Bug#1051965: compat-el: new upstream release 29.1.4.2 needed by elpa-hl-todo/sid
control: tags -1 patch thanks Lev Lamberov writes: > Пт 15 сен 2023 @ 14:25 David Bremner : > >> Lev Lamberov writes: >> elpa-hl-todo has a versioned depends which is wrong. >>> >>> It is not wrong. It is as it is stated in the code, and as it is >>> detected by dh-elpa. >>> >>> Personally, I don't see any problem here. The hl-todo-el package is just >>> waiting for the latest upstream version of complat-el. There's no hurry >>> to make its way into testing right now. From my point of view there is >>> only a wishlist bug requesting the latest upstream version of compat-el >>> to be uploaded into unstable. >> >> Yeah, I see what you mean, but the versioned depends is unsatisfiable in >> unstable, so it doesn't make sense to upload the package to unstable, >> unless there is something weird like a circular dependency. >> >> I don't think it's OK for packages in unstable to be uninstallable in >> unstable. It certainly meets the textbook definition of a release >> critical bug, since nobody can actually use the package. > > Unstable is... well, unstable. Sometimes things break there. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ > There's no point in removing either compat-el or hl-todo-el from testing > because of this. > > Regards, > Lev Prepared a merge request[1] to update compat-el to 29.1.4.2. Also added back "+dfsg" to version as we drop compat.texi to be DFSG-compatible. [1] https://salsa.debian.org/emacsen-team/compat-el/-/merge_requests/1 signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#1051965: compat-el: new upstream release 29.1.4.2 needed by elpa-hl-todo/sid
Пт 15 сен 2023 @ 14:25 David Bremner : > Lev Lamberov writes: > >>> elpa-hl-todo has a versioned depends which is wrong. >> >> It is not wrong. It is as it is stated in the code, and as it is >> detected by dh-elpa. >> >> Personally, I don't see any problem here. The hl-todo-el package is just >> waiting for the latest upstream version of complat-el. There's no hurry >> to make its way into testing right now. From my point of view there is >> only a wishlist bug requesting the latest upstream version of compat-el >> to be uploaded into unstable. > > Yeah, I see what you mean, but the versioned depends is unsatisfiable in > unstable, so it doesn't make sense to upload the package to unstable, > unless there is something weird like a circular dependency. > > I don't think it's OK for packages in unstable to be uninstallable in > unstable. It certainly meets the textbook definition of a release > critical bug, since nobody can actually use the package. Unstable is... well, unstable. Sometimes things break there. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ There's no point in removing either compat-el or hl-todo-el from testing because of this. Regards, Lev
Bug#1051965: compat-el: new upstream release 29.1.4.2 needed by elpa-hl-todo/sid
Lev Lamberov writes: >> elpa-hl-todo has a versioned depends which is wrong. > > It is not wrong. It is as it is stated in the code, and as it is > detected by dh-elpa. > > Personally, I don't see any problem here. The hl-todo-el package is just > waiting for the latest upstream version of complat-el. There's no hurry > to make its way into testing right now. From my point of view there is > only a wishlist bug requesting the latest upstream version of compat-el > to be uploaded into unstable. Yeah, I see what you mean, but the versioned depends is unsatisfiable in unstable, so it doesn't make sense to upload the package to unstable, unless there is something weird like a circular dependency. I don't think it's OK for packages in unstable to be uninstallable in unstable. It certainly meets the textbook definition of a release critical bug, since nobody can actually use the package. What I don't really understand why this bug was not filed on elpa-hl-todo .
Bug#1051965: compat-el: new upstream release 29.1.4.2 needed by elpa-hl-todo/sid
Hi, Пт 15 сен 2023 @ 11:24 David Bremner : > Control: severity -1 important > > David Bremner writes: > >> Andreas Beckmann writes: >> >>> Package: compat-el >>> Version: 29.1.4.1-2 >>> Severity: serious >>> >>> elpa-hl-todo/sid is currently uninstallable since it depends on >>> elpa-compat (>= 29.1.4.2). >>> >>> >>> Andreas >> >> Maybe it doesn't matter, but I don't think this is a serious bug in >> compat.el. It's not like a it's a regression. It's a serious bug in the >> package which is uninstallable. > > Addendum: it does matter, there are a bunch of rdepends and unless they > all don't work with current elpa-compat, then it is needlessly > disruptive to auto-remove elpa-compat (or even to mark it for > auto-removal). > > elpa-hl-todo has a versioned depends which is wrong. It is not wrong. It is as it is stated in the code, and as it is detected by dh-elpa. Personally, I don't see any problem here. The hl-todo-el package is just waiting for the latest upstream version of complat-el. There's no hurry to make its way into testing right now. From my point of view there is only a wishlist bug requesting the latest upstream version of compat-el to be uploaded into unstable. Regards, Lev
Bug#1051965: compat-el: new upstream release 29.1.4.2 needed by elpa-hl-todo/sid
Control: severity -1 important David Bremner writes: > Andreas Beckmann writes: > >> Package: compat-el >> Version: 29.1.4.1-2 >> Severity: serious >> >> elpa-hl-todo/sid is currently uninstallable since it depends on >> elpa-compat (>= 29.1.4.2). >> >> >> Andreas > > Maybe it doesn't matter, but I don't think this is a serious bug in > compat.el. It's not like a it's a regression. It's a serious bug in the > package which is uninstallable. Addendum: it does matter, there are a bunch of rdepends and unless they all don't work with current elpa-compat, then it is needlessly disruptive to auto-remove elpa-compat (or even to mark it for auto-removal). elpa-hl-todo has a versioned depends which is wrong.
Bug#1051965: compat-el: new upstream release 29.1.4.2 needed by elpa-hl-todo/sid
Andreas Beckmann writes: > Package: compat-el > Version: 29.1.4.1-2 > Severity: serious > > elpa-hl-todo/sid is currently uninstallable since it depends on > elpa-compat (>= 29.1.4.2). > > > Andreas Maybe it doesn't matter, but I don't think this is a serious bug in compat.el. It's not like a it's a regression. It's a serious bug in the package which is uninstallable. d
Bug#1051965: compat-el: new upstream release 29.1.4.2 needed by elpa-hl-todo/sid
Package: compat-el Version: 29.1.4.1-2 Severity: serious elpa-hl-todo/sid is currently uninstallable since it depends on elpa-compat (>= 29.1.4.2). Andreas
