Le sam. 16 déc. 2023 à 15:46, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
a écrit :
> The cleanest way is to use CMake, as it can handle this directly in
> code. And I guess qmake will probably not be a thing for Qt 7.
>
Thanks. This just works(TM) for two packages.
Hi,
On Wed, 13 Dec 2023 at 15:04, Salvo Tomaselli wrote:
>
> > This is also being used in src:explosive-c4 now and the approach breaks
> > cross compilation. Please stop doing this, we'll have to touch all of
> > these.
> >
> > Still the use case is real and we need a better way to build
Hej,
Am Montag, 11. Dezember 2023, 16:30:14 CET schrieb Helmut Grohne:
[...]
> Can I also get some ack from Qt maintainers such that we can move
> forward in consensus?
+1
And thanks for all the work you put in.
--
Med vänliga hälsningar
Patrick Franz
> This is also being used in src:explosive-c4 now and the approach breaks
> cross compilation. Please stop doing this, we'll have to touch all of
> these.
>
> Still the use case is real and we need a better way to build packages
> with qmake6. I was talking with Sune and Lisandro on IRC and their
--buildsystem=qmake6 is perfect
Le lun. 11 déc. 2023, 18:32, Sune Stolborg Vuorela a écrit :
> > > +1 from me. qtchooser is no longer supported for Qt >= 6, so going
> > > this way is just awesome.
> >
> > Many thanks
> > to Helmut for this.
>
> Agreed. Both to approach and to thanks to Helmut
On Monday, December 11, 2023 5:26:14 PM CET Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez
Meyer wrote:
> > +1 from me. qtchooser is no longer supported for Qt >= 6, so going
> > this way is just awesome.
>
> Also worth to mention: this is something I should have done myself,
> but I currently lack the needed
Hi again,
On Mon, 11 Dec 2023 at 13:20, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
wrote:
>
[snip]
> > Can I also get some ack from Qt maintainers such that we can move
> > forward in consensus?
>
>
> +1 from me. qtchooser is no longer supported for Qt >= 6, so going
> this way is just awesome.
Also
Hi,
On Mon, 11 Dec 2023 at 12:30, Helmut Grohne wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Dec 04, 2023 at 10:58:44AM +0100, Salvo Tomaselli wrote:
> > I use this in my rules when using qt6
> >
> >
> > %:
> > dh $@
> >
> > override_dh_auto_configure:
> > ln -s /usr/bin/qmake6 ./qmake
> >
Hi,
On Mon, Dec 04, 2023 at 10:58:44AM +0100, Salvo Tomaselli wrote:
> I use this in my rules when using qt6
>
>
> %:
> dh $@
>
> override_dh_auto_configure:
> ln -s /usr/bin/qmake6 ./qmake
> PATH=`pwd`:$(PATH) dh_auto_configure
>
> override_dh_auto_clean:
>
Thanks you
It did the work for one game but I'm now stuck further with two other games:
qmake6 complains it can't parse the parameters it get
and install newer qmake6 from experimental remove other needed stuff.
I want to give it a try to build this with the new debputy,
and see what it takes
Package: debhelper
Version: 13.11.8
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel-ga...@lists.debian.org
Hi,
While packaging "xaos" I found out Qt6 integration in debhelper
is not yet quite ready.
The debian/rules is absolute barebones:
> export DEB_BUILD_MAINT_OPTIONS = hardening=+all
> export
11 matches
Mail list logo
