Bug#330468: sbcl: Can't start sbcl with kernel 2.4.27-2-686

2006-02-13 Thread Peter Van Eynde
On Monday 13 February 2006 14:18, Didier Verna wrote:
 I wrote:
 
  Peter Van Eynde [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  Expect a 2.4 sbcl, without threading, in my people.debian.org repositry
  soon.
 
 Hi Peter.
 
 Did you finally do it ? I can't parse your packages page at
 people.debian.org... ;-)

For sarge, just add 

deb http://people.debian.org/~pvaneynd/cl-sarge24-packages ./

to /etc/apt/sources.list

Groetjes, Peter

-- 
signature -at- pvaneynd.mailworks.org 
http://www.livejournal.com/users/pvaneynd/
God, root, what is difference? Pitr | God is more forgiving. Dave Aronson| 


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#330468: sbcl: Can't start sbcl with kernel 2.4.27-2-686

2005-10-03 Thread Peter Van Eynde
On Friday 30 September 2005 10:48, Didier Verna wrote:
 Peter Van Eynde [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Expect a 2.4 sbcl, without threading, in my people.debian.org repositry
  soon.

 Thanks. BTW, I'm surprised that precompiled 2.4 kernels don't
 support multi-threading ?

They do, but in 2.4 threading was done in a completely different way when in 
2.6. For the C world this resulted in a move from pthreads to the NPTL 
library, for sbcl this enabled the use of more complex features.

The end effect is that it now only works for a 2.6 kernel, even 2.4 kernel 
that are patched to allow the use of the NPTL library seem to pose 
intermittend problems, so I decided it was better to err on the side of 
caution.

Groetjes, Peter

-- 
signature -at- pvaneynd.mailworks.org 
http://www.livejournal.com/users/pvaneynd/
God, root, what is difference? Pitr | God is more forgiving. Dave Aronson| 


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#330468: sbcl: Can't start sbcl with kernel 2.4.27-2-686

2005-09-30 Thread Didier Verna
Peter Van Eynde [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Expect a 2.4 sbcl, without threading, in my people.debian.org repositry
 soon.

Thanks. BTW, I'm surprised that precompiled 2.4 kernels don't support
multi-threading ?


-- 
Didier Verna, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.lrde.epita.fr/~didier

EPITA / LRDE, 14-16 rue Voltaire   Tel.+33 (1) 44 08 01 85
94276 Le Kremlin-BicĂȘtre, France   Fax.+33 (1) 53 14 59 22   [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#330468: sbcl: Can't start sbcl with kernel 2.4.27-2-686

2005-09-28 Thread Didier Verna
Package: sbcl
Version: 1:0.9.4.65-1
Severity: grave


Hi !

When I try to launch SBCL, I get the following message:

 ,
| fatal error encountered in SBCL pid 10204(tid 16384):
| This version of sbcl is compiled with threading support, but your kernel is
| too old to support this. Please use a more recent kernel or a version of sbcl
| without threading support.
`-

... which I consider a bug since the Debian package installed just fine, and
there don't seem to be an alternative sbcl package usable for me. I don't want
to use a 2.6 kernel on my machine.

So what should I do ?


Thanks !




-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.4.27-2-686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)

Versions of packages sbcl depends on:
ii  common-lisp-controller  4.18 This is a Common Lisp source and c
ii  libc6   2.3.5-6  GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  sbcl-common 1:0.9.4.65-1 Architecture independent files for

Versions of packages sbcl recommends:
ii  binfmt-support1.2.6  Support for extra binary formats

-- no debconf information


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#330468: sbcl: Can't start sbcl with kernel 2.4.27-2-686

2005-09-28 Thread Peter Van Eynde
Hello,

On Wednesday 28 September 2005 10:06, Didier Verna wrote:
 ... which I consider a bug since the Debian package installed just fine,

I fear a debian package cannot depend on a given kernel version.

 and there don't seem to be an alternative sbcl package usable for me. I
 don't want to use a 2.6 kernel on my machine.

Expect a 2.4 sbcl, without threading, in my people.debian.org repositry soon.

I expect that the next version of debian will have a 2.6 kernel by default, so 
this problem should get fixed.

Groetjes, Peter

-- 
signature -at- pvaneynd.mailworks.org 
http://www.livejournal.com/users/pvaneynd/
God, root, what is difference? Pitr | God is more forgiving. Dave Aronson| 


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]