Hello,
This may not have been the wisest choice by the administrator
considering the circumstances, but I think it's hard to argue that
people should use an HELO string different from the rDNS...
Philip Armstrong writes:
Quite. If I set it differently to the rDNS then I hit
Apparently I'm hitting spamassassin tests :(
On Mon, Nov 07, 2005 at 11:41:50PM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
On Nov 07, Duncan Findlay [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The SpamAssassin scores are carefully optimized -- I won't change any
scores from upstream. What seems more likely is that your
Yes,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Philip Armstrong writes:
This may not have been the wisest choice by the administrator
considering the circumstances, but I think it's hard to argue that
people should use an HELO string different from the rDNS...
Quite. If I set it
On Nov 08, Justin Mason [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Seems extreme for someone who has a static ip address has set the
SMTP HELO to match the rDNS for that ip. Given that this is
*precisely* what is suggested by the relevant RFCs I'm slightly
peeved!
I'm seeing 4.7 here, nowhere near 7.7.
On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 09:52:49AM -0800, Justin Mason wrote:
Philip Armstrong writes:
This may not have been the wisest choice by the administrator
considering the circumstances, but I think it's hard to argue that
people should use an HELO string different from the rDNS...
Quite. If
Package: spamassassin
Version: 3.1.0a-1
Severity: important
A single generic rDNS in a Received header is enough to raise way too
much the score.
Also, it appears that this check would be applied even to mail
delivered trought an ISP relay.
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
HELO_DYNAMIC_DHCP and HELO_DYNAMIC_IPADDR both will not match if an ISP's
relay is used; they fire only if the last untrusted IP delivered them
directly.
They also do not act on rDNS; they act on HELO strings that match that
kind of rDNS. Major
severity 337922 normal
thanks
On Mon, Nov 07, 2005 at 10:58:51AM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
A single generic rDNS in a Received header is enough to raise way
too much the score. Also, it appears that this check would be
applied even to mail delivered trought an ISP relay.
The SpamAssassin
On Nov 07, Duncan Findlay [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The SpamAssassin scores are carefully optimized -- I won't change any
scores from upstream. What seems more likely is that your
Yes, I am arguing that the scores for these two tests are too much
aggressive.
The message was rejected (even after
9 matches
Mail list logo
