Hi Arnaud,
Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
Wolfgang Baer wrote:
Hi all,
Yo Wolfgang,
Well, I am basically interested in argouml so I did a little research
on the new upstream some time ago.
The main problem is that they - don't ask me why - they started to use
netbeans stuff for the uml model
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Wolfgang Baer wrote:
Hi all,
Yo Wolfgang,
Well, I am basically interested in argouml so I did a little research
on the new upstream some time ago.
The main problem is that they - don't ask me why - they started to use
netbeans stuff for the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Michael Koch wrote:
Hello,
On Wed, Feb 08, 2006 at 10:44:08PM -0300, Javier Kohen wrote:
Could you please share with us the reasons for not closing
this bug, in other words, why we don't yet have the latest
version of ArgoUML in Debian?
Hi all,
Michael Koch wrote:
Hello,
On Wed, Feb 08, 2006 at 10:44:08PM -0300, Javier Kohen wrote:
Could you please share with us the reasons for not closing this bug, in other
words, why we don't yet have the latest version of ArgoUML in Debian? Namely,
is it because of personal reasons,
On Thu, Feb 09, 2006 at 09:19:00AM +0100, Wolfgang Baer wrote:
The main problem is that they - don't ask me why - they started to use
netbeans stuff for the uml model implementation. The problem is that
netbeans stuff is licensed under the SPL alone which with a quick
google search is likely
Package: argouml
Version: 0.19.6-2
Followup-For: Bug #342200
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
Could you please share with us the reasons for not closing this bug, in other
words, why we don't yet have the latest version of ArgoUML in Debian? Namely,
is it because of personal
Hello,
On Wed, Feb 08, 2006 at 10:44:08PM -0300, Javier Kohen wrote:
Could you please share with us the reasons for not closing this bug, in other
words, why we don't yet have the latest version of ArgoUML in Debian? Namely,
is it because of personal reasons, lack of motivation, etc., or
7 matches
Mail list logo
