16:05:37 -0600, Steven Robbins wrote:
> > On Tue, 1 Feb 2022 21:01:39 +0100 Sebastian Ramacher
> > wrote:
> > > Source: digikam
> > > Version: 4:7.1.
Hello,
On Wed, 22 Jun 2022 22:13:11 +0200 Sebastian Ramacher
wrote:
> ffmpeg got a new major release including API and ABI breakage. Hence, it
> needs a transition. The reverse dependencies are not yet ready, so this
> bug is just a heads up and should help to track progress. Due to
> ffmpeg's
Hello,
Patrick suggested I chime in here, as the Digikam maintainer.
On Sat, 25 Jun 2022 23:42:47 +0200 Sebastian Ramacher
wrote:
> On 2022-06-25 20:45:37 +0200, Patrick Franz wrote:
> > Hi Sebastian,
> >
> > Am Samstag, 25. Juni 2022, 20:30:32 CEST schrieb Sebastian Ramacher:
> > [...]
> >
On Monday, June 6, 2022 6:11:38 A.M. CDT Bernhard Übelacker wrote:
> The recent dovecot upload contains this fix:
>
>dovecot (1:2.3.19+dfsg1-1) unstable; urgency=medium
> * [d223bbd] d/patches: add patch to support openssl 3.0 (Closes:
> #996273)
>
>
>
On Saturday, April 23, 2022 7:23:48 A.M. CDT Hoareau Jean Pierre wrote:
> Package: digikam
> Version: 4:7.6.0-1
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
> Dear Maintainer,
> I installed Debian "Bookworm" in order to test this version. When launching
> "Digikam" I get a
On Tue, 1 Feb 2022 21:01:39 +0100 Sebastian Ramacher
wrote:
> Source: digikam
> Version: 4:7.1.0-2
I have just uploaded Digikam 7.5.0 to unstable. If you have a chance to re-
try the build, would appreciate knowing if it now builds with new ffmpeg.
Thanks,
-Steve
signature.asc
Description:
On Mon, 03 May 2021 14:54:07 +0200 Philipp Marek
wrote:
> Package: digikam
> Version: 4:7.1.0-2
> Severity: normal
> X-Debbugs-Cc: phil...@marek.priv.at
>
> Just "apt-get install digikam -t testing" doesn't work - libcharls2 is
> left at 2.0.0+dfsg-1, but this digikam needs at least
On Saturday, January 22, 2022 12:15:25 P.M. CST Étienne Mollier wrote:
> Hi Andreas,
>
> Andreas Tille, on 2022-01-16:
> > I think the roadmap that ITK4 will be deleted as soon as possible
> > is clear. However, if it might serve as an intermediate means
> > to support some remaining
On Saturday, December 11, 2021 3:02:02 A.M. CST Étienne Mollier wrote:
> I considered pushing a change yesterday to disable those tests
> on insighttoolkit4,
Let's please agree to NEVER do that.
> not to hide dust under the carpet, but to
> give a chance to reverse dependencies to make it to
On Monday, November 8, 2021 1:09:43 A.M. CST Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi,
>
> this mail from Jose
>
> Am Sat, Nov 06, 2021 at 01:33:29AM +0100 schrieb Jose Luis Rivero:
> > Hello! Gazebo maintainer here, affected by this RC bug. Looking into
> > upstream repository there is a potential commit that
Hi,
I finally spent a few hours last night to get ITK v5 sources building. There's
still packaging work to do but I've pushed the interim results into salsa.
Note: as previously discussed, python bindings are removed.
On Tuesday, October 12, 2021 1:34:22 A.M. CDT ghisv...@gmail.com wrote:
>
On Wednesday, October 6, 2021 10:18:15 A.M. CDT Ghislain Vaillant wrote:
> * Package name: itk5
> Version : 5.2.1
Hi Ghislain. You surely know that ITK v4 is already in Debian. The salsa
project is called "insighttoolkit" and was where we had intended to put the
ITK v5
On Thursday, September 16, 2021 1:07:19 A.M. CDT you wrote:
> Sorry for the confussion, that also refers to fastcdr, which has a
> failing autopkgtest here:
> https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/amd64/f/fastcdr/15272003/log.
> gz
So it looks like gtest 1.11.0 may well have fixed it.
1 - 100 of 134 matches
Mail list logo
