Jérôme Marant wrote:
Quoting Nathanael Nerode [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Jérôme Marant wrote:
Sooner or later, Debian will have to decide if it definitely wants to
leave the project in the hands of extremists. I hope the GR will lead
us to the right path, that is getting rid of fundamentalists.
If
Quoting Nathanael Nerode [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Jérôme Marant wrote:
Sooner or later, Debian will have to decide if it definitely wants to
leave the project in the hands of extremists. I hope the GR will lead
us to the right path, that is getting rid of fundamentalists.
If Debian goes down
Jérôme Marant wrote:
Sooner or later, Debian will have to decide if it definitely wants to
leave the project in the hands of extremists. I hope the GR will lead
us to the right path, that is getting rid of fundamentalists.
If Debian goes down your we don't give a damn about freedom path, I
Quoting Nathanael Nerode [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
You don't have any kind of authority, as far as I know.
I didn't say I did. I quoted like debian-legal tells me it needs to be
done, and noted that debian-legal had in fact said that. A clear
majority at any rate. That's all.
debian-legal is
Quoting Nathanael Nerode [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Romain Francoise wrote:
Nathanael Nerode [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Please remove these from 'main' ASAP.
Don't:
URL: http://www.debian.org/vote/2006/vote_001
That's not directly relevant, since it's about the GFDL, and this bug
Jérôme Marant wrote:
Nathanael Nerode [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
And for whatever it's worth, as long as I'm maintaining the packages,
these files will almost certainly not be removed unless there's some
overwhelmingly convincing reason, like debian-legal tells me it needs
to be done,
We've
Romain Francoise wrote:
Nathanael Nerode [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Please remove these from 'main' ASAP.
Don't:
URL: http://www.debian.org/vote/2006/vote_001
That's not directly relevant, since it's about the GFDL, and this bug isn't.
I suppose it would be sort of relevant if
The repeatedly-confirmed GRs, the current Social Contract, debian-legal
consensus, and the stated opinion of the etch release team, are that
everything in 'main', with the special exception of license texts which
constitute the licenses to works in 'main', has to satisfy the DFSG. The
DFSG
Nathanael Nerode [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Please remove these from 'main' ASAP.
Don't:
URL: http://www.debian.org/vote/2006/vote_001
--
,''`.
: :' :Romain Francoise [EMAIL PROTECTED]
`. `' http://people.debian.org/~rfrancoise/
`-
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Nathanael Nerode [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
And for whatever it's worth, as long as I'm maintaining the packages,
these files will almost certainly not be removed unless there's some
overwhelmingly convincing reason, like debian-legal tells me it needs
to be done,
We've done that.
You don't
10 matches
Mail list logo
