Ansgar,
On Wed, Aug 03, 2022 at 11:01:53AM +0200, Ansgar wrote:
> On Wed, 2022-08-03 at 09:27 +0100, Mark Hindley wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 03, 2022 at 10:11:29AM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> > >
> > > No, that would be a bad idea since systemd already ships its own,
> > > preferred
On Wed, 2022-08-03 at 09:27 +0100, Mark Hindley wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 03, 2022 at 10:11:29AM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> >
> > No, that would be a bad idea since systemd already ships its own,
> > preferred implementation.
>
> Is there a difference between the built-in and standalone
>
Michael,
Thanks.
On Wed, Aug 03, 2022 at 10:11:29AM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> > I have an alternative approach that I would be grateful for your thoughts
> > and
> > opinion on: all packages (systemd included) use the
> > systemd-standalone-tmpfiles
> > implementation and that is the
Am 03.08.22 um 10:06 schrieb Mark Hindley:
Ansgar and Michael,
On Wed, Aug 03, 2022 at 09:12:04AM +0200, Ansgar wrote:
I assume this is the result of running debootstrap with --include
systemd-standalone-tmpfiles?
No, I changed the dependencies of one of the involved packages to the
one
Ansgar and Michael,
On Wed, Aug 03, 2022 at 09:12:04AM +0200, Ansgar wrote:
> > I assume this is the result of running debootstrap with --include
> > systemd-standalone-tmpfiles?
>
> No, I changed the dependencies of one of the involved packages to the
> one suggested. But it has the same effect
On Wed, 2022-07-27 at 07:14 +0100, Mark Hindley wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 25, 2022 at 09:02:09PM +0200, Ansgar wrote:
> > On Mon, 25 Jul 2022 13:05:02 +0100 Mark Hindley wrote:
> > > It has been suggested that changing the dependency to
> > >
> > > systemd-standalone-tmpfiles | systemd-tmpfiles
> >
Control: close -1
Ansgar,
On Mon, Jul 25, 2022 at 09:02:09PM +0200, Ansgar wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Jul 2022 13:05:02 +0100 Mark Hindley wrote:
> > It has been suggested that changing the dependency to
> >
> > systemd-standalone-tmpfiles | systemd-tmpfiles
> >
> > would help the packaging system
On Tue, 2022-07-26 at 10:49 +0100, Mark Hindley wrote:
> Luca,
>
> [Sorry for the slow reply, your response was not sent to me.]
>
> On Mon, Jul 25, 2022 at 04:52:32PM +0100, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> > Indeed it would be wrong. Also the justification doesn't seem correct:
> > simply installing the
Luca,
[Sorry for the slow reply, your response was not sent to me.]
On Mon, Jul 25, 2022 at 04:52:32PM +0100, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> Indeed it would be wrong. Also the justification doesn't seem correct:
> simply installing the 'systemd' binary does NOT switch the init system,
> so it's
On Mon, 25 Jul 2022 13:05:02 +0100 Mark Hindley wrote:
> It has been suggested that changing the dependency to
>
> systemd-standalone-tmpfiles | systemd-tmpfiles
>
> would help the packaging system usually find the correct solution and reduce
> the
> number of unexpected surprises users are
On Mon, 25 Jul 2022 18:11:21 +0100 Mark Hindley
wrote:
> Michael,
>
> Thanks for this.
>
> On Mon, Jul 25, 2022 at 04:08:28PM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> > Am 25.07.22 um 14:05 schrieb Mark Hindley:
> >
> > > It has been suggested that changing the dependency to
> > >
> > >
Michael,
On Mon, Jul 25, 2022 at 04:14:26PM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Fwiw, if there is no interest from the sysvinit camp to use the standalone
> versions, I'll probably drop them again in one of the next uploads.
Judging by the recent bugs on the issue, there is considerable interest
Michael,
Thanks for this.
On Mon, Jul 25, 2022 at 04:08:28PM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Am 25.07.22 um 14:05 schrieb Mark Hindley:
>
> > It has been suggested that changing the dependency to
> >
> > systemd-standalone-tmpfiles | systemd-tmpfiles
> >
> > would help the packaging system
On Mon, 25 Jul 2022 16:08:28 +0200 Michael Biebl
wrote:
> Am 25.07.22 um 14:05 schrieb Mark Hindley:
>
> > It has been suggested that changing the dependency to
> >
> > systemd-standalone-tmpfiles | systemd-tmpfiles
> >
> > would help the packaging system usually find the correct solution
Am 25.07.22 um 16:08 schrieb Michael Biebl:
Am 25.07.22 um 14:05 schrieb Mark Hindley:
It has been suggested that changing the dependency to
systemd-standalone-tmpfiles | systemd-tmpfiles
would help the packaging system usually find the correct solution and
reduce the
number of
Am 25.07.22 um 14:05 schrieb Mark Hindley:
It has been suggested that changing the dependency to
systemd-standalone-tmpfiles | systemd-tmpfiles
would help the packaging system usually find the correct solution and reduce the
number of unexpected surprises users are reporting.
With this
Package: debhelper
Version: 13.8
Severity: normal
Niels,
Currently, debhelper generates
systemd | systemd-tmpfiles
as the misc:Depends when a tmpfiles implementation is required.
However, that is causing significant problems for a number of users of
non-systemd systems and in containers when
17 matches
Mail list logo