Bug#328180: flac: FTBFS on m68k
Hi, On mar, sep 13, 2005, Nathanael Nerode wrote: You could try building at a lower optimization level (than -O3), or without one or more of the fancy -f options used. Incidentally, the options line passed to GCC is really stupid, containing wonders like '-finline-functions ... -fno-inline-functions ...'. You could also try building with gcc 3.4. Just a note to add that I don't think building with gcc 3.4 is an option since the library has been C++ transitionned explicitely to permit linking with other apps built with gcc 4 and the new C++ ABI. If -O3 is used, it really should be removed as this is said to not only ICE on m68k but also cause silent breakage in i386. Bye, -- Loïc Minier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#328180: flac: FTBFS on m68k
On Sun, Sep 18, 2005 at 12:13:31PM +0200, Loïc Minier wrote: On mar, sep 13, 2005, Nathanael Nerode wrote: You could try building at a lower optimization level (than -O3), or without one or more of the fancy -f options used. Incidentally, the options line passed to GCC is really stupid, containing wonders like '-finline-functions ... -fno-inline-functions ...'. You could also try building with gcc 3.4. Just a note to add that I don't think building with gcc 3.4 is an option since the library has been C++ transitionned explicitely to permit linking with other apps built with gcc 4 and the new C++ ABI. gcc-3.4 is ABI-compatible with gcc-4.0. But in general, I think using gcc-4.0 with reduced optimization levels is a better option. Cheers, -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#328180: flac: FTBFS on m68k
Package: flac Version: 1.1.2-3 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source Build log at http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?pkg=flacver=1.1.2-3arch=m68kstamp=1125138508file=logas=raw GCC segfaults. Good luck tracking it down given the state of GCC on m68k. :-( You could try building at a lower optimization level (than -O3), or without one or more of the fancy -f options used. Incidentally, the options line passed to GCC is really stupid, containing wonders like '-finline-functions ... -fno-inline-functions ...'. You could also try building with gcc 3.4. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
