Bug#291040: NMU uploaded
Bart Martens wrote: On Fri, 2006-09-08 at 23:21 +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: I uploaded an NMU of your package. Please remove that upload. I'm not Andreas, but I'd like to note that it has already been ACCEPTed to the archive; I doubt removing it is an option any more. The bug was reported on 5 september. I asked my sponsor to upload my updated package on 7 september. We are now 8 september. Please give my sponsor the time to process my request to upload. Might I suggest that you tag pending any bugs that you have fixed in your sources (and sent to your sponsor), so that others see that it is in the process of being fixed? It might help avoid these sorts of misunderstandings. (Personally, I tag a bug pending immediately after making the changelog entry for the fix in my own sources.) Antti-Juhani -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#291040: NMU uploaded
On Sat, 2006-09-09 at 09:03 +0300, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho wrote: Bart Martens wrote: On Fri, 2006-09-08 at 23:21 +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: I uploaded an NMU of your package. Please remove that upload. I'm not Andreas, but I'd like to note that it has already been ACCEPTed to the archive; I doubt removing it is an option any more. Yes, I've received the automatic e-mails just now. The bug was reported on 5 september. I asked my sponsor to upload my updated package on 7 september. We are now 8 september. Please give my sponsor the time to process my request to upload. Might I suggest that you tag pending any bugs that you have fixed in your sources (and sent to your sponsor), so that others see that it is in the process of being fixed? It might help avoid these sorts of misunderstandings. (Personally, I tag a bug pending immediately after making the changelog entry for the fix in my own sources.) Good suggestion, thanks. Regards, Bart Martens signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#291040: NMU uploaded
Hi, * Bart Martens ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060909 07:41]: On Fri, 2006-09-08 at 23:21 +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: I uploaded an NMU of your package. Please remove that upload. The bug was reported on 5 september. I asked my sponsor to upload my updated package on 7 september. We are now 8 september. Please give my sponsor the time to process my request to upload. I'm sorry, I didn't know that you asked your sponsor. Otherwise, I wouldn't have uploaded the package. If you would have set the bug report to pending with new package on $location send to the sponsor, I would never have NMUed it (but perhaps asked after some more time should I sponsor it instead). For me, the bug was opened some time ago, but yes, the severity was set to serious only very recently so it might have been in deed better to not upload it tonight. This was necessary to make a FTBFS to go away. I don't see an FTBFS. right. That was the wrong text. It should have been possible usability issues. Please take my word that I didn't intend to step on your toes. I'm sorry to not have known that you already prepared an fixed package which is at your sponsor currently. Cheers, Andi -- http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#291040: NMU uploaded
Hi Andi, On Sat, 2006-09-09 at 10:10 +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: I'm sorry, I didn't know that you asked your sponsor. Otherwise, I wouldn't have uploaded the package. ... I'm sorry to not have known that you already prepared an fixed package which is at your sponsor currently. See notify the maintainer via BTS before uploading in the release update on 8 August, obviously meant to give the maintainer a chance to explain why it would be a bad moment to upload an NMU. See also the developers-reference about contact the developer first, and act later. Please take my word that I didn't intend to step on your toes. Don't worry, my toes are really OK. :) And, more important, you added a good fix to the package. Regards, Bart Martens signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#291040: NMU uploaded
Hi,
I uploaded an NMU of your package. This was necessary to make a FTBFS to go
away. Please find the used diff below.
Cheers,
Andi
diff -Nur catdvi-0.14~/debian/changelog catdvi-0.14/debian/changelog
--- catdvi-0.14~/debian/changelog 2006-09-08 22:34:44.519695000 +0200
+++ catdvi-0.14/debian/changelog2006-09-08 22:52:31.800436173 +0200
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+catdvi (0.14-7.1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * Set the dependencies right to have all tex-parts in. Closes: #291040
+
+ -- Andreas Barth [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri, 8 Sep 2006 22:52:06 +0200
+
catdvi (0.14-7) unstable; urgency=low
* debian/control: Changed my e-mail address.
diff -Nur catdvi-0.14~/debian/control catdvi-0.14/debian/control
--- catdvi-0.14~/debian/control 2006-09-08 22:34:44.517695000 +0200
+++ catdvi-0.14/debian/control 2006-09-08 22:35:32.476302637 +0200
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
Package: catdvi
Architecture: any
-Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, tetex-base
+Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, tetex-base | texlive-base, tetex-bin |
texlive-base-bin
Description: DVI to plain text translator
CatDVI translates a TeX Device Independent (DVI) file into a readable
plaintext file. It aims to generate high-quality output that reproduces
--
http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#291040: NMU uploaded
Hi Andreas,
On Fri, 2006-09-08 at 23:21 +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
Hi,
I uploaded an NMU of your package.
Please remove that upload. The bug was reported on 5 september. I
asked my sponsor to upload my updated package on 7 september. We are
now 8 september. Please give my sponsor the time to process my request
to upload.
This was necessary to make a FTBFS to go
away.
I don't see an FTBFS.
Please find the used diff below.
Cheers,
Andi
diff -Nur catdvi-0.14~/debian/changelog catdvi-0.14/debian/changelog
--- catdvi-0.14~/debian/changelog 2006-09-08 22:34:44.519695000 +0200
+++ catdvi-0.14/debian/changelog 2006-09-08 22:52:31.800436173 +0200
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+catdvi (0.14-7.1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * Set the dependencies right to have all tex-parts in. Closes: #291040
+
+ -- Andreas Barth [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri, 8 Sep 2006 22:52:06 +0200
+
catdvi (0.14-7) unstable; urgency=low
* debian/control: Changed my e-mail address.
diff -Nur catdvi-0.14~/debian/control catdvi-0.14/debian/control
--- catdvi-0.14~/debian/control 2006-09-08 22:34:44.517695000 +0200
+++ catdvi-0.14/debian/control2006-09-08 22:35:32.476302637 +0200
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
Package: catdvi
Architecture: any
-Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, tetex-base
+Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, tetex-base | texlive-base, tetex-bin |
texlive-base-bin
That's what Frank already posted.
Description: DVI to plain text translator
CatDVI translates a TeX Device Independent (DVI) file into a readable
plaintext file. It aims to generate high-quality output that reproduces
Please see the NMU procedure documented here:
http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/ch-pkgs.en.html#s-nmu
Regards,
Bart Martens
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
