Am I right in assuming that the patches submitted by Bas are what's
included as 300_iconv.diff in the source package? (AFAICS the only
differences seem to be due to different dates plus some packaging).
If so it looks like the last version (patch5) inadvertently disabled
itself:
---
* Peter J. Holzer wrote:
Am I right in assuming that the patches submitted by Bas are what's
included as 300_iconv.diff in the source package?
Yes.
If so it looks like the last version (patch5) inadvertently disabled
itself:
Correct.
Or is there another reason why the patch is included in
On 2006-12-11 22:42:20 +0100, Norbert Tretkowski wrote:
* Peter J. Holzer wrote:
Am I right in assuming that the patches submitted by Bas are what's
included as 300_iconv.diff in the source package?
Yes.
If so it looks like the last version (patch5) inadvertently disabled
itself:
* Peter J. Holzer wrote:
On 2006-12-11 22:42:20 +0100, Norbert Tretkowski wrote:
* Peter J. Holzer wrote:
Or is there another reason why the patch is included in the
source but disabled?
Because it's not the way upstream decided to go. A package based
on the current upstream cvs is
4 matches
Mail list logo
