Hi,
I've been an active contributor/developer of gnome-terminal in the
last 1.5 years.
I firmly disagree with Christoph's comment Apparently upstream
intentionally breaks things or simply doesn't care.
We do care, and we worked hard recently to make gnome-terminal work
reasonably close to
Hey.
On Mon, 2015-03-23 at 14:11 +0100, Egmont Koblinger wrote:
I firmly disagree with Christoph's comment Apparently upstream
intentionally breaks things or simply doesn't care.
Well at least it was changed (as it was said in some other discussion)
from properly announcing it as vte or
On Mon, 2015-03-23 at 14:23 +0100, Egmont Koblinger wrote:
Having set the wrong TERM breaks all kinds of things and there is no
real way to correct that (setting it in .bashrc or friends would do this
for all terminals!).
That's not quite true: you can check for $VTE_VERSION in your
Anything new here?
Apparently upstream intentionally breaks things or simply doesn't care.
So could Debian please fix things at least downstream?
The patch is trivial, and having tested it with all kinds of
applications, it seems to not cause breakage.
Having set the wrong TERM breaks all kinds
tags 368916 + confirmed upstream
tags 368916 - patch
forwarded 368916 http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=115750
stop
Hi,
On Thu, May 25, 2006, James Vega wrote:
Gnome-terminal incorrectly claims to be xterm-compatible in it's $TERM.
This should instead be set to gnome, which is
Package: gnome-terminal
Version: 2.14.1-1
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Gnome-terminal incorrectly claims to be xterm-compatible in it's $TERM.
This should instead be set to gnome, which is the proper termcap entry
for gnome-terminal. The attached patch fixes the hard-coded TERM entry
in
6 matches
Mail list logo
