Patrick Ohly wrote:
On Thu, 2009-05-14 at 08:00 +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
0.9 beta 1 doesn't require anything from Funambol. Everything is
dual-licensed LGPLv2.1/3.0.
Regarding packaging: I still consider 0.8.1 the current stable version.
0.9 beta 1 works, but we still have to redo lots
On mer, 2009-02-18 at 16:27 -0400, David Bremner wrote:
On 18-Feb-09, at 15:43, Yves-Alexis Perez cor...@debian.org wrote:
Hey, what's the status of this ITP? I see there may be legal problems
with AGPL and technical problems with included external library
sources.
Is there some news?
On Thu, 2009-05-14 at 08:00 +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
SyncEvolution just announced they switched to the newly re-released
libsynthesis, which is LGPLv2/v3.
See:
http://lwn.net/Articles/333059/
http://www.synthesis.ch/indefero/index.php/p/libsynthesis/
Hey, what's the status of this ITP? I see there may be legal problems
with AGPL and technical problems with included external library sources.
Is there some news?
Cheers,
--
Yves-Alexis
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Following up to myself, my plan (which has been delayed
by other commitments) is to package the funambol client
library seperately, but using a version suitable for
syncevolution. You can follow that at
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=505878
Or you could, if I did anything
On 18-Feb-09, at 15:43, Yves-Alexis Perez cor...@debian.org wrote:
Hey, what's the status of this ITP? I see there may be legal problems
with AGPL and technical problems with included external library
sources.
Is there some news?
Ftpmasters seem to have blessed agpl, so legal issues are
6 matches
Mail list logo
